Banner Portal
Equilibrium and Evolutionary Foundations of Competition and Technology Policy: New Perspectives on the Division of Labour and the Innovation Process
PDF (English)

Palavras-chave

Ciência e tecnologia. Sistemas de inovação. Auto-organização. Processos e instituições. Conhecimento.

Como Citar

METCALFE, J. Stanley. Equilibrium and Evolutionary Foundations of Competition and Technology Policy: New Perspectives on the Division of Labour and the Innovation Process. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, Campinas, SP, v. 2, n. 1, p. 111–146, 2009. DOI: 10.20396/rbi.v2i1.8648870. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8648870. Acesso em: 29 mar. 2024.

Resumo

Ciência, tecnologia e política de inovação desempenham um papel cada vez mais importante no contexto do desenvolvimento das sociedades modernas. Este artigo procura rever a racionalidade da política de inovação analisada sob as lentes do nosso enfoque institucional sobre processos evolucionistas mostrando como estes últimos influenciam a acumulação e a disseminação do conhecimento. A nossa pergunta principal é se podemos contribuir para aperfeiçoar o processo de auto-organização do sistema de inovações. A identificação de ausência de componentes ou elos perdidos entre os diversos blocos deste sistema de inovações pode ser a resposta afirmativa à nossa pergunta.
https://doi.org/10.20396/rbi.v2i1.8648870
PDF (English)

Referências

Andersen, B.; Metcalfe, J.S.; Tether, B., “Innovation Systems as Instituted Economic Processes”, in Metcalfe, J. S.; Miles, I. (eds.), Innovation Systems in the Service Economy: Measurement and Case Study Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.

Antonelli, C., “The Italian Way to Innovation, State of the Art and New Perspectives”, mimeo, University of Turin, 1998.

Autio, E., “New Technology Based Firms in Innovation Networks, Sympletic and Generative Impacts”, in Research Policy, v. 26, p. 263-282, 1997.

Branscomb, L.M., Empowering Technology, Boston: MIT Press, 1993.

Callon, M., “Is Science a Public Good?”, in Science, Technology and Human Values, v. 19, p. 395-424, 1994.

Carlsson, B. (ed.), Technological Systems and Economic Performance: The Case of Factory Automation, Dordrecht: Kluwer-Academic, 1995.

Carlsson, B. (ed.), Technological Systems and Industrial Dynamics, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1997.

Carlsson, B.; Stankiewicz, R., “On the Nature, Function and Composition of Technological Systems”, in Journal of Evolutionary Economics, v. 1, p. 93-118, 1991.

Carter, C.; Williams, B., “Government Science Policy and the Growth of the British Economy”, in Manchester School, v. 32, p. 117-214, 1964.

Constant, E.W., The Origins of the Turbo-Jet Revolution, John Hopkins University Press, 1980.

Coombs, R.; Harvey, M.; Tether, B., “Analysing Distributed Innovation Processes,” in CRIC Discussion Paper, n. 43, University of Manchester, 2001.

Coombs, R.; Metcalfe, J.S., “Organizing for Innovation: Co-ordinating Distributed Innovation Capabilities”, in N. Foss & V. Mahnke, (eds.), Competence, Governance and Entrepreneurship: Advances in Economic Strategy Research, Oxford University Press, 2000.

David, P.A.; Foray, D., “Information Distribution and the Growth of Economically Valuable Knowledge: A Rationale for Technological Infrastructure Policies”, in Teubal, M.; Foray, D.; Justman, M.; Juscovitch, E. (eds.), Technological Infrastructure Policy: An International Perspective, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1996.

Edquist, C. (ed.), Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, London: Pinter, 1997.

Eliasson, G., 1998, “On the Micro Foundations of Economic Growth”, in Lesourne, J. & Orléan, A. (eds.), Advances in Self-Organization and Evolutionary Economics, London: Economica, 1998.

Faulkner, W., “Conceptualizing Knowledge used in Innovation: A Second Look at the Science-

Technology Distinction and Industrial Innovation”, in Science Technology and Human Values, v. 19, p. 425-458, 1994.

Freeman, C., Technology Policy and Economic Performance, London: Pinter, 1987.

Freeman, C., “The Economics of Technical Change”, in Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 18 (5), p. 463-514, 1994.

Freeman, C.; Louca, F., As Time Goes By, Oxford University Press, 2001

Georghiou, L., “The United Kingdom Technology Foresight Programme”, in Futures, v. 28, p. 359-377, 1996.

Georghiou, L., “Global Cooperation in Research”, in Research Policy, v. 27, p. 611-626, 1998.

Gibbons, M.; Johnson, R., “The Role of Science in Technological Innovation”, in Research Policy, v. 3, p. 220-42, 1974.

Georghiou, L.; Limoges, C.; Nowotny, H.; Schwartzman, S.; Scott, P.; Trow, M., The New Production of Knowledge, London: Sage, 1994.

Grandstrand, D.; Patel, P.; Pavitt, K., “Multi-Technology Corporations: Why They Have ‘Distributed’ Rather Than ‘Core’ Competences”, in California Management Review, v. 39, p.8-25, 1997.

Green, K.; Hull, R.; Walsh, V.; McMeekin, A., “The Construction of the Techno-Economic: Networks vs Paradigms”, in CRIC Discussion Paper, n. 17, University of Manchester, 1998.

Griliches, Z., R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence, Chicago University Press, 1998.

Hicks, D., “Published Papers, Tacit Competencies and Corporate Management of the Public/ Private Character of Knowledge”, in Industrial and Corporate Change, v. 4, p. 401-424, 1995.

Howells, J., “Research and Technology Outsourcing”, in CRIC Discussion Paper, n. 6, University of Manchester, 1997.

Katz, J. S.; Martin, B., “What is Research Collaboration?”, in Research Policy, v. 26, p.1-18, 1997.

Keller, A., “Has Science Created Technology”, in Minerva, v. 22, p. 161-82, 1984.

Kline, S. J.; Rosenberg, M., “An Overview of Innovation”, in National Academy of Engineering, The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, Washington: National Academy Press, 1986.

Kodama, F., Emerging Patterns of Innovation, Harvard Business School Press, 1995.

deLaat, B.; Larédo, P., “Foresight for Research and Technology Policies: From Innovation Studies to Scenario Configuration”, in Coombs, R.; Green, K.; Richards, A.; Walsh, V. (eds.) Technological Change and Organisation, Edward Elgar, 1998.

Langrish, J.; Gibbons, M.; Evans, W.; Jevons, F., Wealth from Knowledge, London: Macmillan, 1972.

Layton, E.T., “Through the Looking Glass, or News from Lake Mirror Image”, in Technology and Culture, v. 15, p. 594-601, 1987.

Lundvall, B. A. (ed.), National Systems of Innovation: Towards A Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London: Pinter, 1992.

Marshall, A., Industry and Trade, Macmillan, 1919.

Merges, R. P.; Nelson, R., “On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope”, in The Colombia Law Review, 1990.

Metcalfe, J. S., “Competition and Collaboration in the Innovation Process”, in Bowen, A.; Ricketts, M. (eds.), Stimulating Innovation in Industry, London: Kogan Page, 1990.

Metcalfe, J. S., “The Economic Foundations of Technological Policy: Equilibrium and Evolutionary Perspectives” in Stoneman, P. (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, Oxford: Blackwell, 1995a.

Metcalfe, J. S., “Technology Systems and Technology Policy in an Evolutionary Framework”, in Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 19, p. 25-46, 1995b.

Metcalfe, J. S.; DeLiso, N., “Innovation, Capabilities and Knowledge: The Epistemic Connection”, in Coombs, R.; Green, K.; Richards, A.; Walsh, V. (eds.), Technological Change and Organization, Edward Elgar, 1998.

Metcalfe, J. S.; Georghiou, L., “Equilibrium and Evolutionary Foundations of Technology Policy”, in Science, Technology Industry Review, OECD, n. 22, p. 75-100, 1998.

Mowery, D.C.; Rosenberg, N., Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth, Cambridge University Press, 1989.

Narin, F.; Hamilton, K. S.; Olivastro, D., “The Increasing Linkage Between US Technology and Public Science”, in Research Policy, v. 26, p.317-330, 1997.

Nelson, R., “The Role of Knowledge in R&D Efficiency”, in Quarterly Journal of Economics, v. 97, p. 453-70, 1982.

Nelson, R., National Innovation Systems, New York: Oxford University Press, 1993,

OECD. Technology and the Economy, OECD, Paris, 1992.

Pavitt, K., “What Makes Basic Research Economically Useful”, in Research Policy, v. 20, p. 109-19, 1991.

Petroski, H., Innovation By Design, Harvard University Press, 1996.

Polanyi, M., Personal Knowledge, Routledge, 1958.

Rosenberg, N., “Why Firms Do Basic Research (With Their Own Money)”, in Research Policy, v. 19, p. 165-174, 1990.

Stiglitz, J. E., Whither Socialism, Oxford University Press, 1994.

Stokes, D. E., Pasteur’s Quadrant, Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 1997.

Tassey, G., Technology Infrastructure and Competitive Position, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1992.

Teubal, M., “R&D and Technology Policy in NICs as Learning Processes”, in World Development, v. 24, p. 449-460, 1996.

Utterback, J. M., Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation: How Companies Can Seize Opportunities in the Face of Technological Change, Harvard University Press, 1994.

Varga, A., University Research and Regional Innovation, London: Kluwer Academic, 1998.

Veugelers, R., “Internal R&D Expenditures and External Technology Sourcing”, Research Policy, v. 26, p.303-315, 1997.

Vincenti, W. G., What Engineers Know and How They Know It, John Hopkins University Press, 1990.

Vincenti, W. G., “The Technical Shaping of Technology: Real World Constraints and Technical Logic in Edisons Electrical Lighting System”, in Social Studies of Science, v. 25, p. 553-74, 1995.

Walker, W., “Entrapment in Large Technology Systems: Institutional Commitment and Power Relations”, in Research Policy, v. 29, n. 7-8, p. 833-846, 2000.

Weinburg, A. M., Reflections on Big Science, London: Pergamon Press, 1967.

Wise, G., “Science and Technology”, Osiris, v. 1, p. 229-48, 1985.

Young, A., “Increasing Returns and Economic Progress”, in Economic Journal, v. 38, p. 527-542, 1928.

O conteúdo dos artigos e resenhas publicados na RBI são de absoluta e exclusiva responsabilidade de seus autores.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.