Abstract
This paper has as its purpose to analyze the results obtained by the industries from São Paulo state related to the technological and also to the identification of the factors which influenced this phenomenon. For this purpose data from Research on São Paulo State Economic Activity (PAEP) provided by State Data and System Analysis Foundation (SEADE). Within this context, a conceptual model was designed which relates features that can influence the innovative performance of these enterprises that give rise to a logistic regression model to be the technique used. The results show that when it comes to technological product innovation the relevant factors to make it possible are: the internal information sources, the cooperation on research and development (R&D), the availability of a R&D specific department, financial investments in R&D, export orientation, the information sources related to the market, the human resource investments in R&D, and the so called other information sources. However, the influential factors related to technological innovation processes are: government support to innovation, the information sources related to the market, the internal information resources, the availability of a R&D specific department, company age, cooperation on R&D, other information sources, export orientation, the human resource percentage straight related to the production, to institutional information sources, and the average salary.References
ALBUQUERQUE, E. M. Sistemas nacionais de inovação e direitos de propriedade industrial: notas introdutórias a um debate necessário. Estudos Econômicos, v. 26, n. 2, p. 171-200, maio-agosto 1996.
ANDREASSI, T. Estudo das relações entre indicadores de P&D e indicadores de resultado empresarial em empresas brasileiras. Tese (Doutorado). São Paulo, Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade, Universidade de São Paulo, 1999.
ARCHIBUGI, A.; HOWELLS J.; MICHIE J. Innovation systems in a global economy. Tecnology Analysis & Strategic Management, v. 11, n. 4, p. 527-539, 1999.
CARAYANNIS, E. G.; ROY, R. I. S. Davids vs Goliaths in the small satellite industry: the role of technological innovation dynamics in firm competitiveness. Thecnovation, v. 20, n. 6, p. 287-297, 2000.
CASTELLACCI, F. How does innovation differ across sectors in Europe? Evidence from the CIS-SIEPI database. Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture University of Oslo, 2004 (Working paper 04/04).
CERTA, A.; ENEA, M., GALANTE, G.; LA FATA, M. C. International Journal of Production Research, v. 47, n. 13, p. 3503-3523, 2009.
CHESBROUGH, H.W. The market for innovation: implications for corporate strategy. California Management Review, Vol. 49, n.3, p. 45–66.
CHESBROUGH, H.W.; VAHNAVERBEKE, W.; WEST, J. Open innovation: researching a new paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
DOSI, G. Sources, procedures and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, v. 26, n. 3, p. 1120-1171, 1988.
FAPESP. Indicadores de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação em São Paulo 2004. São Paulo, 2010. Disponível em: http://www.fapesp.br/indicadores/. Acesso em: 12 jul. 2011.
FONSECA, M. D. R. Rules and patterns of behaviour in the context of emergence. Druids - Nelson and Winter Conference, 2001. Disponível em: www.druid.dk/conferences. Acesso em: 21 set. 2011.
FRANCIS, D.; BESSANT, J. Targeting innovation and implications for capability development. Technovation, Thecnovation, v. 25, n. 3, p. 171-183, 2000.
FRANKO, L. G. Global corporate competition: who’s winning, who’s losing and the R&D factor as one reason why. Strategic Management Journal, v. 10, n. 5, p. 449-474, 1991.
FREEMAN, C. The “National System of Innovation” in historical perspective. Journal of Economics, v. 19, n. 1, p. 5-24, 1995.
FREITAS, I. M.; TUNZELMAN, N. V. Mapping public support for innovation in a three dimensional space. Research Policy, v. 37, n. 1, p. 1446-1464, 2008.
FRISHAMMAR, J.; HÖERTE, S. A. Managing external information in manufacturing firms: the impact on innovation performance. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, v. 22, n. 3, p. 251-266, 2005.
GREENE, W. H. Econometric analysis. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1993.
HAGEDOORN, J. Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? Research Policy, 2002.
HAIR JR., J. F.; ANDERSON, R. E.; TATHAM, R. L.; BLACK, W. Multivariate Data Analysis: with readings. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1998.
IBGE – Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa Industrial de Inovação Tec-
nológica – Pintec 2008. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 2008. Disponível em: www.ibge.gov.br/. Acesso em: 15 set. 2011.
KANNEBLEY JR., S.; PORTO, G. S.; PAZELLO, E. T. Characteristics of Brazilian innovative firms: an empirical analysis based on PINTEC – industrial research on technological innovation. Research Policy, v. 34, n. 6, p. 872-893, 2005.
KARLSSON, M.; TRYGG, L.; ELFSTRÖM, B. Measuring R&D productivity: complementing the picture by focusing on research activities. Technovation, v. 32, n. 8, p. 1365-1379, 2003.
KLINE, S.; ROSEMBERG, N. An overview of innovation. The positive sum strategy. Washington: National Academy Press, 1986.
KRUNGLIANSKAS, I. Tornando a pequena e média empresa competitiva: como inovar e sobreviver em mercados globalizados. São Paulo: Ed. Iege,1996.
LUNDVALL, B. National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers, 1992.
MADDALA, G. S. Introduction to econometrics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall, 1992.
MAHMOOD, P. I.; LEE, C. Y. Business groups: entry barrier-innovation debate revisited. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, v. 54, n. 1, p. 513-531, 2004.
MALHOTRA, N. K. Pesquisa de marketing: uma orientação aplicada. 3. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2001.
MARSILI, O.; VERSPAGEN, B. Technology and the dynamics of industrial structures: an empirical mapping of Dutch manufacturing. Industrial and Corporate Change, v. 11, n. 4, p. 791-815, 2002.
MATESCO, V. R. Inovação tecnológica nas empresas brasileiras: a diferenciação competitiva e a motivação para inovar. Tese (Doutorado). Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Economia Industrial da Faculdade Federal do Rio de Janeiro,1993.
NELSON, R. R. National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press., 1993.
VIOTTI, E. B.; MACEDO, M. M. (Orgs.). Indicadores de ciência, tecnologia e inovação no Brasil. Campinas: Editora Unicamp, 2001.
OCDE. Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data: Oslo Manual. Paris, 2005. Disponível em: http://www.oecd.org. Acesso em: 14 mar. 2007.
PATEL, P.; PAVITT, K. National innovation systems: why they are important, and how they might be measured and compared. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, v. 3, n.1, p. 77-95, 1994.
QUADROS, R.; FURTADO, A.; BERNARDES, R.; FRANCO, E. Technological innovation in Brazilian industry: an assessment based on the São Paulo innovation survey. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 67, n. 2, p. 203-219, 2001.
SCHUMPETER, J. A. The theory of economic development. New York: Oxford University Press, 1961.
SANTARELLI, E.; STERLACCHINI, A. Innovation, formal vs. informal R&D, and firm size: some evidence from Italian manufacturing firms. Small Business Economics, v. 2, n. 3, p. 223-228, 2004.
SHARP, M.; PAVITT, K. Technology policy in the 1990s: old trends and new realities. Journal of Common Market Studies, v. 31, n. 2, p. 129-151, 1993.
SHEFER, D.; FRENKEL, A. R&D, firm size and innovation: an empirical analysis. Technovation, v. 25, n. 1, p. 25-32, January 2005.
The content of the articles and reviews published in RBI are of absolute and exclusive responsibility of their authors.
Downloads
