Resumo
Este artigo remete-se à natureza das organizações corporativas, suas "competências" e "capacitações" e seus padrões de aprendizado. A análise é realizada em diferentes níveis de observação – que vão dos estudos no nível das firmas, sobre seus padrões de mudança tecnológica e organizacional, até amplas comparações entre nações. A análise da natureza das organizações corporativas, suas "competências" (ou "capacitações"), seus padrões de aprendizado e seu enraizamento em quadros institucionais nacionais e setoriais é, possivelmente, uma das áreas da pesquisa microeconômica mais atuais, com importantes ramificações em múltiplos domínios da investigação, incluindo as relações entre inovação tecnológica e organizacional, as fronteiras verticais e horizontais da firma e o papel das instituições. De fato, é nossa proposição geral que a natureza das empresas, suas competências/capacitações e sua orientação estratégica – enraizadas como estão em instituições nacionais específicas – são cruciais não somente para o desempenho das firmas individuais mas também para a competitividade e crescimento das nações e regiões.Referências
Appleyard, M. M.; Hatch, N. W.; Mowery. D. C.,“Managing the Development of Transfer of Process Technologies in the Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry”, in Dosi et al. (eds.), 2000.
Argote, L.;. Darr,. E, “Repositories of Knowledge in Franchise Organizations”, in Dosi et al. (eds.), 2000.
Argyris, C.; Schön, D. A., Organizational Learning II. Theory, Method, and Practice, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1996.
Arora, A.; Gambardella, A., “The Changing Technology of Technological Change: General and Abstract Knowledge and The Division of Innovative Labor”, Research Policy 23, p. 523-532, 1994.
Axelrod, R.; Cohen, M.D., Harnessing complexity, New York: Free Press, 1999.
Balconi, M., “Codification of technological knowledge, firm boundaries, and ‘cognitive’ barriers to entry”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 2000b.
Barley, S. R., Freeman, J.; Hybels, R. C., “Strategic Alliances in Commercial Biotechnology”, in Nohria, N., Eccles, R. G. (eds.), Networks and Organizations, Cambridge, Ma: Harvard Business School Press, p. 311-347, 1992.
Bezza, B., “A critical review of the major analytical perspectives on competencies, organizational learning and innovation, and the relationship between technological and organizational change”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 1999b.
Breschi, S.; Malerba, F., “Diversification and Specialization in Innovative Activities: An Analysis of Patenting Activity of Electronic Firms”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 1999b.
Breschi, S.; Orsenigo, L., “Technological Regimes and Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation”, Economic Journal, v. 110, n. 463, p. 388-410, 2000.
Cantwell, J.; “Technological lock-in of large firms, since the interwar period”, European Review of Economic History, 4, p. 147-174, 2000.
Cantwell, J.; Piscitello, L., “Accumulating technological competence – its changing impact on corporate diversification and internationalization”, DYNACOM Working Paper.; a revised version is published in Industrial and Corporate Change (2000), v. 9, n. 1, p. 21-51, 1999a.
Cantwell, J., “Corporate Diversification, Internationalization and location of Technological Activities by MNCs: Differences between EU and non-EU Firms in the European Regions”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 1999b.
Cantwell, J.; Kosmopoulou, E., “What determines the internationalization of corporate technology?”, DYNACOM Working Paper; a revised version is forthcoming in Forsgren, M.; Håkansson, H; Havila, V., 2001, (eds.), Critical Perspectives on Internationalization, University of Uppsala, 2000b.
Castellani, D.; Zanfei, A., “Multinational experience, absorptive capacity and knowledge exploitation. A comparative analysis of the electronics and chemical industries”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 1999b.
Cavalli-Sforza, L.L.; Feldman, M.W., Cultural Transmission and Evolution: a quantitative approach, Princeton University Press, 1981.
Christensen, C. M; Bower, J. L., “Customer power, strategic investment and the failure of leading firms”, Strategic Management Journal 17, p. 197-218, 1996.
Christensen, C.; Rosenblom, R., “Explaining the Attacker’s Advantage: Technological Paradigms, Organizational Dynamics, and the Value Network”, Research Policy, 23, p. 233-257, 1995.
Christensen, C, The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1997.
Cohen, M. D.; Bacdayan P., “Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory”, Organization Science, 5, p. 554-68, 1994.
Cohen, M. D.; Sprull, L. S. (eds.), Organizational Learning, Organization Science, Sage Publications, 1996.
Cohen, M. D.;; Burkhart, R.; Dosi, G.; Egidi, M.; Marengo, L.; Warglien, M.; Winter, S., “Routines and other Recurring Action Patterns of Organization: Contemporary Research Issues”, Industrial and Corporate Change 5, p. 653-699,1996.
Cohen, W. M.; Levinthal, D. A., “Innovation and Learning: the Two Faces of Rand D”, The Economic Journal, 1989.
Cole, R. E., Managing Quality Fads: How American Business Learned to Play the Quality Game, New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Coriat, B., “The ‘Abominable Ohno Production System’. Competences, Monitoring, and Routines in Japanese Production Systems”, in Dosi et al. (eds.), 2000.
Coriat, B.; “Compétences, Structures de Gouvernance et Rente Relationnelle. Le cas de la Conception des Grands Projets Complexes”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 2000a.
Coriat, B.; “Organizational innovation in European firms: A critical overview of the survey evidence”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 2000b.
Coriat, B.; “The state of organizational reform in the European firms. Evidence from a comparative overview of ten EU countries”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 2000c.
Coriat, B.; Dosi, G., “Learning How To Govern and Learning How To Solve Problems : on the Co-Evolution of Competences, Conflicts and Organizational Routines”, in Chandler, Jr., A. D.; Hagström, P.; Sölvell, Ö (eds.), The Dynamic Firm, Oxford University Press, 1998a.
Coriat, B.; Weinstein, O., “Organization and Institution in the generation of innovations”, under revision for Research Policy, 2000.
Deming, W. E., Out of the Crisis, Mass.: MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study, 1982.
Dosi, G., “Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories. A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change”, Research Policy, 11, p. 147-162, 1982.
Dosi, G., “Sources, Procedures and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation”, Journal of Economic Literature, v. XXVI, September, 1988.
Dosi, G.; Marsili, O.; Orsenigo, L.; Salvatore, R., “Learning, Market Selection and the Evolution of Industrial Structures”, Small Business Economics, 1995.
Dosi, G.; Marengo, L.; Fagiolo, G., “Learning in Evolutionary Environments”, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria, Working Paper, 1996, forthcoming in K. Dopfer (ed.) Principles of Evolutionary Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Dosi, G.; Teece, D.J., “Organizational competences and the Boundaries of the firms”, in Arena, R.; Longhi, C. (eds.), Markets and Organizations, Berlin/Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1998.
Dosi, G.; Marengo, L., “On the tangled discourse between transaction costs economics and competence-based views of the firm: Some comments”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 1999b.
Dosi, G.; Hobday, M.; Marengo, L., “Problem-Solving Behaviors, Organizational Forms and the Complexity of Tasks”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 2000b.
Dosi, G.; Nelson, R.; Winter, S., “Introduction: The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities”, in Dosi et al. (eds.), 2000.
Dosi, G., et al. (eds.), The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Egidi, M., “Routines, hierarchies of problems, procedural behavior; some evidence from experiments”, in Arrow, K. J. (ed.), The Rational Foundations of Economic Behavior, London: Mac Millan, 1995.
Eliasson, G., “The firm as a competent team”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 13, p. 275-98, 1990.
Flaherty, M. T., “Limited Inquiry and Intelligent Adaptation in Semiconductor Manufacturing”, in Dosi et al. (eds.), 2000.
Florida, R.; Kenney, M., “Transfer and Replication of Organizational Capabilities”, in Dosi et al. (eds.), 2000.
Fransman, M., “At and T, BT and NTT: a comparison of vision, strategy and competence”, Telecommunications Policy, 18, p. 137-53, 1994a.
Fransman, M., “Information, knowledge, visions and theories of the firm”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 3, p. 713-58, 1994b.
Freeman, C., The Economics of Industrial Innovation, London: Pinter, 2ª ed., 1982.
Freeman, C., “The Economics of Technical Change”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 18, p. 463-514, 1994.
Fujimoto T., “Evolution of Manufacturing Systems and Ex Post Dynamic Capabilities”, in Dosi et al. (eds.), 2000.
Gambardella, A., Science and Innovation. The U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry During the 1980s, Cambridge, UK: University Press, 1995.
Giarratana, M.; Torrisi, S., “Competence accumulation and collaborative ventures: evidence from the largest European electronics firms and implications for the EU technological policies”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 2000b.
Grandstrand, O., “Corporate Innovation Systems A Comparative Study of Multi-Technology Corporations in Japan, Sweden and the USA”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 2000b.
Grandstrand, O.; Patel, P.; Pavitt, K., “Multi-Technology Corporations: why they have ‘distributed’ rather than ‘distinctive core’ competencies”, California Management Review, Summer, v. 39, n. 4, p. 8-25, 1997.
Grant, R.M., “‘Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm”, Strategic Management Journal 17 (Winter special issue): p. 109-122, 1996.
Henderson, R., “The Evolution of Integrative Capabilities: Innovation in Cardiovascular Drug Discovery”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), p. 607-630, 1994.
Henderson, R.; Cockburn, I., “Measuring Competence? Exploring Firm Effects in Drug Discovery”, in Dosi et al. (eds.), 2000.
Henderson, R., “Measuring Competence ? Exploring Firm Effects in Pharmaceutical Research”, Strategic Management Journal, v. 15, p. 63-84, 1994.
Henderson, R.; Clark, K., “Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, p. 9-30, 1990.
Henderson, R.; Orsenigo, L.; Pisano G. P., “The Pharmaceutical Industry and the Revolution in Molecular Biology: Exploring the Interactions between Scientific, Institutional and Organizational Change”, in Mowery, D. C.; Nelson, R. R. (eds.), The Sources of Industrial Leadership, Cambridge, Ma: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Holland, J.H., Adaptation in natural and artificial systems, Ann Arbor (MI): University of Michigan Press, 1975.
Hutchins, E., “Organizing work by adaptation”, Organization Science, 2: 14-39, 1991.
Ichniowski, C.; Levine, D.; Olsen, C.; Strauss, G. (eds.), The american, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Juran, J. M., Juran on Leadership for Quality. an Executive Handbook, New York: Free Press, 1989.
Levinthal, D., “Organizational Capabilities in Complex Worlds”, in Dosi et al. (eds.), 2000.
Levitt, B.; March, J.G., “Organizational Learning, in Cohen, M. D.;. Sproull, L. S, (eds.), Organizational Learning, Organization Science, Sage Publications, 1996.
Lhuillery, S., “The organizational practices of innovation and the performances of firms: an empirical investigation”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 2000b.
Lorenz, E., “Organizational Routines In the Light of ‘Old’ Evolutionary Economics: Bringing Politics Back into the Study of Organizational Learning”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 2000b.
Lorenz, E.; Lazaric, N., “The Transfer of Competences to European-Based Japanese Affiliates”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 1999b.
Lundvall, B. Â.; Christensen, J., “Extending and Deepening the Analysis of Innovation Systems with Empirical Illustrations from the DISKO Project”, DRUID Working Paper, n. 99-12, Department of Business Studies, Aalborg University, 1999.
Malerba, F.; Orsenig, L., “Technological Regimes and Firm Behaviour”, in Dosi, G.; Malerba, F. (eds.), Organization and Strategy in the Evolution of the Entreprise, London: Macmillan Press, 1996.
Marengo L.; Dosi, G.; Legrenzi, P.; Pasquali, C., “The structure of problem-solving knowledge and the structure of organizations”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 2000b.
Marengo L., “Coordination and Organizational Learning in the Firm”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, v. 2, p. 313-326, 1992.
Marengo L., “Structure, Competence and Learning in an Adaptive Model of the Firm”, in Dosi, G.; Malerba, F. (eds.), Organization and Strategy in the Evolution of the Enterprise, London: Macmillan, p.124-154, 1996.
Marsili, O., “Techological Regimes: Theory and Evidence”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 1999b.
Narduzzo, A.; Rocco, R.; Warglien, M., “Talking about Routines in the Field”, in Dosi et al. (eds.), 2000a.
Nelson, R.R.; Winter, S.G., An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.
Orsenigo, L., The Emergence of Biotechnology, New York: St. Martin Press, 1989.
Orsenigo, L.; Pammolli, F.; Riccaboni M., “Competencies, Technological Change and Network Dynamics. The case of the bio-pharmaceutical industry”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 1999b.
Pammolli, F., Innovazione, concorrenza e strategie di sviluppo nell’industria farmaceutica, Ed. Guerini Scientifica, 1997.
Patel, P., “Measurement and Analysis of Technological Competencies of Large Firms”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 1999b.
Patel, P.; Pavitt, K., “The technological competencies of the world’s largest firms: complex and path-dependent, but not much variety”, Research Policy, v. 26, n. 2, May, p. 141-156, 1997.
Patel, P., “The Wide (and Increasing) Spread of Technological Competences in the World’s Largest Firms: a Challenge to Conventional Wisdom”, in Chandler, Jr., A. D.; Hagström, P.; Sölvell , Ö. (eds.), The Dynamic Firm, Oxford University Press, 1998a.
Patel, P., “Uneven (and divergent) technological accumulation among advanced countries. Evidence and a framework of explanation”, in Dosi, G;. Teece, D. J; Chytry, J., Technology, Organization and Competitiveness Perspectives on Industrial Corporate Change, Oxford University Press, 1998b.
Patel, P., “How Technological Competencies Help Define the Core of the Firm”, in Dosi et al. (eds.), 2000a.
Pavitt, K., “Patterns of technical of Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory”, Research Policy, 13:6, 343-73, 1984.
Pavitt, K., “The Objectives of Technology Policy”, Science and Public Policy, 14: 4, p.192-8, 1987.
Pavitt, K., “Technology, Products and Organization in the Innovating Firm: What Adam Smith Tells Us and Joseph Schumpeter Doesn’t”, Working Paper, SPRU, 1998.
Pavitt, K., Technology, Management and Systems of Innovation, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 1999.
Pavitt, K., “Academic Research in Europe”, Working Paper, SPRU, 2000a.
Peters, T. J; Waterman, R. H.. In search of Excellence: Lessons from America’s Best-Run Companies, New York: Warner Books, 1982.
Pisano, G. P., “The Governance of Innovation. Vertical Integration and collaborative arrangements in the Biotechnology Industry”, Research Policy, 20, p. 237-249, 1991.
Pisano, G. P., “In Search of Dynamic Capabilities”, in Dosi et al. (eds.), 2000.
Piscitello, L., “Largest firms’ patterns of technological and business diversification. A comparison between European, US and Japanese firms”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 1999b.
Powell, W. W.; Doput, K. W.; Smith-Doerr, L., “Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, p. 116-145, 1996.
Prahalad, C. K.; Hamel, G., “The Core Competence of the Corporation”, Harvard Business Review, May-June, p. 79-91, 1990.
Rosenberg, N., Inside the Blackbox, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
Selznick, P., Leadership in Administration: a Sociological Interpretation, Evanston, Ill.: Row, Peterson and Co., 1957.
Shan, W.; Walker, G.; Kogut, B., “Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry”, Strategic Management Journal June., p 387(8), 1994.
Simon, H.A., Bounded Rationality and Organization Learning, Organization Science, 2, p. 125-134, 1991.
Sproull, L. S., “Beliefs in Organizations”, in Nystrom, P.C;. Starbuck, W. H (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Design. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1981.
Szulanski, G., “Appropriability and the Challenge of Scope”, in Dosi et al. (eds.), 2000a.
Tushman, M.; Anderson, P., “Technological discontinuities and organization environments”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, p. 439-65, 1986.
Von Hippel, E.; Tyre, M. J., “How learning by doing is done. Problem identification in novel process equipment”, Research Policy, 24, p. 1-12, 1995.
Weick, K. E.; Westley, F., “Organizational Learning : Affirming an Oxymoron”, in Clegg, S. R.; Hardy, C.; North, W. R. (eds.), Managing Organizations, London: Sage Publications, 1996.
Weinstein, O.; Azoulay, N., “Firms’ capabilities and organizational learning. A critical survey of some literature”, DYNACOM Working Paper, 1999b.
O conteúdo dos artigos e resenhas publicados na RBI são de absoluta e exclusiva responsabilidade de seus autores.
Downloads
