A contribuição da geografia econômica evolucionária para os estudos sobre conhecimento nas firmas

uma agenda de pesquisa para estudos brasileiros

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20396/rbi.v21i00.8666305

Palavras-chave:

Economia evolucionária, Geografia Econômica Evolucionária, Conhecimento

Resumo

Os estudos sobre a geração e a difusão de conhecimento nas firmas vêm ganhando importância à medida que a inovação se tornou estratégica para a competividade das firmas. Duas vertentes teóricas, ligadas a diferentes campos de conhecimento, se destacam nesta discussão: a economia evolucionária e a geografia econômica evolucionária. Esta última, porém, é um campo emergente de pesquisa no Brasil. O objetivo deste artigo é, em primeiro lugar, discutir as complementaridades entre a economia evolucionária e a geografia econômica evolucionária, a partir de suas contribuições para os estudos sobre conhecimento. A partir desta discussão, será apresentada uma agenda de pesquisa para os estudos brasileiros sobre a geração e difusão de conhecimento nas firmas sob uma perspectiva evolucionária que leve em consideração os elementos do território.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Renata Lèbre La Rovere, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Professor na Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil. 

Referências

AGHION, P.; JARAVEL, X. Knowledge spillovers, innovation and growth. Economic Journal, London, v. 125, p. 533-573, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12199

AMIN, A.; COHENDET, P. Geographies of knowledge formation in firms. In: THE DRUID SUMMER CONFERENCE 2003 ON CREATING, SHARING AND TRANSFERRING KNOWLEDGE: THE ROLE OF GEOGRAPHY, 2003, Copenhagen. Anais... Copenhagen: DRUID, 2003.

ASHEIM, B.; BOSCHMA, R.; COOKE, P. Constructing regional advantage: platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Utrecht: University of Utrecht, 2011. (Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, 07.09). Disponível em: <https://ideas.repec.org/p/egu/wpaper/0709.html>. Acesso em: 6 jul. 2021.

ASHEIM, B.; GRILLITSCH, M.; TRIPPL, M. Introduction: combinatorial knowledge bases, regional innovation, and development dynamics.

AGHION, P.; JARAVEL, X. Knowledge spillovers, innovation and growth. Economic Journal, London, v. 125, p. 533-573, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12199

AMIN, A.; COHENDET, P. Geographies of knowledge formation in firms. In: THE DRUID SUMMER CONFERENCE 2003 ON CREATING, SHARING AND TRANSFERRING KNOWLEDGE: THE ROLE OF GEOGRAPHY, 2003, Copenhagen. Anais... Copenhagen: DRUID, 2003.

ASHEIM, B.; BOSCHMA, R.; COOKE, P. Constructing regional advantage: platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Utrecht: University of Utrecht, 2011. (Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, 07.09). Disponível em: <https://ideas.repec.org/p/egu/wpaper/0709.html>. Acesso em: 6 jul. 2021.

ASHEIM, B.; GRILLITSCH, M.; TRIPPL, M. Introduction: combinatorial knowledge bases, regional innovation, and development dynamics.

BRESCHI, S.; LISSONI, F. Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: a critical survey. Industrial and Corporate Change, New York, v. 10, n. 1, p. 975-1005, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.4.975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.4.975

BRESCHI, S. et al. The geography of knowledge spillovers: the role of inventors’ mobility across firms and in space. In: BOSCHMA, R.; MARTIN, R. (Org.). The handbook of evolutionary economic geography. Chelteham: Elgar, 2010. cap. 16.

CASSIOLATO, J. E.; LASTRES, H. M. M. Local systems of innovation in Mercosur countries. Industry and Innovation, London, v. 7, n. 1, p. 33-53, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/713670250

CASSIOLATO, J. E.; LASTRES, H. M. M. The framework of ‘local productive and innovation systems’ and its influence on STI policy in Brazil. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, London, v. 29, n. 7, p. 784-798, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2020.1719650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2020.1719650

CASSIOLATO, J. E. et al. RedeSist 20 Anos: cooperando, criando conceitos, influenciando políticas e acumulando aprendizados. In: MATOS, M. P. et al. (Org). Arranjos Produtivos Locais: Referencial, experiências e políticas em 20 anos de RedeSist. Rio de Janeiro: E-papers, 2017. cap.1.

CASTRO, S. D. et al. Aprendizados com políticas para APLs e sua conexão com as políticas de desenvolvimento regional, produtivo e inovativo. In: MATOS, M. P. et al. (Org.). Arranjos produtivos locais: referencial, experiências e políticas em 20 anos de RedeSist. Rio de Janeiro: E-papers, 2017. p. 391-421. cap. 13.

COHEN, W. M.; LEVINTHAL, D. A. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, Ithaca, v. 35, n. 1, p. 128-152, 1990, https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553

COOKE, P. et al. Regional knowledge economies markets, clusters and innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2007. cap. 2-4.

COOKE, P.; GOMEZ URANGA, M.; ETXEBARRIA, G. Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organizational dimensions. Research Policy, Amsterdam, v. 26, n.4-5, p. 475-491, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5

DAVID, P. Why are institutions the ‘carriers of history’? Path dependence and the evolution of conventions, organizations, and institutions. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Amsterdam, v. 5, n. 2, p. 205-220, 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0954-349X(94)90002-7

DAVID, P. Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, v. 75, n. 2, p. 332-337, 1985.

DOSI, G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, Amsterdam, v. 11, n. 3, p. 147-162, 1982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6

DOSI, G.; ORSENIGO, L. Coordination and transformation: an overview of structures, behaviours and change in evolutionary environments. In: DOSI, G. et al. Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter, 1988.

DOSI, G. et al. Information, appropriability, and the generation of innovative knowledge four decades after Arrow and Nelson: an introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, New York, v. 15, n. 6, p. 891-901, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtl028

ERBER, F. The evolution of development conventions. In: CONGRESSO DA SOCIEDADE INTERNACIONAL J. A. SCHUMPETER, 12., 2012, Rio de Janeiro. Anais... Rio de Janeiro: IE/UFRJ, 2012.

ERBER, F. Eficiência coletiva em arranjos produtivos locais industriais: comentando o conceito. Nova Economia, Belo Horizonte, v. 18, n. 1, p. 11-32, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-63512008000100001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-63512008000100001

FELD, B. Startup Communities: Building an entrepreneurial ecosystem in your city. Hoboken: Wiley, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119204459

FRAGA, L. T. F. Inovação, fluxos de conhecimento e externalidades de aglomeração: proposta de políticas públicas para o desenvolvimento COOKE, P.; GOMEZ URANGA, M.; ETXEBARRIA, G. Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organizational dimensions. Research Policy, Amsterdam, v. 26, n.4-5, p. 475-491, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5

DAVID, P. Why are institutions the ‘carriers of history’? Path dependence and the evolution of conventions, organizations, and institutions. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Amsterdam, v. 5, n. 2, p. 205-220, 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0954-349X(94)90002-7

DAVID, P. Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, v. 75, n. 2, p. 332-337, 1985.

DOSI, G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, Amsterdam, v. 11, n. 3, p. 147-162, 1982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6

DOSI, G.; ORSENIGO, L. Coordination and transformation: an overview of structures, behaviours and change in evolutionary environments. In: DOSI, G. et al. Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter, 1988.

DOSI, G. et al. Information, appropriability, and the generation of innovative knowledge four decades after Arrow and Nelson: an introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, New York, v. 15, n. 6, p. 891-901, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtl028

ERBER, F. The evolution of development conventions. In: CONGRESSO DA SOCIEDADE INTERNACIONAL J. A. SCHUMPETER, 12., 2012, Rio de Janeiro. Anais... Rio de Janeiro: IE/UFRJ, 2012.

ERBER, F. Eficiência coletiva em arranjos produtivos locais industriais: comentando o conceito. Nova Economia, Belo Horizonte, v. 18, n. 1, p. 11-32, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-63512008000100001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-63512008000100001

FELD, B. Startup Communities: Building an entrepreneurial ecosystem in your city. Hoboken: Wiley, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119204459

FRAGA, L. T. F. Inovação, fluxos de conhecimento e externalidades de aglomeração: proposta de políticas públicas para o desenvolvimento Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. Disponível em:

<https://www.cambridge.org/core>. Acesso em: 6 jul. 2021.

HIDALGO, C. A. et al. The product space and its consequences for economic growth. Science, Washington, v. 317, p. 482-487, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1144581

ISENBERG, D. J. The big idea: How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review, v. 88, n. 6, p. 41-50, 2010.

JOHNSON, B. From user-producer relations to the learning economy. Science & Public Policy, Guildford, v. 38, n. 9, p. 703-711, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3152/030234211X13070021633288

KRAFFT, J.; QUATRARO, F.; SAVIOTTI, P. P. The knowledge-base evolution in biotechnology: a social network analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, London, v. 20, n. 5, p. 445-475, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2011.562355

KRUGMAN, P.R. Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, v. 99, n. 3, p. 483-499, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261763

LA ROVERE, R. L. A contribuição da geografia econômica evolucionária para os estudos sobre conhecimento nas empresas e suas possíveis aplicações para a análise do caso brasileiro. Rio de Janeiro: IE/UFRJ, 2020. Artigo inédito apresentado como parte dos requisitos para a progressão para professor titular. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29736.29440

LA ROVERE, R. L. et al. Bridging the literature on innovation systems and entrepreneurial ecosystems: cross-fertilizations for understanding knowledge-intensive, social and environmental entrepreneurship. In: TSVETKOVA, A.; SCHMUTZLER, J.; PUGH, R. (Org.). Entrepreneurial ecosystems meet innovation systems: synergies, policy lessons and overlooked dimensions. 1. ed.Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2020. v. 1, p. 10-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789901184.00010

LA ROVERE, R. L.; SANTOS, G. O.; VASCONCELLOS, B. L. X. Desafios para a mensuração de ecossistemas de inovação e de empreendedorismo no Brasil. In: ENCONTRO DE ESTUDOS SOBRE EMPREENDEDORISMO E GESTÃO DE PEQUENAS

EMPRESAS ONLINE, 11., 2020, Belo Horizonte. Anais... Belo Horizonte: UFMG, 2020. p. 1-19.

LUNDVALL, B. Å. Innovation as an interactive process: from user producer interaction to the national innovation systems. In: DOSI, G. et al. (Org.). Technology and economic theory. London: Pinter, 1988.

LUNDVALL, B. Å. Product innovation and user-producer interaction. Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag, 1985.

LUNDVALL, B. Å.; JOHNSON, B. The learning economy. Journal of Industry Studies, Kensington, v. 1, n. 2, p. 23-42, 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662719400000002

LUNDVALL, B. Å.; JOHNSON, B.; ANDERSEN, E. S. et al. National systems of production, innovation and competence building. Research Policy, Amsterdam, v. 31, n. 2, p. 213-231, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00137-8

LUNDVALL, B. Å. Innovation as an interactive process: from user producer interaction to the national innovation systems. In: DOSI, G. et al. (Org.). Technology and economic theory. London: Pinter, 1988.

LUNDVALL, B. Å. Product innovation and user-producer interaction. Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag, 1985.

LUNDVALL, B. Å.; JOHNSON, B. The learning economy. Journal of Industry Studies, Kensington, v. 1, n. 2, p. 23-42, 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662719400000002

LUNDVALL, B. Å.; JOHNSON, B.; ANDERSEN, E. S. et al. National systems of production, innovation and competence building. Research Policy, Amsterdam, v. 31, n. 2, p. 213-231, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00137-8

MALERBA, F. Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, Amsterdam, v. 31, n. 2, p. 247-264, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1

MALERBA, F.; MCKELVEY, M. Knowledge-intensive innovative entrepreneurship integrating Schumpeter, evolutionary economics, and innovation systems. Small Business Economics, Dordrecht, v. 3, p. 503-522, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0060-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0060-2

MALERBA, F.; VONORTAS, N. Innovation networks in industries. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848449275

MALERBA, F. Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, Amsterdam, v. 31, n. 2, p. 247-264, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1

MALERBA, F.; MCKELVEY, M. Knowledge-intensive innovative entrepreneurship integrating Schumpeter, evolutionary economics, and innovation systems. Small Business Economics, Dordrecht, v. 3, p. 503-522, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0060-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0060-2

MALERBA, F.; VONORTAS, N. Innovation networks in industries. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848449275

MALMBERG, A.; MASKELL, P. An evolutionary approach to localized learning and spatial clustering. In: BOSCHMA, R.; MARTIN, R. (Org.). The handbook of evolutionary economic geography. Chelteham: Elgar, 2010. cap. 18.

MALMBERG, A.; MASKELL, P. An evolutionary approach to localized learning and spatial clustering. In: BOSCHMA, R.; MARTIN, R. (Org.). The handbook of evolutionary economic geography. Chelteham: Elgar, 2010. cap. 18.

MANTZAVINOS, C.; NORTH, D. C.; SHARIQ, S. Learning, Institutions and economic performance. Perspectives on Politics, New York, v. 2, n. 1, p. 75-84, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1537592704000635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592704000635

MANTZAVINOS, C.; NORTH, D. C.; SHARIQ, S. Learning, Institutions and economic performance. Perspectives on Politics, New York, v. 2, n. 1, p. 75-84, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1537592704000635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592704000635

MARTIN, R.; SUNLEY, P. The place of path dependence in an evolutionary perspective on the economic landscape. In: BOSCHMA,

EMPRESAS ONLINE, 11., 2020, Belo Horizonte. Anais... Belo Horizonte: UFMG, 2020. p. 1-19.

MARTIN, R.; SUNLEY, P. The place of path dependence in an evolutionary perspective on the economic landscape. In: BOSCHMA, regional de inovação do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Tese (Doutorado) - Instituto de Economia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 2020.

SCHAMP, E. W. On the notion of co- evolution in economic geography. In: BOSCHMA, R.; MARTIN, R. (Org.). The handbook of evolutionary economic geography. Chelteham: Elgar, 2010. cap. 20.

SCHAMP, E. W. Evolutionary economic geography. In: RICHARDSON, D. et al. (Org.). The International Encyclopedia of Geography, the Earth, Environment and Technology. London: John Wiley & Sons, 2017. p. 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0997

SCHERER, F. M. Inter-industry technology flows in the United States. Research Policy, Amsterdam, v. 11, n. 4, p. 227-245, 1982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(82)90011-7

SCHERER, F. M. Technology flows matrix estimation revisited. Economic Systems Research, Abingdon, v. 15, n. 3, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0953531032000111790

SCHUMPETER, J. A. Theorie der Wirschaftlichen Entwicklung. Leipzig: Verlag von Duncker und Humblot, 1911.

SCHUMPETER, J. A. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1942.

SOETE, L. L. G.; VERSPAGEN, B.; TER WEEL, B. J. Systems of innovation. Maastricht: UNU-MERIT, Maastricht Economic and Social Research and Training Centre on Innovation and Technology, 2009. (UNU-MERIT Working Papers, 062).

STAM, E. Entrepreneurship, evolution and geography. In: BOSCHMA, R.; MARTIN, R. (Org.). The handbook of evolutionary economic geography. Chelteham: Elgar, 2010. cap. 6.

STAM, E. Knowledge and entrepreneurial employees: a country-level analysis. Small Business Economics, Dordrecht, v. 41, n. 4, p. 887-898, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9511-y

STAM, E. Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: a sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, Abingdon, v. 23, n. 9, p. 1759-1769, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484

STAM, E.; SPIGEL, B. Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. Utrecht: School of Economics, Utrecht University, 2016. (Discussion Paper Series 16-13)

STORPER, M. The regional world: territorial development in a global economy. New York: Guilford, 1997.

STRAMBACH, S. Path dependence and path placticity: the co-evolution of institutions and innovation - the German customized business software industry. In: BOSCHMA, R.; MARTIN, R. (Org.). The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, Cheltenham: Elgar, 2010. cap. 19.

TRIPPL, M.; ASHEIM, B.; MIORNER, J. Identification of regions with less developed research and innovation systems. Lund: Lund University, 2015. (CIRCLE Papers in Innovation Studies, 2015/1).

VAN DER PANNE, G. Agglomeration externalities: Marshall versus Jacobs. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Heidelberg, v. 14, p. 593-604, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00191-004-0232-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-004-0232-x

VASCONCELLOS, B. L. X. Oportunidades produtivas para as mesorregiões do estado do Rio de Janeiro: análise em redes sob as perspectivas da Complexidade Econômica e da Geografia Econômica Evolucionária. Tese (Doutorado) - Instituto de Economia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 2022.

WINTER, S. The place of entrepreneurship in “The Economics that Might Have Been”. Small Business Economics, Dordrecht, v. 47, p. 15-34, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9701-5

WURTH, B.; STAM, E.; SPIGEL, B. Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Hoboken, 2021. No prelo. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258721998948. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258721998948

XIMENES, A. C. A. O diálogo entre a oferta de ensino técnico e tecnológico e o desenvolvimento: um estudo multicaso sobre a mudança institucional da Rede Federal de Educação Profissional, Científica e Tecnológica do Brasil. 2018. Tese (Doutorado) - Instituto de Economia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 2018.

XU, Z.; MAAS, G. Innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystems as important building blocks. In: MAAS, G.; JONES, P. (Org.). Transformational entrepreneurship practices. London: Palgrave, 2019. p. 15-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11524-1_2

Publicado

2022-06-27

Como Citar

LÈBRE LA ROVERE, R. . A contribuição da geografia econômica evolucionária para os estudos sobre conhecimento nas firmas: uma agenda de pesquisa para estudos brasileiros. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, Campinas, SP, v. 21, n. 00, p. e022007, 2022. DOI: 10.20396/rbi.v21i00.8666305. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8666305. Acesso em: 9 fev. 2023.