Keywords
Composite resins
Glass ionomer cements
How to Cite
Abstract
Aim: Evaluate the influence of the cervical margin relocation (CMR) on stress distribution in the lower first molar restored with direct nano-ceramic composite (zenit). Methods: A 3D model of the lower first molar was modeled and used. Standardized mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) preparation consisted in two models used in this study with mesial subgingival margin in model II. (CMR) was applied in model II using flowable composite or resin glass ionomer (Riva). Both models were restored with nanoceramic composite and then subjected to six runs (2 for the model I and 4 for model II) with load (100N) as two load cases, one at (11º) and other at (45º) from the vertical axis. The stress distributions (FEA) in the final restoration and (CMR) material were analyzed using 3D models. Results: The two models recorded an equivalent Von Mises stress and Total deformation in the final restoration, regardless of the difference in the oblique angle incidence from (11º to 45º) or the type of the material used for (CMR) there was no significant difference in the (FEA) between the model with CMR (model II) and the model without CMR (model I). Conclusions: (CMR) technique seems to be biomechanically beneficial with high eccentric applied stress, (CMR) with resin glass ionomer or flowable composite resin in combination with nanoceramic composite improved the biomechanical behavior of (MOD) cavities extended below cement enamel junction (CMR) with high modulus elasticity material like (Riva) exhibits a more uniform stress distribution.
References
- Da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Cenci MS, Donassollo TA, Loguercio AD, Demarco FF. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings. J Dent.2006 Aug;34(7):427-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.09.006.
- Opdam NJ, van de Sande FH, Bronkhorst E, Cenci MS, Bottenberg P, Pallesen U, et al. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2014 Oct;93(10):943-9. doi: 10.1177/0022034514544217.
- Juloski J, KÖken S, Ferrari M. No correlation between two methodological approaches applied to evaluate cervical margin relocation. Dent Mater J. 2020 Aug;39(4):624-32. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2018-410.
- Magne P, Spreafico R. Deep margin elevation: a paradigm shift. Am J Esthet Dent. 2012;2(2):86-96 . Corpus ID: 130524661.
- Frese C, Wolff D, Staehle HJ. Proximal box elevation with resin composite and the dogma of biological width: clinical R2-technique and critical review. Oper Dent. 2014 Jan-Feb;39(1):22-31. doi: 10.2341/13-052-T.
- Venuti P, Eclano M, Avellino, Italy. Rethinking deep marginal extension. Int. Jo. Cosm. Dent, 2018; 7(1):26-32.
- Kielbassa AM, Philipp F. Restoring proximal cavities of molars using the proximal box elevation technique: Systematic review and report of a case. Quintessence Int. 2015 Oct;46(9):751-64. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a34459.
- Sengul F, Gurbuz T, Sengul S. Finite element analysis of different restorative materials in primary teeth restorations. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2014 Sep;15(3):317-22. PMID: 25306152.
- Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Class I and Class II restorations of resin composite: an FE analysis of the influence of modulus of elasticity on stresses generated by occlusal loading. Dent Mater. 2008 May;24(5):600-5. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.06.019.
- Rodrigues F. Ceramic Onlay: Influence of the Deep Margin Elevation Technique on Stress Dis- tribution—A Finite Element Analysis [master’s thesis]. Coimbra, Portugal: University of Coimbra; 2016.
- Srirekha A, Bashetty K. Infinite to finite: an overview of finite element analysis. Indian J Dent Res. 2010 Jul-Sep;21(3):425-32. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.70813.
- Bandela V and Kanaparthi S. Finite element analysis and Its applications in dentistry. Intech Open. 2020 Nov 11;1-24. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.94064.
- D'souza KM, Aras MA. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the stress distribution pattern in a mandibular first molar tooth restored with five different restorative materials. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2017 Jan-Mar;17(1):53-60. doi: 10.4103/0972-4052.197938.
- Joshi S, Mukherjee A, Kheur M, Mehta A. Mechanical performance of endodontically treated teeth. Finite Elements Anal Design. 2001;37(8):587-601. doi: 10.1016/S0168-874X(00)00059-7.
- Okamoto K, Ino T, Iwase N, Shimizu E, Suzuki M, Satoh G, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution in composite resin cores with fiber posts of varying diameters. Dent Mater J. 2008 Jan;27(1):49-55. doi: 10.4012/dmj.27.49.
- Amarante MV, Pereira MVS, Darwish FAI, Camardo AF. Virtual analysis of stresses in human teeth restored with esthetic posts. Mater Res. 2008;11(4):459-63. doi: 10.1590/S1516-14392008000400014.
- Zhong Q, Huang Y, Zhang Y, Song Y, Wu Y, Qu F, et al. Finite element analysis of maxillary first molar with a 4-wall defect and 1.5-mm-high ferrule restored with fiber-reinforced composite resin posts and resin core: the number and placement of the posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Mar:S0022-3913(22)00077-4. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.01.029.
- Zhu J, Luo D, Rong Q, Wang X. Effect of biomimetic material on stress distribution in mandibular molars restored with inlays: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. PeerJ. 2019 Sep;7:e7694. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7694.
- Kumar P, Rao RN. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution in a tooth restored with metal and fiber posts of varying diameters: an in-vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2015 Mar-Apr;18(2):100-4. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.153061.
- Agarwal SK, Mittal R, Singhal R, Hasan S, Chaukiyal K. Stress evaluation of maxillary central incisor restored with different post materials: a finite element analysis. J Clin Adv Dent. 2020;4:22-27. doi: 10.29328/journal.jcad.1001020.
- Tribst JPM, Dal Piva AMO, Borges ALS, Araújo RM, da Silva JMF, Bottino MA, et al. Effect of different materials and undercut on the removal force and stress distribution in circumferential clasps during direct retainer action in removable partial dentures. Dent Mater. 2020 Feb;36(2):179-86. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.11.022.
- Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Mortazavi F. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/com- posite sandwich restorations. Oper Dent. 1997;22(1):21-9.
- Ausiello P, Ciaramella S, De Benedictis A, Lanzotti A, Tribst JPM, et al. The use of different adhesive filling material and mass combinations to restore class II cavities under loading and shrinkage effects: a 3D-FEA. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2021 Apr;24(5):485-95. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2020.1836168.
- Alp Ş, Gulec Alagoz L, Ulusoy N. Effect of Direct and Indirect Materials on Stress Distribution in Class II MOD Restorations: A 3D-Finite Element Analysis Study. Biomed Res Int. 2020 Dec;2020:7435054. doi: 10.1155/2020/7435054.
- Grassi EDA, de Andrade GS, Tribst JPM, Machry RV, Valandro LF, Ramos NC, et al. Fatigue behavior and stress distribution of molars restored with MOD inlays with and without deep margin elevation. Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Mar;26(3):2513-26. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04219-6.
- Ausiello P, Ciaramella S, Martorelli M, Lanzotti A, Gloria A, Watts DC. CAD-FE modeling and analysis of class II restorations incorporating resin-composite, glass ionomer and glass ceramic materials. Dent Mater. 2017 Dec;33(12):1456-65. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.10.010.
- Yaman SD, Sahin M, Aydin C. Finite element analysis of strength characteristics of various resin based restorative materials in Class V cavities. J Oral Rehabil. 2003 Jun;30(6):630-41. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01028.x.
- Vertolli TJ, Martinsen BD, Hanson CM, Howard RS, Kooistra S, Ye L. Effect of deep margin elevation on CAD/CAM-fabricated ceramic inlays. Oper Dent. 2020 Nov;45(6):608-17. doi: 10.2341/18-315-L.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Nabil al Aggan, Sameh Mahmoud Nabih, Abd Allah Ahmed Abd Al Hady
Downloads
