The impacts of innovations in the diversification of the Brazilian industry: an analysis based on Pintec and Cempre

Jucélio Kretzer

Resumo


The article aims to associate the differences in the pattern of diversification with the differences in the pattern of innovation of the Brazilian industrial sectors. The neo-Schumpeterian literature advocates that the establishment of sectoral patterns of innovation influences the rates and directions of technological change in a distinctive way among sectors. This is an empirical study, based on the statistical information of the Innovation Survey (Pintec 2011) and the Central Register of Companies (Cempre 2010), to investigate the relationship between innovation and diversification, in order to contribute to the understanding of the sectoral patterns of diversification of the Brazilian industry. The statistical results suggest that the introduction of innovations to a large extent has led industries to concentrate their business lines on activities that have some ‘proximity’ in their production functions, independent of innovative activities. Notably, certain sectors, such as ‘science-based’ ones, assume typical behaviour of ‘diversification based on technological activities’.


Palavras-chave


Technological innovations. Diversification. Pintec. Brazil.

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referências


ARCHIBUGI, D.; CESARATTI, S.; SIRILLI, G. Sources of innovative activities and industrial organization in Italy, Research Policy, v.20, p. 299-313, 1991.

AROCENA, R.; SUTZ, J. Knowledge, innovation and learning: systems and policies in thenorth and in the south. In: CASSIOLATO, J.E.; LASTRES, H.M.M.; MACIEL, M.L. (Ed.). Systems of innovation and development: evidence from Brazil. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2003, p. 291-310.

AUDRETSCH, D.; FELDMAN, M. Innovation in cities: science-based diversity, specialisation and localized competition. European Economic Review, v. 43, p. 409–429, 1999.

BARNEY, J. B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, v. 17, n. 1, p. 99-120, 1991.

BRESCHI, S.; LISSONI, F.; MALERBA, F. Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Research Policy, v. 32, p. 69–87, 2003.

CAMPOS, B.; URRACA-RUIZ, A. Padrões setoriais de inovação na indústria brasileira. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, Campinas (SP), v. 8, n. 1, p.167-210, jan./jun. 2009.

CANTWELL, J.; VERTOVA, G. Historical evolution of technological diversification. Research Policy, n. 33, p. 511-529, 2004.

DOI, N. Diversification and R&D activity in Japanese manufacturing firms. Managerial and Decision Economics, v. 6, 1985.

DOSI, G.; TEECE, D. J.; WINTER, S. Towards a theory of corporate coherence: preliminar remarks. In: DOSI, G.; GIANNETTI, R.; TONINELLI, P. A. (Ed.). Technology and enterprise in a historical perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992, p. 185-211.

FAI, F. Technological Diversification: implications for the firm. In: Nelson and Winter Conference. DRUID. Aalborg, Denmark. June12-15 2001.

FAI, F. Corporate technological competence and the evolution of technological diversification. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, Mass. USA: Edward Elgar, 2003.

FERRAZ, J. C.; KUPFER, D.; HAGUENAUER, L. Made in Brazil: desafios competitivos para a indústria. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Campus, 1995.

FURTADO, A. T.; CARVALHO, R. Q. Padrões de intensidade tecnológica da indústria brasileira: um estudo comparativo com os países centrais. São Paulo em Perspectiva, v. 19, n. 1, p. 70-84, jan./mar. 2005.

GAMBARDELLA, A.; TORRISI, S. Does technological convergence imply convergence in markets? Evidence from the electronics industry. Research Policy, v. 27, p. 445-464, 1998.

GARCIA-VEGA, M. Does technological diversification promote innovation? An empirical analysis for European firms. Research Policy, v. 35, p. 230-246, 2006.

GRABOWSKI, H. The determinants of industrial research and development: a study of chemical, drug, and petroleum industries. Journal of Political Economy, n. 76, p. 292-306, 1968.

GRANSTRAND, O. Towards a theory of the technology-based firm. Research Policy, v. 25, n. 5, p. 467-491, 1998.

GRANSTRAND, O.; PATEL, P.; PAVITT, K. Multitechnology corporations: why they have ‘distributed’ rather than ‘distinctive core’ competencies. California Management Review, n. 39, p. 8–25, 1997.

GORT, M. Diversification and integration in American industry. N. J.: Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1962.

HEELEY, M.; MATUSIK, S. Corporate scope and knowledge creation: the effect of technological diversity on firm platform and incremental inventive output. 2004. Mimeo.

HOLANDA FILHO, S. H. Estrutura industrial no Brasil: concentração e diversificação. Rio de Janeiro: Ipea/Impes, 1983.

HUGHES, K. Technological opportunity and R&D diversification in the conglomerate firm. University of Manchester, 1987. Mimeo.

INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA – IBGE. Classificação nacional de atividades econômicas – Versão 2. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 2007. Available on: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv36932.pdf. Access: 1 Feb. 2016.

INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA – IBGE. Estatísticas do Cadastro Central de Empresas. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 2012a. Available on: https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas-novoportal/economicas/industria/9016-estatisticas-do-cadastro-central-de-empresas.html?edicao=17076&t=downloads. Access: 15 Aug. 2016.

INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA – IBGE. Pesquisa de Inovação 2011 - Instruções para o preenchimento do questionário. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 2012b. Available on: http://www.pintec.ibge.gov.br/downloads/METODOLOGIA/Manual%20de%20Instrucoes%20para%20Preenchimento%20do%20Questionario/manual_de_instrucoes_pintec_2017.pdf. Access: 1 Feb. 2016.

INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA – IBGE. Pesquisa de Inovação 2011. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 2013. Available on: https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas-novoportal/multidominio/ciencia-tecnologia-e-inovacao/9141--pesquisa-de-inovacao.html?=&t=downloads>. Access: 1 Feb. 2016.

MARKIDES, C. C.; WILLIAMSON, P. Related diversification, core competences and corporate performance. Strategic Management, v. 15, Issue Supplement S2, p. 149-165, Summer 1994.

MILLER, L. M. Diversificação das empresas industriais no Brasil: 1974. Pesquisa e Planejamento Econômico, Ipea, v. 2, n. 11, p. 469-498, 1981.

MONTGOMERY, C. A. The measurement of firm diversification: some new empirical evidence. Academy Management Journal, v. 25, n. 2, p. 299-307, June 1, 1982.

NEGRI, J. A.; SALERMO, M. S.; CASTRO, A. B. Inovações, padrões tecnológicos e desempenho das firmas industriais brasileiras. In: NEGRI, J. A.; SALERMO, M. S. (Orgs.). Inovações, padrões tecnológicos e desempenho das firmas industriais brasileiras. Brasília: Ipea, 2005, p. 5-46.

NELSON, R. The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy, v. 67, p. 297-–306, 1959.

PAVITT, K. Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, v. 13, p. 343-373, 1984.

PAVITT, K.; ROBSON, M.; TOWNSEND, J. technological accumulation, diversification and organization in UK companies, 1945-1983. Management Science, v. 35, n. 1, p. 81-99, Jan. 1989.

PENROSE, E. The theory of the growth of the firm. 3 ed. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1995[1959].

PISCITELLO, L. Relatedness and coherence in technological and product diversification of the world’s largest firms. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, v. 11, 295-315. 2000.

PISCITELLO, L. Corporate diversification, coherence and firm innovative performance. Revue D’economie Industrielle, v. 110, n. 1, p. 127-148, 2005.

PORTER, M. E. Competitive advantage: cre ating and sustaining competitive performance. New York: Free Press. 1985.

PRAHALAD, C. K.; HAMEL, G. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, v. 68, n. 3, p. 79-91, May-June 1990.

RABELO, F. M.; COUTINHO, L. Corporate governance in Brazil. In: OECD DEVELOPMENT CENTER. Policy dialogue meeting on corporate governance in developing countries and emerging economies. Paris, OECD Development Centre. Headquarters on 23-24 Apr. 2001. Available on: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.621.1058&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Access: 14 Dec. 2016.

REISS, G. D. Development of Brazilian industrial enterprise: a historical perspective. 1980. Tese (Doutorado). Universidade da Califórnia, Berkeley, 1980.

RIBEIRO, A. M. Diversificação e integração industrial no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Economia, v. 23, n. 4, p. 45-69, out./dez. 1969.

ROBINS, J.; WIERSEMA, M. F. A resource-based approach to the multibusiness firm: empirical analysis of portfolio interrelationships and corporate financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, v. 16, n. 4, p. 277-299, 1995.

RUIZ, R. M. Estratégias empresariais: um estudo de grupos industriais nacionais (1980-1993). Nova Economia, v. 6, n. 2, p. 85-110, nov. 1996.

RUIZ, R. M. The Restructuring of the Brazilian Industrial Groups between 1980 and 1993. CEPAL Review, n. 61, p. 167-186, 1997.

RUIZ, R. M. Diversificação das grandes e grupos empresariais brasileiros: alguns apontamentos. Revista USP, n. 93, p. 101-112, mar./abr./maio. 2012.

RUMELT, R. P. Strategy, structure, and economic performance. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press, 1974.

SCHERER, F. Industrial market structure and economic performance. 2. ed. New York: Rand McNally. 1980.

SCHERER, F. Corporative size, diversification, innovative activity. In: SCHERER, F. Innovation and Growth. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1984.

TEECE, D. J. Economies of scope and the scope of the enterprise. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, v. 1, n. 3, p. 223-247, 1980.

TEECE, D. J. Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, v. 3, n. 1, p. 39-63, 1982.

TEECE, D. J.; PISANO, G. P.; SHUEN, A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strategic Management Journal, v. 18, P. 509-33, 1997.

TEECE, D. J. et al. Understanding corporate coherence: theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, v. 23, n. 1, p. 1-30, 1994.

URRACA, A. I+D y recursos alternativos a la innovación en la industria española, Economía Industrial, n. 319, p. 91-104, 1998.

URRACA, A. Patrones sectoriales de cambio técnico en la industria española, Economía Industrial, n. 332, p. 99-108, 2000.

WERNERFELT, B. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, v. 5, n. 2, p. 171-180, 1984.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20396/rbi.v17i2.8649844

Métricas do Artigo

Carregando métricas...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.


Licença Creative Commons
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição - NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.

Licença Creative Commons
Este obra foi licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 3.0 Brasil

(c) Rev. Bras. Inov. / Braz. Inov. J., Campinas (SP) – e-ISSN  2178-2822