Banner Portal
On the coevolution of commercial and technological structures: theory and empirical evidence
PDF Acesso via SciELO (Português (Brasil))
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Technological and commercial structures. Structural change. Commercial liberalization.

How to Cite

CARVALHO, Cecilia Menezes Barbosa de; RUIZ, Ana Urraca. On the coevolution of commercial and technological structures: theory and empirical evidence. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, Campinas, SP, v. 17, n. 2, p. 229–258, 2018. DOI: 10.20396/rbi.v17i2.8650105. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8650105. Acesso em: 4 jul. 2024.

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze how technological specialization patterns coevolve with the commercial specialization patterns. Given the interdependence between productive, technological and commercial structures, it is expected that demand shocks implicit to liberalization processes will generate impacts on the technological structure. The coevolution hypothesis will be tested by means of a panel data formed for 35 countries and 38 sectors from 1996 to 2013. The results confirm that commercial and technological patterns of specialization coevolved in all models and, mostly, in dynamic sectors. The demand-pull effect was also confirmed for the most internationalized and dynamic sectors. Multinational corporations emerged as a minor determinant of the technological specialization patterns in host countries. In relation to the autonomous determinants of technological specialization, cumulativeness seems to play a central role, while technological opportunity was relevant only in industries intensive in natural resources.
https://doi.org/10.20396/rbi.v17i2.8650105
PDF Acesso via SciELO (Português (Brasil))
PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

ARCHIBUGI, D., PIANTA, M. The technological specialization of advanced countries: A report to the EEC on international science and technology activities. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic, 1992.

ARELLANO, M. Panel Data Econometrics. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2003.

ARELLANO, M.; BOND, S. R. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, v. 58, n. 2, p. 277-297, 1991.

ARELLANO, M.; BOVER, O. Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error components models. Journal of Econometrics, v. 68, n. 1, p. 29-51, 1995.

BALASSA, B. Trade liberalization and ‘revealed’ comparative advantage. The Manchester School, v. 33, n. 2, p. 99-123, 1965.

BELL, M.; PAVITT, K. Technological accumulation and industrial growth: contrasts between developed and developing countries. Industrial and Corporate Change, v. 2, n. 2, p. 157-210, 1993.

BOND, S. S.; HOEFFLER, A.; TEMPLE, J. GMM estimation of empirical growth models. Economics Papers, Economics Group, Nuffield College: University of Oxford, v. W21, n. 1, p. 33, 2001.

BLUNDELL, R.; BOND, S. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, v. 87, n. 1, p. 115-143, 1998.

CAMERON, G.; PROUDMAN, J.; REDDING, S. Technological convergence, R&D, trade and productivity growth. European Economic Review, v. 49, p. 775–807, 2005.

CAMERON, A. C.; TRIVEDI, P. K. Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005.

CANTWELL, J.; VERTOVA, G. Historical Evolution of Technological Diversification. Research Policy, v. 33, p. 511-529, 2004.

COHEN, W.M.; LEVINTHAL, D.A. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 35, p. 128–152, 1990.

DIAZ-MORA, C. The role of comparative advantage in trade within industries: a panel data approach for the European Union. Review of World Economics, v.138, n.2, p. 291-316, 2002.

DOSI, G.; PAVITT, K.; SOETE, L. The economics of technical change and international trade. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1990.

EUROSTAT. Patent Statistics: Concordance IPC V8 – NACE REV.2. 2014. Disponível em: < https://circabc.europa.eu/sd/a/d1475596-1568-408a-9191-426629047e31/2014-10-16-Final%20IPC_NACE2_2014.pdf >. Acesso em: 12/02/2017.

GLAUBER VITAL DA COSTA, C; CASTILHO, M; PUCHET ANJUL, M. “Estrutura produtiva e encadeamentos produtivos na era das cadeias globais de valor. Uma análise insumo-produto. Artigo apresentado no II ENEI da ABEIN. 1-3 agosto, 2017, Rio de Janeiro.

HOLLAND, M.; XAVIER, C.L. Dinâmica e competitividade setorial das exportações brasileiras: uma análise de painel para o período recente. Economia e Sociedade, v.14, n.1, p.85-108, 2005.

HUANG, H.T.; MIOZZO, M. Patterns of technological specialisation in Latin-American and East Asian countries: an analysis of patentes and trade flows. Economic Innovation and New Technologies, v. 13, n. 7, p. 615-653, 2004.

LAURSEN, K. The impact of technological opportunity on the dynamics of trade performance. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, v. 10, p. 341-357, 1999.

LAURSEN, K., ENGENDAL. The role of the technology factor in economic growth: a theoretical and empirical inquiry into new approaches to economic growth. 1995, (Dissertação de Mestrado), University of Aalborg, Dinamarca.

MALERBA, F.; MONTOBBIO, F. Exploring factors affecting international technological specialization. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, v. 13, p. 411-434, 2003.

MELICIANI, V. The impact of technological specialisation on national performance in a balance-of-payments-constrained growth model. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics v. 13, 101–118, 2002.

MELO, M.; URRACA-RUIZ, A. Mudança estrutural e co-evolução das estruturas produtiva, comercial e tecnológica no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Economia de Empresas, v. 15, n. 1, p. 49-66, 2015.

MIRANDA, P. A internacionalização de atividades tecnológicas e a inserção dos países em desenvolvimento: uma análise baseada em dados de patentes. In: 42º Encontro Nacional de Economia, 2014, Natal, RN.

MONTOBBIO, F., RAMPA, F. The impact of technology and structural change on export performance in nine developing countries. World Development, v. 33, n. 4, p. 527–547, 2005.

PAVITT, K.: Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, v.6, n. 13, p. 343-373, 1984.

ROODMAN, D. A Note on the Theme of Too Many Instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, v. 71, n. 1, p. 135–158, 2009.

SCHMOCH, U.; LAVILLE, F.; PATEL, P.; FRIETSCH, R. Linking technology areas to industrial sectors. Final Report to the European Comission, DG Research. Karlsruhe, Paris, Brighton, 2003.

STURGEON, T.; GEREFFI, G; GUINN, A.; ZYLBERBERG, E. O Brasil nas cadeias globais de valor: implicações para a política industrial e de comércio. Revista Brasileira de Comércio Exterior, n. 115, 2013.

URRACA-RUIZ, A. The ‘technological’ dimension of structural change under Market integration. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, v. 27, p. 1-18, 2013.

VERTOVA, G. National technological specialization and the highest technological opportunities historically. Technovation, v. 21, p. 605–612, 2001.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Brasileira de Inovação

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.