Banner Portal
Problem-solving and coordination-governance: advances in a competence-based perspective on the theory of the firm
PDF (English)


Capacidades organizacionais. Competências. Rotinas. Conhecimento tecnológico. Resolução de problemas.

Como Citar

CORIAT, B.; DOSI, G. Problem-solving and coordination-governance: advances in a competence-based perspective on the theory of the firm. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, Campinas, SP, v. 1, n. 1, p. 49–84, 2009. DOI: 10.20396/rbi.v1i1.8648852. Disponível em: Acesso em: 9 dez. 2023.


O artigo baseia-se nas conclusões de um projeto (Dynacom), apoiado pela União Européia, sobre a natureza e a dinâmica das competências e capacitações organizacionais. Tal análise busca identificar as relações entre estas competências e capacitações e as várias formas de conhecimento incorporado nas organizações. Em segundo lugar, o artigo compara a visão da firma centrada sobre as capacitações (visão baseada em recursos) com outras abordagens – que incluem a abordagem tradicional da teoria do agente principal e a economia dos custos de transação. Finalmente, são apresentadas algumas implicações de política.
PDF (English)


Amable, B. (2000). “Institutional Complementarity and Diversity of Social Systems of Innovation and Production”, Review of International Political Economy (forthcoming), 2000.

Andreassen, L., B.; Coriat, F.; Den Hartog; R. Kaplinsky (eds.), Europe’s Next Step – Organizational Innovation, Competition and Employment, London: Ed. Frank Cass, 1995.

Archibugi, D.; M. Pianta, The technological Specialization of Advanced Countries, Dorthrecht, Kluwer, 1992.

Balconi, M. (B). “Codification of technological knowledge, firm boundaries, and ‘cognitive’ barriers to entry”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 2000.

Ballantine, B.; S. Thomas Benchmarking the Competitiveness of Biotechnology in Europe, Business Decisions Ltd., 1997.

Breschi, S.;F. Malerba (B)., “Diversification and Specialisation in Innovative Activities: An Analysis of Patenting Activity of Electronic Firms”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 1999.

Cantwell, J.; L. Piscitello (B). “Accumulating technological competence – its changing impact on corporate diversification and internationalisation”, DYNACOM Working Paper.; a revised version is published in Industrial and Corporate Change, (2000), vol. 9, nº 1, p. 21-51, 1999a.

Castellani, D.; A. Zanfei, (B), “Multinational experience, absorptive capacity and knowledge exploitation. A comparative analysis of the electronics and chemical industries”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 1999.

Cefis, E., (B). “Persistence in Profitability and in Innovative Activities. Comparison between European, US and Japanese firms”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 1999.

Cockburn, I.; R. Henderson (A). “Measuring Competence? Exploring Firms Effects in Drug Discovery”, in Dosi et al. (eds.), 2000.

Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, Funding a Revolution: Government support for Computing Research, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999.

Conner, K.R.; C.K. Prahalad , “A resource-based theory of the firm: knowledge vs. Opportunism”, Organization Science, v. 7, p. 477-501, 1996.

Connerade, J-P. , “European Science Policy: just where is it going?”, Euroscience News, n.o 10, January: 1, 2000.

Coriat, B., L’innovation Organisationnelle dans les Firmes Européennes – Nature, Diffusion, Performances- Premiers Jalons, Rapport pour la DG-III, Document CREI, Université Paris, v. 13, 1998.

Coriat, B., “The ‘Abominable Ohno Production System’. Competences, Monitoring, and Routines in Japanese Production Systems”, in Dosi et al. (eds.), 2000 (A).

Coriat, B.; “Compétences, Structures de Gouvernance et Rente Relationnelle. Le Cas de la Conception des Grands Projets Complexes”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 2000a (B)

Coriat, B., “Organisational nnovation in European irms: A Critical Overview of the Survey Evidence”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 2000b (B)

Coriat, B., “The State of Organisational Reform in the European Firms. Evidence From a Comparative Overview of Ten EU Countries”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 2000c (B).

Coriat, B.; Dosi, G., “Learning How To Govern and Learning How To Solve Problems : on the Co-Evolution of Competences, Conflicts and Organizational Routines”, in Chandler, Jr.,A.D.; Hagström, P. ; Sölvell, Ö. (eds.) 1998, The Dynamic Firm, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998a.

Coriat, B.; Weinstein, O. “Firms and Institutions in the Innovation Generation. Towards a Theory of ‘Corporate Systems of Innovation’ ”. Paper prepared for the Druid Conference on National Innovation Systems, Industrial Dynamics, and Innovation Policy, Rebild, Denmark, p. 9-12 jun., 1999.

Dalton, D., M. Serapio and P. Yoshida Globalizing Industrial Research and Development, U.S Department of Commerce, Washington, 1999.

Dalum, B. ; Freeman, C.; Simonetti, R.; Tunzelman, N.V.; Verspagen, B. “Europe and the Information and Communication Technologies Revolution”, in Fagerberg, P. Guerrieri and B. Verspagen (eds.) 1999.

David, P.A., “Why are Institutions ‘the Carriers’ of History? Path-dependence and the Evolution of Conventions, Organizations and Institutions”, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, v. 5, n°2, 1994.

Dierickx, I.; Cool, K., “Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage’, Management Science v. 35, p. 1504-1511, 1989.

Dosi, G., “Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories. A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change”, Research Policy, v. 11, p. 147-162, 1982.

Dosi, G., “Opportunities, Incentives and the Collective Patterns of Technological Change”, Economic Journal, v. 107:144, p. 1530-1548, 1997.

Dosi, G., “Some Notes on National Systems of Innovation and Production, and their Implications for Economic Analysis”, in Archibugi D., Howells, J.; Michie, J. (eds.), Innovation Policy in a Global Economy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 35-48, 1999.

Dosi, G., Coriat, B.; Pavitt, K. , “Competences, Capabilities and Corporate Performances”. Dynacom Project, 2002.

Dosi, G., Egidi M., “Substantive and Procedural Uncertainty. An Exploration of Economic Behaviours in Changing Environments”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1991.

Dosi, G., Marengo, L., “Some Elements of an Evolutionnary Theory of Organizational Competences”, in England, R. W. (ed.), Evolutionary Concepts in Contemporary Economics, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1994.

Dosi, G.,; “On the Tangled Discourse between Transaction Costs 80 Revista Brasileira de Inovação Economics and Competence-based Views of the Firm: Some Comments”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 1999 (B).

Edquist, C. (ed.), Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, London: Pinter, 1997.

European Union. Second European Report on Science and Technology Indicators, Brussels, European Commission, Report EUR 17639, 1997.

Fagerberg, J.; Guerrieri, P.; Verspagen, B. (eds.). The Economic Challenge for Europe. Adapting to Innovation Based Growth, Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1999.

Florida, R. (1999). “The Role of the Universities: Leveraging Talent not Technology”, Issues in Science and Technology Online,

Florida, R.; Kenney, M., “Transfer and Replication of Organizational Capabilities”, in Dosi et al. (eds.), 2000 (A).

Fontagné, M., Freudenberg, M.; Ünal-Kesenci, D. “La spécialisation technologique des pays Européens”, in Delapierre, I., Ph.; Moati, El M. Mouhoud (eds.), Connaissance et Mondialisation, Economica, Paris, 2000.

Freeman, C., The Economics of Industrial Innovation, London: Pinter, 2a. edn., 1982.

Fujimoto T., “Evolution of Manufacturing Systems and Ex Post Dynamic Capabilities’, in Dosi et al. (eds.) 2000 (A).

Gambardella, A.; Torrisi, S., (2000)(B). “The Economic Value of Knowledge and Inter-firm Technological Linkages: An Investigation of Science-Based Firms”, DYNACOM Working Paper., 2000 (B).

Giarratana, M.; Torrisi, S., “Competence Accumulation and Collaborative Ventures: Evidence from the Largest European Electronics Firms and Implications for the EU Technological Policies’, DYNACOM Working Paper. 2000 (B).

Grant, R.M., Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Concepts, Techniques, Applications, 2ª edn. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell, 1995.

Grant, R.M., “Toward a Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm”, Strategic Management Journal, v. 17 (Winter special issue): p. 109-122, 1996.

Hanke, B. “Varieties of Capitalism Revisited. Globalisation and Comparative Institutional Advantage”, La Lettre de la Régulation, Paris, September, n°30, 1999.

Hughes, T. P., American Genesis: a Century of Invention and Technological Enthousiasm, Penguin Books, 1990.

Ichniowski, C.; Levine, D.; Olsen, C.; Strauss, G. (eds.) The American. Workplace Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

Jansen, M.; Landesmann, M., “European Competitiveness: Quality Rather than Price”, in Fagerberg, J., Guerrieri, P.; Verspagen, B. (eds.) 1999.

Kogut, B.; Zander, U. “Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology”, Organizations Science, v. 3: p. 383-97, 1992.

Kogut, B.; , “Knowledge, Market Failure and the Multinational Enterprise: a Reply”, Journal of International Business Studies, 1995.

Koumpis, K.; Pavitt, K., “Corporate Activities in Speech Recognition and Natural Language: Another ‘New-Science’ – Based Technology”, International Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 3, p. 335-336, 1999.

Levinthal, D., “Organizational Capabilities in Complex Worlds”, in Dosi et al. (eds.) 2000 (A).

Lhuillery, S. “The Organizational Practices of Innovation and the Performances of Firms: An Empirical Investigation”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 2000 (B).

Lorenz, E.; Lazaric, N., “The Transfer of Competences to European-Based Japanese Affiliates”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 1999 (B).

Lundvall, B. Å. (ed.), National Systems of Innovation, London: Pinter, 1992.

Madhok, A. “‘The Organization of Economic Activity: Transaction Costs, Firm Capabilities and the Nature of Governance”, Organization Science, v. 7, p. 577-90, 1996.

Mahdi, S.; Pavitt, K., “Key National Factors in the Emergence of Computational Chemistry Firms”, International Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 1: p. 355-386, 1997.

March, J.G., A Primer on Decision Making, New York: Free Press, 1994.

March, J.G.; Simon, H. A., Organizations, 2a. edn., Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1993.

Marengo L.; Dosi, G.; Legrenzi, P.; Pasquali, C., “The Structure of Problem-Solving Knowledge and the Structure of Organisations”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 2000 (B).

Marsili, O., “Techological Regimes: Theory and Evidence”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 1999 (B).

Metcalfe, J. S., “Evolutionary Economics and Technology Policy”, Economic Journal, v. 104: p. 931-44, 1994.

Miyazaki, K., Building Competences in the Firm: Lessons from Japanese and European Optoelectronics, New York: St. Martin Press, 1995.

Mowery, D.; Nelson, R.; Sampat. B.; Ziedonis, A., “The effects of the Bayh-Dole Act on US Academic research and technology transfer”, Research Policy, (forthcoming), 2000.

Muldur, U., “L’allocation des capitaux dans le processus global d’innovation estelle optimale en Europe?”, in Cohen, E.; Lorenzi, J. H. (eds.), Politiques Industrielles pour l’Europe, Paris, Cahiers du Conseil d’Analyse Economique, Premier Ministre, La Documentation Française, 2000.

Nelson, R. R. “Why do Firms Differ, and Does it Matter ?”, Strategic Management Journal, v. 12:61-74, 1991.

Nelson, R. R. (ed.), National Systems of Innovation: a Comparative Study, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.

Nelson, R. R.; Winter, S.G., An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.

Niosi, J., “Introduction: the Internationalisation of Industrial R & D: From Technology Transfer to the Learning Organisation”, Research Policy, v. 28: 107-117, 1999.

Orsenigo, L., The Emergence of Biotechnology, New York: St. Martin Press, 1989.

Orsenigo, L.; Pammolli, F.; Riccaboni, M. “Competencies, Technological Change and Network Dynamics. The Case of the Bio-pharmaceutical Industry”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 1999 (B).

Orsi, F.; Ph. Moatti. “Les nouvelles relations Science et Industrie dans le domaine du Génome Humain : Vers un nouveau Statut de la Connaissance”, under revision for Economie et Prévisions, 2001.

OST (L’Observatoire des Sciences et des Techniques)(2000). Science et Technologie Indicateurs, Economica, Paris, 2000.

Patel, P.; Pavitt, K., “The Wide (and Increasing) Spread of Technological Competences in the World’s Largest Firms: a Challenge to Conventional Wisdom”, in Chandler, A. D., Jr.; Hagström. P.; Sölvell, Ö. (eds.), The Dynamic Firm, Oxford University Press, 1998a.

Patel, P.; Pavitt, K., “Uneven (and divergent) Technological Accumulation among Advances Countries. Evidence and a Framework of Explanation”, in Dosi, G.; Teece, D. J.; Chytry, J., Technology, Organization and Competitiveness Perspectives on Industrial Corporate Change, Oxford University Press, (1998b).

Patel, P., “How Technological Competencies Help Define the Core of the Firm”, in Dosi et al. (eds.) 2000 (A).

Pavitt, K., “Academic Research in Europe”, Working Paper, SPRU, 2000a.

Pavitt, K., “Public Policies to Support Basic Research: What can the rest of the world learn from US theory and practice? (And what they should not learn)”, Working Paper, SPRU, 2000b.

Penrose, E., The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, New York: Wiley, 1959.

Peterson, J.; Sharp, M., Technology Policy in the European Union, Macmillan, Basingstoke, 1998.

Pisano, G. P., “In Search of Dynamic Capabilities”, in Dosi et al. (eds.), 2000 (A).

Porter, M. E., “What is strategy?”, Harvard Business Review, 1996.

Rosenberg, N., Inside the Blackbox, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

Rumelt, R.; Schendel, D.; Teece, D., “Strategic management and economics”, Strategic Management Journal, v. 12: 5-29, 1991.

Soskice, D. German Technology Policy, Innovation, and National Institutional Frameworks, Berlin, WZB Discussion Paper, FS I 96-319, 1996.

Soskice, D. “Divergent Production Regimes: Coordinated and Uncoordinated Market Economies in the 1980s and 1990s”, in Kitschelt, H.; Lange, P.; Marks, G.; Stephens, J.D. (eds.), Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

Stalk, G.; Evans, P.; Shulman, L. E., “Competing on Capabilities : the New Rules of Corporate Strategy”, Harvard Business Review, March-April : 57-69, 1992.

Teece, D.; Rumelt, R.; Dosi, G.; Winter, S., “Understanding Corporate Coherence: Theory and Evidence”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization v. 23: 1-30, 1994.

Teece, D.; Pisano, G., “The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms : An Introduction”. Industrial and Corporate Change, v. 3, n° 3, 1994.

Teece, D.; ; Shuen, A., “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management”, Strategic Management Journal, v. 18: p. 509-33, 1997.

Teece, D.; “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management”, in Dosi et al. (eds.) 2000.

Tjissen, R; van Wijk, E. “In Search of the European Paradox: An International Comparison of Europe’s Scientific Performance and Knowledge Flows in Information and Communications Technologies Research”, Research Policy, v. 28: 519-543, 1999.

Warglien, M., “The Evolution of Competences in a Population of Projects: a Case Study”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 1999 (B).

Weinstein, O.; Azoulay, N., “Firms’ Capabilities and Organizational Learning. A Critical Survey of Some Literature”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 1999 (B).

Williamson, O.E., Strategy Research: “Governance and Competence Perspectives”, Strategy Research: “Governance and Competence Perspectives”, Strategic Management Journal, v. 20(12), p. 1087-1109, 1999a.

Williamson, O.E., Human Actors and Economic Organization, Berkeley, University of California, mimeo, 1999b.

Winter, S.G., “An Essay on the Theory of Production”, in Hymans, H. (ed.), Economics and the World around It, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, p. 55-93, 1982.

Winter, S.G., “On Coase, Competence, and the Corporation”, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, v. 4: p. 163-180, 1988.

O conteúdo dos artigos e resenhas publicados na RBI são de absoluta e exclusiva responsabilidade de seus autores.


Não há dados estatísticos.