Banner Portal
Effect of S. mutans biofilm on the hybrid ceramic-resin cement bond strength assessed by different methods
PDF

Keywords

Biofilms
Resin cements
Dental bonding
Tensile strength

How to Cite

1.
Mushashe AM, Almeida SA de, Ferracane JL, Merritt J, Gonzaga CC, Correr GM. Effect of S. mutans biofilm on the hybrid ceramic-resin cement bond strength assessed by different methods. Braz. J. Oral Sci. [Internet]. 2023 Aug. 24 [cited 2024 Jun. 26];22(00):e239389. Available from: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8669389

Funding data

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study was to investigate the biofilm effect on the hybrid ceramic-resin cement bond strength (BS) by comparing two methods. Methods: Teeth were distributed into groups (n=5), according to the resin cement (Maxcem Elite-(MC) or NX3 Nexus-(NX)) and degradation method (24h or 7 days in distilled water; 7 or 30 days incubated with biofilm and 30 days in sterile media). Treated surfaces of Vita Enamic blocks (5x6x7mm) were luted to treated or no treated dentin surfaces and light-cured. After 24h, beams were obtained (1x1x10mm) and stored accordingly. The flexural bond strength (FBS) was assessed by four-point bending test. Additional beams were obtained from new teeth (n=5), stored for 24h or 7 days in distilled water, and submitted to a microtensile bond strength (μTBS) assay. Failure modes were determined by scanning electron microscopy (100X). The flexure strength of the cements (n=10) was assessed by a four-point bending test. Data were analyzed by 1 and 2-ways ANOVA, and Tukey’s test (α=0.05). Results: There was no significant difference between the degradation methods for the FBS groups. For the μTBS, the significant difference was as follows: NX 7days > NX 24h > MC 7days = MC 24h. Failure mode was mainly adhesive and mixed, but with an increase of cohesive within cement and pre-failures for the MC groups assessed by μTBS. NX had better performance than MC, regardless of the method. Conclusions: The biofilm had no effect on the materials BS and FBS test was a useful method to evaluate BS of materials with poor performance.

https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v22i00.8669389
PDF

References

de Oliveira Lino LF, Machado CM, de Paula VG, Vidotti HA, Coelho PG, Benalcázar Jalkh EB et al. Effect of aging and testing method on bond strength of CAD/CAM fiber-reinforced composite to dentin. Dent Mater. 2018;34(11):1690-701.doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.08.302

Amaral CD, Correa DS, Miragaya LM, Silva EM. Influence of organic acids from the oral biofilm on the bond strength of self-etch adhesives to dentin. Braz Dent J. 2015;26(5):497-502. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201300260.

Reis A, Martins GC, de Paula EA, Sanchez AD, Loguercio AD. Alternative aging solutions to accelerate resin-dentin bond degradation. J Adhes Dent. 2015 Aug;17(4):321-8. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a34591.

Follak AC, Miotti LL, Lenzi TL, Rocha RO, Soares FZ. Degradation of multimode adhesive system bond strength to artificial caries-affected dentin due to water storage. Oper Dent.2018;43(2)E92-E101. doi: 10.2341/17-129-L.

Jain A, Armstrong SR, Banas JA, Qian F, Maia RR, Teixeira EC. Dental adhesive microtensile bond strength following a biofilm-based in vitro aged model. J Appl Oral Sci. 2020;28 e20190737. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0737.

Sen N, Us YO. Mechanical and optical properties of monolithic CAD-CAM restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(4):593-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.06.012.

Cruz MEM, Simões R, Martins SB, Trindade FZ, Dovigo LN, Fonseca RG. Influence of simulated gastric juice on surface characteristics of CAD-CAM monolithic materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123(3):483-90.doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.04.018.

Elmougy A, Schiemann AM, Wood D, Pollington S, Martin N. Characterization of machinable structural polymers in restorative dentistry. Dent Mater. 2018;34(10):1509-17. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.06.007.

Beyabanaki E, Eftekhar Ashtiani R, Feyzi M, Zandinejad A. Evaluation of microshear bond strength of four different CAD-CAM polymer-infiltrated ceramic materials after thermocycling. J Prosthodont. 2022 Aug;31(7):623-628. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13469.

Velo MMAC, Nascimento TRL, Scotti CK, Bombonatti JFS, Furuse AY, Silva VD et al. Improved mechanical performance of self-adhesive resin cement filled with hybrid nanofibers-embedded with niobium pentoxide. Dent Mater. 2019;35(11):e272-e85. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.08.102.

Mushashe AM, Gonzaga CC, Cunha LF, Furuse AY, Moro A, Correr GM. Effect of enamel and dentin surface treatment on the self-adhesive resin cement bond strength. Braz Dent J. 2016;27(5):537-42. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201600445.

Campos RE, Santos Filho PCF, de Oliveira Júnior OB, Ambrosano GMB, Pereira CA. Comparative evaluation of 3 microbond strength tests using 4 adhesive systems: mechanical, finite element, and failure analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(1):166-74. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.02.024.

Wong ACH, Tian T, Tsoi JHK, Burrow M, Matinlinna JP. Aspects of adhesion tests on resin-glass ceramic bonding. Dent Mater. 2017;33(9):1045-55. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.06.013.

Albuquerque PPAC, Duarte MFB, Moreno MBP, Schneider LFJ, Moraes RR, Cesar PF et al. Physicochemical properties and microshear bond strength of experimental self-adhesive resin cements to dentin or yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal. J Adhes Dent. 2019;21(2):133-41. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a42363.

Sanli S, Comlekoglu M, Comlekoglu E, Sonugelen M, Pamir T, Darvell BW. Influence of surface treatment on the resin-bonding of zirconia. Dent Mater. 2015;31(6):657–68. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.03.004.

Merritt J, Senpuku H, Kreth J. Let there be bioluminescence: development of a biophotonic imaging platform for in situ analyses of oral biofilms in animal models. Environ Microbiol. 2016;18(1):174-90. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12953.

Shin Y, Kim Y, Cho BH. Flexural test as an alternative to tensile test for bond strength of resin cement to zirconia. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021 Jul;119:104525. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104525.

Öznurhan F, Ünal M, Kapdan A, Öztürk C. Flexural and microtensile bond strength of bulk fill materials. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015;39(3):241-6. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-39.3.241.

Rai S, Nikhil V, Jha P. Does eugenol affect the microtensile bond strength of self-adhering composite? - An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2021;24(4):354-58. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_60_21.

Al-Dulaijan YA, Cheng L, Weir MD, Melo MAS, Liu H, Oates TW, Wang L, Xu HHK. Novel rechargeable calcium phosphate nanocomposite with antibacterial activity to suppress biofilm acids and dental caries. J Dent. 2018;72(1):44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.03.003.

Fukuoka A, Koshiro K, Inoue S, Yoshida Y, Tanaka T, Ikeda T Suzuki K et al. Hydrolytic stability of one-step self-etching adhesives bonded to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2011;13(3):243-8. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a19226.

Chen C, Chen Y, Lu Z, Qian M, Xie H, Tay FR. The effects of water on degradation of the zirconia-resin bond. J Dent. 2017;64(1):23-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.04.004.

Malysa A, Wezgowiec J, Grzebieluch W, Danel DP, Wieckiewicz M. Effect of thermocycling on the bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements used for luting CAD/CAM ceramics to human. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(2):745. doi: 10.3390/ijms23020745.

Santos MJ, Bapoo H, Rizkalla AS, Santos GC. Effect of dentin-cleaning techniques on the shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentin. Oper Dent. 2011;36(5):512-20. doi: 10.2341/10-392-L.

Sundfeld D, Palialol ARM, Fugolin APP, Ambrosano GMB, Correr-Sobrinho L, Martins LRM, et al. The effect of hydrofluoric acid and resin cement formulation on the bond strength to lithium disilicate ceramic. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32:e43. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0043.

Kanamori Y, Takahashi R, Nikaido T, Bamidis EP, Burrow MF, Tagami J. The effect of curing mode of a high-power LED unit on bond strengths of dualcure resin cements to dentin and CAD/CAM resin blocks. Dent Mater J. 2019;38(6):947-54. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2018-344.

Huang B, Cvitkovitch DG, Santerre JP, Finer Y. Biodegradation of resin-dentin interfaces is dependent on the restorative material, mode of adhesion, esterase or MMP inhibition. Dent Mater. 2018;34(9):1253-62. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.05.008.

Kim HJ, Bagheri R, Kim YK, Son JS & Kwon TW. Influence of curing mode on the surface energy and sorption/solubility of dental self-adhesive resin cements. Materials (Basel). 2017;10(2):129. doi: 10.3390/ma10020129.

Higashi M, Matsumoto M, Kawaguchi A, Miura J, Minamino T, Kabetani T et al. Bonding effectiveness of self-adhesive and conventional-type adhesive resin cements to CAD/CAM resin blocks Part 1: Effects of sandblasting and silanization. Dent Mater J. 2016;35(1):21-8. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2015-234

Kim AJ, Shin SJ, Yu SH, Oh S, Bae JM. Shear bond strengths of various resin cements between three types of adherends and bovine teeth with and without thermocycling. Dent Mater J. 2022;41(2):323-32. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2021-259.

Mazzoni A, Maravić T, Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Tjäderhane L, Scaffa PMC, Seseogullari-Dirihan R et al. Biochemical and immunohistochemical identification of MMP-7 in human dentin. J Dent. 2018;79:90-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.10.008.

Cantoro A, Goracci G, Vichi A, Mazzoni A, Fadda GM, Ferrari M. Retentive strength and sealing ability of new self-adhesive resin cements in fiber post luting. Dent Mater. 2011;27(10):e197-204. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.07.003.

Pisani-Proença J, Erhardt MSG, Amaral R, Valandro LF, Bottino MA, Castillo-Salmerón RD. Influence of different surface conditioning protocols on microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to dentin. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;105(4):227-35. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60037-1.

Fuirichi T, Takamizawa T, Tsujimoto A, Miyasaki M, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA. Mechanical properties and sliding-impact wear resistance of self-adhesive resin cements. Oper Dent.2016;41(3):E83-92. doi: 10.2341/15-033-L.

Almeida CM, Meereis CTW, Leal FB, Ogliari AO, Piva E, Ogliari FA. Evaluation of long-term bond strength and selected properties of self-adhesive resin cements. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32:e15. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0015.

Ferracane JL, Stansbury JW, Burke FJ. Self-adhesive resin cements - chemistry, properties and clinical considerations. J Oral Rehabil. 2011;38(4):295-314. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02148.x.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Amanda Mahammad Mushashe, Sarah Aquino de Almeida, Jack Libório Ferracane, Justin Merritt, Carla Castiglia Gonzaga, Gisele Maria Correr

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.