Palavras-chave
Digitalização
Adoção de tecnologias
Empresas
Indústria
Pesquisa empírica
Arcabouço analítico
Como Citar
Resumo
This paper proposes a methodological framework for assessing the adoption of digital technologies by industrial firms. Given the increasing economic importance of digital technologies, proper assessment methods are required. However, evaluating digital adoption can be quite challenging due to the pervasiveness, intangibility, and fast progress rate of such technologies. The proposed framework is designed to enable three tasks: (i) registering information about current and prospective adoption of digital technologies by industrial firms, (ii) developing indicators to capture the dynamics of digital adoption in time; and (iii) analysing digitalisation determinants, requirements, and outcomes. This paper contributes to building a reference framework to evaluating how digital technologies can strengthen the industrial development of nations, particularly developing countries.
Referências
ABRAMOVITZ, M. Catching up, forging ahead, and falling behind. The Journal of Economic History, v. 46, n. 2, p. 385-406, 1986.
AGRESTI, A. an introduction to categorical data analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1996.
AGRESTI, A. Categorical data analysis. 2. ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2002.
ALBRIEU, R. et al. Travesía 4.0: hacia la transformación industrial argentina. Nota Técnica no. IDB-TN-1672. Buenos Aires: Intal-BID, 2019.
ALBRIEU, R. et al. Travesía 4.0: hacia la transformación industrial argentina. Buenos Aires: Intal-BID, 2022. Mimeo. Forthcoming.
ANDREWS, D.; NICOLETTI, N.; TIMILIOTIS, C. Digital technology diffusion: a matter of capabilities, incentives or both? Working Papers, OECD, Economics Department, n. 1476, 2018.
BAINES, T. et al. Servitization: revisiting the state-of-the-art and research priorities. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, v. 27, n. 2, p. 256-278, 2017.
BALCER, Y.; LIPPMAN, S. A. Technological expectations and adoption of improved technology. Journal of Economic Theory, v. 34, p. 292-318, 1984.
BRITTO, J.; URRACA-RUIZ, A.; FERRAZ, J. C.; TORRACCA, J.; SCHMIDT, H. El impacto de la digitalización sobre el empleo y las habilidades por estadios de adopción en Brasil y Argentina. Rio de Janeiro: IE-UFRJ; Campinas: IE-UNICAMP; Niteroi: FCC-UFF, 2022. Mimeo. Forthcoming.
CANTNER, U.; VANNUCCINI, S. A new view of general-purpose technologies. Jena Economic Research Papers, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, n. 2012-054, 2017. Available at: https://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/redir.pf?u=http%3A%2F%2Fpubdb.wiwi.uni-jena.de%2Fpdf%2Fwp_2012_054.pdf;h=repec:jrp:jrpwrp:2012-054. Accessed on 13 Aug. 2019.
CALVINO, F. et al. A taxonomy of digital intensive sectors. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, n. 2018/14. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/f404736a-en.
CETIC.BR - CENTRO REGIONAL DE ESTUDOS PARA O DESENVOLVIMENTO DA SOCIEDADE DA INFORMAÇÃO. ICT enterprises 2019. Survey on the use of information and communication technologies in Brazilian enterprises. São Paulo: Cetic.br, Nic.br, CGI.br, 2020.
CHIAN, F. T. T. A perception-based model for technological innovation in small and medium enterprises. ECIS 2010 Proceedings, n. 33, 2010. Available at: http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2010/33.
COUTINHO, L. Digitalização, expectativas e dinamismo industrial: um mapa conceitual. Rio de Janeiro: IE-UFRJ; Campinas: IE-UNICAMP; Niteroi: FCC-UFF, 2022. Mimeo. Forthcoming.
DOCAMPO RAMA, M.; RIDDER, H.; BOUMA, H. Technology generation and age in using layered user interfaces. Gerontechnology, v. 1, n. 1, January 2001. DOI:10.4017/gt.2001.01.01.003.00.
DOSI, G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, v. 11, p. 147-162, 1982.
DOSI, G.; NELSON, R. Technical change and industrial dynamics as evolutionary processes. In: HALL, B.; ROSENBERG, N. (Eds.) Handbook of the Economics of Technical Change. North Holland: Elsevier, 2010.
FERRAZ, J. C.; KUPFER, D.; TORRACCA, J.; BRITTO, J. N. P. Snapshots of a state of flux: how Brazilian industrial firms differ in the adoption of digital technologies and policy implications. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, v. 23, n. 4, p. 390-407, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/17487870.2019.1578651.
FERRAZ, J. C.; RUSH, H.; MILES, I. Development, technology and flexibility: Brazil faces the Industrial Divide. London: Routledge, 1992.
FREEMAN, C., PEREZ, C. Structural crises of adjustment: Business cycles and investment behavior. In: DOSI, G.; FREEMAN, R.; NELSON, R.; SILVERBERG, G.; SOETE, L. (Eds.). Technical change and economic theory. London: Pinter Publishing, 1988.
GAMBARDELLA, A.; TORRISI, S. Does technological convergence imply convergence in markets? Evidence from the electronics industry. Research Policy, v. 27, p. 445-463, 1998.
GREGORY, R. Knowledge in perception and illusion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological, v. 352, n. 1358, p. 1121–1127, Aug. 29, 1997.
IDG. 2019 Digital Business Survey. IDG Communications, Inc. 2019.
IEL/CNI et al. Industry 2027: risks and opportunities for Brazil in the face of disruptive innovations. Final report: Building the Future of Brazilian Industry. Brasília, IEL/CNI. 2018.
ITU-D - TELECOMMUNICATION DEVELOPMENT SECTOR. Partnership on Measuring ICT for Development. ITU-D, 2021. Available at: https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/intlcoop/partnership/default.aspx. Accessed Sept. 2021.
KOUL, S.; EYDGAHI, A. A systematic review of technology adoption frameworks and their applications. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, v. 12, n. 4, p. 106-112, 2017.
KUPFER, D.; FERRAZ, J.C.; TORRACCA, J. A comparative analysis on digitalization in manufacturing industries in selected developing countries: Firm-level data on Industry 4.0. Working Paper 16/2019. Vienna: Department of Policy, Research and Statistics, UNIDO, 2019.
LONG, J. S.; FREESE, J. Regression Models for categorical and limited dependent variables using Stata. 2. ed. College Station, Texas: Stata Press, 2006.
LONG, J. S.; FREESE, J. Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. 3. ed. College Station, TX: Stata Press, 2014.
MCKINSEY. Transformações digitais no Brasil: Insights sobre o nível de maturidade digital das empresas no país. São Paulo: McKinsey Brasil, 2019.
NELSON, R. Why do firms differ, and how does it matter? Strategic Management Journal, v. 12, p. 61-74, 1991,
NELSON, R.; WINTER, S. G. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.
NYLÉN, D.; HOLMSTROM, J. Digital innovation strategy: a framework diagnosing and improving digital product and service innovation. Business Horizons, v. 58, n. 1, p. 57-67, 2015.
OECD – ORGANISATION FOR THE ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT; EUROSTAT - STATISTICAL OFFICE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation. 4. ed. Paris: OECD Publishing; Luxembourg: Eurostat, 2018. DOI: 10.1787/9789264304604-en.
PFEIFFER, S. The vision of “Industrie 4.0” in the making – a case of future told, tamed, and traded. Nanoethics, v. 11, p. 107-121, 2017.
PORTER, M.; HEPPELMANN, J. How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harvard Business Review, nov. 2014. Available at: https://hbr.org/2014/11/how-smart-connected-products-are-transforming-competition. Accessed Sept. 2021.
PWC. The Industry 4.0 / Digital Operations Self-Assessment. [On-line] PwC, 2021. Available at: < https://i40-self-assessment.pwc.de/i40/landing/>. Accessed Sept. 2021.
ROGERS, E. M. Diffusion of innovations. 5. ed. New York: Free Press, 1910. [The Journal of Economic History, v. 23, p. 414-443, 2003]
ROSENBERG, N. Inside the black box: technology and economics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
SEDB - SINGAPORE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD. The Singapore Smart Industry Readiness Index: catalysing the transformation of manufacturing. Singapore: SEDB, 2017.
SEDB - SINGAPORE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD. The prioritisation matrix: catalysing the transformation of manufacturing. Singapore: SEBD, 2019.
SCHACTER, D. Psychology. New York: Worth Publishers, 2011.
SCHUMACHER, A.; SIHN, W. Development of a monitoring system for implementation of industrial digitalisation and automation using 143 key performance indicators. Procedia CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems, v. 93, p. 1310-1315, 2020.
SILVA NETO, V. j., BONACELLI, M. B. M. AND PACHECO, C. A. O Sistema Tecnológico Digital: inteligência artificial, computação em Nuvem e Big Data. Revista Brasileira de Inovação. 2020. DOI: http://doi.org/10.20396/rbi.v19i0.8658756
SOH P. Dominant design. In: AUGIER, M.; TEECE, D. (Eds.). The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_387-1
EUROSTAT - STATISTICAL OFFICE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Community survey on ICT usage (e-commerce) of enterprises 2002. Luxemburg: Eurostat, 2002. Available at: https://businessdocbox.com/Marketing/126358173-Community-survey-on-ict-usage-e-commerce-of-enterprises-2002.html.
EUROSTAT - STATISTICAL OFFICE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Community survey on ICT usage and e-commerce in enterprises 2021. Luxemburg: Eurostat, 2021. Available at: https://circabc.europa.eu/sd/a/f9dc8b66-a429-49e2-ae01-f7424ec389f0/MQ_2021_ICT_ENT.pdf.
UNCTAD - UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT. Manual for the production of statistics on the digital economy. Geneva: UNCTAD, 2021.
UNIDO - UNITED NATIONS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION. Industrial Development Report. Vienna: UNIDO, 2020.
VDMA. Guideline Industrie 4.0: Guiding principles for the implementation of Industrie 4.0 in small and medium sized businesses. VDMA, [s.d.].
VERHOEF, P. C. et al. Digital transformation: a multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, v. 122, p. 889-901, 2021.
ZOLAS, N. et al. Advanced technologies adoption and use by US firms: evidence from the annual business survey. CES 20-40. Suitland, MD: US Census Bureau, 2020.
YU, J. Korea Smart Factory Initiative. In: COLLOQUIUM ON DIGITAL INDUSTRIAL POLICY PROGRAMME, South Africa, Nov. 2018. Available at: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/52246331e4b0a46e5f1b8ce5/t/5bf25bdc758d46dbf17f821b/1542609889778/Dr+Yu_Korea+Smart+Factory+Initiative.pdf. Accessed Sept. 2021.
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Brasileira de Inovação
Downloads
