Banner Portal
Capacidades tecnológicas y vínculos territoriales en empresas argentinas de maquinaria agrícola
PDF (Español (España))
PDF Acesso via SciELO (Español (España))

Palavras-chave

Capacidades tecnológicas
Vínculos territoriales
Indústria

Como Citar

MOCHI, Silvina. Capacidades tecnológicas y vínculos territoriales en empresas argentinas de maquinaria agrícola. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, Campinas, SP, v. 19, p. e020001, 2020. DOI: 10.20396/rbi.v19i0.8654201. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8654201. Acesso em: 24 abr. 2024.

Resumo

The persistent technological gaps of developing countries in a context of transition to new techno-organizational paradigms highlight the need to deepen understanding about their processes of technological change. In this framework, the objective of this article is to analyze the path of construction of technological, productive and organizational capacities in Argentine agricultural machinery companies, in order to unravel their innovation processes and learning mechanisms. Likewise, links with territorial agents are studied, taking into account the role of intermediary institutions. From an empirical, evolutionary and systemic approach, this qualitative research was carried out to demonstrate the influence of some micro and meso factors, as well as irregularities, discontinuities and diversity in the levels and type of capabilities in the trajectories of industrial companies. In this way, the paper provides elements that contribute to the evolutionist studies on technological change and territorial development, as well as to the reflection in the design and implementation of public policy instruments.

https://doi.org/10.20396/rbi.v19i0.8654201
PDF (Español (España))
PDF Acesso via SciELO (Español (España))

Referências

ARGENTINA. MECON – Ministerio de Economía. Informes de cadenas de valor. Maquinaria agrícola, año 1, n. 8, 2016.

AROCENA, R.; SUTZ, R. Understanding underdevelopment today: new perspectives on NSI. 2001. Text displayed in The First Globelics Conference: Innovation Systems and Development Strategies for the Third Millennium, Plenary Session 3: National innovation systems and development, Rio de Janeiro, 2001.

BARLETTA, F.; ROBERT, V.; YOGUEL, G. Complementariedades de conocimiento, estrategias de conectividad e innovación en firmas industriales argentinas. Revista de Economía Política de Buenos Aires, v. 6, n. 11, p. 49-80, 2012.

BELL, M.; ALBU, M. Knowledge systems and technological dynamism in industrial clusters in developing countries. World Development, v. 27, n. 9, p. 1715-1734, 1999.

BELL, M.; PAVITT, K. Technological Accumulation and Industrial Growth: Contrasts Between Developed and Developing Countries. Industrial and Corporate Change, v. 2, n.2, p. 157-210, 1993.

BELL, M.; PAVITT, K. The development of technological capabilities. In: HAQUE, I. (ed.). Trade, technology and international competitiveness. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank, 1995. p. 60-101.

BISANG, R.; ANLLÓ, G.; CAMPI, M. Políticas tecnológicas para la innovación: la producción agrícola argentina. Santiago de Chile: Cieplan, 2015.

COHEN, W.; LEVINTHAL, D. Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 35, n. 1, p. 128-152, 1990. (Special Issue: Technology, Organizations, and Innovation).

DAHLMAN, C.; ROSS-LARSEN, B.; WESTPHAL, L.E. Managing Technological Development: industrializing countries. World Development, v. 15, n. 6, p. 759-775, 1987.

DAHLMAN, C.; WESTPHAL, L.E. Technological Effort in Industrial Development. An Interpretative Survey of Recent Research. In: STEWART, F.; JAMES, J. (ed.). The Economics of New Technology in Developing Countries. London: Frances Pinter, 1982. p. 105-137.

DANTAS, E.; BELL, M. Latecomer firms and the emergence and development of knowledge networks: The case of Petrobras in Brazil. Research Policy, v. 38, n. 5, p. 829-844, 2009.

DANTAS, E.; BELL, M. The Co-Evolution of Firm-Centered Knowledge Networks and Capabilities in Late Industrializing Countries: The Case of Petrobras in the Offshore Oil Innovation System in Brazil. World Development, v. 39, n. 9, p. 1570-1591, 2011.

DUTRENIT, G. Reflexiones sobre la metodología de estudio de caso para analizar los procesos de aprendizaje en las firmas. In: FLORES SALGADO, J.; TIRADO JIMÉNEZ, R. (ed.). Economía industrial y agrícola en México ante la apertura. México DF: Producción económica, 2001. p. 115-134.

DUTRÉNIT, G. Building Technological Capabilities in Latecomer Firms: Review Essay. Science, Technology and Society, v. 9, n. 2, p. 209-241, 2004.

DUTRENIT, G.; ARZA, V. Features of interactions between public research organizations and industry in Latin America: the perspective of researchers and firms. In: ALBUQUERQUE, E.; SUZIGAN, W; KRUSS, G.; LEE, K. (ed.). Developing National Systems Of Innovation: University–Industry Interactions in the Global South. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015. p. 164-193.

EDQUIST, C. Striving Towards a Holistic Innovation Policy in European Countries - But Linearity Still Prevails!. Lund University, CIRCLE, 2014. (Papers in Innovation Studies, n. 2014/22).

ERBES, A.; ROBERT, V.; YOGUEL, G. Capacities, innovation and feedbacks in production networks in Argentina. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, v. 19, n. 8, p. 719-741, 2010.

FIGUEIREDO, P.N. Discontinuous innovation capability accumulation in latecomer natural resource-processing firms. Technological Forecasting y Social Change, v. 77, n. 7, p. 1090-1108, 2010.

FREEMAN, C.; PÉREZ, C. Structural crises of adjustment: business cycles and investment behavior. In: DOSI, G.; FREEMAN, C.; NELSON, R.; SILVERBERG, G.; SOETE, L. (ed.). Technical Change and Economics Theory. London: Pinter Publishers, 1988. p. 38-66.

GIULIANI, E.; ARZA, V. What drives the formation of ‘valuable’ university-industry linkages? Insights from the wine industry. Research Policy, v. 38, n. 6, p. 906-921, 2009.

GIULIANI, E.; BELL, M. The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: evidence from a Chilean wine cluster. Research Policy, v. 34, n. 1, p. 47-68, 2005.

KATZ, J. Domestic Technological Innovations and Dynamic Comparative Advantage: Further Reflections on a Comparative Case-Study Program. Journal of Development Studies, v. 16, n. 1-2, p. 13-38, 1984.

KLERKX, L.; GILDEMACHER, P.R. The role of innovation brokers in agricultural innovation systems. In: WORLD BANK. Agricultural innovation systems: an investment sourcebook. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2012. Module 3. p. 211-230.

LALL, S. Learning to Industrialize: The Acquisition of Technological Capability by India. London: Macmillan Press, 1987.

LALL, S. Technological Capabilities and Industrialization. World Development, v. 20, n.2, p. 165-186, 1992.

LAVARELLO, P.; SILVA, D.; LANGARD, F. Transferencia de tecnología, tramas locales y cadenas globales de valor: trayectorias heterogenias en la industria de la maquinaria agrícola argentina. Innovación RICEC, v. 2, n. 1, p.1-17, 2010.

LIM, C.; LEE, K. Technological regimes, catching-up and leapfrogging: findings from the Korean industries. Res. Policy, v. 30, n. 3, p. 459-483, 2001.

LÓPEZ, A. Las evaluaciones de programas públicos de apoyo al fomento y desarrollo de la tecnología y la innovación en el sector productivo en América Latina. Una revisión crítica. Washington, DC: Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, 2009.

LUNDVALL, B. National systems of innovation. Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers, 1992.

MALERBA, F.; ORSENIGO, L. Knowledge, Innovative Activities and Industrial Evolution. Industrial and Corporate Change, v. 9, n. 2, p. 289-313, 2000.

MOCHI, S. Evolución de las capacidades tecnológicas, los vínculos territoriales y las políticas de innovación. El caso de empresas argentinas de maquinaria agrícola. 2017. 247

p. Tesis (Doctoral en Economía y Gestión de la Innovación) – Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, 2017.

NELSON, R.; WINTER, S. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge: The Harvard University Press, 1982.

TEECE, D.J.; PISANO, G. The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, v. 3, n. 3, p. 537-556, 1994.

VAN LENTE, H.; HEKKERT, M.; SMITS, R.; VAN WAVEREN, B. Roles of systemic intermediaries in transition processes. International Journal of Innovation Management, v. 7, n. 3, p. 1-33, 2003.

VÁZQUEZ BARQUERO, A. Los territorios innovadores, espacios estratégicos del desarrollo. En: CURBELO, J.L.; PARRILLI, M.D.; ALBURQUERQUE, F. (coord.). Territorios innovadores y competitivos. Madrid: Marcial Pons Ediciones Jurídicas y Sociales S.A., 2011. p. 75-88.

YIN, R. Case Study Research. Design and Methods. London: SAGE Publications, 2003.

Creative Commons License
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Brasileira de Inovação

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.