Banner Portal
Creative imitation face the opportunities of pharmabiotechnology
PDF (Español (España))
PDF Acesso via SciELO (Español (España))

Keywords

Upgrading
Biotechnology
Pharmaceutical industry

How to Cite

LAVARELLO, Pablo Jose; SZTULWARK, Sebastian; MANCINI, Matias; JUNCAL, Santiago. Creative imitation face the opportunities of pharmabiotechnology: learning from national experiences of (late) late industrialization. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, Campinas, SP, v. 19, p. e020008, 2020. DOI: 10.20396/rbi.v19i0.8655699. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8655699. Acesso em: 16 jul. 2024.

Abstract

This article analyzes the experience of industrial upgrading in South Korea and India in the global biopharmaceutical industry. From a comparative historical approach, it is analyzed how during the last years and before a scenario of expiration of the patents of the pharmaceutical products of greater complexity, these two countries managed to advance in “very late” industrialization processes based on a creative imitation strategy. It is inquired, in particular, how these countries followed different paths of entry: on the one hand, that of “stage skipping”, which demanded a set of deliberate actions aimed at favoring certain activities or sectors in a focused way; on the other, the sequential type, in which the institutional and policy changes were more gradual, ensuring a set of general conditions of technological infrastructure and intellectual property.

https://doi.org/10.20396/rbi.v19i0.8655699
PDF (Español (España))
PDF Acesso via SciELO (Español (España))

References

ABERNATHY, William J.; UTTERBACK, James M. Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology review, vol. 80, no 7, p. 40-47, 1978

ALTENBURG, T.; SCHMITZ, H.; STAMM, A. Breakthrough? China’s and India’s transition from production to innovation. World Development, 36 (2), 325-344, 2008

BELL, M.; FIGUEIREDO, P.N. Innovation capability building and learning mechanisms in latecomer firms: recent empirical contributions and implications for research. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d’études du développement, v. 33, n. 1, p. 14-40, 2012.

BELL, M.; PAVITT, K.L.R. Technological accumulation and industrial growth: contrasts between developed and developing countries. Industrial and Corporate Change, v. 2, n. 1, p. 157-210, 1993.

BELSEY, M.J.; HARRIS, L.M.; DAS, R.R.; CHERTKOW, J. Biosimilars: initial excitement gives way to reality. Nature, v. 5, n. 7, July 2006.

BERKOWITZ, S.; ENGEN, J.; MAZZEO, J.; JONES, G. Analytical Tools for Characterizing Biopharmaceuticals and the Implications for Biosimilars. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, v. 11, n. 7, p. 527-540, 2012. doi:10.1038/nrd3746. 201.

BIANCHI, C.; TORRES FREIRE, C. Biotecnología para salud humana, estrategias de desarrollo y políticas públicas:Brasil 2004-2016. In: LAVARELLO, P.; GUTMAN, G.; SZTULWARK, S. (coord.). Explorando el camino de la imitación creativa: La industria biofarmacéutica argentina en los 2000. Buenos Aires: CEUR-Editorial Libro Punto, 2018. p. 65-80.

BIOPLAN. 12th Annual Report and Survey of Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing Capacity and Production. Rockville, BioPlan Associates, 2018. ISBN 978-1-934106-36-5.

BROWNE, R. Analysis of the Trastuzumab Biosimilar Market As Herceptin Exclusivity Nears an End. Biosimilar Developmnet, April 23, 2019.

CHATURVEDI, S. India Innovation Systems and Emergence of Biopharmaceutical Sector: Issues and Prospects. Research and Information System for Development Countries (RIS). New Dehli, India, 2007. (RIS Discussion Papers, #124).

CHESNAIS, F. Biotechnologie et modifications des structures de l’industrie chimique: quelques points de repère. Revue d’économie industrielle, v. 18, p. 218-230, 4 trim. 1981. (Genèse et développement de la BIOINDUSTRIE).

CHOWDHURY, P.R. Outsourcing biopharma R&D to India. Great Britain: Biohealthcare Publishing. Ltd. Oxford, 2011.

CHUNG, B.H.; PARK, H.K.; JUNG, Y. Nanobiotechnology R&D Strategy in Republic of Korea. Asia-Pacific Biotech News, v. 10, n. 17, p. 978-987, 2006.

COHEN, W.M.; LEVINTHAL, D.A. Innovation and learning: the two faces of R & D. The economic journal, v. 99, n. 397, p. 569-596, 1989.

CORREA, C. Implications of bilateral free trade agreements on access to medicines. Bulletin of World Health Organization, v. 84, n. 5, 2006.

DEKKER, H.C.; VAN DEN ABBEELE, A.G.H.L. Organizational learning and interfirm control: the effects of partner search and prior exchange experiences. Organization science, v. 21, n. 6, p. 1233-1250, 2010.

DIRK, J. The Reconfiguration of a Latecomer Innovation System: Governing Pharmaceutical Biotechnology Innovation in South Korea. Frankfurt; Peter Lang Pub., 2013.

DOSI, G. Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of economic literature, p. 1120-1171, 1988.

FREEMAN, C. Continental, national and sub-national innovation systems—complementarity and economic growth. Research Policy, v. 31, n. 2, p.191-211, 2002. GERSCHENKRON, A. El atraso económico en perspectiva histórica. Investigación Económica, v. 28, n. 111/112, jun.-dic. 1968.

GOMES, E.B.P.; ROSSETO, R.; PINHEIRO, L.; HASENCLEVER, L.; PARANHOS, J. Desenvolvimento de biossimilares no Brasil. Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science, v. 5, n. 1, p. 31-42, 2016.

GUTMAN, G.E.; LAVARELLO, P.J. Biopharmaceuticals and firm organization in Argentina: opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, v. 7, n. 3, p. 159-178, 2014.

GUTMAN, G.E.; LAVARELLO, P.J. El sector biofarmacéutico: desafíos de política para una industria basada en la ciencia. In: ABELES, M.; CIMOLI, M.; LAVARELLO, P.J. Manufactura y cambio estructural: aportes para pensar la política industrial en la Argentina. Santiago: CEPAL, 2017. p. 243-281.

HASENCLEVER, L.; PARANHOS, J. Le développement de l’industrie pharmaceutique au Brésil et en Inde: capacité technologique et développement industriel. L’émergence: des trajectoires aux concepts. Paris: Les Editions Karthala, 2013.

HIKINO, T.; AMSDEM, A. La industrialización tardía en perspectiva histórica. Desarrollo Económico, n. 137, Buenos Aires. 1995.

HIRSCHMAN, A. Auge y ocaso de la teoría económica del desarrollo. El Trimestre Económico, v. 47, n. 188(4), p. 1055-1077, 1980. IBEF. Formula of Success. Emerging trends in Biosimilars in India. Nova Delhi, India Brand Equity Foundation (IBEF), 2011. Available at: http://www.ibef.org/download/Biosimilarsin-India-30312.pdf. Accessed on April 5, 2016

INDIA. Ministry of Science & Technology. Department of Biotechnology. National Biotechnology Development Strategy 2015-2020. India, 2015.

INDIAN drugs: not what the doctor ordered. Financial Times, Sept. 9th 2015. Available at: https://next.ft.com/content/de0ca3f4-5581-11e5-97e9-7f0bf5e7177b. Accessed on May 5 2016

KALE, D.; HUZAIR, F. Evolution of creative imitation under the TRIPS compliant patent regime: Development of biosimilar capabilities in the Indian pharmaceutical sector. In: ATLANTA CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE AND INNOVATION POLICY, 2015, Atlanta, GA. Atlanta, 17-19 Sept. 2015.

KATZ, J.; BERCOVICH, N. Biotecnología y economía política: estudios del caso argentino. Buenos Aires: Centro Editor de América Latina, 1990.

KEDRON, P.; BAGCHI-SEN, S. Foreign direct investment in Europe by multinational pharmaceutical companies from India. Journal of Economic Geography, 12, p. 809-839, 2012.

KIM, L. Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea’s Technological Learning. Cambridge: Harvard Business Press, 1997.

LAVARELLO, P.; GUTMAN, G.; SZTULWARK, S. Explorando el camino de la imitación creativa: La industria biofarmacéutica argentina en los 2000. Buenos Aires: CEUR-Editorial Libro Punto, 2018.

LEE, K. Making a Technological Catch‐up: Barriers and opportunities. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, v. 13, n. 2, p. 97-131, Jan. 2005.

LEE, K.; LIM, C. The Technological regimes, catch-up and leapfrogging: findings from the Korean industries. Research Policy, v. 30, n. 3, p. 459-483, Feb. 2001.

LI, F.; SHEN, A.; AMANULLAH, A. Cell culture processes in monoclonal antibody production. Pharmaceutical Sciences Encyclopedia: Drug Discovery, Development, and Manufacturing, 2010. p. 1-38.

MOTA, F.B.; CASSIOLATO, J.; GADELHA, C. Futuro da pesquisa, desenvolvimento tecnológico e produção industrial de biofarmacêuticos no Brasil. Rev Eletron de Comun Inf Inov Saúde, v. 8, n. 4, p. 461-477. out.-dez. 2014.

MROCZKOWSKI, T. The New Players in Life Science Innovation: Best Practices in R&D from Around the World. New Jersey: Financial Times Press, 2012.

MU, Q.; LEE, K. Knowledge diffusion, market segmentation and technological catch-up: The case of the telecommunication industry in China. Research policy, v. 34, n. 6, p. 759783, 2005.

MUELLER, L.; ANAND, N. An Overview of Biosimilars and the Biosimilar Pathway in India. Bric Wall Blog. Jun. 21, 2014. Available at: https://bricwallblog.wordpress.com/2014/05/21/ an-overview-of-biosimilars-and-the-biosimilar-pathway-in-india/. Accessed on May 5th 2015

NELSON, R.; WRIGHT, G. The rise and fall of American technological leadership: the postwar era in historical perspective. Journal of Economic Literature, v. 30, n. 4, p. 19311964, 1992.

PÉREZ, C. Cambio tecnológico y oportunidades de desarrollo como blanco móvil. Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. Revista de la CEPAL, n. 75, p. 115-136, dic. 2001.

PEREZ, C.; SOETE, L. Catching up in technology: Entry barriers and windows of opportunity. In: DOSI, G. et al. (ed.). Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter Publishers, 1988.

PERROUX, F. L’effet d’entraînement: de l’analyse au repérage quantitatif. Economie appliquée, v. 26, n. 2/3/4, 1973.

PISANI, J.; BONDUELLE, Y. Opportunities and barriers in the biosimilar market: evolution or revolution for generics companies. London: Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP, 2006.

PISANO, G.P. Science business: The promise, the reality, and the future of biotech. Cambridge: Harvard Business Press, 2006.

PISANO, G.P.; SHIH, W.C. Does America really need manufacturing. Harvard Business Review, v. 90, n. 3, p. 94-102, 2012.

REZAIE, R.; MCGAHAN, A.M.; FREW, S.E.; DAAR, A.S.; SINGER, P.A. Emergence of biopharmaceutical innovators in China, India, Brazil, and South Africa as global competitors and collaborators. Health Research Policy and Systems, v. 10, n. 18, 2012.

SIDDIQUI, Z. India risks missing boat as biosimilars shake up drug industry. Reuters, October 15th, 2015. Available at: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-india-biosimilarsidUSKCN0S82OQ20151014. Accessed on April 6th 2016 SRINIVAS, S. Industrial Development and Innovation: Some Lessons from Vaccine Procurement. World Development v. 34, n. 10, p. 1742-1764, 2006.

SZTULWARK, S.; MANCINI, M.; JUNCAL, S.; LAVARELLO, P. Imitación creativa en países de industrialización tardía: enseñanzas del caso de los biosimilares en Corea e India. In: LAVARELLO, P.; GUTMAN, G.; SZTULWARK, S. Explorando el camino de la imitación creativa: La industria biofarmacéutica argentina en los 2000. Buenos Aires: CEUR-Editorial Libro Punto, 2018. p. 47-64.

THAKUR, D. A new class of drugs is here- but India is dangerously inept at dealing with them. Scroll.in, Sept. 16, 2015. Available at: http://scroll.in/article/754277/a-new-class-ofdrugs-is-here-but-india-is-dangerously-inept-at-dealing-with-them. Accessed on November 7 2016 THOMPSON, P. Learning by doing. In: HALL, B.; ROSENBERG. N. (ed.). Handbook of the Economics of Innovation. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2010. v. 1. p. 429-476.

THORSTEINSDÓTTIR, H.; QUACH, U.; DAAR, A.S.; SINGER P. Conclusions: promoting biotechnology innovation in developing countries. Nature Biotechnology, v. 22, 2014. (Supplement).

TORRES, R.L.; HASENCLEVER, L. La evolução institucional das indústrias farmacêuticas indiana e brasileira revisitada. História Econômica & História de Empresas. São Paulo, v. 20, n. 2, p. 375-406, 2017.

VARGAS, M.A. Base Biotecnológica no Brasil: desafios e nichos estratégicos. In: GADHELA, C.A.; GADELHA, P.; NORONHA, J.; PEREIRA, T. (Org.). Brasil Saúde Amanhã: complexo econômico-industrial da saúde. 1. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fiocruz, 2017. v. 1. p. 61-87.

VON ZEDTWITZ, M. Organizational learning through post-project reviews in R&D. R&D management, v. 32, n. 3, p. 255-268, 2002.

WADE, R. The paradox of US industrial policy: The developmental state in disguise. In: SALAZAR, J.M. Transforming economies. Making industrial policy work for growth, jobs and development. Geneve: UNCTAD-ILO, 2014.

WONG, J. From Learning to Creating: Biotechnology and the Postindustrial Developmental State in Korea. Journal of East Asian Studies, v. 4, n. 3, p. 491-517, 2004

WOONG, H. Latecomers’ science-based catch-up in transition: the case of the Korean pharmaceutical industry. Doctoral thesis (PhD), University of Sussex, 2015.

YIN, R.K. Case study research and applications: Design and methods. New York: Sage publications. 2017.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Brasileira de Inovação

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.