A review of the influence of long-term patterns in research and technological development (R&D) formalisation on university-industry links
Palavras-chave:Relação universidade-empresa. P&D.
Interest has been growing in the study of the role played by university-industry links in the development and strengthening of economic systems. It is commonly agreed that universityindustry links play a crucial role in the economy, and many studies have examined the factors that influence their occurrence. Two sets of factors can be identified from these studies: demand-side factors (i.e. relating to industry) and supply-side factors (i.e. relating to universities). This paper reviews the literature covering these issues, concentrating on the influence of long-term patterns in R&D formalisation on university-industry links. This is done for selected advanced and late-industrialising countries. The literature reviewed indicated that, in advanced countries, university-industry links become more varied as R&D becomes formalised. In late industrialising countries, university-industry links become more intense as R&D becomes formalised.
AGRAWAL, A.; COCKBURN, I. The anchor tenant hypothesis: exploring the role of large, local, R&D-intensive firms in regional innovation systems. International Journal of Industrial Organization, v. 21, n. 9, p. 1227-1253, 2003.
ALBU, A. British attitudes to engineering education: a historical perspective. In: PAVITT, K. (Ed.). Technical innovation and British economic performance. Londres: MacMillan Press, 1980, p. 67-87.
ALBUQUERQUE, E. Scientific infrastructure and catching-up process: notes about a relationship illustrated by science and technology statistics. Revista Brasileira de Economia, v. 55, n. 4, p. 545-566, 2001.
ANPROTEC. Anprotec 20 anos: aventura do possível. Brasília D.F., 2007.
AROCENA, R.; SUTZ, J. Changing knowledge production and Latin American universities. Research Policy, v. 30, n. 8, p. 1221-1234, 2001.
ARUNDEL, A.; GEUNA, A. Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technologies, v. 13, n. 6, p. 559-580, 2004.
ARUNDEL, A.; STEINMUELLER, E. The use of patent databases by European small and medium-sized enterprises. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, v. 10, n. 2, p. 157-173, 1998.
ARUNDEL, A.; VAN DE PAAL, G.; SOETE, L. Innovation strategies of Europe’s largest industrial firms: results of the PACE survey for information sources, public research, protection of innovations and government programmes. Final report prepared for the SPRINT Programme, DG XIII of the European Commission. Maastricht: MERIT, 1995.
AUDRETSCH, D.; LEHMANN, E.; WARNING, S. University spillovers: does the kind of science matter? Industry and Innovation, v. 11, n. 3, p. 193-206, 2004.
BAYONA, C.; TERESA, G; ARRIBAS, E. Collaboration in R&D with universities and research centres: an empirical study of Spanish firms. R&D Management, v. 32, n. 4, p. 321-341, 2002.
BELL, M.; PAVITT, K. The development of technological capabilities. In: HAQUE, I. (Ed.). Trade, technology and international competitiveness. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank, 1995, p. 69-101.
BERNASCONI, A. Is there a Latin American model of the university? Comparative Education Review, v. 52, n. 1, p. 27-52, 2008.
BROOKS, H.; RANDAZZESE, L. University-industry relations: the next four years. In: BRANSCOMB, L.; KELLER, J. (Eds.). Investing in innovation: creating a research and innovation policy that works. Cambridge, Massachusetts e Londres: MIT Press, 1999, p. 361-399.
CALVERT, J. Is there a role for ‘basic research’ in Mode 2? VEST Swedish Journal for Science and Technology Studies, v. 13, n. 3-4, p. 35-51, 2001.
CARLSSON, B.; FRIDH, A.-C. Technology transfer in United States universities: a survey and statistical analysis. In: METCALFE, J. S.; CANTNER, U. (Eds.). Change, transformation and development. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag, 2003, p. 379-412.
CASAS, R.; DE GORTARI, R.; LUNA, M. University, knowledge production and collaboration patterns with industry. In: CIMOLI, M. (Ed.). Developing innovation systems: Mexico in a global context. Londres: Continuum, 2000, p. 154-174.
CLARK, B. R. Creating entrepreneurial universities: organizational pathways of transformation. Oxford: International Association of Universities/Pergamon Press Inc., 1998.
COHEN, W. M.; LEVINTHAL, D. A. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, v. 35, n. 1, p. 128-152, 1990.
COHEN, W. M.; NELSON, R.; WALSH, P. Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. In: GEUNA, A.; SALTER, A.; STEINMUELLER, E. (Eds.). Science and innovation: rethinking the rationales for funding and governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003, p. 109-146.
DAGNINO, R.; VELHO, L. University-industry-government relations on the periphery: the University of Campinas, Brazil. Minerva, v. 36, n. 3, p. 229-251, 1998.
DE CAMPOS, A. University-industry links in late-industrializing countries: a study of Unilever Brazil. 2006. 306 p. Tese (Doutorado). SPRU, University of Sussex, Brighton, 2006.
ETZKOWITZ, H. The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages. Research Policy, v. 27, n. 8, p. 823-833, 1998.
ETZKOWITZ, H.; DE MELLO, J. M. C; ALMEIDA, M. Towards “meta-innovation” in Brazil: the evolution of the incubator and the emergence of a triple helix. Research Policy, v. 34, n. 4, p. 411-424, 2005.
ETZKOWITZ, H.; LEYDESDORFF, L. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, v. 29, n. 2, p. 109-123, 2000.
ETZKOWITZ, H.; WEBSTER, A. Entrepreneurial science: the second academic revolution. In: ETZKOWITZ, H.; WEBSTER, A.; HEALEY, P. (Eds.). Capitalizing knowledge: new intersections of industry and academia. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1998, p. 21-46.
EUN, J.-H.; LEE, K.; WU, G. Explaining the “university-run enterprises” in China: a theoretical framework for university-industry relationship in developing countries and its application to China. Research Policy, v. 35, n. 9, p. 1329-1346, 2006.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Third European report on science & technology indicators: towards a knowledge based economy. Bruxelas: Directorate-General for Research, 2003.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Towards a European research area: science, technology and innovation key figures 2005. Bruxelas: Directorate-General for Research, 2005.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Towards a European research area: science, technology and innovation key figures 2007. Bruxelas: Directorate-General for Research, 2007.
FIGUEIREDO, P.; VEDOVELLO, C. Firm’s creative capabilities, the supporting innovation system and globalization in Southern Latin America: a bleak technological outlook or a myopic standpoint? Maastricht: UNU-Intech, 2005 (Discussion Paper Series, 2005-4).
FLORIDA, R. The role of the university: leveraging talent, not technology. Issues in Science and Technology On Line. Richardson, 1999. Available in: http://www.issues.org/15.4/florida.htm Acces in: 03 Sep. 2010.
FREEMAN, C. Technology policy and economic performance: lessons from Japan. Londres: Pinter Publishers Limited, 1987.
FREEMAN, C. Formal scientific and technical institutions in the National System of Innovation. In: LUNDVALL, B.-Å. (Ed.). National Systems of Innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Londres: Pinter Publishers Limited, 1992, p. 173-192.
FREEMAN, C. Continental, national and sub-national innovation systems – complementarity and economic growth. Research Policy, v. 31, n. 2, p. 191-211, 2002.
FREEMAN, C.; SOETE, L. The economics of industrial innovation. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1997.
GARCÍA-GUADILLA, C. Latin America: higher education research in a transformation context. In: TEICHLER, U.; SADLAK, J. (Eds.). Higher education research: its relationship to policy and practice. Oxford: International Association of Universities/Pergamon, 2000, p. 107-120.
GEUNA, A. The internationalisation of European universities: a return to medieval roots. Minerva, v. 36, n. 3, p. 253-270, 1998.
GEUNA, A.; NESTA, L. J. J. University patenting and its effects on academic research: the emerging European evidence. Research Policy, v. 35, n. 6, p. 790-807, 2006.
GIBBONS, M.; JOHNSTON, R. The roles of science in technological innovation. Research Policy, v. 3, n. 3, p. 220-242, 1974.
GLÄNZEL, W.; LETA, J.; THIJS, B. Science in Brazil. Part 1: A macro-level comparative study. Scientometrics, v. 67, n. 1, p. 67-86, 2006.
GOLDEMBERG, J. What is the role of science in developing countries? Science, v. 279, n. 5354, p. 1140-1141, 1998.
GOMES, E. A relação universidade-empresa no Brasil: testando hipóteses a partir do caso da UNICAMP. 2001. Tese (Doutorado). Departamento de Política Científica e Tecnológica. Campinas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 2001.
HANE, G. Comparing university-industy linkages in the United States and Japan. In: BRANSCOMB, L.; KODAMA, F.; FLORIDA, R. (Eds.). Industrializing knowledge: university-industry linkages in Japan and the United States. Cambridge, Massachusets e Londres: The MIT Press, 1999, p. 20-61.
HASHIMOTO, T. The hesitant relationship reconsidered: university-industry cooperation in postwar Japan. In: BRANSCOMB, L.; KODAMA, F.; FLORIDA, R. (Eds.). Industrializing knowledge: university-industry linkages in Japan and the United States. Cambridge, Massachusets e Londres: The MIT Press, 1999, p. 234-251.
HENDERSON, R.; JAFFE, A. B.; TRAJTENBERG, M. Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting. The Review of Economics and Statistics, v. 80, n. 1, p. 119-127, 1998.
HERSHBERG, E.; NABESHIMA, K.; YUSUF, S. Opening the ivory tower to business: university-industry linkages and the development of knowledge-intensive clusters in Asian cities. World Development, v. 35, n. 6, p. 931-940, 2007.
HICKS, D. University-industry research links in Japan. Brighton: SPRU, 1992.
HOBDAY, M. Strategies of East Asian NICs in new technologies: catching up in electronics. Brighton: SPRU, 1993.
HOBDAY, M.; RUSH, H.; BESSANT, J. Approaching the innovation frontier in Korea: the transition phase to leadership. Research Policy, v. 33, n. 10, p. 1433-1457, 2004.
HUGHES, A.; COSH, A.; FU, X. UK plc: just how innovative are we? Cambridge: The Cambridge-MIT Institute, 2006.
JAFFE, A. Real effects of academic research. The American Economic Review, v. 79, n. 5, p. 957-970, 1989.
KIM, L. Stages of development of industrial technology in a developing country: a model. Research Policy, v. 9, n. 3, p. 254-277, 1980.
KIM, L. Absorptive capacity and industrial growth: a conceptual framework and Korea’s experience. In: KOO, B.-H.; PERKINS, D. H. (Eds.). Social capability and long-term economic growth. Nova Iorque: Saint Martin’s Press, 1995, p. 266-287.
KIM, L. The dynamics of technological learning in industrialisation. Maastricht: UNU-Intech. 2000 (Discussion Paper Series, 2000-7).
KLEVORICK, A. K. et al. On the sources and the significance of interindustry diferences in technological opportunities. Research Policy, v. 24, n. 2, p. 185-205, 1995.
KLINE, S. J.; ROSENBERG, N. An overview of innovation. In: LANDAU, R.; ROSENBERG, N. (Eds.). The positive sum strategy: harnessing technology for economic growth. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1986, p. 275-306.
KODAMA, F.; SUZUKI, J. How Japanese companies have used scientific advances to restructure their businesses: the receiver-active National System of Innovation. World Development, v. 35, n. 6, p. 976-990, 2007.
LALL, S. Technological capabilities and industrialization. World Development, v. 20, n. 2, p. 165-186, 1992.
LAURSEN, K.; SALTER, A. Searching low and high: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation. Aalborg: DRUID. 2003 (Druid Working Paper, 03-16).
LEE, K. Technology transfer through university-industry cooperation: an overview of Korean experience. In: SHIN, G.-W. (Ed.) A study on innovation toward university-industry networking. Seul: STEPI, 2002, p. 75-108.
LEHRER, M.; ASAKAWA, K. Rethinking the public sector: idiosyncrasies of biotechnology commercialization as motors of national R&D reform in Germany and Japan. Research Policy, v. 33, n. 6-7, p. 921-938, 2004.
MANSFIELD, E.; LEE, J.Y. The modern university: contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support. Research Policy, v. 25, n. 7, p. 1047-1058, 2006.
MARQUES, R. Technological systems of innovation in an industrialising country: a case study of Brazilian aircraft industry. In: FOURTH UNU/INTECH-CERES WP3/EADI CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION, LEARNING AND TECHNOLOGICAL DYNAMISM OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES. Maastricht, Maio, 2002.
MARTIN, B. R. The evolution of the university – a new triple helix or return to an earlier social contract? Keynote Lecture. In: 4TH INTERNATIONAL TRIPLE HELIX CONFERENCE ON ‘BREAKING BOUNDARIES, BUILDING BRIDGES’. Copenhagen, 2002.
MARTIN, B. R. The changing social contract for science and the evolution of the university. In: GEUNA, A.; SALTER, A.; STEINMUELLER, E. (Eds.). Science and innovation: rethinking the rationales for funding and governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003, p. 7-29.
MATHEWS, J. A.; HU, M. C. Enhancing the role of universities in building national innovative capacity in Asia: the case of Taiwan. World Development, v. 35, n. 6, p. 1005-1020, 2007.
MATOS, A. M. Cooperação universidade empresa: o caso UFRJ/Petrobras. 1999. Tese (Mestrado). Rio de Janeiro, Coordenação dos Programas de Pós Graduação de Engenharia. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 1999.
MAZZOLENI, R. The role of universities and public research in the catching-up process. In: THE FIRST GLOBELICS CONFERENCE: INNOVATION SYSTEMS AND DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES FOR THE THIRD MILLENNIUM. Rio de Janeiro, Novembro, 2003.
MOHNEN, P.; HOAREAU, C. What type of enterprise forges close links with universities and government labs? Evidence from CIS 2. Maastricht: Merit. 2002 (Research Memoranda, 2002-008).
MOLAS-GALLART, J. et al. Measuring third stream activities: final report to the Russell Group of Universities. Brighton: SPRU, 2002.
MOWERY, D. C.; ROSENBERG, N. Technology and the pursuit of economic growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
MOWERY, D. C.; ROSENBERG, N. Paths of innovation: technological change in 20th Century America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1998.
NEZU, R. (Coord.). Technology transfer, intellectual property and effective university-industry partnerships: the experience of China, India, Japan, Phillipines, the Republic of Korea, Singapore and Thailand. Genebra: World Intellectual Property Organization, 2005.
NSF. InfoBrief - Science Resources Statistics. Arlington: Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences, 2008.
OECD. University-enterprise relations in OECD member countries. Paris: Committee for Scientific and Technological Policy, 1990 (relatório não publicado).
OECD. Technology and the economy the key relationships. Paris, 1992.
OECD. Innovative people: mobility of skilled personnel in National Innovation Systems. Paris: OECD Proceedings, 2001.
OECD. Benchmarking industry-science relationships. Paris, 2002.
OECD. Turning science into business: patenting and licensing at public research organisations. Paris, 2003.
OLDS, K. Global assemblage: Singapore, foreign universities, and the construction of a “global education hub”. World Development, v. 35, n. 6, p. 959-975, 2007.
PADILLA-PÉREZ, R. A regional approach to study technology transfer through foreign direct investment: the electronics industry in two Mexican regions. Research Policy, v. 37, n. 5, p. 849-860, 2008.
PAVITT, K. Public policies to support basic research: what can the rest of the world learn from US theory and practice? (and what they should not learn). Industrial and Corporate Change, v. 10, n. 3, p. 761-779, 2001.
POYAGO-THEOTOKY, J.; BEATH, J.; SIEGEL, D. Universities and fundamental research: reflections on the growth of university–industry partnerships. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, v. 18, n. 1, p. 10-21, 2002.
QUADROS, R. et al. Technological innovation in Brazilian industry: an assessment based on the São Paulo Innovation Survey. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 67, n. 2-3, p. 203-219, 2001.
REICH, L. S. The making of American industrial research: science and business at GE and Bell,1876-1926. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
RIBEIRO, D. A universidade necessária. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1969.
ROSE, H.; ROSE, S. Science and society. Londres: The Penguin Press, 1969.
ROSENBERG, N.; NELSON, R. American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy, v. 23, n. 3, p. 323-348, 1994.
SALTER, A. J.; MARTIN, B. R. The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review. Research Policy, v. 30, n. 3, p. 509-532, 2001.
SAMPAT, B. N. Patenting and US academic research in the 20th century: the world before and after Bayh-Dole. Research Policy, v. 35, n. 6, p. 772-789, 2006.
SECYT. La investigación científica y tecnológica en Argentina – ‘un análisis de las áreas de vacancia desde la demanda’. Buenos Aires: Secretaría de Ciencia y Tecnología, 1999.
SHIN, G.-W. A study on innovation toward university-industry networking. Seul, STEPI, 2002. 185 p.
SHINN, T. The industry, research and education nexus. In: NYE, M. J. (Ed.). The Cambridge history of science: volume 5 the modern physical and mathematical sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, p. 133-153.
SLAUGHTER, S. et al. The ‘traffic’ in graduate students: graduate students as tokens of exchange between academe and industry. Science, Technology & Human Values, v. 27, n. 2, p. 282-312, 2002.
SOHN, D.-W.; KENNEY, M. Universities, clusters, and innovation systems: the case of Seoul, Korea. World Development, v. 35, n. 6, p. 991-1004, 2007.
SUZIGAN, W.; ALBUQUERQUE, E. A interação entre universidades e empresas em perspectiva histórica no Brasil. Belo Horizonte: Cedeplar/UFMG, 2008 (Textos para discussão, 329).
TETHER, B. S. Who co-operates for innovation, and why: an empirical analysis. Research Policy, v. 31, n. 6, p. 947-967, 2002.
THOMAS, H. E. Dinâmicas de inovação na Argentina (1970-1995): abertura comercial, crise sistêmica e rearticulação. 1999. 7Tese (Doutorado). Departamento de Política Científica e Tecnológica. Campinas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 1999.
THOMAS, H. E.; DAVYT, A.; DAGNINO, R. Racionalidades de la interacción universidad-empresa en América Latina (1955-1995). In: COLOQUIUM TECHNOLOGICAL LEARNING, INNOVATION AND INDUSTRIAL POLICY. México D.F., Setembro,1996.
VELHO, L. Science and technology in Latin America and the Caribbean: an overview. Maastricht: UNU/INTECH, 2004 (Discussion Paper Series, 2004-4).
VON HIPPEL, E. The sources of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.
VON TUNZELMANN, G. N. Technology and industrial progress: the foundations of economic growth. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1995.
WONG, P.-K.; HO, Y.-P.; SINGH, A. Towards an “entrepreneurial university” model to support knowledge-based economic development: the case of the National University of Singapore. World Development, v. 35, n. 6, p. 941-958, 2007.
O conteúdo dos artigos e resenhas publicados na RBI são de absoluta e exclusiva responsabilidade de seus autores.