Corpos reconfigurados

  • Elizabeth Grosz Rutgers University
Palavras-chave: Filosofia. Corporalidade. Gênero. Teorias feministas

Resumo

A filosofia e as teorias feministas que implicitamente seapóiam em seus conceitos e métodos recusam-se reconhecer, ao mesmo tempo que precisam se apoiar neles, modos de corporalidade para sua forma, estrutura e estatuto, para situar questões-chave e para estabelecer critérios de validade e verdade de seus modos de explicação. Este texto indica, num breve esboço, algumas das características principais da história recebida que herdamos na nossa concepção atual dos corpos, chamando a atenção para o fato de que se a teoria feminista aceita acriticamente essas suposições comuns, ela participa da desvalorização social do corpo que anda de mãos dadas com a opressão das mulheres.

 

Abstract

Philosophy and feminist theories implicitly based on its concepts and methods refuse to acknowledge modes of corporeality for their form, structure, and statute, to locate key questions and to establish validity and truth criteria for their modes of explanation. This text suggests, in broad outlines, some of the main characteristics of the history we inherit in our conception of the body, calling attention to the fact that if feminist theory uncritically accepts these usual assumptions it will be participating in the social devaluation of the body which goes hand in hand with the oppression of women.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Elizabeth Grosz, Rutgers University
Professor of Women's and Gender Studies at Rutgers University

Referências

ADKINS, A.W.H. From the Many to the One. London, Constable, 1970.

ARMSTRONG, D.M. A materialist Theory of Mind. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1968.

BORDO, Susan. Anorexia Nervosa: Psychopathology as the Crystallization of Culture. In: DIAMOND, Irene e QUINBY, Lee. (eds.) Feminism and Foucault: Reflections on Resistance. Boston, Northeastern University Press, 1988.

BORDO, Susan. Reading the Slender Body. In: JACOBUS, Mary et alii (eds.) Women, Science and the Body-Politic: Discourses and Representations. New York, Methuen, 1989.

BORDO, Susan. The Body and Reproduction of Femininity: A Feminist Appropriation of Foucault. In: JAGGAR, Allison M. e BORDO, S. (eds.) Gender/Body/Knowledge: Feminist Reconstructions of Being and Knowing. New Brunswick, Rutgers University Press, 1989.

BROODY, S. N. The Disease of the Soul: Leprosy in Medieval Literature. Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1974.

BUTLER, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York, Routledge, 1990.

CADDICK. Alison. Feminism and the Body. Arena 74, 1986.

CHURCHLAND, Patricia. Neurophilosophy: Toward a Unified Understanding of the Mind-Brain. Cambridge, MIT Press, 1986.

CHURCHLAND, Paul. A neurocomputational Perspective. Cambridge, MIT Press, 1989.

Corporeal Representations in/and the Body politic. In: DIPROSE, Rosalyn e FERRELL, Robin. (eds.) Cartographies:

Corporeographies. Inscriptions: Journal for the Critique of Colonial Discourse 5, 1989 .

DERRIDA, Jacques. Dissemination. London, Athlone, 1981 e Economimesis. Diacritics II, 1981.

DERRIDA, Jacques. Of Grammatology. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976.

DERRIDA, Jacques. Positions.London, Athlone, 1972.

DODDS, E. R. The Greeks and the Irrational. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1973.

EDWARDS, Anne. The Sex/Gender Distinction: Has it Outlived its Usefulness? Australian feminist Studies 10, 1989.

Elizabeth V. Spelman Inessential Woman: Problems of Exclusion in Feminist Thought Boston, Beacon Press, 1988.

ESPINOSA. Ética, III, Prop. 2.

FREUD, S. Fetichism (1927)

FREUD, S. Negation (1925)

FREUD, S. The Splitting of the Ego in the Process of Defence (1938). Standard Edition, vol.23.

FREUD, S. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. London, Hogarth Press, vol.19.

FUSS, Diana. Essentially Speaking: Feminism, Nature and Difference. New York, Routledge, 1989.

GATENS, M. Towards a Feminist Philosophy of the Body. Op.cit., pp.68-69.

GATENS, M. Women and Her Double(s): Sex, Gender and Ethics. Australian feminist Studies 10, 1989.

GATENS, Moira. Feminism and Philosophy:Perspectives on Difference and Equality. Cambridge, Polity Press, 1991.

GATENS, Moira. Feminism, Philosophy and Riddles Without Answers. In:PATEMAN Carole e GROSZ, Elizabeth. (eds.) Feminist Challenges: Social andPolitical Theory. Sydney, Allen and Unwin, 1986.

GATENS, Moira. Towards a Feminist Philosophy of the Body. In: CAINE, Barbara, GROSZ, E. A. e LEPERVANCHE, Marie de. (eds.) Crossing Boundaries: Feminism and the Critique of Knowledges. Sydney, Allen and Unwin, 1988.

GATENS, Moira. Towards a Feminist Philosophy of the Body. Op. cit.

GOLDSTEIN, Kurt. Human Nature in the Light of Psychoterapy. New York, Schocken Books, 1963.

GOLDSTEIN, Kurt. Selected Papers. The Hague, Martinus Nijoff, 1971.

GROSZ, E. A Note on Essentialism and Difference. In: GUNEW, Sneja. (ed.) Feminist Knowledge: Critique and Construct. London, Routledge, 1990.

GROSZ, Elizabeth. Derrida and the limits of Philosophy. Thesis Eleven 14, 1986.

GROSZ, Elizabeth. Sexual Subversions: Three French Feminists. Sydney, Allen and Unwin, 1989.

GUNEW, Sneja. (ed.) A Reader in Feminist Knowledge. London, Routledge, 1990.

Habeas Corpus. After Image 17 (3), 1989.

HOBBES. Leviatã.

LA METTRIE. Man a machine (1988).

JAY, Nancy.Gender and Dichotomy. Feminist Studies I, 1981.

JONAS, Hans. Spinoza and the Theory of Organism. In: STUART Spicker. (ed.) Philosophy of the Body. Chicago, Quadrangle Books, 1970.

KIRBY, Vicki. On the Cutting Edge: Feminism and Clitoridectomy. Australian Feminist Studies 5, 1987.

LE DOEUFF. The Philosophical Imagination. London, Athlone, 1989.

LLOYD, Genevieve. The Man of Reason: “Male” and “Female” in Western Philosophy. London, Methuen, 1984.

LLOYD, Genevieve. Woman as Other: Sex, Gender and Subjectivity. Australian Feminist Sudies 10, 1989.

LURIA, A. R. The Working Brain: An Introduction to Neuropsychology. Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1973.

MATTHEWS, Jill. Building the Body Beautiful: The Femininity of Modernity. Australian Feminist Studies 5, 1987.

MITCHELL, J. e ROSE, J. (eds.) Feminine Sexuality: Jacques Lacan and the École Freudienne. London, MacMillan,1982.

NORRIS, Christopher. Spinoza and the Origins of Modern Critical Theory. Oxford, Blackwell, 1991.

PLUMWOOD, Val. Do we Need a Sex/Gender Distinction? Radical Philosophy 51, 1989.

Poststructuralism and the Mapping of Bodies and Spaces. Sydney, Allen and Unwin, 1991.

PROBYN, Elspeth. Bodies and Anti-Bodies: Feminism and the Postmodern. Cultural Studies 1 (3), 1987.

ROTHFIELD, Philipa. Habeus Corpus:Discourse and the Body. Writings on Dance 3, 1988.

ROTHFIELD, Philipa. Subjectivity and the Language of the Body. Arena 75, 1986.

SACKS, Oliver. The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat. London, Picador, 1985.

SPELMAN, Elizabeth V. Woman as Body: Ancient and Contemporary Views. Feminist Studies 8 (1),111-19, 1982.

STRAUS, E. W. Aesthesiology and Hallucination. In: ROLLO MAY, E. Angel e ELLEMBERGER, H. F. (eds.) Existence: a New Dimension in Psychiatry and Psychology. New York, Springer,1962, pp.141-150.

The Meditations. In: DESCARTES, R. (1931-34).

THOMPSON, Denise. The “Sex/Gender” Distinction: A Reconsideration. Australian Feminist Studies 10, 1989

Women’s time In: MOI, Toril. (ed.) The Kristeva Reader. Oxford, Blackwell, 1986.

Publicado
2015-06-01
Como Citar
Grosz, E. (2015). Corpos reconfigurados. Cadernos Pagu, (14), 45-86. Recuperado de https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/cadpagu/article/view/8635340