Banner Portal
Some comments regarding frege’s criterion of correct indirect speech report in the indexical point of view
PDF

Keywords

Indirect speech report
Semantic content
Context
Thought
Speaker's role

How to Cite

BARBOSA, Eduarda Calado. Some comments regarding frege’s criterion of correct indirect speech report in the indexical point of view. Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy, Campinas, SP, v. 45, n. 3, p. 6–19, 2023. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8672868. Acesso em: 26 sep. 2024.

Abstract

Bozickovic’s The Indexical Point of View is a richly informative and solid philosophical work about the problem of cognitive significance involving indexical thoughts and expressions. Although I tend to agree with most of what is said in the book, here I will make some comments on two minor correlated points regarding Bozickovic’s Fregean account of indirect speech reports (or ISRs). After presenting some of the author's ideas about reports, I will claim that the tracking and updating involved in ISRs is of a complex kind that requires attention to the role played by speech reporters and their audiences. Following that, I will hold that a general theory of correct ISR strictly in Fregean terms (as Bozickovic’s) fails to account for that - at least directly.

PDF

References

BORG, E. “Explanatory roles for minimal contente”. Noûs, v. 53, n. 3, p. 513-539, 2019.

BOZICKOVIC, V. The Indexical Point of View: On Cognitive Significance and Cognitive Dynamics Routledge, 2020.

CAPPELEN, H.; LEPORE, E. “On an alleged connection between indirect speech and the theory of meaning”. Mind & Language, v. 12, n. 3‐4, p. 278-296, 1997.

CAPPELEN, H.; LEPORE, E. Insensitive semantics: A defense of semantic minimalism and speech act pluralism John Wiley & Sons, 2008.

CARSTON, R. ‘Truth-conditional content and conversational implicature”. The semantics/pragmatics distinction, p. 65-100, 2004.

CHAPMAN, S. Paul Grice: philosopher and linguist Springer, 2005.

FREGE, G. 1918/1977. Thoughts. In Geach, P. T. (ed.), Logical Investigations Oxford: Blackwell, 1977, pp. 1-30.

KAPLAN. D. “Demonstratives”. Em J. Among, J. Perry, and H. Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 481-563, 1989.

PERRY, J. "Frege on demonstratives." Philosophical Review 86, 47497; reprinted in Perry (1997) p. 325 (page numbers refer to this printing), 1977.

PERRY, J. The Problem of the Essential Indexical and Other essays Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.

PERRY, J. Reference and reflexivity Stanford: CSLI, 2001.

RECANATI, F. Literal Meaning Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004a.

RECANATI, F. ‘What is said’ and the Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction. Em C. Bianchi (ed.), pp. 45-64, 2004b.

RECANATI, F. Literalism and Contextualism: Some Varieties. Em Gerhard Preyer & Georg Peter (eds.), Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning and Truth Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.171-96, 2005.

RECANATI, F. On truth-conditional Pragmatics Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2010.

SAINSBURY, R. M. Departing from Frege: Essays in the Philosophy of Language Londres: Routlegde, 2002.

STRAWSON, Peter F. “On referring”. Mind, v. 59, n. 235, p. 320-344, 1950.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.