Los aportes de tres corrientes evolucionistas neoschumpterianas a la discusión sobre políticas de innovación

Palavras-chave: Sistemas de Innovación. Auto-organización. Causación Acumulativa. Política de Innovación

Resumo

Este artículo presenta en forma estilizada algunos elementos que podrían contribuir a una agenda de discusión sobre política de innovación en un sentido amplio que se deriva de tres corrientes evolucionistas neo-schumpeterianas que comparten una ontología similar pero se focalizan en ejes diferenciados. Estas corrientes son: sistemas de innovación, modelos de auto-organización y causación acumulativa. Los tres enfoques aportan ideas de gran poder explicativo en torno a la manera en la que se manifiesta la innovación y el modo de intervención orientado a favorecer su dinámica. Partiendo de la identificación de los elementos comunes y complementarios de estos enfoques, el artículo se propone establecer un diálogo entre esas corrientes para contribuir a la discusión de un marco analítico que permita entender la dinámica de la innovación en América Latina.

Biografia do Autor

Gabriel Yoguel, Interdisciplinario de Estudios en Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación

I am research profesor at University of General Sarmiento. I coodinate the program of knowledge economy PIEC.

Florencia Barletta, Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento
‎Investigadora - Innovación y Desarrollo - ‎Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento
Mariano Pereira, Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento
Possui graduação em Engenharia Mecânica pela Universidade Federal da Paraíba (1993) , mestrado em Engenharia Mecânica pela COPPE/UFRJ (1995) e doutorado em Engenharia Mecânica pela COPPE/UFRJ (2000), na área de Termofluidodinâmica. 

Referências

ANDERSEN, E. S. Population thinking, price’s equation and the analysis of economic evolution. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, v. 1, n. 1, p. 127-148, 2004.

AROCENA, R.; SUTZ, J. El estudio de la innovación desde el sur y las perspectivas de un nuevo desarrollo. CTS+I: Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología, Sociedad e Innovación, n. 7, Septiembre-Diciembre 2006.

BIELSCHOWSKY, R. Estratégia de desenvolvimento e as três fontes de expansão no Brasil: um desenho conceitual. Economia e Sociedade, Campinas, v. 21, n. esp., p. 729- 47, dez. 2012.

BARLETTA, F. ; ROBERT, V.; YOGUEL, G. Algunos comentarios sobre el artículo “Dinamismo tecnológico e inclusión social mediante una estrategia basada en los recursos naturales”, de Carlota Pérez. Revista Econômica, v. 14, n. 2, p. 55-61, 2012.

BERGEK, A.; JACOBSSON, S.; HEKKERT, M.; SMITH, K. Functionality of innovation systems as a rationale for, and guide to innovation policy. In: SMITS, R.; KUHLMANN, S.; SHAPIRA, P. (Ed.). Innovation policy, theory and practice. An international handbook. Elgar Publishers, 2010.

BLEDA, M.; DEL RÍO, P. The market failure and the systemic failure rationales in technological innovation systems. Research Policy, n. 42, p. 1039-1052, 2013.

BOSCHMA, R.; MARTIN, R. The handbook of evolutionary economic geography. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2010.

BRESCHI, S.; MALERBA, F. Sectorial Innovation Systems: technological regimes, schumpeterians dynamics and spatial boundaries. In: EDQUIST, C. (Ed.). Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions and organizations. London: Pinter Publishers/Cassell Academic, 1997.

BREZNITZ, D.; ORNSTON, D. Scaling up and sustaining experimental innovation policies with limited resources: peripheral Schumpeterian development agencies. In: DUTZ, M. A. et al. (Ed.). Making innovation policy work. Learning from experimentation. OECD, World Bank, 2014. p. 247-284.

CASSIOLATO, J.; LASTRES, H. Discussing innovation and development: converging points between the Latin American school and the Innovation Systems perspective? Globelics, 2008 (Working Paper Series, n. 08-02).

CEPAL – Comissão Econômica para a América Latina. Cambio estructural para la igualdad. Una visión integrada del desarrollo. Santiago de Chile: Cepal, Julio 2012.

CHICK, V.; DOW, S. A post-keynesian perspective on the relation between banking and regional development. In: ARESTIS, P. (Ed.). Post-keynesian monetary economics: new approaches to financial modelling. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 1998. p. 219-250.

CIMOLI, M.; DOSI, G.; STIGLITZ, J. Industrial policy and development: the political economy of capabilities accumulation. Oxforf: Oxford University Press, 2009.

CIMOLI, M.; PORCILE, G.; ROVIRA, S. Structural change and the BOP-constraint: why did Latin America fail to converge? Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 34, n. 2, p. 389-411, 2010.

CHAMINADE, C.; EDQUIST, C. From theory to practice. The use of the systems of innovation approach in innovation policy. In: HAGE, J.; DE MEEUS, M. (Ed.). Innovation, science and institutional change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.

CHAMINADE, C.; LUNDVALL, B.Å.; VANG, J.; JOSEPH, K. J. Designing innovation policies for development: towards a systematic experimentation-based approach, In: LUNDVALL, B. Å.; JOSEPH, K. J.; CHAMINADE, C.; VANG, J. (Ed.). Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries: building domestic capabilities in a global setting. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011.

COOKE, P.; URANGA, M.G.; ETXEBARRIA, G. Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy, v. 26, n. 4-5, p. 475-491, 1997.

CRESPI, G.; FERNANDEZ-ARIAS, E.; STEIN, E. Rethinking productive development: sound policies and institutions for economic transformation. Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.

CRESPI, G.; MAFFIOLI, A.; MOHNEN, P.; VÁZQUEZ, G. Evaluating the impact of science, technology and innovation programs: a methodological toolkit. Inter-American Development Bank, 2011.

CYPHER, J. Neoextraccionismo y primarización: términos de intercambio em América del Sur. In: GIRÓN, A. (Coord.). Democracia, financiarización y neoextraccionismo ante los desafios de la industrialización y el mercado de trabajo. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas, 2014. p. 117-41.

DOPFER, K.; FOSTER, J.; POTTS, J. Micro-meso-macro. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, v. 14, n. 3, p. 263-279, 2004.

DOSI, G. Sources, procedures and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, v. 26, n. 3, p. 1120-1171, 1988.

DOSI, G. Dinámica y coordinación económica. Algunos elementos para un paradigma alternativo “evolucionista”. In: BARLETTA, F.; ROBERT, V.; YOGUEL, G. (Ed.). Tópicos de la teoría evolucionista neoschumpeteriana de la innovación y el cambio tecnológico Miño y Dávila: Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento, 2014. v. 1.

DOSI, G.; FREEMAN, C.; NELSON, R.; SOETE, L. Technical change and economic theory. London: Pinter Publishers, 1989.

DUTRENIT, G.; KATZ, J. Innovation, growth and development in Latin-America: Stylized facts and a policy agenda. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, v. 7, n. 2-3, p. 105-130, 2005.

DUTZ, M. A.; KUZNETSOV, Y.; LASAGABASTER, E.; PILAT, D. Making innovation policy work: learning from experimentation. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2014.

EDQUIST, C. Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions, and organizations. Psychology Press, 1997.

EDQUIST, C.; HOMMEN, L. Systems of innovation: theory and policy for the demand side. Technology in Society, n. 21, p. 63-79, 1999.

ERBER, F. Technological dependence and learning revisited. In: MONTEIRO FILHA, D.; DELORME PRADO, L.; LASTRES, H. (Ed.). Estratégias de desenvolvimento, política industrial e innovação: ensaios em memória de Fabio Erber. 2014. Brasília: BNDES, 1983.

ERBES, A.; ROBERT, V.; YOGUEL, G. Capacities, innovation and feedbacks in production networks in Argentina. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, v. 19, n. 8, p. 719-741, 2010.

FAGERBERG, J.; VERSPAGEN, B. Technology-gaps, innovation-diffusion and transformation: an evolutionary interpretation. Research Policy, v. 31, n. 8, p. 1291-1304, 2002.

FERRANTI, D. et al. From natural resources to the knowledge economy. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank, 2002 (World Bank Latin American and Caribbean Studies).

FOSTER, J. From simplistic to complex systems in economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 29, n. 6, p. 873-892, 2005.

FREEMAN, C. Technology policy and economic performance: lessons from Japan. London: Pinter Publishers, 1987.

FRANKEL, J. A. The natural resource curse: a survey of diagnoses and some prescriptions. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 2012.

FURTADO, J. Muito além da especialização regressiva e da doença holandesa: oportunidades para o desenvolvimento brasileiro. Novos Estudos Cebrap, n. 81, jul. 2008.

HIRSCHMAN, A. O. The strategy of economic development. Clinton, MA: Yale University Press, 1958.

PORCILE, G.; HOLLAND, M. Brecha tecnológica y crecimiento en América Latina. In: CIMOLI, M. (Ed.). Heterogeneidad estructural, asimetrías tecnológicas y crecimiento en América Latina-LC/W. BID-Cepal,2005. p. 40-71.

JOHNSON, B.; EDQUIST, C.; LUNDVALL, B. Å. Economic development and the national system of innovation approach. In: FIRST GLOBELICS CONFERENCE. Rio de Janeiro, 2003.

KIRMAN, A. Complex economics: individual and collective rationality. Routledge, 2010.

KNUDSEN, T. General selection theory and economic evolution: the price equation and the replicator/interactor distinction. Journal of Economic Methodology, v. 11, n. 2, p. 147-173, 2004.

LALL, S.; TEUBAL, M. “Market-Stimulating” technology policies in developing countries: a framework with examples from East Asia. World Development, v. 26, n. 8, p. 1369-1385, 1998.

LEE, K. Schumpeterian analysis of economic catch-up: knowledge, path-creation, and the middle-income trap. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

LUNDVALL, B. Å. National system of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers, 1992.

LUNDVALL, B. Å. Innovation system research. Where it came from and where it might go. Globelics, 2007 (Working Paper Series, 2007-01).

LUNDVALL, B. Å .; JOSEPH, K. J.; CHAMINADE, C.; VANG, J. Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries: building domestic capabilities in a global setting. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011.

LLERENA, P.; MATT, M. Innovation policy in a knowledge-based economy: theory and practice. Springer Science & Business Media, 2006.

MALERBA, F.; ORSENIGO, L. Technological regimes and sectoral patterns of innovative activities. Industrial and Corporate Change, v. 6, n. 1, p. 83-118, 1997.

MARENGO, L.; DOSI, G. Division of labor, organizational coordination and market mechanisms in collective problem-solving. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, v. 58, n. 2, p. 303-326, 2005.

METCALFE, J. S. Technology systems and technology policy in an evolutionary framework. Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 19, n. 1, p. 25-46, 1995.

METCALFE, J. S. Dancing in the dark: la disputa sobre el concepto de competencia. Desarrollo Económico, v. 50, n. 197, p. 59-79, abr.-jun. 2010.

METCALFE, J. S.; FOSTER, J.; RAMLOGAN, R. Adaptive economic growth. Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 30, n. 1, p. 7-32, 2006.

NELSON, R. National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.

NELSON, R.; WINTER, S. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1982.

O’ HARA, P. A. Principle of circular and cumulative causation: Fusing Myrdalian and Kaldorian growth and development dynamics. Journal of Economic Issues, v. 42, n. 2, p. 375-387, 2008.

PAMPLONA, J. B.; CACCIAMALI, M. C. O paradoxo da abundância: recursos naturais e desenvolvimento na América Latina. Estudos Avançados, v. 31, n. 89, p. 251-270, 2017.

PERES, W. El lento retorno de las políticas industriales en América Latina y el Caribe. Revista de la Cepal, n.º 88, p. 71-88, Abril 2006.

PÉREZ, C. Dinamismo tecnológico e inclusión social en América Latina: una estrategia de desarrollo productivo basada en los recursos naturales. Revista de la Cepal, n. 100, p. 123-145, 2010.

PÉREZ, C. Réplica a los comentarios. Revista Econômica, v. 14, n. 2, p.73-81, 2012.

PÉREZ, Caldentey E. Una coyuntura propicia para reflexionar sobre los espacios para el debate y el diálogo entre el (neo) estructuralismo y las corrientes heterodoxas. Neoestructuralismo y corrientes heterodoxas en América Latina y el Caribe a inicios del siglo XXI. Santiago: Cepal, 2015. p. 33-91.

POSSAS, M. L. Estructuras de mercado em oligopólio. São Paulo: Hucitec, 1985.

ROBERT, V.; YOGUEL, G. Complexity paths in neo-Schumpeterian evolutionary economics, structural change and development policies. Structural Change and Economics Dynamics, v. 38, p. 3-14, 2016.

SAVIOTTI, P. P. Variety, growth and demand. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, v. 11, n. 1, p. 119-142, 2010.

SAVIOTTI, P. P.; PYKA, A. Economic development by the creation of new sectors. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, v. 14, n. 1, p. 1-35, 2004.

SETTERFIELD, M. Endogenous growth: a Kaldorian approach. 2010. Disponible en: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1597944.

SUZIGAN, W.; FURTADO, J. Política industrial e desenvolvimento. Revista de Economía Política, v. 26, n. 2, (102), p. 163-185, 2006.

TEDESCO, J. C. Industrialización y educación en la Argentina. Buenos Aires: Unesco/Cepal/PNUD, Proyecto Desarrollo y Educación en América Latina y el Caribe, 1977.

WITT, U. Self-organization and economics – what is new? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, v. 8, n. 3, p. 489-507, 1997.

YOGUEL, G.; BOSCHERINI, F. El desarrollo de las capacidades innovativas de las firmas y el rol del sistema territorial. Desarrollo Económico, v. 41, n. 161, p. 37-69, 2001.

Publicado
2017-08-21
Como Citar
Yoguel, G., Barletta, F., & Pereira, M. (2017). Los aportes de tres corrientes evolucionistas neoschumpterianas a la discusión sobre políticas de innovación. Revista Brasileira De Inovação, 16(2), 381-404. https://doi.org/10.20396/rbi.v16i2.8650116
Seção
Artigos