Banner Portal
Gerenciamento e disciplina algorítmica


Plataformas digitais
Algoritmos e trabalho
Emprego qualificado

Como Citar

OLIVEIRA, Herbert Paolo Salles de; BRITTO, Jorge Nogueira de Paiva. Gerenciamento e disciplina algorítmica: uma análise focalizada em plataformas de emprego de elevada qualificação. Economia e Sociedade, Campinas, SP, v. 32, n. 3, p. 633–668, 2023. Disponível em: Acesso em: 18 jun. 2024.


O artigo discute as práticas de gerenciamento e disciplina algorítmica no contexto das plataformas digitais de trabalho, com um foco particular em plataformas digitais de emprego de elevada qualificação, estruturando-se em quatro seções. Uma primeira seção busca caracterizar, de maneira geral, as plataformas digitais de trabalho. Uma segunda seção aborda especificamente as características das plataformas digitais de emprego de elevada qualificação, destacando as do trabalho freelance associado a estas plataformas, correlacionado a argumentos da literatura que discute estas transformações dos mercados de trabalho. Uma terceira seção discute o papel das práticas de gerenciamento algorítmico nas plataformas digitais de trabalho. Uma quarta seção aborda a questão da “disciplina algorítmica” em plataformas digitais de trabalho, referenciando esse processo às características de plataformas digitais de trabalho com maior qualificação. Uma última seção sumariza as principais conclusões e aponta desdobramentos desse programa de pesquisa.



ANTUNES, R. Trabalho digital, “indústria 4.0” e uberização do trabalho. In: CARELLI, Rodrigo de Lacerda; CAVALCANTI, Tiago Muniz; FONSECA, Vanessa Patriota da (Org.). Futuro do trabalho: os efeitos da revolução digital na sociedade. Brasília: ESMPU, 2020.

ANTUNES, Ricardo. O privilégio da servidão: o novo proletariado de serviços na era digital. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2018.

ARCIDIACONO, D.; BORGHI, P.; CIARINI, A. Platform work: from digital promises to labor challenges. Partecipazione e Conflitto, v. 12, n. 3, p. 611-628, 2019. DOI:

AUTOR, D. H. Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, v. 29, n. 3, p. 3-30, 2015. DOI:

BAILEY, D. E.; BARLEY, S. R. Beyond design and use: how scholars should study intelligent technologies. Information and Organization, 30 (2), Jun. 2020. DOI:

BARACH, M. A. Search, screening, and information provision: personnel decisions in an on-line labor market. 2015. Available at:

BARNES, S. A.; GREEN, A.; HOYOS, M. Crowdsourcing and work: individual factors and circumstances influencing employability. New Technology, Work and Employment, v. 30, n. 1, p. 16-31, 2015.

BLAZQUEZ, D.; DOMENECH, J. Web data mining for monitoring business export orientation. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. On-line, v. 24, n. 2, p. 1-23, 2018. DOI:

BRAWLEY, A. M. The big, gig picture: we can’t assume the same constructs matter. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, v. 10, n. 4, p. 687-696, 2017. DOI:

BRAYNE, S.; CHRISTIN, A. Technologies of crime prediction: the reception of algorithms in policing and criminal courts. Social Problems Epub ahead of print, 2020.

BUCHER, E.; SCHOU, P.; WALDKIRCH, M. Pacifying the algorithm: anticipatory compliance in the face of algorithmic management in the gig economy. Organization, v. 28, n. 1, p. 44-67, 2021.

CARNEIRO, L. L.; MOSCON, D. C. B.; DIAS, L. M. M.; OLIVEIRA, S. M. D.; ALVES, H. M. C. Digiwork: reflections on the scenario of work mediated by digital platforms in Brazil. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, v. 24, n. 2, p. 1-28, 2023. DOI:

CEPI. Center of Education and Research on Innovation at FGV Direito SP. Gig economy and work on platforms in Brazil: from concept to platforms. São Paulo: FGV Direito SP, 2021.

CHRISTIN, A. Algorithms in practice: comparing web journalism and criminal justice. Big Data & Society, v. 4, n. 2), 2017. DOI:

CLAUSSEN, J.; KHASHABI, P.; KRETSCHMER, T.; SEIFRIED, M. Knowledge work in the sharing economy: what drives project success in on-line labor markets? 2018.

DE GROEN, W. P.; MASELLI, I.; FABO, B. The digital market for local services: a onenight stand for workers? An example from the on-demand economy. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016. DOI:

DE STEFANO, V. Negotiating the algorithm: automation, artificial intelligence and labour protection. International Labour Office, 2018. (Employment Working Paper, n. 246).

DELFANTI, A. Machinic dispossession and augmented despotism: digital work in an Amazon warehouse. New Media & Society, v. 23, n. 1, p. 39-55, 2019.

DIGITAL FUTURE SOCIETY. The future of work in the digital era: the rise of labour platforms. Digital Future Society. Dec. 2019.

DRAHOKOUPIL, J.; PIASNA, A. Work in the platform economy: deliveroo riders in Belgium and the SMart arrangement. Eur. Trade Union Inst., Brussels, 2019. (Work. Pap., 2019.01).

DUGGAN, J.; SHERMAN, U.; CARBERY, R. et al. Algorithmic management and app-work in the gig economy: a research agenda for employment relations and HRM. Human Resource Management Journal, v. 30, n. 1, p. 114-132, 2019.

EUROFOUND. Employment and working conditions of selected types of platform work. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018.

FABO, B.; KARANOVIC, J.; DUKOVA, K. In search of an adequate European policy response to the platform economy. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, v. 23, n. 2, p. 163-175, 2017.

FELSTEAD, A.; GALLIE, D.; GREEN, F.; HENSEKE, G. Conceiving, designing and trailing a short form measure of job quality: a proof-of concept study. Industrial Relations Journal, v. 50, n. 1, p. 2-19, 2019.

FILGUEIRAS, V.; ANTUNES, R. Plataformas digitais, uberização do trabalho e regulação no capitalismo contemporâneo. Contracampo, v. 39, n. 1, p. 27-43, 2020. DOI:

FU, J. Cost of hiring full-time vs. freelance software developers. Codementor, 2017. Available at:

GERBER, C.; KRZYWDZINSKI, M. Brave new digital work? New forms of performance control in crowdwork. In: VALLAS, S. P.; KOVALAINEN, A. (Ed.). Work and labor in the digital age. Emerald Publishing Limited, 2019. p. 121-143. DOI:

GILLESPIE, T. The relevance of algorithms. In: GILLESPIE; BOCZKOWSKI; FOOT (Ed.). Media technologies: essays on communication, materiality, and society, 167. 2014.

GOSETTI, G. Lavoro, qualita e sicurezza: laprospettivadeglioperatoridellaprevenzione. Studi Organizzativi, n. 1, p. 124-153, 2015. DOI:

GREEN, F. Why has work effort become more intense? Industrial Relations, v. 43 n. 4, p. 709-741, 2004.

GRØNSUND, T.; AANESTAD, M. Augmenting the algorithm: emerging human-in-the-loop work configurations. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, v. 29, n. 2, p. 101614, 2020.

GUO, X.; GONG, J.; PAVLOU, P. Call for bids to improve matching efficiency: evidence from online labor markets. 2017.

GWEBU, K. L.; WANG, J.; TROUTT, M. D. A conceptual framework for understanding trust building and maintenance in virtual organizations. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, v. 9, p. 43-63, 2007.

HAGIU, A.; ROTHMAN, S. Network effects aren’t enough. Harvard Business Review, v. 94, n. 4, p.17, 2016.

HAGIU, A.; WRIGHT, J. Multi-sided platforms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, v. 43, p. 162-174, 2015.

HAGIU, A. Strategic decisions for multisided platforms. MIT Sloan Management Review, v. 55, n. 2, p. 71-80, 2014.

HARMS, PD; HAN, G. Algorithmic leadership: the future is now. Journal o Leadership Studies, v. 12, n. 4, p. 74-75, 2019.

HARVEY, D. A condição pós-moderna: uma pesquisa sobre as origens da mudança cultural. São Paulo, SP, 1992.

ILO – International Labour Office. Digital labour platforms and the future of work: towards decent work in the on-line world. Geneva: International Labour Office, 2018.

ILO – International Labour Office. World Employment and Social Outlook 2021 – The role of digital labour platforms in transforming the world of work. Geneva: International Labour Office, 2021a. ISBN 978-92-2-031941-3.

ILO – International Labour Office. Digital platforms and the world of work in G20 countries: status and policy action. Paper prepared for the Employment Working Group under Italian G20 Presidency. Jun. 2021b.

JARRAHI, M. H.; SUTHERLAND, W. Algorithmic management and algorithmic competencies: understanding and appropriating algorithms in gig work. In: INTERNATIONAL Conference on Information, Washington, DC, USA, Cham, Switzerland: Springer, March 31-April 3, p. 578-589, 2019.

JARRAHI, M. H.; SUTHERLAND, W.; NELSON, S. B.; SAWYER, S. Platformic management, boundary resources for gig work, and worker autonomy. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), v. 29, n. 1, p. 153-189, 2020. DOI:

JARVENPAA, S.; TEIGLAND, R. January. Introduction to trust, identity, and trusted systems in digital environments minitrack. In: Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2017.

KALLEBERG, A. L.; DUNN, M. Good jobs, bad jobs in the gig economy. LERA for Libraries, v. 20, n. 1-2, 2016.

KÄSSI, O.; LEHDONVIRTA, V. On-line labour index: measuring the on-line gig economy for policy and research. Paper presented at Internet, Politics & Policy, 22-23 Sept. Oxford, 2016. Available at:

KATZ, L. F.; KRUEGER, A. B. The rise and nature of alternative work arrangements in the United States, 1995-2015. Princeton University and NBER, Mar. 2016.

KELLOGG, K. C.; VALENTINE, M.; CHRISTIN, A. Algorithms at work: the new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals, v. 14, n. 1, p. 366-410, 2020.

KENNEY, M.; ZYSMAN, J. The rise of the platform economy. Issues Sci. Technol., v. 32, n. 3, p. 61-69, 2016.

KENNEY, M.; ZYSMANJ. Work and value creation in the platform economy. Research in the Sociology of Work, v. 33, 2019.

KENNEY, M.; ZYSMAN, J. The next phase in the digital revolution: platforms, automation, growth, and employment. VALLAS, SP.; KOVALAINEN, A. (Ed.). Work and Labor in the Digital Age. Binkley, UK: Emerald, 2017, p. 13-41.

KHAN, M.; JAN, B.; FARMAN, H. Deep learning: convergence to big data analytics. Singapore: Springer, 2019.

KUEK, Siou Chew; PARADI-GUILFORD, Cecilia; FAYOMI, Toks; IMAIZUMI, Saori; IPEIROTIS, Panos; PINA, Patricia; SINGH, Manpreet. The global opportunity in on-line outsourcing. World Bank Group, 2015.

KUHN, KM; MALEKI, A. Micro-entrepreneurs, dependent contractors, and instaserfs: understanding on-line labor platform workforces. Acad. Manag. Perspect., v. 31, n. 3, p. 183-200, LEE, MK; KUSBIT, D.; METSKY, E.; DABBISH, L. Working with machines: the impact of algorithmic, data-driven management on human workers. In: PROCEEDINGS of the 33rd Annual ACM SIGCHI Conference, Seoul, South Korea, 18-23 April. New York: ACM Press, 2015. p. 1603-1612.

LEHDONVIRTA, V. Flexibility in the gig economy: managing time on three on-line piecework platforms. New Technology, Work and Employment, v. 33, n. 1, p. 13-29, 2018.

LIN, L.; LASSITER, T.; OH, J. et al. Algorithmic hiring in practice: recruiter and HR Professional’s perspectives on AI use in hiring. In: THE PROCEEDINGS of the AAAI/ACM Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Ethics, and Society (AIES 2021). A virtual conference. New York: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), May, 19-21, 2021.

MARKUS, M. L. Datification, organizational strategy, and IS research: what’s the score? The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, v. 26, n. 3, p. 233-241, 2017. DOI:

MATEESCU, A.; NGUYEN, A. Explainer algorithmic management in the workplace. New York: Data & Society, 2019.

MCKINSEY GLOBAL INSTITUTE. Jobs lost, jobs gained: workforce transitions in a time of automation. Dec. 2017.

MEXI, M. Social dialogue and the governance of the digital platform economy: understanding challenges, shaping opportunities. Geneva: ILO, 2019.

MIELE, F.; TIRABENI, L. Digital technologies and power dynamics in the organization: a conceptual review of remote working and wearable technologies at work. Sociology Compass, v. 14, n. 6, p. e12795, 2020. DOI:

PAIS, Ivana; BORGHI, Paolo; MURGIA, Annalisa. High-skilled platform jobs in Europe: trends, quality of work and emerging challenges. Sociologia del Lavoro, v. 160, 2021.

PARKER, G.; VAN ALSTYNE, M.; CHOUDARY, SP. Platform revolution: how networked markets are transforming the economy and how to make them work for you. New York: W.W. Norton, 2016.

PARKER, G.; VAN ALSTYNE, M. Innovation, openness, and platform control. Management Science, 2017.

PAVLOU, P. A.; GEFEN, D. Building effective on-line marketplaces with institution-based trust. Information Systems Research, v. 15, n. 1, p. 37-59, 2004.

PESOLE, A.; URZÍ BRANCATI, MC; FERNÁNDEZ-MACÍAS, E.; BIAGI, F.; GONZÁLEZ VÁZQUEZ, I. Platform workers in Europe. Luxembourg, Luxembg.: Publ. Off. Eur. Union, 2018. (Tech. Rep., EUR 29275 EN).

SCHMIDT, F. A. Digital labour markets in the platform economy: mapping the political challenges of crowdwork and gig work. Friedich Ebert Stiftung, 2017. Available at:

SCHMIDT, Florian Alexander. The good, the bad and the ugly: why crowdsourcing needs ethics. In: Third International Conference on Cloud and Green Computing (CGC), 2013, p. 531-535.

SCHÖRPF, P.; FLECKER, J.; SCHÖNAUER, A.; EICHMANN, H. Triangular love–hate: management and control in creative crowd working. New Technology, Work and Employment, v. 32, n. 1, p. 43-58, 2017. DOI:

SCHREIECK, M.; WIESCHE, M.; KRCMAR, H. Design and Governance of Platform Ecosystems– Key concepts and issues for future research. ECIS, Jun. 2016.

SCHULTE, J.; SCHLICHER, K. D.; MAIER, G. W. (). Working everywhere and every time? chances and risks in crowdworking and crowdsourcing work design. Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift Für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO), v. 51, n. 1, p. 59-69, 2020. DOI:

SPREITZER, G. M.; CAMERON, L.; GARRETT, L. Alternative work arrangements: two images of the new world of work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, v. 4, n. 1, p. 473-499, 2017. DOI:

STEFANO, V. The rise of the “just-in-time workforce”: on-demand work, crowdwork and labour protection in the “gig-economy”. International Labour Office, 2016. Available at:

STEFANO, V. D.; DURRI, I. Platform work and the employment relationship. International Labour Organization, Mar. 2021. Available at:–en/index.htm.

TASKINEN, Jaakko. High-skilled freelance platforms: the impact of trust building mechanisms on attracting top freelance software professionals. Master’s Thesis. Helsinki, Sept. 4, 2018.

TURA, N.; KUTVONEN, A.; RITALA, P. Platform design framework: conceptualisation and application. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, p. 1-14, 2017.

UNI GLOBAL UNION PROFESSIONALS & MANAGERS. Algorithmic management – A Trade Union Guide. 2021.

VAN ALSTYNE, M. W.; SCHRAGE, M. The best platforms are more than match makers. Harvard Business Review, v. 94, n. 7/8, 2016.

VEEN, A.; BARRATT, T.; GOODS, C. Platform-capital’s ‘appetite’ for control: a labour process analysis of food-delivery work in Australia. Work, Employment and Society, v. 34, n. 3, p. 388-406, 2020.

WEIL, D. The fissured workplace: why work became so bad, for so many and what can be done to improve it. Boston: Harvard University Press, 2014.

WOOD, A. J. Despotism on demand: how power operates in the flexible workplace. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2020.

WOOD A. J.; LEHDONVIRTA, V. Platform precarity: surviving algorithmic insecurity in the gig economy. Working paper presented at AI at Work: Automation, Algorithmic Management, and Employment Law’ On-line Workshop at the University of Sheffield. 2021. Available at:

WOOD, A. J.; GRAHAM, M.; LEHDONVIRTA, V.; HJORTH, I. Good gig, bad gig: autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, v. 33, n. 1, p. 56- 75, 2019.

WOODCOCK, J.; JOHNSON, M. R. Gamification: what it is, and how to fight it. The Sociological Review, v. 66, n. 3, p. 542-558, 2018. DOI:

ZANATTA, A. L.; MACHADO, L. S.; PEREIRA, G. B.; PRIKLADNICKI, R.; CARMEL, E. Software crowdsourcing platforms. IEEE Software, v. 33, n. 6, p. 112-116, 2016.

ZHENG, A.; HONG, Y.; PAVLOU, P. A. Matching in two-sided platforms for IT services / Evidence from on-line labor markets. 2016.

ZUBOFF, S. Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. J. Inf. Technol., v. 30, n. 1, p. 75-89, 2015.

ZUBOFF, S. The age of surveillance capitalism. New York: Public Affairs, 2019.

Creative Commons License

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Economia e Sociedade


Não há dados estatísticos.