Banner Portal
Community revolutionary object
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Revolutionary subject
Collective
Community
Social transformation
Surplus.

How to Cite

BARKIN, David; SÁNCHEZ JIMÉNEZ, Alejandra. Community revolutionary object: strengthening post-capitalist societies. Ideias, Campinas, SP, v. 10, p. e19015, 2019. DOI: 10.20396/ideias.v10i0.8656865. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/ideias/article/view/8656865. Acesso em: 1 jul. 2024.

Abstract

The hope for a unique revolutionary actor in the XX Century evaporated as a result of the weaknesses of social organizations in the face of the multiple crises that proliferated in the post-war era, generating doubts about the possibility of revolutionary change. This paper examines the potential of an almost forgotten group of revolutionary actors –collectively organized and deliberately involved in processes of social and productive transformation with a legitimate claim to territory– whose present-day activities involve them in concerted processes to consolidate a different social structure on the margins of the global capitalist system. Indigenous and peasant communities throughout the Americas are self-consciously restructuring their organizations and governance structures, taking control of territories they claimed for generations. They are also reorganizing production to generate surplus, assembling their members to take advantage of underutilized resources and peoples’ energies for improving their ability to raise living standards and assure environmental conservation and restoration. These communities are not operating in isolation. They coordinate activities, share information, and build alliances. Hundreds of millions of people are participating in this growing movement; they occupy much more than one-quarter of the world’s land area. There is great potential for others to join them, expanding from the substantial areas where that are already operational, transforming societies and ecosystems, consolidating post-capitalist societies.

https://doi.org/10.20396/ideias.v10i0.8656865
PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

ÁLVAREZ, S.; DAGNINO, E; ESCOBAR, A. Culture of Politics, Politics of Culture: Re-visioning Latin American Social Movements. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1998.

AMESO, E.; BUKACHI, S.; OLUNGAH, C.; HALLER, T.; WANDIBBA, S.; NANGENDO, S. “Pastoral Resilience among the Maasai Pastoralists of Laikipia County, Kenya,” Land, v. 7, n. 2, 2018. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/7/2/78.

ANDERSON, C.; BUCHANAN, C.; CHANG, M.; SANCHEZ RODRIGUEZ, J.; WAKEFORD, T (eds.) Everyday Experts: How people’s knowledge can transform the food system. Coventry: Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience, Coventry University, 2017.

ARMENTA, W. Acumulación de capital extra-económica en el México rural. Cuetzalan del Progreso, Puebla. Tesis doctoral en Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, 2016.

ARSEL, M.; HOGENBOOM, B.; PELLIGRINI, L (eds.) The extractive boom in Latin America. (Special Issue) The Extractive Industries and Society, v. 3, n. 4, p. 880-1129. 2016. https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/the-extractive-industries-and-society/vol/3/issue/4.

BARAN, P. Sobre la Evolución del Excedente Económico, El Trimestre Económico, v. 25, n. 4, 1958, p. 735-748. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20855461.

BARAN, P. La Economía Política del Crecimiento, México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1958a.

BARKIN, D. De La Protesta a La Propuesta: 50 años imaginando y construyendo el futuro. México: Siglo XXI Editores, 2018.

BARKIN, D. La economía ecológica desde abajo. En: Azamar, A.; Escobar, D.; y Peniche, S. (comps.), Perspectivas de la Economía Ecológica en el Nuevo Siglo, Guadalajara: Universidad de Guadalajara, 2018, pp. 89-108. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331273061_Perspectivas_de_la_economia_ecologica_en_el_nuevo_siglo.

BARKIN, D. Communities Constructing Their Own Alternatives in the Face of Crisis. Mountain Research and Development, n. 32, Suppl, 2012, p. S12–S22. https://www.mdpi.com/MRD-JOURNAL-D-11-00088.S1.

BARKIN, D. Innovaciones Mexicanas en el Manejo del Agua. México: Centro de Ecología y Desarrollo, 2001.

BARKIN, D. Superando el Paradigma Neoliberal: Desarrollo sustentable popular, En: GIARRACCA, N (comp.) ¿Una Nueva Ruralidad en América Latina?, Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 2000, pp. 81-99.

BARKIN, D.; ARMENTA, W.; CABRERA, D.; CARCAÑO, E.; PARRA, G. Capacidad social para la gestión del excedente la construcción de sociedades alternativas. En: NOVELO, F. (comp.) La UAM ante la Sucesión Presidencial, México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Xochimilco, División de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 2011, p. 543-557. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304542041_Capacidad_social_para_la_gestion_del_excedente_la_construccion_de_sociedades_alternativas.

BARKIN, D.; FUENTE, M.; ROSAS, M. Tradición e innovación: Aportaciones campesinas en la orientación de la innovación tecnológica para forjar sustentabilidad. Trayectorias, v.11, n.29, p. 39-54. http://trayectorias.uanl.mx/29/pdf/barkin_tradicion_e_inovacion.pdf.

BARKIN, D.; LEMUS, B. Soluciones Locales para la Justicia Ambiental. En: De Castro, F., Hogenboom, B.; Baud, M. (comps.) Gobernanza ambiental en América Latina. Buenos Aires: CLACSO, p. 297-329. http://www.clacso.org.ar/libreria-latinoamericana/libro_detalle.php?id_libro=941&orden=&pageNum_rs_libros=0&totalRows_rs_libros=910.

BARONNET, B.; MORA BAYO, M.; STAHLER-SHOLK, R. (eds.) Luchas “muy otras”. Zapatismo y autonomía en las comunidades indígenas de Chiapas. México: UAM-Xochimilco, CIESAS y Universidad Autónoma de Chiapas, 2011. https://zapatismoyautonomia.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/luchas-muy-otras-2011.pdf.

BARTRA, A.; OTERO, G. Movimientos indígenas campesinos en México: la lucha por la tierra, la autonomía y la democracia. En: Moyo, S.; Yeros, P. (eds.) Recuperando la tierra: El resurgimiento de movimientos rurales en África, Asia y América Latina, Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 2008, p. 401-428.

http://bibliotecavirtual.clacso.org.ar/ar/libros/sursur/moyo/18BarOt.pdf.

BASCHET, J. Resistencia, Rebelión, Insurrección. Conceptos y fenómenos fundamentales de nuestro tiempo. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales, 2012.

BEAUCAGE, P. Belleza, placer y sufrimiento: reflexiones sobre cuerpo y género entre los nahuas de la Sierra Norte de Puebla, Culturas y Representaciones Sociales, v.6, n.12, 165-196, 2012. http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/crs/article/download/30479/28292.

BENGOA, J. La emergencia indígena en América Latina. 3rd ed. Santiago: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2016.

BERKES, F. Sacred Ecology. 4th ed. Abington: Routledge, 2017.

BONFIL-BATALLA, G. México Profundo: Una Civilización Negada. México: Grijalbo, 1987.

BORRAS JR., S.; EDELMAN, M.; KAY, C. Transnational Agrarian Movements Confronting Globalization. London: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.

BORRINI-FEYERABEND, G.; PIMBERT, M.; FARVAR, T.; KOTHARI, A.; RENARD, Y. Sharing Power: Learning by Doing in Co-management of Natural Resources throughout the World. London: Earthscan, 2007.

http://www.iucn.org/themes/ceesp/Publications/sharingpower.htm#download.

BORSATTO, R.; SOUZA-ESQUERDO, V. MST’s experience in leveraging agroecology in rural settlements: lessons, achievements, and challenges. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, v.43, n.7-8, 2019, p. 915-935. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21683565.2019.1615024.

BOYCE, J.; NARAIN, S.; STANTON, E. (eds.) Reclaiming Nature: Environmental justice and ecological restoration, New York: Anthem, 2007.

CARCAÑO VALENCIA, E. Las mujeres indígenas en la Nueva Ruralidad Comunitaria (NRC) y su implicación en la generación de excedentes. El caso de la organización Masehualsihuamej Monsenyolchicahuanij. Tesis doctoral en Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, 2013.

CAYCEDO, J. El sujeto histórico en su complejidad. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 1999. http://www.cronicon.net/paginas/Documentos/No.39.pdf.

COALITION AGAINST LAND GRABBING (CALG). Defending Commons' Land and ICCAs. Palawan, Philippines: CALG, 2018. https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/16abfd_c3e762deb8ad41f1a64d139b95ab2e5c.pdf.

DELGADO, G. Coproducción de conocimiento, fractura metabólica y transiciones hacia territorialidades socio-ecológicas justas y resilientes. Polis. n.41, 2017. http://polis.revues.org/10957.

DESMARAIS, A.-A. La Vía Campesina: Globalization and the Power of Peasants. London: Pluto Press, 2007.

ENLACE ZAPATISTA. Que Retiemble En Sus Centros La Tierra, 2016.

http://enlacezapatista.ezln.org.mx/2016/10/14/que-retiemble-en-sus-centros-la-tierra/.

ENLACE ZAPATISTA. Falta lo que falta, 2018. http://enlacezapatista.ezln.org.mx/2018/05/02/falta-lo-que-falta/.

ESCOBAR, A.; DEMARIA, F.; KOTHARI, A.; SALLEH, A. (eds.) Pluriverse: The Post-Development Dictionary. Delhi: AuthosUpfront and Columbia University Press, 2019.

ESTEVA, G. Time to Enclose the Enclosers With Marx and Illich. The International Journal of Illich Studies, v.4, n.1, p.70-96, 2015.

ESTEVA, G. The Zapatistas and People’s Power, Capital & Class n. 68, 2015, p. 153-183. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/030981689906800108.

ESTEVA, G.; BABONES, S.; BABCICKY, P. The Future of Development: A radical manifesto. Bristol: Policy Press/Bristol University Press, 2013.

EZLN - Participación de la Comisión Sexta. El Pensamiento Crítico Frente a la Hidra Capitalista, V. 1. Mexico: UAM-Xochimilco, 2015.

FARRELL, K. Snow White and the Wicked Problems of the West. Science, Technology & Human Values, v.38, n.3, 2011, p. 334-361. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0162243910385796.

FENELON, J.; HALL, T. Revitalization and Indigenous Resistance to Globalization and Neoliberalism. American Behavioral Scientist, v.51, n.12, 2008, p. 1867-1901. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002764208318938.

FUNTOWICZ, S.; RAVETZ, J. La Ciencia Posnormal, Barcelona: Icaria, 2001.

GARNETT, S.; BURGESS, N.; FA, J.; FERNÁNDEZ-LLAMAZARES, A.; MOLNAR, Z.; ROBINSON, C. et al. A spatial overview of the global importance of Indigenous lands for conservation,” Nature Sustainability, v.1, n.7, 2018, p.369–374. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-018-0100-6.

GIBSON-GRAHAM, J.; CAMERON, J.; HEALY, S. Take Back the Economy: An Ethical Guide for Transforming Our Communities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2013.

GONZALES, T.; GONZÁLEZ, M. (eds.) Introduction: Indigenous peoples and autonomy in Latin America (Núm. especial), Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies, v.10, n.1, 2015 1-154.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17442222.2015.1034437.

HARVEY, D. ‘Listen, Anarchist!’ A personal response to Simon Springer’s ‘Why a radical geography must be anarchist.’ Dialogues in Human Geography, v.7, n.3, 2017, p.233-250. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2043820617732876.

HARVEY, D. Marxism, Metaphors, and Ecological Politics. Monthly Review, v.49, n.11, 17-31, 1998.

HUANACUNI MAMANI, F. Buen Vivir/Vivir Bien. Filosofía, políticas, estrategias y experiencias regionales andinas. Lima: CAOI, 2010. https://www.escrnet.org/sites/default/files/Libro%20Buen%20Vivir%20y%20Vivir%20Bien_0.pdf.

ILLICH, I. La Convivencialidad. 1973 http://clevercycles.com/tools_for_conviviality/.

KHADSE, A.; ROSSET, P. Zero Budget Natural Farming in India - from inception to institutionalization, Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, v.43, n.7-8, 2019, p.848-871. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21683565.2019.1608349.

KOVACH, M. Indigenous Methodologies: Characteristics, Conversations, and Contexts. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2009.

LANG, M.; KÖNIG, C-D.; REGELMANN, A-C. Alternatives in a World of Crisis: Seeking alternatives beyond development. Brussels: Rosa-Luxemburg Foundation, 2018. https://www.rosalux.eu/publications/alternatives-in-a-world-of-crisis/.

LENKERSDORF, C. Cosmovisiones. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 1998. https://alfarcolectivo.files.wordpress.com/2017/06/cosmovisiones.pdf.

LINSALATA, L. De la defensa del territorio maseual a la reinvención comunitario-popular de la política: crónica de una lucha, Estudios Latinoamericanos, n.40, 2017, p.117-136. http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rel/article/view/61595.

LITTLE, D. Marx on peasant consciousness, 2015. http://understandingsociety.blogspot.com/2015/09/marx-on-peasant-consciousness.html.

LÖNNQVIST, L Morral de experiencias para la seguridad y soberanía alimentarias: Aprendizajes de organizaciones civiles en el sureste mexicano. San Cristobál, Mexico y Santa Cruz, CA.: EcoSur/Community Agroecology Network, 2018.

MARTÍNEZ LUNA, J. Comunalidad y Desarrollo. Oaxaca: Conaculta-Culturas Populares e Indígenas y Centro de Apoyo al Movimiento Popular Oaxaqueño, A.C., 2003.

MARX, K. Reply to Vera Zasulich, 1881. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1881/zasulich/reply.htm

MARX, K.; Engels, F. Manifiesto Comunista, 1848. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch01.htm#007.

MEADOWS, D.; RANDERS, J.; MEADOWS, D. Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update. London: Earthscan, 2004.

NATIONS, J. Naming the Dragonfly: Why Indigenous languages matter in the 21st century. Langscape, v.5, n.1, 2016, p.20-24. https://medium.com/langscape-magazine/naming-the-dragonfly-why-indigenous-languages-matter-in-the-21st-century-885025c8cbc1.

O’CONNOR, J. Causas Naturales. Ensayos de marxismo ecológico. México: Siglo XXI, 2001.

OLDEKOP, J.; SIMS, K.; KARNA, B.; WHITTINGHAM, M.; AGRAWAL, A. Reductions in deforestation and poverty from decentralized forest management in Nepal, Nature Sustainability, v.2, 2019, p.421-428. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-019-0277-3.

PALERM, A. Obras hidráulicas prehispánicas en el sistema lacustre del Valle de México. México: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Centro de Investigaciones Superiores, Seminario de Etnohistoria del Valle de México, 1973.

PALERM, J. A comparative history, from the 16th to 20th centuries, of irrigation water management in Spain, Mexico, Chile, Mendoza (Argentina) and Peru, Water Policy, v.12, n.6, 2010, p.779-797. https://iwaponline.com/wp/article-abstract/12/6/779/19611/A-comparative-history-from-the-16th-to-20th?redirectedFrom=fulltext.

PETRAS, J.; VELTMEYER, H. (eds.) Extractive Imperialism in the Americas: Capitalism's New Frontier, Leiden, NL: Brill, 2014.

PETRAS, J.; VELTMEYER, H. Are Latin American peasant movements still a force for change? Some new paradigms revisited, Journal of Peasant Studies, v.28, n.2, 2001, p.83-118. https://tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03066150108438767?src=recsys.

PIMBERT, M. (ed.) Food Sovereignty, Agroecology and Biocultural Diversity: Constructing and contesting knowledge. London: Routledge, 2018.

POLANYI, K. La Gran Transformación: Los orígenes políticos y económicos de nuestros tiempos. México: Fondo de Cultura Económico 2003 [1944].

PORTO-GONCALVES, C. W. De Saberes y de Territorios: Diversidad y emancipación a partir de la experiencia latino-americana, Polis, v.8, n.22, 2009, p.121-136.

RODRÍGUEZ-WALLENIUS, C. (comp.) Defensa comunitaria del territorio en la zona central de México, Enfoques teóricos y análisis de experiencias. Mexico: Juan Pablos, 2010.

ROSSET, P.; VAL, V.; BARBOSA, L.; MCCUNE, N. Agroecology and La Vía Campesina II. Peasant agroecology schools and the formation of a socio-historical and political subject, Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, v.43, n.7-8, 2019, p.895-914. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21683565.2019.1617222?src=recsys

SAED. Rojava, Capitalism Nature Socialism, v.26, n.1, 2015, p.1-15. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10455752.2015.1006948.

SCOTT, J. Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985.

SERNA DE LA GARZA, M.; MARTÍNEZ GARCÉS, D. Integralidad en la responsabilidad social empresarial: caso de la cooperativa Tosepan Titataniske, Otra Economía, v.3, n.4, 2009, p.122-139. http://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/otraeconomia/article/view/1128/307.

SHATTUCK, A., SCHIAVONI, C.; VANGELDER, Z. The Politics of Food Sovereignty: Concept, Practice and Social Movements. London: Routledge, 2017.

SILVA-RIVERO, E.; VERGARA-TENORIO, M. DEL C.; RODRÍGUEZ-LUNA, E. (comps.) Casos Exitosos en la Construcción de Sociedades Sustentables. Xalapa, Veracruz: Universidad Veracruzana, 2017.

SMITH, L. T. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. 2nd ed. London: Zed Press, 2012.

SMITH, L. T. The Challenges of Kaupapa Maori Research in the 21st Century. Wellington, NZ: New Zealand Council for Educational Research, 2011. http://www.nzcer.org.nz/system/files/Hui_Procedings__v3_Web_1.pdf.

SMITH, N. The Revolutionary Imperative, Antipode, v.41, n.S1, 2011, p.50-65. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00716.x.

SOCLA. Declaración de la Sociedad Científica Latinoamericana de Agroecología sobre el II Simposio Internacional de Agroecología de la FAO: ampliación de la agroecología para contribuir a los objetivos de desarrollo sostenible, 2018. https://www.socla.co/blog/declaracion-de-la-sociedad-cientifica-latinoamericana-de-agroecologia-socla-sobre-el-ii-simposio-internacional-de-agroecologia-de-la-fao-ampliacion-de-la-agroecologia-para-contribuir-a-los-objetivo/.

STEVENS, C.; WINTERBOTTOM, R.; REYTAR, K.; SPRINGER, R. Securing Rights, Combating Climate Change: How Strengthening Community Forest Rights Mitigates Climate Change. Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute, 2014.

TOLEDO, V. Ecocidio en México. La batalla final es por la vida. México: Grijalbo, 2015.

TOLEDO, V.; BARRERA-BASSOLS, N. Political Agroecology in Mexico: A Path toward Sustainability, Sustainability, v.9, n.2, 2019, art. 268. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/268.

TOLEDO, V.; ESPEJEL-ORTIZ, B. México, Regiones que caminan hacia la sustentabilidad. Puebla: Universidad Iberoamericana, 2014.

VAL, V.; ROSSET, P.; ZAMORA LOMELI, C.; GIRALDO, O.; ROCHELEAU, D. Agroecology and La Vía Campesina I. The symbolic and material construction of agroecology through the dispositive of “peasant-to-peasant” processes, Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, v.43, n.7-8, 2019, p.872-894. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21683565.2019.1600099.

VERGARA-CAMUS, L. The MST and the EZLN Struggle for Land: New Forms of Peasant Rebellions, Journal of Agrarian Change, v.9, n.3, 2009, p.365-393. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1471-0366.2009.00216.x.

VILLORO, L. Sobre el concepto .de revolución, Revista del Centro de Estudios Constitucionales, n.11, 1992, p.277-290. (Madrid). http://www.cepc.gob.es/publicaciones/revistas/revistaselectronicas?IDR=15&IDN=1240&IDA=35439.

VILLORO, L. De la libertad a la comunidad. México: FCE-ITESM. Cuadernos de la Cátedra Alfonso Reyes, 2003.

WEN, T.; LAU, K.; CHENG, C.; QUI, J.; HE, H. Ecological Civilization, Indigenous Culture, and Rural Reconstruction in China, Monthly Review, v.63, n.9, 2012, p.29-44. http://monthlyreview.org/2012/02/01/ecological-civilization-indigenous-culture-and-rural-reconstruction-in-china/.

WILSON, S. Research is Ceremony. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing, 2009.

WOLF, E. R. Las Luchas Campesinas del Siglo XX. México: Siglo XXI editores, 1972.

WOLF, E. R. Europa y la Gente sin Historia. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1987.

WRENN, M.; WALLER, W. Care and the Neoliberal Individual. Journal of Economic Issues, v.52, n.2, 2017, p.495-502. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00213624.2017.1321438.

ZERMEÑO, S. Reconstruir a México en el Siglo XXI: Estrategias para mejorar la calidad de vida y enfrentar la destrucción del medio ambiente. México: Océano, 2015.

A Idéias utiliza a licença do Creative Commons (CC), preservando assim, a integridade dos artigos em ambiente de acesso aberto.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.