Palavras-chave
Como Citar
Resumo
La periferia del sistema mundo – que denominamos en este trabajo “Sur Global” – ha experimentado un salto en su dinamismo durante la última década, liderado por un grupo de países, con epicentro en el Este asiático, convertidos en los principales dinamizadores del sistema. Ante la advertencia de ese particular contexto, y desde una perspectiva centralmente comparativa de las dinámicas de América Latina y el Este de Asia, en el presente trabajo se exploran algunos elementos que procuran dar cuenta del alcance de esa irrupción en cuanto a su potencialidad de alterar la estructura del sistema mundial y las posibilidades que, en dicho escenario, se abren para el desarrollo de la periferia latinoamericana.
Abstract
The periphery of the world-system – the “Global South” for us − has experienced a jump in its dynamism over the last decade, led by a group of countries, centered in East Asia, that have become the most dynamic of the system. Given this particular context, and from a comparative perspective of the dynamics of Latin America and East Asia, this paper explores some elements that seek to notice the scope of this emergency in terms of its potential to alter the structure of the global system and the possibilities that, in this context, arises for Latin-American development. Keywords: World-system; Global South; East Asia; Latin America.
Referências
AKYUZ, Y.; CHANG, H.; KOZUL-WRIGHT, R. New perspective on East Asia development. Journal of Development Studies, v. 34, n. 6, p. 4-36, 1998.
AMSDEN, A. The rise of the rest: challenges of the West from late-industrializing economies. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
AMSDEN, A. Goodbye dependency theory, hello dependency theory. Studies in Comparative International Development, v. 38, n. 1, p. 32-38, 2003.
ARCEO, E. El impacto de la globalización en la periferia y las nuevas y viejas formas de la dependencia en América Latina. Cuadernos del Cendes, v. 22, n. 60, p. 25-61, 2005.
ARRIGHI, G. El largo siglo XX. Madrid: Akal, 1999.
ARRIGHI, G.; DRANGEL, J. The stratification of the world-economy: an exploration of the semiperipheral zone. Review, v. X, n. 1, p. 9-74, 1986.
ARRIGHI, G., SILVER, B.; BREWER, B. Industrial convergence, globalization, and the persistence of north-south divide. Studies in Comparative International Development, v. 38. n. 1, p. 3-31, 2003.
BEESON, M. Developmental states in East Asia: a comparison of the Japanese and Chinese experiences. Asian Perspective, v. 33, n. 2, p. 5-39, 2009.
BERRETTONI, D.; POLONSKY, M. Evolución del comercio exterior argentino en la última década: origen, destino y composición. Revista del CIE, n. 19, p. 80-99, 2011.
BERGESEN, A.; SAHOO, C. Evidence of the decline of american hegemony in world production. Review, v. 8, n. 4, p. 595-611, 1985.
BORON, A. Teoría(s) de la dependencia. Revista Realidad Económica, n. 238, p. 20-43, 2008.
BRESLIN, S. Power and production: rethinking China's global economic role. Review of International Studies, n. 31, p. 735-753, 2005.
BRESSER-PEREIRA, L. C.; GALA, P. Macroeconomia estructuralista do desenvolvimento. Revista de Economía Política, v. 30, n. 4 (120), p. 663-686, 2010.
CEPAL. La inversión extranjera directa en América Latina y el Caribe. Santiago de Chile, 2010.
CEPAL. Panorama de la inserción internacional de América Latina y el Caribe 2011- 2012. Santiago de Chile, 2012.
CEPAL. Panorama de la inserción internacional de América Latina y el Caribe 2010- 2011. Santiago de Chile, 2011a.
CEPAL. Estudio Económico de América Latina y el Caribe 2010-2011. Santiago de Chile, 2011b.
CHANG, H. Regulation of foreign investment in historical perspective. European Journal of Development Research, v. 16, 2004.
AMSDEN, A. The political economy of industrial policy in Korea. Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 16, n. 2, p. 131-157, 1993.
CHIBBER, B. ¿Revivir el Estado Desarrollista? El mito de la burguesía nacional. Documentos y Aportes en Administración Pública y Gestión Estatal, n. 11, p. 7-34, 2008.
CHIBBER, B. Building a developmental state: the Korean case reconsidered. Politics & Society, v. 27, n. 3, p. 309-346, 1999.
CIMOLI, M., PORCILE, G., PRIMI, A., Y VERGARA, S. Cambio estructural, heterogeneidad productiva y tecnología en América Latina. In: CIMOLI, M. (Ed.). Heterogeneidad estructural, asimetrías tecnológicas y crecimiento en América Latina. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL, 2005.
DABAT, A. La crisis financiera en Estados Unidos y sus consecuencias internacionales. Problemas del Desarrollo, v. 40, n. 157, p. 39-74, 2009.
DABAT, A; MELO MARTÍNEZ, O. La crisis histórico estructural de Estados Unidos y sus consecuencias mundiales. Economía Informa, n. 352, p.7-19, 2008.
DABAT, A; LEAL, P. Declinación de Estados Unidos: contexto histórico mundial. Problemas del Desarrollo, v. 174, n. 44, Jul./Sept. 2013.
DICKEN, P. Global shift, fifth edition: mapping the changing contours of the world economy. New York: Guilford Press, 2007.
DUNFORD, M.; LI, L. Chinese spatial inequalities and spatial policies. Geography Compass, 4/8, p. 1039-1054, 2010.
EVANS, P. Embedded autonomy: states and industrial transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.
FIORI, J. O sistema interestatal capitalista no início do século XXI. In: MEDEIROS, C.; SERRANO, F.; FIORI, J. O mito do colapso do poder americano. Sao Paulo: Editora Record, 2008.
FRÖBEL, F.; HEINRICHS, J.; KREYE, O. The tendency towards a new international division of labor: the utilization of a world-wide labor force for manufacturing oriented to the world market. Review, v. 1, n. 1, p. 73-88, 1977.
GEREFFI, G. Las cadenas productivas como marco analítico para la globalización. Problemas del Desarrollo, v. 32, n. 125, p. 9-37, 2001.
GLASSMAN, J. The geo-political economy of global production networks. Geography Compass, v. 5, n. 4, p. 154-164, 2011.
HARDT, M.; NEGRI, A. Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000.
HARRIS, N. The end of the Third World. Newly industrializing countries and the decline of an ideology. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1986.
HARVEY, D. El nuevo imperialismo. Madrid: Akal, 2004.
HARVEY, D. Spaces of hope. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2000.
HIKINO, T.; AMSDEN, A. La industrialización tardía en perspectiva histórica. Desarrollo Económico, v. 35, n. 137, p. 3-34, 1995.
HOPKINS, T.; WALLERSTEIN, I. Commodity chains in the world-economy prior to 1800. Review, v. 10, n. 1, p. 157-170, 1986.
HUMPHREY, J.; SCHMITZ, H. Governance and upgrading: linking industrial cluster and global value chain research. IDS Working Paper, n. 120, 2000.
JOHNSON, C. Political institutions and economic performance: the government-business relationship in Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. In: DEYO, F. C. (Ed.). The political economy of the new Asian industrialism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987.
KAPLINSKY, R. Spreading the gains from globalization: what can be learn from value chain analysis?. IDS Working Paper, n. 110, 2000.
KOHLI, A. Estado y desarrollo económico. Documentos y Aportes en Administración Pública y Gestión Estatal, n. 12, p. 7-29, 2009.
LEMOINE, F.; ÜNAL-KESENCI, D. Assembly trade and technology transfer: the case of China. World Development, v. 32, n. 5, p. 829-850, 2004.
LI, L.; DUNFORD, M.; YEUNG, G. International trade and industrial dynamics: geographical and structural dimensions of Chinese and Sino-EU merchandise trade. Applied Geography, n. 32, p. 130-142, 2012.
MADDISON A. The world economy. Washington, DC: OECD Publishing, 2006.
MAHUTGA, M. The persistence of structural inequality? A network analysis of international trade, 1965-2000. Social Forces, v. 84, n. 4, p. 1863-1889, 2006.
MANN, M. The autonomous power of the state: its origins, mechanisms and results. European Journal of Sociology, n. 25, p. 185-213, 1984.
MCMICHAEL, P. Incorporating comparisons within a world-historical perspective: an alternative comparative method. American Sociological Review, v. 55, n. 3, p. 385-397, 1990.
MINTZ, S. The so-called world system: local initiative and local response. Dialectical Anthropology, n. 2, p. 253-70, 1977.
MEDEIROS, C. Desenvolvimento econômico e ascensao nacional: rupturas e transições na Rússia e na China. In: MEDEIROS, C.; SERRANO, F.; FIORI, J. O mito do colapso do poder americano. Sao Paulo: Editora Record, 2008.
PALMA, G. Why has productivity growth stagnated in most Latin American countries since the neo-liberal reforms? The economic consequences of a rentier-dominated power structure and a narcissistic ideology. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, 130, 2010.
PALMA, G. Latin America during the second half of the twentieth century: from the “age of extremes” to the age or “end-of-history” uniformity. In: CHANG, H-J. (Ed.). Rethinking development economics. London: Anthem Press, 2003.
PEMPEL, T. J. The developmental regime in a changing world economy. In: WOOCUMMINGS, M. (Ed.). The developmental state. New York: Cornell University Press, 1999.
PÉREZ, C. Technological revolutions, paradigm shifts and socio-institutional change. In: REINERT, E. (Ed.). Globalization, economic development and inequality: an alternative perspective. United Kingdom: Edward Elgar, 2004.
PÉREZ, C. Technological revolutions and techno-economic paradigms. Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics. Tallinn: The Other Canon Foundation, Norway and Tallinn University of Technology, 2009 ROBINSON, W.; HARRIS, J. Towards a global ruling class? Globalization and the transnational capitalist class. Science and Society, v. 64, n. 1, p. 11-54, 2000.
ROSEBERRY, W. Anthropologies and histories, essays in culture, history, and political economy. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1989.
SÁNCHEZ ANCOCHEA, D. Inserción externa, heterogeneidad estructural y globalización en América Latina. Institute for the Study of the Americas, Universidad de Londres, 2005.
SANTISO, J. La emergencia de las multilatinas. Revista de la CEPAL, n. 95, p. 7-30, 2008.
SASSEN, S. Ciudades en la economía global: enfoques teóricos y metodológicos. Eure, v. XXIV, n. 71, p. 5-25, 1998.
SCHUMPETER, J. Capitalism, socialism, & democracy. London: Allen & Unwin, 1954.
SKOCPOL, T. Wallerstein's world capitalist system: a theoretical and historical critique. American Journal of Sociology, v. 82, n. 5, p. 1075-1090, 1977.
TOMICH, D. Slavery in the circuit of sugar. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 1990.
TOMICH, D. World market and american slavery: problems of historical method. Paper presented at the conference on Els espais del mercat, Second International Local History Colloquy, University of Valencia, Spain, Apr. 2001.
TOMICH, D. World of capital/Worlds of labor: a global perspective. In: HALL J. R. (Ed.). Reworking class. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1997.
WADE, R. Reubicando al Estado: lecciones de la experiencia de desarrollo del Este asiático. Documentos y Aportes en Administración Pública y Gestión Estatal, n. 10, p. 7-28, 2008.
WALLERSTEIN, I. The modern world-system: capitalist agriculture and the origins of the European world-economy in the sixteenth century. New York; London: Academic Press, 1974.
WALLERSTEIN, I. Capitalismo histórico y movimientos antisistémicos. Un análisis de sistemasmundo. Madrid: Akal, 2004 WEISS, L. Introduction: bringing domestic institutions back in. In: WEISS L. (Ed.). States in the global economy. Bringing domestic institutions back. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
WOLF, E. Europe and the people without history. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982.
WOO-CUMINGS, M. (Ed.). The developmental state. New York: Cornell University Press, 1999.
A Economia e Sociedade utiliza a licença do Creative Commons (CC), preservando assim, a integridade dos artigos em ambiente de acesso aberto.
Downloads
