Banner Portal
Los aportes de tres corrientes evolucionistas neoschumpterianas a la discusión sobre políticas de innovación
PDF (Español (España))

Palavras-chave

Sistemas de Innovación. Auto-organización. Causación Acumulativa. Política de Innovación

Como Citar

YOGUEL, Gabriel; BARLETTA, Florencia; PEREIRA, Mariano. Los aportes de tres corrientes evolucionistas neoschumpterianas a la discusión sobre políticas de innovación. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, Campinas, SP, v. 16, n. 2, p. 381–404, 2017. DOI: 10.20396/rbi.v16i2.8650116. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8650116. Acesso em: 20 abr. 2024.

Resumo

Este artículo presenta en forma estilizada algunos elementos que podrían contribuir a una agenda de discusión sobre política de innovación en un sentido amplio que se deriva de tres corrientes evolucionistas neo-schumpeterianas que comparten una ontología similar pero se focalizan en ejes diferenciados. Estas corrientes son: sistemas de innovación, modelos de auto-organización y causación acumulativa. Los tres enfoques aportan ideas de gran poder explicativo en torno a la manera en la que se manifiesta la innovación y el modo de intervención orientado a favorecer su dinámica. Partiendo de la identificación de los elementos comunes y complementarios de estos enfoques, el artículo se propone establecer un diálogo entre esas corrientes para contribuir a la discusión de un marco analítico que permita entender la dinámica de la innovación en América Latina.

https://doi.org/10.20396/rbi.v16i2.8650116
PDF (Español (España))

Referências

ANDERSEN, E. S. Population thinking, price’s equation and the analysis of economic evolution. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, v. 1, n. 1, p. 127-148, 2004.

AROCENA, R.; SUTZ, J. El estudio de la innovación desde el sur y las perspectivas de un nuevo desarrollo. CTS+I: Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología, Sociedad e Innovación, n. 7, Septiembre-Diciembre 2006.

BIELSCHOWSKY, R. Estratégia de desenvolvimento e as três fontes de expansão no Brasil: um desenho conceitual. Economia e Sociedade, Campinas, v. 21, n. esp., p. 729- 47, dez. 2012.

BARLETTA, F. ; ROBERT, V.; YOGUEL, G. Algunos comentarios sobre el artículo “Dinamismo tecnológico e inclusión social mediante una estrategia basada en los recursos naturales”, de Carlota Pérez. Revista Econômica, v. 14, n. 2, p. 55-61, 2012.

BERGEK, A.; JACOBSSON, S.; HEKKERT, M.; SMITH, K. Functionality of innovation systems as a rationale for, and guide to innovation policy. In: SMITS, R.; KUHLMANN, S.; SHAPIRA, P. (Ed.). Innovation policy, theory and practice. An international handbook. Elgar Publishers, 2010.

BLEDA, M.; DEL RÍO, P. The market failure and the systemic failure rationales in technological innovation systems. Research Policy, n. 42, p. 1039-1052, 2013.

BOSCHMA, R.; MARTIN, R. The handbook of evolutionary economic geography. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2010.

BRESCHI, S.; MALERBA, F. Sectorial Innovation Systems: technological regimes, schumpeterians dynamics and spatial boundaries. In: EDQUIST, C. (Ed.). Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions and organizations. London: Pinter Publishers/Cassell Academic, 1997.

BREZNITZ, D.; ORNSTON, D. Scaling up and sustaining experimental innovation policies with limited resources: peripheral Schumpeterian development agencies. In: DUTZ, M. A. et al. (Ed.). Making innovation policy work. Learning from experimentation. OECD, World Bank, 2014. p. 247-284.

CASSIOLATO, J.; LASTRES, H. Discussing innovation and development: converging points between the Latin American school and the Innovation Systems perspective? Globelics, 2008 (Working Paper Series, n. 08-02).

CEPAL – Comissão Econômica para a América Latina. Cambio estructural para la igualdad. Una visión integrada del desarrollo. Santiago de Chile: Cepal, Julio 2012.

CHICK, V.; DOW, S. A post-keynesian perspective on the relation between banking and regional development. In: ARESTIS, P. (Ed.). Post-keynesian monetary economics: new approaches to financial modelling. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 1998. p. 219-250.

CIMOLI, M.; DOSI, G.; STIGLITZ, J. Industrial policy and development: the political economy of capabilities accumulation. Oxforf: Oxford University Press, 2009.

CIMOLI, M.; PORCILE, G.; ROVIRA, S. Structural change and the BOP-constraint: why did Latin America fail to converge? Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 34, n. 2, p. 389-411, 2010.

CHAMINADE, C.; EDQUIST, C. From theory to practice. The use of the systems of innovation approach in innovation policy. In: HAGE, J.; DE MEEUS, M. (Ed.). Innovation, science and institutional change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.

CHAMINADE, C.; LUNDVALL, B.Å.; VANG, J.; JOSEPH, K. J. Designing innovation policies for development: towards a systematic experimentation-based approach, In: LUNDVALL, B. Å.; JOSEPH, K. J.; CHAMINADE, C.; VANG, J. (Ed.). Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries: building domestic capabilities in a global setting. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011.

COOKE, P.; URANGA, M.G.; ETXEBARRIA, G. Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy, v. 26, n. 4-5, p. 475-491, 1997.

CRESPI, G.; FERNANDEZ-ARIAS, E.; STEIN, E. Rethinking productive development: sound policies and institutions for economic transformation. Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.

CRESPI, G.; MAFFIOLI, A.; MOHNEN, P.; VÁZQUEZ, G. Evaluating the impact of science, technology and innovation programs: a methodological toolkit. Inter-American Development Bank, 2011.

CYPHER, J. Neoextraccionismo y primarización: términos de intercambio em América del Sur. In: GIRÓN, A. (Coord.). Democracia, financiarización y neoextraccionismo ante los desafios de la industrialización y el mercado de trabajo. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas, 2014. p. 117-41.

DOPFER, K.; FOSTER, J.; POTTS, J. Micro-meso-macro. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, v. 14, n. 3, p. 263-279, 2004.

DOSI, G. Sources, procedures and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, v. 26, n. 3, p. 1120-1171, 1988.

DOSI, G. Dinámica y coordinación económica. Algunos elementos para un paradigma alternativo “evolucionista”. In: BARLETTA, F.; ROBERT, V.; YOGUEL, G. (Ed.). Tópicos de la teoría evolucionista neoschumpeteriana de la innovación y el cambio tecnológico Miño y Dávila: Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento, 2014. v. 1.

DOSI, G.; FREEMAN, C.; NELSON, R.; SOETE, L. Technical change and economic theory. London: Pinter Publishers, 1989.

DUTRENIT, G.; KATZ, J. Innovation, growth and development in Latin-America: Stylized facts and a policy agenda. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, v. 7, n. 2-3, p. 105-130, 2005.

DUTZ, M. A.; KUZNETSOV, Y.; LASAGABASTER, E.; PILAT, D. Making innovation policy work: learning from experimentation. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2014.

EDQUIST, C. Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions, and organizations. Psychology Press, 1997.

EDQUIST, C.; HOMMEN, L. Systems of innovation: theory and policy for the demand side. Technology in Society, n. 21, p. 63-79, 1999.

ERBER, F. Technological dependence and learning revisited. In: MONTEIRO FILHA, D.; DELORME PRADO, L.; LASTRES, H. (Ed.). Estratégias de desenvolvimento, política industrial e innovação: ensaios em memória de Fabio Erber. 2014. Brasília: BNDES, 1983.

ERBES, A.; ROBERT, V.; YOGUEL, G. Capacities, innovation and feedbacks in production networks in Argentina. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, v. 19, n. 8, p. 719-741, 2010.

FAGERBERG, J.; VERSPAGEN, B. Technology-gaps, innovation-diffusion and transformation: an evolutionary interpretation. Research Policy, v. 31, n. 8, p. 1291-1304, 2002.

FERRANTI, D. et al. From natural resources to the knowledge economy. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank, 2002 (World Bank Latin American and Caribbean Studies).

FOSTER, J. From simplistic to complex systems in economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 29, n. 6, p. 873-892, 2005.

FREEMAN, C. Technology policy and economic performance: lessons from Japan. London: Pinter Publishers, 1987.

FRANKEL, J. A. The natural resource curse: a survey of diagnoses and some prescriptions. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 2012.

FURTADO, J. Muito além da especialização regressiva e da doença holandesa: oportunidades para o desenvolvimento brasileiro. Novos Estudos Cebrap, n. 81, jul. 2008.

HIRSCHMAN, A. O. The strategy of economic development. Clinton, MA: Yale University Press, 1958.

PORCILE, G.; HOLLAND, M. Brecha tecnológica y crecimiento en América Latina. In: CIMOLI, M. (Ed.). Heterogeneidad estructural, asimetrías tecnológicas y crecimiento en América Latina-LC/W. BID-Cepal,2005. p. 40-71.

JOHNSON, B.; EDQUIST, C.; LUNDVALL, B. Å. Economic development and the national system of innovation approach. In: FIRST GLOBELICS CONFERENCE. Rio de Janeiro, 2003.

KIRMAN, A. Complex economics: individual and collective rationality. Routledge, 2010.

KNUDSEN, T. General selection theory and economic evolution: the price equation and the replicator/interactor distinction. Journal of Economic Methodology, v. 11, n. 2, p. 147-173, 2004.

LALL, S.; TEUBAL, M. “Market-Stimulating” technology policies in developing countries: a framework with examples from East Asia. World Development, v. 26, n. 8, p. 1369-1385, 1998.

LEE, K. Schumpeterian analysis of economic catch-up: knowledge, path-creation, and the middle-income trap. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

LUNDVALL, B. Å. National system of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers, 1992.

LUNDVALL, B. Å. Innovation system research. Where it came from and where it might go. Globelics, 2007 (Working Paper Series, 2007-01).

LUNDVALL, B. Å .; JOSEPH, K. J.; CHAMINADE, C.; VANG, J. Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries: building domestic capabilities in a global setting. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011.

LLERENA, P.; MATT, M. Innovation policy in a knowledge-based economy: theory and practice. Springer Science & Business Media, 2006.

MALERBA, F.; ORSENIGO, L. Technological regimes and sectoral patterns of innovative activities. Industrial and Corporate Change, v. 6, n. 1, p. 83-118, 1997.

MARENGO, L.; DOSI, G. Division of labor, organizational coordination and market mechanisms in collective problem-solving. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, v. 58, n. 2, p. 303-326, 2005.

METCALFE, J. S. Technology systems and technology policy in an evolutionary framework. Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 19, n. 1, p. 25-46, 1995.

METCALFE, J. S. Dancing in the dark: la disputa sobre el concepto de competencia. Desarrollo Económico, v. 50, n. 197, p. 59-79, abr.-jun. 2010.

METCALFE, J. S.; FOSTER, J.; RAMLOGAN, R. Adaptive economic growth. Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 30, n. 1, p. 7-32, 2006.

NELSON, R. National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.

NELSON, R.; WINTER, S. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1982.

O’ HARA, P. A. Principle of circular and cumulative causation: Fusing Myrdalian and Kaldorian growth and development dynamics. Journal of Economic Issues, v. 42, n. 2, p. 375-387, 2008.

PAMPLONA, J. B.; CACCIAMALI, M. C. O paradoxo da abundância: recursos naturais e desenvolvimento na América Latina. Estudos Avançados, v. 31, n. 89, p. 251-270, 2017.

PERES, W. El lento retorno de las políticas industriales en América Latina y el Caribe. Revista de la Cepal, n.º 88, p. 71-88, Abril 2006.

PÉREZ, C. Dinamismo tecnológico e inclusión social en América Latina: una estrategia de desarrollo productivo basada en los recursos naturales. Revista de la Cepal, n. 100, p. 123-145, 2010.

PÉREZ, C. Réplica a los comentarios. Revista Econômica, v. 14, n. 2, p.73-81, 2012.

PÉREZ, Caldentey E. Una coyuntura propicia para reflexionar sobre los espacios para el debate y el diálogo entre el (neo) estructuralismo y las corrientes heterodoxas. Neoestructuralismo y corrientes heterodoxas en América Latina y el Caribe a inicios del siglo XXI. Santiago: Cepal, 2015. p. 33-91.

POSSAS, M. L. Estructuras de mercado em oligopólio. São Paulo: Hucitec, 1985.

ROBERT, V.; YOGUEL, G. Complexity paths in neo-Schumpeterian evolutionary economics, structural change and development policies. Structural Change and Economics Dynamics, v. 38, p. 3-14, 2016.

SAVIOTTI, P. P. Variety, growth and demand. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, v. 11, n. 1, p. 119-142, 2010.

SAVIOTTI, P. P.; PYKA, A. Economic development by the creation of new sectors. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, v. 14, n. 1, p. 1-35, 2004.

SETTERFIELD, M. Endogenous growth: a Kaldorian approach. 2010. Disponible en: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1597944.

SUZIGAN, W.; FURTADO, J. Política industrial e desenvolvimento. Revista de Economía Política, v. 26, n. 2, (102), p. 163-185, 2006.

TEDESCO, J. C. Industrialización y educación en la Argentina. Buenos Aires: Unesco/Cepal/PNUD, Proyecto Desarrollo y Educación en América Latina y el Caribe, 1977.

WITT, U. Self-organization and economics – what is new? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, v. 8, n. 3, p. 489-507, 1997.

YOGUEL, G.; BOSCHERINI, F. El desarrollo de las capacidades innovativas de las firmas y el rol del sistema territorial. Desarrollo Económico, v. 41, n. 161, p. 37-69, 2001.

O conteúdo dos artigos e resenhas publicados na RBI são de absoluta e exclusiva responsabilidade de seus autores.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.