Banner Portal
Between Thinking and Acting Fichte’s Deduction of the Concept of Right
PDF (English)

Palavras-chave

Johann Gottlieb Fichte
Fundamentos do direito natural
Dedução
Certo
Moralidade

Como Citar

RAMSAUER, Laurenz. Between Thinking and Acting Fichte’s Deduction of the Concept of Right. Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia, Campinas, SP, v. 46, n. 2, p. 156–197, 2023. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8674115. Acesso em: 14 abr. 2024.

Resumo

O ambicioso projeto de Fichte na Fundamentação do direito natural é fornecer uma dedução a priori do conceito de direito independentemente da moralidade. Até o momento, as interpretações da dedução de Fichte do conceito de direito têm se enquadrado persistentemente em uma de duas categorias aproximadas: ou elas (re)interpretam a necessidade normativa do direito em termos de normatividade moral ou quase moral ou interpretam a necessidade normativa do direito em termos de imperativos hipotéticos. No entanto, cada uma dessas interpretações enfrenta dificuldades exegéticas significativas. Por outro lado, defendo que podemos entender a necessidade normativa do direito em termos de necessidade conceitual. Nessa visão, o direito não nos diz o que deve ser feito, mas, em vez disso, nos diz o que estamos fazendo e fizemos. Isso não apenas fornece uma descrição filosófica promissora da normatividade não moral do direito, mas também fornece uma leitura convincente do texto de Fichte tanto na dedução do conceito de direito nos Fundamentos do Direito Natural quanto em sua discussão sobre a aplicação do conceito de direito e coerção.

PDF (English)

Referências

Bobbio, Norberto, 1965, ‘Law and Force’, The Monist 49(3), pp. 321-341

Clarke, James, 2016, ‘Fichte’s Independence Thesis,’ in Fichte's Foundations of Natural Right. A Critical Guide, edited by Gabriel Gottlieb, Cambridge University Press, pp. 52-71

Clarke, James, 2020a, ‘Deduction of Right,’ in in The Bloomsbury Handbook of Fichte, edited by Marina Bykova, Bloomsbury, pp. 433-440

Clarke, James, 2020b, ‘Separation of Right from Morality,’ in, edited by Marina Bykova, Bloomsbury, pp. 441-448

Darwall, Stephen, 2013, ‘Fichte and the Second-Person Standpoint,’ in Honor, History, and Relationship: Essays in Second-Personal Ethics II, Oxford University Press, pp. 222-246

Darwall, Stephen, 2014, ‘Why Fichte’s Second-Personal Foundations can provide a More Adequate Account of the Relation of Right than Kant’s,’ Grazer Philosophische Studien 90, pp. 5-20

De Pascale, Carla, 2003, „Die Vernunft ist praktisch.“ Fichte’s Ethik und Rechtslehre im System, translated by Stefan Monhardt, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot (originally published 1995 as Etica e diritto. La filosofia practica di Fichte e le sue ascendenze kantiane, Bologna: il Mulino)

Erhard, Johann Benjamin, 1795, ‘Apologie des Teufels,’ Philosophisches Journal einer Gesellschaft Teutscher Gelehrten, Neu-Strelitz: Hof, pp. 105-40

Erhard, Johann Benjamin, 1795, Über das Recht des Volks zu einer Revolution, Jena and Leipzig: Gabler

Fichte, Johann Gottlieb, Hans Gliwitzky, Hans Jacob, Reinhard Lauth, Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1962-, J.G. Fichte-Gesamtausgabe der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Friedrich Frommann Verlag

Fichte, Johann Gottlieb, 1988, Fichte: Early Philosophical Writings, translated and edited by Daniel Breazeale, Ithaca: Cornell University Press

Fichte, Johann Gottlieb, 1992, Foundations of Transcendental Philosophy: Wissenschaftslehre (nova methodo) (first published 1796/99), edited and translated by Daniel Breazeale, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press

Fichte, Johann Gottlieb, 1996, ‘Reclamation of the Freedom of Thought from the Princes of Europe, Who Have Oppressed It Until Now (1793),’ translated by Thomas E. Wartenberg, in What Is Enlightenment? Eighteenth-Century Answers and Twentieth-Century Questions, edited by James Schmidt, University of California Press, pp. 119-141

Fichte, Johann Gottlieb, 2000, Foundations of Natural Right according to the Principles of the Wissenschaftslehre, edited by Frederick Neuhouser, translated by Michael Baur, Cambridge University Press [FNR]

Fichte, Johann Gottlieb, 2005, The System of Ethics according to the Principles of the Wissenschaftslehre, translated and edited by Daniel Breazeale and Günter Zöller, Cambridge University Press [SE]

Fichte, Johann Gottlieb, 2021, Contribution to the Correction of the Public’s Judgments on the French Revolution, translated and edited by Jeffrey Church and Anna Marisa Schön, Albany: SUNY Press

Franks, Paul, 2005, All or Nothing: Systematicity, Transcendental Arguments, and Skepticism in German Idealism, Harvard University Press

Franks, Paul, 2006, ‘The Discovery of the Other: Cavell, Fichte, and skepticism,’ in Reading Cavell, edited by Alice Crary and Sanford Shieh, London: Routledge, pp. 166-203

Gottlieb, Gabriel, 2018, ‘A Family Quarrel: Fichte’s Deduction of Right and Recognition,’ in Kant and his German Contemporaries Volume II: Aesthetics, History, Politics, and Religion, edited by Daniel Dahlstrom, Cambridge University Press, pp. 170-192

James, David, 2016, ‘Fichte on Personal Freedom and the Freedom of Others,’ in Fichte's Foundations of Natural Right. A Critical Guide, edited by Gabriel Gottlieb, Cambridge University Press, pp. 177-195

Kelsen, Hans, 1934, ‘La Méthode et la Notion Fondamentale de la Théorie Pure du Droit’ Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 41(2), pp. 183-204.

Kletzer, Christoph, 2013, ‘Primitive Law,’ Jurisprudence 4(2), pp. 263-272

Kletzer, Christoph, 2018, The Idea of a Pure Theory of Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing

Kersting, Wolfgang, 2001, “Die Unabhängigkeit des Rechts von der Moral (Einleitung),” in Johann Gottlieb Fichte, Grundlage des Naturrechts, edited by Jean-Christophe Merle, Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 21-37

Kosch, Michelle, 2017, ‘Individuality and Rights in Fichte’s Ethics,’ Philosopher’s Imprint 17(12), pp. 1-23

Kosch, Michelle, 2021, ‘Fichte on Summons and Self-Consciousness,’ Mind 130(517), pp. 215-249

McNulty, Jacob, 2016, ‘Transcendental Philosophy and Intersubjectivity: Mutual Recognition as a Condition for the Possibility of Self‐Consciousness in Sections 1-3 of Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right,’ European Journal of Philosophy 24(4), pp. 788-810

Nance, Michael, 2012, ‘Recognition, Freedom, and the Self in Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right,’ European Journal of Philosophy 23(3), pp. 608-632

Nance, Michael, 2016, ‘Freedom, Coercion, and the Relation of Right,’ in Fichte's Foundations of Natural Right. A Critical Guide , edited by Gabriel Gottlieb, Cambridge University Press, pp. 196-217

Nance, Michael, 2021, ‘Fichte’s First Principle of Right,’ Fichte-Studien 49, pp. 248-266

Neuhouser, Frederick, 1994, ‘Fichte and the Relation between Right and Morality,’ in Fichte: Historical Context/Contemporary Controversies, edited by Daniel Breazeale and Tom Rockmore, Humanities Press, pp. 158-80

Neuhouser, Frederick, 2000, ‘Introduction,’ in Fichte, Foundations of Natural Right according to the Principles of the Wissenschaftslehre , edited by Frederick Neuhouser, translated by Michael Baur, Cambridge University Press, pp. vii-xxviii

Neuhouser, Frederick, 2016, ‘Fichte’s Separation of Right from Morality,’ inFichte's Foundations of Natural Right. A Critical Guide , edited by Gabriel Gottlieb, Cambridge University Press, pp. 32-51

Nomer, Nedim, 2010, ‘Fichte and the Relationship between Self-Positing and Rights,’ Journal of the History of Philosophy, 48(3), pp. 469-490

Nomer, Nedim, 2020, ‘Are There Any Moral Rights for Fichte?’ in The Bloomsbury Handbook of Fichte, edited by Marina Bykova, Bloomsbury, pp. 449-455

Renaut, Alain, 1986, Le système du Droit: Philosophie et Droit dans la Pensée de Fichte, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France

Renaut, Alain, 1992, ‘Fichte: Le Droit Sans Morale?‘ Archives de Philosophie 55(2), pp. 221-242

Siep, Ludwig, 1979, Anerkennung als Prinzip der praktischen Philosophie: Untersuchungen zu Hegels Jenaer Philosophie des Geistes, Freiburg: Karl Alber

Siep, Ludwig, 1992a, ‘Naturrecht und Wissenschaftslehre,’ in Fichte’s Lehre vom Rechtsverhältnis: Die Deduktion der §§1-4 der Grundlage des Naturrechts und ihre Stellung in der Rechtsphilosophie, edited by Michael Kahlo, Ernst A. Wolff und Rainer Zaczyk , Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, pp. 71-91

Siep, Ludwig, 1992b, Praktische Philosophie im Deutschen Idealismus, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp

Ware, Owen, 2009, ‘Fichte’s Voluntarism,’ European Journal of Philosophy 18(2), pp. 262-282

Williams, Robert, 2002, ‘The Displacement of Recognition by Coercion in Fichte’s Grundlage des Naturrechts,’ in New Essays on Fichte’s Later Jena Wissenschaftslehre, edited by Daniel Breazeale and Tom Rockmore, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, pp. 47-64

Wood, Allen, 1990, Hegel’s Ethical Thought, Cambridge University Press

Wood, Allen, 2016a, Fichte’s Ethical Thought, Oxford University Press

Wood, Allen, 2016b, ‘Deduction of the Summons and the Existence of Other Rational Beings,’ in Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right: A Critical Guide, edited by Gabriel Gottlieb, Cambridge University Press, pp. 72-91

Creative Commons License

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.