Banner Portal
CRITICAL STUDY OF OSWALDO CHATEAUBRIAND’S LOGICAL FORMS I CLE, UNICAMP, CAMPINAS, BRASIL 2001, 442pp., AND LOGICAL FORMS II, UNICAMP, CAMPINAS, BRASIL 2005
PDF

Palavras-chave

Philosophy. Oswaldo Chateaubriand's Logical Forms

Como Citar

HADDOCK, Guillermo E. Rosado. CRITICAL STUDY OF OSWALDO CHATEAUBRIAND’S LOGICAL FORMS I CLE, UNICAMP, CAMPINAS, BRASIL 2001, 442pp., AND LOGICAL FORMS II, UNICAMP, CAMPINAS, BRASIL 2005. Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia, Campinas, SP, v. 30, n. 1, p. 185–218, 2016. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8643515. Acesso em: 26 abr. 2024.

Resumo

In this critical study I try to highlight some of the most important issues discussed in Chateaubriand’s excellent book. In particular, I discuss in some detail Chateaubriand’s criticism of one of the icons of analytic philosophy, namely, Quine, as well as some of his own valuable contributions to philosophy in this book – for example, his refutation of the various forms of the slingshot argument and his characterization of logical truth.

 

PDF

Referências

BARWISE, J., PERRY, J. “Semantic Innocence and Uncompromising Situations”. In: P. A. French et al. (eds.) (1981), pp. 387-403.

CARNAP, R. Der logische Aufbau der Welt 1928, fourth edition. Hamburg:

Meiner, 1974.

FØLLESDAL, D. “Gödel and Husserl”. In: J. Hintikka (ed.) (1995), pp. 427-446.

FRENCH, P. A. et al. (eds.). Midwest Studies in Philosophy. Vol. 6: The

Foundations of Analytic Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota

Press, 1981.

HAUSER, K. “Gödel’s Program Revisited: Part I: The Turn to Phenomenology”. The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 12, n. 4, pp. 529-

, December 2006.

HILL, C. O., ROSADO HADDOCK, G. E. Husserl or Frege?: Meaning,

Objectivity and Mathematics. Chicago: Open Court 2000. Paperback

edition, 2003.

HUSSERL, E. Philosophie der Arithmetik 1891, mit ergänzenden Texten

(1890-1901). Den Haag: M. Nijhoff, 1970.

————. Logische Untersuchungen 1900-1901. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff,

(I) and 1984 (II).

————. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und einer hänomenologischen Philosophie I, 1913. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff, 1976.

HINTIKKA, J. (ed.). From Dedekind to Gödel. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1995.

ROSADO HADDOCK, G. E. “On Necessity and Existence”. Diálogos,

, pp. 57-62, July 1996.

————. “Chateaubriand on Logical Forms and Semantics”. Manuscrito, XXVII, n. 1, pp. 115-128, 2004.

————. “Kritische Fußnoten zu Bernulf Kanitscheiders Naturalismus Aufsatz”. Erwägen, Wissen, Ethik, 17, n. 3, pp. 351-353, 2006.

————. The Young Carnaps Unknown Master, forthcoming.

TIESZEN, R. “Gödel’s Path from the Incompleteness Theorems (1931)

to Phenomenology (1961)”. The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 4, n. 2, pp.

-203, June 1998.

VAN ATTEN, M., KENNEDY, J. “On the Philosophical Development of Kurt Gödel”. The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 9, n. 4, pp. 425-476, December 2003.

WANG, H. From Mathematics to Philosophy. London: Routledge, 1974.

————. Reflections on Kurt Gödel. Cambridge: Mass., The MIT Press,

————. A Logical Journey: From Gödel to Philosophy. Cambridge,

Mass., The MIT Press, 1996.

WEIDEMANN, H. “Aussagesatz und Sachverhalt: ein Versuch zur Neubestimmung ihres Verhältnisses”. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 18, pp. 75-99, 1982.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.