Palavras-chave
Inovação
Colaboração
Serviços empresariais
Como Citar
Resumo
Este artigo aborda como é construída a apropriação da inovação em serviços empresariais em que fornecedores e clientes precisam colaborar para o desenvolvimento da inovação. O trabalho envolveu o estudo de múltiplos casos de díades fornecedor-cliente no desenvolvimento de projetos inovativos intensivos no uso de tecnologia da informação. O estudo identifica que a escolha dos mecanismos de apropriação se estabelece em um processo dinâmico, mantendo relação com o progresso do projeto e com o grau de exposição do fluxo de conhecimento envolvido. Os achados sugerem, ainda, que os mecanismos de apropriação da inovação se apresentam de forma combinada entre os de natureza formal e os de natureza informal, mantendo relação com a evolução do projeto colaborativo, e que são utilizados para dois propósitos gerais: prevenção da imitação e sustentação as capacidades inovativas.
Referências
AMARA, N.; LANDRY, R.; TRAORÉ, N. Managing the protection of innovations in knowledge-intensive business services. Research Policy, v. 37, n. 9, p. 1530–1547, 2008.
ARORA, A.; ATHREYE, S.; HUANG, C. The paradox of openness revisited: Collaborative innovation and patenting by UK innovators. Research Policy, v. 45, n. 7, p. 1352–1361, 2016.
BARROS, H. M. Exploring the use of patents in a weak institutional environment: The effects of innovation partnerships, firm ownership, and new management practices. Technovation, v. 45–46, p. 63–77, 2015.
BELDERBOS, R.; CARREE, M.; LOKSHIN, B. Cooperative R&D and firm performance. Research Policy, v. 33, n. 10, p. 1477–1492, 2004.
BETTENCOURT, L. A. et al. Client Co-Production in Knowledge-Intensive Business Services. California Management Review, v. 44, n. 4, p. 100–128, 2002.
BLIND, K.; CREMERS, K.; MUELLER, E. The influence of strategic patenting on companies’ patent portfolios. Research Policy, v. 38, n. 2, p. 428–436, 2009.
BOLISANI, E.; PAIOLA, M.; SCARSO, E. Knowledge protection in knowledge-intensive business services. Journal of Intellectual Capital, v. 14, n. 2, p. 192–211, 2013.
BRASIL. Lei 5.648 INPI. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Leis/L5648.htm. Acesso em: 21 maio. 2019.
CARMICHAEL, D. G. What is Project Management? In: Project Management Framework. Anais... [s.l: s.n.]. p. 51–62.
COHEN, W. M.; NELSON, R. R.; WALSH, J. P. Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent (or not). [s.l.] National Bureau of Economic Research, 2000.
DESYLLAS, P. et al. Capturing Value from Innovation in Knowledge-Intensive Business Service Firms: The Role of Competitive Strategy. British Journal of Management, v. 29, n. 4, p. 769-795, 2018.
DOSI, G. Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, v. 26, n. 3, p. 1120–1171, 1988.
EISENHARDT, K. M. Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, v. 14, n. 4, p. 532–550, 1989.
FILIPPETTI, A.; D’IPPOLITO, B. Appropriability of design innovation across organisational boundaries: exploring collaborative relationships between manufacturing firms and designers in Italy. Industry and Innovation, v. 24, n. 6, p. 613–632, 2017.
FLICK, U. Uma introdução à pesquisa qualitativa. 2. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2004.
GALLOUJ, F. F.; SAVONA, M. Innovation in services: A review of the debate and a research agenda. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, v. 19, n. 1, p. 1–28, 2008.
HALL, B. et al. The Choice between Formal and Informal Intellectual Property: A Review. Journal of Economic Literature, v. 52, n. 2, p. 375–423, 2014.
HALL, B. H.; SENA, V. Appropriability mechanisms, innovation, and productivity: evidence from the UK. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, v. 26, n. 1–2, p. 42–62, 2017.
HANNAH, D.; PARENT, M.; PITT, L.; BERTHON, P. Secrets and knowledge management strategy: the role of secrecy appropriation mechanisms in realizing value from firm innovations. Journal of Knowledge Management, v. 23, n. 2, p. 297–312, 2019.
HERTOG, P. DEN. Knowledge-intensive business services as co-producers of innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, v. 4, n. 04, p. 491–528, 2000.
HIPP, C. Service peculiarities and the specific role of technology in service innovation management. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, v. 9, n. 2, p. 154–173, 2008.
HIPP, C.; GRUPP, H. Innovation in the service sector: The demand for service-specific innovation measurement concepts and typologies. Research Policy, v. 34, n. 4, p. 517–535, 2005.
HURMELINNA-LAUKKANEN, P. The availability, strength and efficiency of appropriability mechanisms–protecting investments in knowledge creation. International Journal of Technology Management, v. 45, n. 3–4, p. 282–290, 2009.
HURMELINNA-LAUKKANEN, P.; PUUMALAINEN, K. Formation of the appropriability regime: Strategic and practical considerations. Innovation: Organization & Management, v. 9, n. 1, p. 2–13, 2007.
HURMELINNA‐LAUKKANEN, P. Enabling collaborative innovation – knowledge protection for knowledge sharing. European Journal of Innovation Management, v. 14, n. 3, p. 303–321, 2011.
HURMELINNA‐LAUKKANEN, P.; PUUMALAINEN, K. Nature and dynamics of appropriability: strategies for appropriating returns on innovation. R&D Management, v. 37, n. 2, p. 95–112, 2007.
HURMELINNA‐LAUKKANEN, P.; RITALA, P. Protection for profiting from collaborative service innovation. Journal of Service Management, v. 21, n. 1, p. 6–24, 2010.
HURMELINNA‐LAUKKANEN, P.; SAINIO, L.; JAUHIAINEN, T. Appropriability regime for radical and incremental innovations. R&D Management, v. 38, n. 3, p. 278–289, 2008.
INPI. INPI — Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial. Disponível em: http://www.inpi.gov.br/. Acesso em: 21 maio. 2019.
JAMES, S. D.; LEIBLEIN, M. J.; LU, S. How Firms Capture Value From Their Innovations. Journal of Management, v. 39, n. 5, p. 1123–1155, 28 jul. 2013.
LAURSEN, K.; SALTER, A. My Precious - The Role of Appropriability Strategies in Shaping Innovation Performance. Frederiksberg, Denmark: Copenhagen Business School, 2005.
LAURSEN, K.; SALTER, A. J. The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration. Research Policy, v. 43, n. 5, p. 867–878, 2014.
MILES, I. et al. Service production and intellectual property. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, v. 1, n. 1, p. 1-37, 2000.
MILES, I. Services Innovation: A Reconfiguration of Innovation Studies. PREST Discussion Papers, 05-01, p. 1–39, 2001.
MILES, I. Knowledge intensive business services: Prospects and policies. Foresight, v. 7, n. 6, p. 39–63, 2005.
MIOZZO, M.; DESYLLAS, P.; LEE, H.; MILES, I. Innovation collaboration and appropriability by knowledge-intensive business services firms. Research Policy, v. 45, n. 7, p. 1337–1351, 2016.
OLANDER, H.; HURMELINNA-LAUKKANEN, P.; MÄHÖNEN, J. What’s small size got to do with it? Protection of intellectual assets in SMEs. International Journal of Innovation Management, v. 13, n. 3, p. 349–370, 2009.
OLANDER, H.; HURMELINNA-LAUKKANEN, P.; VANHALA, M. Mission: Possible but sensitive — Knowledge protection mechanisms serving different purposes. International Journal of Innovation Management, v. 18, n. 6, 1440012, 2014.
PAALLYSAHO, S.; KUUSISTO, J. Intellectual property protection as a key driver of service innovation: an analysis of innovative KIBS businesses in Finland and the UK. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, v. 9, n. 3–4, p. 268–284, 2008.
PAASI, J. et al. Knowledge and intellectual property management in customer-supplier relationships. International Journal of Innovation Management, v. 14, n. 4, p. 629-654, 2010.
PINTEC/IBGE. Pesquisa de inovação 2014. Rio de Janeiro: [s.n.].
PISANO, G. Profiting from innovation and the intellectual property revolution. Research Policy, v. 35, n. 8 SPEC. ISS., p. 1122–1130, 2006.
REIS, R. C.; GONÇALVES, E.; TAVEIRA, J. G. Determinantes das colaborações inventivas nas redes brasileiras de copatenteamento inter-regional e internacional. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, v. 17, n. 2, p. 287–316, 2018.
RITALA, P. et al. External knowledge sharing and radical innovation: the downsides of uncontrolled openness. Journal of Knowledge Management, v. 22, n. 5, p. 1104–1123, 2018.
ROPER, S.; DU, J.; LOVE, J. H. Modelling the innovation value chain. Research Policy, v. 37, n. 6–7, p. 961–977, 2008.
RUIZ, A. U. Patrones de Inserción de las Empresas Multinacionales en la Formación de Competencias Tecnológicas de Paises Seguidores. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, v. 6, n. 2, p. 405–432, 2009.
SANTOS, J. B.; SPRING, M. Are knowledge intensive business services really co-produced? Overcoming lack of customer participation in KIBS. Industrial Marketing Management, v. 50, p. 85–96, 2015.
SAVIOTTI, P. P. On the dynamics of appropriability, of tacit and of codified knowledge. Research Policy, v. 26, n. 7–8, p. 843–856, 1998.
SAVIOTTI, P. P. The knowledge-base of the firm in the biotechnology based sectors: Properties and performance. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, v. 3, n. 1, p. 129–166, 2009.
TEECE, D. J. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, v. 15, n. 6, p. 285–305, 1986.
TEECE, D. J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, v. 28, n. 13, p. 1319–1350, 2007.
TEECE, D.; PISANO, G.; SHUEN, A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, v. 18, n. 7, p. 509–533, 1997.
TETHER, B. S. Do services innovate (Differently)? Insights from the European innobarometer survey. Industry and Innovation, v. 12, n. 2, p. 153–184, 2005.
THOMÄ, J.; BIZER, K. To protect or not to protect? Modes of appropriability in the small enterprise sector. Research Policy, 2013.
VAN DE VEN, A. H. Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organisational and Social Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
VARGO, S. L.; AKAKA, M. A. Service-Dominant Logic as a Foundation for Service Science: Clarifications. Service Science, v. 1, n. 1, p. 32–41, 2009.
YIN, R. K. Case study research: Design and methods. 3rd Revised ed. California: Sage Publications Inc, 2003.
ZOBEL, A.-K.; LOKSHIN, B.; HAGEDOORN, J. Formal and informal appropriation mechanisms: The role of openness and innovativeness. Technovation, v. 59, p. 44–54, 2017.
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Brasileira de Inovação
Downloads
