Banner Portal
Ideological classification of informational sources
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Communication
Hybrid media system
Political parallelism

How to Cite

JÚNIOR, Marcelo Alves dos Santos; ALBUQUERQUE, Afonso de. Ideological classification of informational sources: political parallelism in the analysis of the multiparty media attention model in Brazil. Opinião Pública, Campinas, SP, v. 30, p. e3016, 2024. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8676890. Acesso em: 17 jul. 2024.

Abstract

This article contributes to political communication research by proposing an ideological classification of information sources according to multiparty attention in Brazil. To do this, we reproduced the methodology for classifying multiparty media attention on Twitter (Benkler; Faris; Roberts, 2018; Giglietto et al., 2019). We extracted an original database of 2.95 million tweets, posted between 2019 and 2020 by 1,346 users. The results point to a more complex reality than the classic concept of political parallelism describes. Most of the sources of information distribute their attention among various party groups. Insular sites are cited less often and reproduce broader political-ideological identities, without an exclusive party alignment or audience. Finally, we discuss the implications of the results for the theory of political parallelism.

PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

ARTERO, J. P. Political parallelism and media coalitions in Western Europe, [online]. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford, 2015. Disponível em:<https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/political-parallelism-and-media-coalitionswestern-europe>. Acesso em: 15 fev. 2024.

ALBUQUERQUE, A. Political Parallelism. In: ORNEBRING, H. (Org.). The Oxford Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 1338-1351, 2020.

ALBUQUERQUE, A.; MAGALHÃES, E.; ALVES, M. "Ciberativismo no Brasil". Cadernos Adenauer, vol. 15, nº 3, p. 75-95, 2015. Disponível em:<https://www.kas.de/documents/265553/265602/7_file_storage_file_16508_5.pdf/08acce75-2be3-963a-0a2e-ed5340f846da>. Acesso em: 15 fev. 2024.

ALVES, M. “Campanha não oficial – A Rede Antipetista na eleição de 2014”. Revista Fronteiras–Estudos Midiáticos, vol. 19, nº 1, 2017. Disponível em:<https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317051613_Campanha_nao_oficial_-A_Rede_Antipetista_na_eleicao_de_2014>. Acesso em: 05 mai. 2024.

ALVES, M. "As Flutuações de Longo Prazo da Polarização no Brasil–Análise do Compartilhamento de Informações Políticas Entre 2011 e 2019". Dados, vol. 66, nº 2, 2022. Disponível em:<https://www.scielo.br/j/dados/a/R7CjTc36wwQ8JRqJXD3qTRt/>. Acesso em: 15 fev.2024.

AZEVEDO, F. "PT, eleições e editoriais da grande imprensa (1989-2014)". Opinião Pública, vol. 24, nº2, p. 270-290, 2018. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8653385>. Acesso em: 11 abr.2020.

BENKLER, Y.; FARIS, R.; ROBERTS, H. Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.

BIMBER, B. “The Internet and political transformation: Populism, community, and accelerated pluralism”. Polity, vol. 31, nº 1, p. 133–160, 1998. Disponível em:<https://www.jstor.org/stable/3235370?seq=1>. Acesso em: 15 fev. 2024.

BORGES, A.; VIDIGAL, R. “Do lulismo ao antipetismo? Polarização, partidarismo e voto nas eleições presidenciais brasileiras”. Opinião Pública, vol. 24, nº 1, p. 53-89, 2018. Disponível em:<https://www.scielo.br/j/op/a/pVWZC8RnnP6d3pnQKygCPRg/>. Acesso em: 11 abr. 2020.

BLUMLER, J. G.; GUREVITCH, M. The Crisis of Public Communication. London: Routledge, 1995.

CHADWICK, A. The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.

COOK, T. E. Governing with the News: The News Media as a Political Institution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.

DALTON, R. “Modeling ideological polarization in democratic party systems”. Electoral Studies, vol.72, 102346, p.1-10, 2021. Disponível em: <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261379421000652>. Acesso em: 29 abr.2024.

ENGELMANN, F. “Julgar a política, condenar a democracia? Justiça e crise no Brasil”. Conjuntura Austral, vol. 7, nº 37, p. 9-16, 2016. Disponível em:<https://seer.ufrgs.br/ConjunturaAustral/article/view/66030 >. Acesso em: 11 abr. 2020.

GIGLIETTO, F., et al. “Multi-party media partisanship attention score. Estimating partisan attention of news media sources using Twitter data in the lead-up to 2018 Italian election”. Comunicazione politica, vol. 20, nº 1, p. 85-108, 2019. Disponível em:https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.3270/93030>. Acesso em: 11 abr. 2020.

HALLIN, D. C. “Mediatisation, neoliberalism and populisms: the case of Trump”. Contemporary Social Science vol. 14, nº 1, p. 14-25, 2019.

HALLIN, D. C.; MANCINI, P. Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

IBEANU, O. “Ethnicity and Transition to Democracy in Nigeria: Explaining the Passing of Authoritarian Rule in Multi-ethnic Society”. African Journal of Political Science, vol. 5, nº 2, p. 45-65, 2000.

LAWSON, K. When linkage fails. In: LAWSON, K.; MERKL, P. (Orgs.). When parties fail: Emerging alternative organizations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, p. 14–47, 1988.

LEVITSKY, S.; ZIBLATT, D. Como as Democracias Morrem. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2020.

LIJPHART, A. Modelos de Democracia. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 2003.

LYCARIÃO, D. MAIA, R. “A COP-15 sob holofotes mediáticos: modos e níveis de intervenção política do jornalismo no sistema de mídia brasileiro”. E-Compós, vol. 18, n° 1, p. 1-17, 2015. Disponível em:<https://doi.org/10.30962/ec.1096>. Acesso em: 11 abr. 2020.

MAIR, P. Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy. Londres: Verso, 2013.

MAGALHÃES CARVALHO, E.; ALBUQUERQUE, A.; ALVES, M. “Brazilian Blogosfera Progressista: digital vanguards in dark times”. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, vol. 18, nº 1, p. 219-235, 2020. Disponível em:<https://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/1126>. Acesso em: 15 fev. 2024.

MESSING, S.; VAN KESSEL, P.; HUGHES, A. “Sharing the news in a polarized congress”, [online]. Pew Research Center, 2017. Disponível em:<https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2017/12/18/sharing-the-news-in-a-polarized-congress/>.Acesso em: 29 abr. 2024.

MEYER, E. “Judges and Courts Destabilizing Constitutionalism: The Brazilian Judiciary Branch’s Political and Authoritarian Character”. German Law Journal, vol. 19, nº 4, p. 727-768, 2018. Disponível em: <https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/german-law-journal/article/judges-andcourts-destabilizing-constitutionalism-the-brazilian-judiciary-branchs-political-and-authoritariancharacter/5F9FE75C31AE0F4F7FC0736380009A21>. Acesso em: 02 mai. 2024.

NECHUSTAI, E. “From liberal to polarized liberal? Contemporary U.S. news in Hallin and Mancini’s typology of news systems”. The International Journal of Press/Politics, vol. 23, nº 2, p. 183–201, 2018. Disponível em: <https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1940161218771902>. Acesso em: 15 fev. 2024.

PIAIA, V.; ALVES, M. “Abrindo a caixa preta: análise exploratória da rede bolsonarista no WhatsApp”. Intercom: Revista Brasileira de Ciências da Comunicação, vol. 43, p. 135-154, 2020. Disponível em: <https://www.scielo.br/j/interc/a/JB3zHccN7KnHJXTwsRj8WjF/>. Acesso em: 24 abr. 2024.

PIMENTEL, P.; MARQUES, F. P. J. “De-Westernizing Media Parallelism: How Editorial Interests Unfold During Impeachment Crises”. Journalism Studies, vol. 22, nº 3, p. 282-304, 2021. Disponível em: <https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1867000>. Acesso em: 15 fev. 2024.

PRIOR, M. “Media and political polarization”. Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 16, p. 101-127, 2013. Disponível em:https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242>. Acesso em: 11 abr. 2020.

SALAMEY, I. “Failing Consociationalism in Lebanon and Integrative Options”. International Journal of Peace Studies, vol. 14, nº 2, p. 83-105, 2009.

SAMUELS, D. “Presidentialized Parties: The Separation of Powers and Party Organization and Behavior”. Comparative Political Studies, vol. 35, nº4, p. 461-483, 2002.

SANTOS, D.; MARQUES, F.; FONTES, G. “Political journalism between news and opinion: a comparative study of the 2018 Brazilian presidential elections”. Brazilian Journalism Research, vol. 16, nº 1, p. 122-151, 2020. Disponível em: <https://bjr.sbpjor.org.br/bjr/article/view/1264>. Acesso em: 11 abr. 2020

SANTOS, M.; VALENZUELA, S. Changing Media Landscapes and Political Participation. In: GRASSO, M.; GIUGNI, M. (Orgs.). Oxford Handbook of Political Participation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p.841-857, 2021.

SARTORI, G. Parties and Party Systems: a framework for analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.

SCHUDSON, M. Discovering the News: A Social History of American Newspapers. New York: Basic Books, 1978.

SEYMOUR-URE, C. The political impact of mass media. London: Constable, 1974.

SOLANO, E. “Crise da democracia e extremismos de direita”. Análise Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, vol. 42, nº 1, p. 1-27, 2018. Disponível em: <https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/brasilien/14508.pdf>. Acesso em: 11 abr. 2020.

STROUD, N. Niche news: The politics of news choice. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.

VAN AELST, P., et al. “Political communication in a high-choice media environment: a challenge for democracy?”. Annals of the International Communication Association, vol. 41, nº 1, p. 3-27, 2017. Disponível em: <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551>. Acesso em: 11 abr. 2020.

VAN DER PAS, D.; VAN DER BRUG, W.; VLIEGENTHART, R. “Political parallelism in media and political agenda-setting”. Political Communication, vol. 34, nº 4, p. 491–510, 2017.

YGLESIAS, M. “The case for Fox News studies”. Political Communication, vol. 35, nº 4, p. 681–683, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10584609.2018.1477532> Acesso em: 11 abr. 2020.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Opinião Pública

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.