Banner Portal
Influence of abutment angulation on implant failure in immediately placed and restored implants in the esthetic zone
PDF

Keywords

Dental restoration failure
Dental implantation
Tooth extraction
Weight-bearing
Immediate dental implant loading

How to Cite

1.
Fouad HF, Elkhadem AH, Elkerdawy MW, Elfar MM. Influence of abutment angulation on implant failure in immediately placed and restored implants in the esthetic zone: a randomized clinical trial. Braz. J. Oral Sci. [Internet]. 2022 Aug. 1 [cited 2024 Jul. 28];21(00):e226999. Available from: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8666999

Abstract

Background: Tooth extraction socket in the aesthetic area is a major indication for immediate implant placement greatly improving patient satisfaction and preserving the alveolar ridge. However, the effect of non-axial force on the peri-implant bone with subsequent early implant failure remains unclear. Objective: Evaluate the prognosis of tilted implants immediately placed and restored with angled abutments in comparison to straight implants restored with straight abutments in the esthetic area (anterior or premolars) using computer-aided surgical guides. Material and methods: Badly decayed non-restorable teeth in the aesthetic zone (anterior or premolars) were extracted atraumatically. Immediately after guided implant insertion, the abutments were adjusted and placed according to the allocation group (0, 15, or 25-degree angle) then a temporary crown was performed out of occlusion in centric and eccentric relation. Early implant failure was assessed at three and six months. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P=0.305). Straight and angled abutment groups showed 6 (14.3%) and 8 (20%) failed cases, respectively. The post-hoc subgroup analysis showed no statistically significant difference between angle 15 and angle 25 degree groups where (P=0.686) or between Anterior and Premolar groups (P=0.853). Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference in the failure rate when comparing angled to straight immediately placed & restored implants. This applies to both anterior and premolar implants.

https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v21i00.8666999
PDF

References

Brignardello-Petersen R. Immediately placed and restored single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla shown to have good esthetic outcomes 1 year after treatment. J Am Dent Assoc. 2017 Jul;148(7):e103. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2017.05.008.

Weigl P, Strangio A. The impact of immediately placed and restored single-tooth implants on hard and soft tissues in the anterior maxilla. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2016;9 Suppl 1:S89-106.

Kolerman R, Mijiritsky E, Barnea E, Dabaja A, Nissan J, Tal H. Esthetic assessment of implants placed into fresh extraction sockets for single‐tooth replacements using a flapless approach. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Apr;19(2):351-64. doi: 10.1111/cid.12458.

Testori T, Del Fabbro M, Capelli M, Zuffetti F, Francetti L, Weinstein RL. Immediate occlusal loading and tilted implants for the rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla: 1-year interim results of a multicenter prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Mar;19(3):227-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01472.x.

Maló P, de Araújo Nobre M, Lopes A, Rodrigues R. Preliminary report on the outcome of tilted implants with longer lengths (20–25 mm) in low‐density bone: one‐year follow‐up of a prospective cohort study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Jan;17 Suppl 1:e134-42. doi: 10.1111/cid.12144.

Kao HC, Gung YW, Chung TF, Hsu ML. The influence of abutment angulation on micromotion level for immediately loaded dental implants: a 3-D finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23(4):623-30.

Menini M, Signori A, Tealdo T, Bevilacqua M, Pera F, Ravera G, et al. Tilted implants in the immediate loading rehabilitation of the maxilla: a systematic review. J Dent Res. 2012 Sep;91(9):821-7. doi: 10.1177/0022034512455802.

Del Fabbro M, Ceresoli V. The fate of marginal bone around axial vs. tilted implants: a systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014;7 Suppl 2:S171-89.

Del Fabbro M, Ceresoli V, Taschieri S, Ceci C, Testori T. Immediate loading of postextraction implants in the esthetic area: systematic review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Feb;17(1):52-70. doi: 10.1111/cid.12074.

Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Tilted versus axially placed dental implants: a meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015 Feb;43(2):149-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.09.002.

Omori Y, Lang NP, Botticelli D, Papageorgiou SN, Baba S. Biological and mechanical complications of angulated abutments connected to fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review with meta‐analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 2020 Jan;47(1):101-11. doi: 10.1111/joor.12877.

Ma S, Tawse‐Smith A, Brown SD, Duncan W. Immediately restored single implants in the aesthetic zone of the maxilla using a novel design: 5‐year results from a prospective single‐arm clinical trial. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2019 Apr;21(2):344-51. doi: 10.1111/cid.12733.

Chaushu G, Chaushu S, Tzohar A, Dayan D. Immediate loading of single-tooth implants: immediate versus non-immediate implantation. A clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001 Mar-Apr;16(2):267-72.

Atieh MA, Payne AG, Duncan WJ, Cullinan MP. Immediate restoration/loading of immediately placed single implants: is it an effective bimodal approach? Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Jul;20(7):645-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01725.x.

Buser D, Sennerby L, De Bruyn H. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb;73(1):7-21. doi: 10.1111/prd.12185.

Trombelli L, Farina R, Marzola A, Bozzi L, Liljenberg B, Lindhe J. Modeling and remodeling of human extraction sockets. J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Jul;35(7):630-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01246.x.

Chappuis V, Araújo MG, Buser D. Clinical relevance of dimensional bone and soft tissue alterations post‐extraction in esthetic sites. Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb;73(1):73-83. doi: 10.1111/prd.12167.

Palma Carrió C, Maestre Ferrín L, Peñarrocha Oltra D, Peñarrocha Diago M, Peñarrocha Diago M. Risk factors associated with early failure of dental implants. A literature review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011 Jul 1;16(4):e514-7. doi: 10.4317/medoral.16.e514.

Mohajerani H, Roozbayani R, Taherian S, Tabrizi R. The risk factors in early failure of dental implants: a retrospective study. J Dent (Shiraz). 2017 Dec;18(4):298-303.

Ferrus J, Cecchinato D, Pjetursson EB, Lang NP, Sanz M, Lindhe J. Factors influencing ridge alterations following immediate implant placement into extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Jan;21(1):22-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01825.x.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Huda Fakhry Fouad, Amr Hosny Elkhadem , Maha Wagdy Elkerdawy , Mahmoud Mokhtar Elfar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.