Bond strength of bulk-fill resin composites: the effect of cavity preparation and aging

Caroline de Farias Charamba; Larissa Dias Boson  Silva; Renally Bezerra Wanderley  Lima; Rosângela Marques  Duarte; Ana Karina Maciel  Andrade

doi:10.20396/bjos.v21i00.8665454

Vol. 21 (2022), Original Research

Vol. 21 (2022)

Bond strength of bulk-fill resin composites: the effect of cavity preparation and aging

Original Research

https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v21i00.8665454

Published 2022-03-23

Caroline de Farias Charamba⁺⁻
Larissa Dias Boson Silva⁺⁻
Renally Bezerra Wanderley Lima⁺⁻
Rosângela Marques Duarte⁺⁻
Ana Karina Maciel Andrade⁺⁻

Caroline de Farias Charamba

University of Pernambuco

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5811-1796

Larissa Dias Boson Silva

Federal University of Paraíba

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6091-1063

Renally Bezerra Wanderley Lima

Faculty of Nova Esperança

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4477-7850

Rosângela Marques Duarte

Federal University of Paraíba

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4369-2951

Ana Karina Maciel Andrade

Federal University of Paraíba

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4520-5176

PDF

Keywords

Composite resins
Tensile strength
Aging
Dental cavity preparation

How to Cite

1.

Charamba C de F, Silva LDB, Lima RBW, Duarte RM, Andrade AKM. Bond strength of bulk-fill resin composites: the effect of cavity preparation and aging. Braz. J. Oral Sci. [Internet]. 2022 Mar. 23 [cited 2024 Apr. 20];21(00):e225454. Available from: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8665454

Abstract

Aim: Evaluating the resin-dentin bond strength of Class II conventional and bulk-fill composite restorations, using different cavity sizes before and after aging. Methods: Seventy-five human molars were distributed into groups according to the buccolingual width of the cavities, conservative (n=25) and extended (n=50). They were divided according to the restorative material: conventional (Z100/control group) or bulk-fill resin composites (Filtek Bulk Fill/FBF; Tetric N Ceram Bulk Fill/TNCBF; Filtek Bulk Fill Flow/FBFF; Surefill SDR flow/SDR). The restored teeth were sectioned on sticks (n=50 per restorative materials + width cavities group), half were stored in Water/Ethanol 75% for 30 days and the other half were submitted to the immediate microtensile bond strength (μTBS) test. Data were analyzed applying the Three-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Bonferroni test, test t, and Weibull analyses (p<0.05). Results: SDR and FBF presented lower μTBS values for extended preparation when compared to the conservative preparation, before aging. After aging, only for the FBFF, a decrease in the μTBS values was observed. Comparing the μTBS values, before and after aging, the SDR demonstrated lower μTBS values after aging when the conservative cavity was used. A decrease in the μTBS values was observed for the Z100, the FBF and, the FBFF, after aging, when the extended cavity was used. Conclusion: The effect of cavity preparation and aging on the resin-dentin of Class II is material dependent. Most of the bulk-fill resin composites evaluated presented a similar performance to the conventional resin composites for all the conditions of this study.

https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v21i00.8665454

PDF

References

Yazici AR, Kutuk ZB, Ergin E, Karahan S, Antonson SA. Six-year clinical evaluation of bulk-fill and nanofill resin composite restorations. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Jun 10. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04015-2.

3M Oral Care. Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative-Technical Product Profile. Ontario: 3M Esp; 2021 [cited 2021 April 18]. Avaliable from: https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/976634O/filtek-bulk-fill-posterior-restorative-technical-product-profile.pdf.

Loguercio AD, Rezende M, Gutierrez MF, Costa TF, Armas-Vega A, Reis A. Randomized 36-month follow-up of posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations. J Dent. 2019 Jun;85:93-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.05.018.

Czasch P, Ilie N. In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of bulk fill composites. Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Jan;17(1):227-35. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0702-8.

Fronza BM, Rueggeberg FA, Braga RR, Mogilevych B, Soares LE, Martin AA, et al. Monomer conversion, microhardness, internal marginal adaptation, and shrinkage stress of bulk-fill resin composites. Dent Mater. 2015 Dec;31(12):1542-51. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.10.001.

Van Ende A, De Munck J, Lise DP, Van Meerbeek B. Bulk- fill composites: a review of the current literature. J Adhes Dent. 2017;19(2):95-109. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a38141. PMID: 28443833.

Ferracane JL. Buonocore Lecture. Placing dental composites–a stressful experience. Oper Dent. 2008;33(3):247-57. doi: 10.2341/07-BL2.

de Assis FS, Lima SN, Tonetto MR, Bhandi SH, Pinto SC, Malaquias P, et al. Evaluation of Bond Strength, Marginal Integrity, and Fracture Strength of Bulk- vs Incrementally-filled Restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2016;18(4):317-23. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a36516.

Ástvaldsdóttir Á, Dagerhamn J, Van Dijken JWV, Naimi-Akbar A, Sandborgh-Englund G, Tranæus S, et al. Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in adults—a systematic review. J Dent. 2015 Aug;43(8):934-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.05.001.

El Gezawi MF, Al-Harbi FA. Reliability ofbonded MOD restorations in maxillary premolars: microleakage and cusp fracture resistance. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2012;46(1):31-42.

Braga S, Oliveira L, Rodrigues RB, Bicalho AA, Novais VR, Armstrong S, et al. The effects of cavity preparation and composite resin bond strength and stress distribution using the microtensile bond test. Oper Dent. 2018 Jan/Feb;43(1):81-9. doi: 10.2341/16-338-L.

Park KJ, Pfeffer M, Näke T, Schneider H, Ziebolz D, Haak R. Evaluation of low-viscosity bulk-fill composites regarding marginal and internal adaptation. Odontology. 2021 Jan;109(1):139-48.

Rosatto CM, Bicalho AA, Veríssimo C, Bragança GF, Rodrigues MP, Tantbirojn D, et al. Mechanical properties, shrinkage stress, cuspal strain and fracture resistance of molars restored with bulk-fill composites and incremental filling technique. J Dent. 2015 Dec;43(12):1519-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.09.007.

Garcia D, Yaman P, Dennison J, Neiva G. Polymerization shrinkage and depth of cure of bulk fill flowable composite resins. Oper Dent. 2014 Jul-Aug;39(4):441-8. doi: 10.2341/12-484-L.

Han SH, Sadr A, Shimada Y, Tagami J, Park SH. Internal adaptation of composite restorations with or without an intermediate layer: effect of polymerization shrinkage parameters of the layer material. J Dent. 2019 Jan;80:41-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.10.013.

Roggendorf MJ, Krämer N, Appelt A, Naumann M, Frankenberger R. Marginal quality of flowable 4-mm base vs. conventionally layered resin composite. J Dent. 2011 Oct;39(10):643-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.07.004.

Campos EA, Ardu S, Lefever D, Jassé FF, Bortolotto T, Krejci I. Marginal adaptation of class II cavities restored with bulk-fill composites. J Dent. 2014 May;42(5):575-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.02.007.

Chen HY, Manhart J, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Polymerization contraction stress in light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater. 2001 May;17(3):253-9. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(00)00079-8.

Versluis A, Douglas WH, Cross M, Sakaguchi RL. Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses? J. Dent. Res. 1996 Mar;75(3):871-8. doi: 10.1177/00220345960750030301.

Braga RR, Ferracane JL. Alternatives in polymerization contraction stress management. J Appl Oral Sci. 2004;12(spe):1-11. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572004000500002.

Braga RR, Ballester RY, Ferracane JL. Factors involved in the development of polymerization shrinkage stress in resin-composites: a systematic review. Dent Mater. 2005 Oct;21(10):962-70. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.018.

Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, De Stefano Dorigo E. Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dent Mater. 2008 Jan;24(1):90-101. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.02.009.

Balkaya H, Arslan S, Pala K. A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass ionomer in Class II cavities: one-year results. J Appl Oral Sci. 2019 Oct 7;27:e20180678. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0678.

Lins RBE, Aristilde S, Osório JH, Cordeiro CMB, Yanikian CRF, Bicalho AA, et al. Biomechanical behaviour of bulk-fill resin composites in class II restorations. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019 Oct;98:255-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.06.032.

Fronza BM, Abuna GF, Braga RR, Rueggberg FA, Giannini M. Effect of composite polymerization stress and placement technique on dentin micropermeability of Class I restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2018;20(4):355-63. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a40987.

Lima RBW, Troconis CCM, Moreno MBP, Murillo-Gómez F, De Goes MF. Depth of cure of bulk fill resin composites: a systematic review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018 Nov;30(6):492-501. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12394.

Boaro LCC, Lopes DP, Souza ASC, Nakano EL, Perez MDA, Pfeifer CS, et al. Clinical performance and chemical-physical propeties of bulk fill composites resin – a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent Mater. 2019 Oct;35(10):e249-64. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.07.007.

Veloso SRM, Lemos CAA, de Moraes SLD, do Egito Vasconcelos BC, Pellizzer EP, de Melo Monteiro GQ. Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Jan;23(1):221-33. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2429-7.

Durão MA, Andrade AKM, Santos MDCMDS, Montes MAJR, Monteiro GQM. Clinical performance of Bulk-Fill resin composite restorations using the United States Public Health Service and Federation Dentaire Internationale Criteria: a 12-month randomized clinical trial. Eur J Dent. 2021 May;15(2):179-92. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1718639.

Tichy A, Brabec M, Bradna P, Hosaka K, Tagami J. A competing risk model for bond strength data analysis. Dent Mater. 2020 Dec;36(12):1508-15. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.09.004.

Weibull W. A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J Appl Mech. 1951 Sep;18:293-7.

Inokoshi M, Poitevin A, Munck JD, Minakuchi S, Meerbeek BV. Bonding effectiveness to different chemically pre-treated dental zirconia. Clin Oral Investig. 2014 Sep;18(7):1803-12. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-1152-7.

Reis A, Martins GC, De Paula E, Davila-Sanchez A. Alternative aging solutions to accelerate resin-dentin bond degradation. J Adhes Dent. 2015 Aug;17(4):321-8. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a34591.

Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater. 2001 Jul;17(4):296-308. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(00)00087-7.

Hass V, Dobrovolski M, Zander-Grande C, Martins GC, Gordillo LA, Rodrigues Accorinte ML, et al. Correlation between degree of conversion, resin–dentin bond strength and nanoleakage of simplified etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater. 2013 Sep;29(9):921-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.05.001.

Marchesi G, Frassetto A, Mazzoni A, Apolonio F, Diolosà M, Cadenaro M, et al. Adhesive performance of a multi-mode adhesive system: 1-year in vitro study. J Dent. 2014 May;42(5):603-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.12.008.

Munoz MA, Luque I, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Bombarda NH. Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J Dent. 2013 May;41(5):404-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.001.