Facebook out of control? A technically-mediated autonomous technology
On the controversy triggered by the influence of the so-called “fake news” that circulated on Facebook in the 2016 United States presidential elections, we notice the emergence of an idea of “control of technology”, both in the platform’s official publications and steps announced after the event, and in the specialized media demands. In order to refute the idea of total control of technology and defend the recognition of the action of nonhuman elements, thus contributing to a better understanding of the platform’s actions, we use the concepts of “autonomous technology”, by Langdon Winner (1977), and “technical mediation”, by Bruno
Latour (1994). Methodologically, we were inspired by the Cartography of Controversies (VENTURINI, 2010) and worked with content collected through the platform’s official pages and media vehicles that covered the event from July 2016 to July 2018.
ANGWIN, Julia; GRASSEGGER, Hannes. Facebook’s secret censorship rules protect white men from hate speech but not black children. ProPublica. Jun. 28, 2017. Available at: https://www.propublica.org/article/facebook-hate-speech-censorship-internal-documentsalgorithms. Access on: Aug. 05, 2019.
BELL, Emilly; OWEN, Taylor. The platform press: how Silicon Valley reengineered journalism. Tow Center for Digital Journalism. Mar. 29, 2017. Available on: https://www.cjr.org/tow_center_reports/platform-press-how-silicon-valley-reengineered-journalism.php. Access on: Aug. 22, 2018.
BUMP, Phillip. All the ways Trump’s campaign was aided by Facebook, ranked by importance. Washington Post. 22 Mar. 2018. Available on: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2018/03/22/all-the-ways-trumps-campaign-was-aided-by-facebook-ranked-byimportance/?utm_term=.b99bc340aaf5. Access on: Aug. 05, 2019.
CADWALLADR, Carole; GRAHAM-HARRISON, Emma. Revealed: 50 million Facebook profiles harvested for Cambridge Analytica in major data breach. The Guardian. Mar. 17, 2018. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/17/cambridge-analyticafacebook-influence-us-election. Access on: Aug. 05, 2019.
CONDLIFFE, Jamie. Regardless of its influence on the election, Facebook needs to change. Technology Review. Nov 14, 2016. Available at: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/602851/regardless-of-its-influence-on-the-election-facebook-needs-to-change/. Access on: Aug. 05, 2019.
D’ANDRÉA, Carlos; JURNO, Amanda. Algoritmos como um devir: uma entrevista com Taina Bucher. Parágrafo, São Paulo, v. 6, n. 1, p. 165-170, jan./abr. 2018 BURKE, Samuel. Zuckerberg: Facebook will develop tools to fight fake news. CNN. Nov. 19, 2016. Available on: https://money.cnn.com/2016/11/19/technology/mark-zuckerbergfacebook-fake-news-election/index.html. Access on: Aug. 22, 2018.
DN – DIÁRIO DE NOTÍCIAS. Zuckerberg no Parlamento Europeu: "Foi um erro, peço desculpa". 22 maio 2018. Available on: https://www.dn.pt/mundo/interior/fundador-dofacebook-pede-desculpa-a-ue-9366672.html. Access on: Jul. 25, 2018.
FURTADO, Silvia de Freitas Dal Ben. Cartografando o jornalismo automatizado: redes sociotécnicas e incertezas na redação de notícias por “robôs”. 2018. 116 f. –Dissertação (Mestrado) – Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 2018.
GADDE, Vijaya; ROTH, Yoel. Enabling further research of information operations on Twitter. Twitter. Oct. 17, 2018. Available at: https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2018/enabling-further-research-of-information-operations-on-twitter.html. Access on: Aug 05, 2019.
GILLESPIE, Tarleton. The relevance of algorithms. In: GILLESPIE, Tarleton; BOCZKOWSKI, Pablo J.; FOOT, Kirsten A. (ed.). Media technologies: essays on communication, materiality, and society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014. p. 167-194.
GILLESPIE, Tarleton; BOCZKOWSKI, Pablo J.; FOOT, Kirsten A. (ed.). Media technologies: essays on communication, materiality, and society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014.
GRIFFITH, Erin. Facebook can absolutely control its algorithm. Wired. Sep. 26, 2017. Available on: https://www.wired.com/story/facebook-can-absolutely-control-its-algorithm/. Access on: Oct. 02, 2017.
HEFFERNAN, Virginia. Who will take responsibility for Facebook? Wired. Oct. 02, 2017. Available on: https://www.wired.com/story/mark-zuckerberg-who-will-take-responsibilityfor-facebook-now. Access on: Oct. 02, 2017.
INGRAM, David. Facebook to hire 1,000 people to review ads after Russian buys. Reuters. Oct 02, 2017. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/facebook-advertising/facebookto-hire-1000-people-to-review-ads-after-russian-buys-idUSL2N1MD03F. Access on: Oct. 02, 2017.
ISAAC, Mike; SHANE, Scott. Facebook to deliver 3,000 Russia-Linked ads to Congress on monday. The New York Time. Oct. 1, 2017. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/01/technology/facebook-russia-ads.html. Access on: Aug. 05, 2019.
KASTRENAKES, Jacob. Facebook will remove the trending topics section next week. The Verge. Jun 1, 2018. Available at: https://www.theverge.com/2018/6/1/17417428/facebooktrending-topics-being-removed. Access on: Aug. 05, 2019.
KITCHIN, Rob. Thinking critically about algorithms. The Programmable City, 2014. (Working Paper, 5).
KRAMER, Melody. Do Facebook and Google have control of their algorithms anymore? Poynter. Nov. 14, 2017. Available on: https://www.poynter.org/news/do-facebook-andgoogle-have-control-their-algorithms-anymore-sobering-assessment-and-warning. Access on: Jul. 31, 2018.
LATOUR, Bruno. On technical mediation. Common Knowledge, v. 3, n. 2, p. 29-64, 1994.
LATOUR, Bruno. Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
LATOUR, Bruno. The Berlin key or how to do words with things. In: GRAVES-BROWN, Paul (ed.). Matter, materiality and modern culture. London: Routledge, 2000. p. 10-21.
LATOUR, Bruno. Where are the missing masses? Sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In: BIJKER, Wiebe E.; LAW, John (ed.). Shaping technology / building society: studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1992.
LEONNIG, Carol D. et al. Russian firm tied to pro-Kremlin propaganda advertised on Facebook during election. The Washington Post. Sep. 6, 2017. Available on: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/facebook-says-it-sold-political-ads-to-russian-companyduring-2016-election/2017/09/06/32f01fd2-931e-11e7-89fa-b822a46da5b_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.e839141325db. Access on: Aug. 22, 2018.
LEVIN, Sam. Facebook allowed advertisers to target ‘Jew haters’. The Guardian. Sep. 15, 2017. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/sep/14/facebookadvertising-jew-hater-antisemitism. Access on: Jul. 26, 2019.
MIMS, Christopher. Facebook is still in denial about its biggest problem. The Wall Street Journal. Oct. 1, 2017. Available on: https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-is-still-in-denialabout-its-biggest-problem-1506855607. Access on: Jul. 31, 2018.
MOSSERI, Adam. Addressing hoaxes and fake news. Newsroom. Dec. 15, 2016. Available at: https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2016/12/news-feed-fyi-addressing-hoaxes-and-fakenews/. Access on: Feb. 09, 2019.
NEWSROOM. Site. Newsroom. Available at: https://newsroom.fb.com. Access on: Jul. 26, 2019.
NUNES, Michael. Former Facebook workers: we routinely suppressed conservative news. Gizmodo. May. 09, 2016. Available on: https://gizmodo.com/former-facebook-workerswe-routinely-suppressed-conser-1775461006. Access on: Aug. 05, 2019.
O’NEIL, Cathy. Maybe Facebook is broken. Bloomberg. Nov. 7, 2017a. Available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-11-07/maybe-social-media-is-broken. Access on: Aug. 05, 2019.
O'NEIL, Cathy. Weapons of math destruction: how big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. New York: Broadway Books, 2017b.
PASQUALE, Frank. The black box society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015.
PINCH, Trevor J.; BIJKER, Wiebe E. The social construction of facts and artefacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. In: BIJKER, Wiebe E. et al. The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. 4. ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993, p. 17-50.
PHILLIPS, Kristine. Mark Zuckerberg apologizes ‘for the ways my work was used to divide people’. The Washington Post. Oct. 1, 2017. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2017/10/01/mark-zuckerberg-apologizes-for-the-ways-my-workwas-used-to-divide-people/. Access on: Aug. 05, 2019.
ROSENBERG, Matthew et al. How Trump consultants exploited the Facebook data of millions. The New York Times. Mar. 17, 2018. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/17/us/politics/cambridge-analytica-trump-campaign.html. Access on: Aug. 05, 2019.
SHONTELL, Alyson. Facebook is being blamed for Trump's election – but Mark Zuckerberg's response is tone deaf. Business Insider. Nov 11, 2016. Available at: https://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-blamed-trump-election-mark-zuckerberg-response-tonedeaf-2016-11. Access on: Aug. 05, 2019.
SIMO, Fidji. Announcing the Facebook journalism project. Newsroom. Jan. 11, 2017. Available at: https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2017/01/announcing-the-facebook-journalismproject/. Access on: Feb. 09, 2019.
STAMOS, Alex. An update on information operations on Facebook. Newsroom. Sep. 06, 2017. Available on: https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2017/09/information-operationsupdate/. Access on: Oct. 02, 2017.
STRUHAR, Chris. Finding popular conversations on Facebook. Newsroom. Jan. 16, 2014. Available on: https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2014/01/finding-popular-conversations-onfacebook/. Access on: Feb. 09, 2019.
THIELMAN, Sam. Facebook news selection is in hands of editors not algorithms, documents show. The Guardian. May 12, 2016. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/may/12/facebook-trending-news-leaked-documents-editor-guidelines. Access on: Feb. 09, 2019.
TUFEKCI, Zeynep. We’re building a dystopia just to make people click on ads. TED – Ideas worth spreading. Sep., 2017. Available on: https://www.ted.com/talks/zeynep_tufekci_we_re_building_a_dystopia_just_to_make_people_click_on_ads/transcript#t-9834. Access on: Jul. 31, 2018.
VENTURINI, Tommaso. Diving in magma: how to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science, v. 19, n. 3, p. 258-273, 2010.
WAGNER, Kurt. Facebook will now tell you what's most popular on Facebook. Mashable. Jan. 16, 2014. Available at: https://mashable.com/2014/01/16/facebooktrending/#4aEiQ2Iggiqw. Access on: Aug. 05, 2019.
WICHTER, Zach. 2 days, 10 hours, 600 questions: what happened when Mark Zuckerberg went to Washington. The New York Times. Apr. 12, 2018. Available at: https://www.nytimes. com/2018/04/12/technology/mark-zuckerberg-testimony.html. Access on: Aug. 05, 2019.
WINNER, Langdon. Autonomous technology: technics-out-of-control as a theme in political thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1977.
WINNER, Langdon. Technologies as forms of life. Epistemology, methodology, and the social sciences. Springer Netherlands, 1983. p. 249-263.
WINNER, Langdon. Upon opening the black box and finding it empty: social constructivism and the philosophy of technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values, v. 18, n. 3, p. 362-378, 1993.
WONG, Joon Ian et al. Facebook is trying to get rid of bias in trending news by getting rid of humans. Quartz. Aug. 26, 2016. Available on: https://qz.com/768122/facebook--fires-human-editors-moves-to-algorithm-for-trending-topics/. Accessed on: Feb. 09, 2019.
ZUCKERBERG, Mark. Photo. Facebook. May 18, 2016a. Available on: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10102840575485751&set=a.529237706231.2034669.4&type=3&theater. Accessed on: Jul. 11, 2016.
ZUCKERBERG, Mark. Post. Facebook. Nov. 19, 2016b. Available on: https://www.facebook.com/zuck/posts/10103269806149061. Access on: Aug. 22, 2018.
ZUCKERBERG, Mark. Post. Facebook. Sep. 21, 2017a. Available on: https://www.facebook.com/zuck/posts/10104052907253171. Access on: Oct. 02, 2017.
ZUCKERBERG, Mark. Post. Facebook. Sep. 30, 2017b. Available on: https://www.facebook.com/zuck/posts/10104074437830721. Access on: Oct. 02, 2017.
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Brasileira de Inovação
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Ao submeter um artigo para a RBI o autor permite que o direito de publicação de artigos aprovados e publicados seja transferido automaticamente à RBI, permitindo a publicação do artigo nesta revista e também o compartilhamento deste com o reconhecimento de sua autoria, de acordo com a Licença Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR), que indica o seguinte: este é um artigo de Acesso Aberto distribuído sob os termos da Creative Commons Attribution License, que permite uso irrestrito, distribuição e reprodução em qualquer meio, desde que o trabalho original seja devidamente citado.
O conteúdo dos artigos e resenhas publicados na RBI são de absoluta e exclusiva responsabilidade de seus autores.
Os autores devem, através da consulta ao sistema, preencher a “Declaração de Responsabilidade, Concordância com Licença de Publicação e com Licença de Acesso Aberto”. O autor que submete o artigo preencherá esta declaração em nome dos demais autores. Neste sentido, recomendamos a leitura deste documento por todos os autores do artigo.
O conteúdo dos artigos e resenhas publicados na RBI são de absoluta e exclusiva responsabilidade de seus autores.