Keywords
Bibliometry
Cluster analysis
Themes
How to Cite
Abstract
From the 1990s onwards, studies on entrepreneurship increased significantly. Currently, the field has many scientific publications, journals, specialized events and is present in undergraduate and graduate courses. Over time different approaches, definitions, concepts, theories and ramifications have emerged. Therefore, it is possible to carry out a review to analyze and understand the evolution of the field in different periods. Given this, this work aimed to analyze an evolution of entrepreneurship while the research field through themes that marked different periods. A bibliometric literature review was carried out with a focus on cluster analysis. It was possible to observe that in the last decades the field has gained breadth, with the introduction of new concepts and research themes. In addition, the maintenance of some themes indicates that these important ones continue and seek theoretical / methodological density.
References
AUDRETSCH, D. B.; THURIK, A. R. Capitalism and democracy in the 21st century: from the managed to the entrepreneurial economy.Journal of Evolutionary Economics, New York, v. 10, n. 1-2, p. 17-34, 2000.
BARON, R. A. Psychological perspectives on entrepreneurship: cognitive and social factors in entrepreneurs’ success. Current Directions in Psychological Science, New York, v. 9, n. 1, p. 15-18, 2000.
BARRINGER, B. R.; BLUEDORN, A. C. The relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, Hoboken, v. 20, n. 5, p. 421-444, 1999.
BAUCUS, D. A.; BAUCUS, M. S.; HUMAN, S. E. Consensus in franchise organizations: a cooperative arrangement among entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, New York, v. 11, n. 5, p. 359-378, 1996.
BYRNE, J.; FATTOUM, S.; DIAZ GARCIA, M. C. Role models and women entrepreneurs: entrepreneurial superwoman has her say. Journal of Small Business Management, Morgantown, v. 57, n. 1, p. 154-184, 2019.
CAVALLO, A.; GHEZZI, A.; BALOCCO, R. Entrepreneurial ecosystem research: present debates and future directions. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, New York, v. 15, n. 4, p. 1291-1321, 2019.
CENTOBELLI, P. et al. Exploration and exploitation in the development of more entrepreneurial universities: a twisting learning path model of ambidexterity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, New York, v. 141, p. 172-194, 2019.
CHANDRA, Y. Mapping the evolution of entrepreneurship as a field of research (1990-2013): a scientometric analysis. PloS One, San Francisco, v. 13, n. 1, e0190228, 2018.
CHEN, C.; IBEKWE‐SANJUAN, F.; HOU, J. The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: a multiple‐perspective cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, New York, v. 61, n. 7, p. 1386-1409, 2010.
CORNELIUS, B.; LANDSTRÖM, H.; PERSSON, O. Entrepreneurial studies: the dynamic research front of a developing social science. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Hoboken, v. 30, n. 3, p. 375-398, 2006.
COVIN, J. G.; LUMPKIN, G. T. Entrepreneurial orientation theory and research: reflections on a needed construct. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Hoboken, v. 35, n. 5, p. 855-872, 2011.
CRAMMOND, R. J. Entrepreneurship: origins and nature. In:
CRAMMOND, R. J. (Org.). Advancing entrepreneurship education in universities. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020. p. 23-55.
DACIN, M. T.; DACIN, P. A.; TRACEY, P. Social entrepreneurship: a critique and future directions. Organization Science, Maryland, v. 22, n. 5, p. 1203-1213, 2011.
DACIN, P. A.; DACIN, M. T.; MATEAR, M. Social entrepreneurship: why we don’t need a new theory and how we move forward from here. The Academy of Management Perspectives, New York, v. 24, n. 3, p. 37-57, 2010.
DAVIDSSON, P. Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: a re-conceptualization. Journal of Business Venturing, New York, v. 30, n. 5, p. 674-695, 2015.
EISENHARDT, K. M.; SCHOONHOVEN, C. B. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, Maryland, v. 7, n. 2, p. 136-150, 1996.
ELLEGAARD, O.; WALLIN, J. A. The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: how great is the impact? Scientometrics, Amsterdam, v. 105, n. 3, p. 1809-1831, 2015.
EVANS, D. S.; JOVANOVIC, B. An estimated model of entrepreneurial choice under liquidity constraints. Journal of Political Economy, Chicago, v. 97, n. 4, p. 808-827, 1989.
EVANS, D. S.; LEIGHTON, L. S. Some empirical aspects of entrepreneurship. In: ACS, Z. J.; AUDRETSCH, D. B. (Org.). The economics of small firms. Dordrecht: Springer, 1990. p. 79-99.
FRITSCH, M.; OBSCHONKA, M.; WYRWICH, M. Historical roots of entrepreneurship-facilitating culture and innovation activity: an analysis for German regions. Regional Studies, Oxfordshire, v. 53, n. 9, p. 1296-1307, 2019.
GAMANIS, A. et al. Tracing the concept of entrepreneurship and the role of an entrepreneur: a critical review. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovative Competitiveness, Cyprus, v. 1, n. 1, p. 1-14, 2019.
GARTNER, W. B. A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of Management Review, Ohio, v. 10, n. 4, p. 696-706, 1985.
GARTNER, W. B.; VESPER, K. H. Experiments in entrepreneurship education: successes and failures. Journal of Business Venturing, New York, v. 9, n. 3, p. 179-187, 1994.
GRIMALDI, R. et al. 30 years after Bayh–Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, Amsterdam, v. 40, n. 8, p. 1045-1057, 2011.
IRELAND, R. D. et al. Integrating entrepreneurship and strategic management actions to create firm wealth. Academy of Management Perspectives, New York, v. 15, n. 1, p. 49-63, 2001.
JONES, M. V.; COVIELLO, N.; TANG, Y. K. International entrepreneurship research (1989-2009): a domain ontology and thematic analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, New York, v. 26, n. 6, p. 632-659, 2011.
KLEIN, P. G. et al. Toward a theory of public entrepreneurship. European Management Review, Houndmills, v. 7, n. 1, p. 1-15, 2010.
LANDSTRÖM, H. The evolution of entrepreneurship as a scholarly field. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, Boston, v. 16, n. 2, p. 65-243, 2020.
LANDSTRÖM, H.; HARIRCHI, G.; ÅSTRÖM, F. Entrepreneurship: exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, Amsterdam, v. 41, n. 7, p. 1154-1181, 2012.
LEWIS, P. The quest for invisibility: female entrepreneurs and the masculine norm of entrepreneurship. Gender, Work & Organization, Oxford, v. 13, n. 5, p. 453-469, 2006.
LIÑÁN, F.; FAYOLLE, A. A systematic literature review on entrepreneurial intentions: citation, thematic analyses, and research agenda. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, New York, v. 11, n. 4, p. 907-933, 2015.
LIU, S. et al. Knowledge domain and emerging trends in Alzheimer’s disease: a scientometric review based on CiteSpace analysis. Neural Regeneration Research, Mumbai, v. 14, n. 9, p. 1643, 2019.
LOW, M. B.; MACMILLAN, I. C. Entrepreneurship: past research and future challenges. Journal of Management, v. 14, n. 2, p. 139-161, 1988.
MCCLELLAND, D. C. et al. Achieving society. London: Simon & Schuster, 1961.
MITCHELL, R. K. et al. The distinctive and inclusive domain of entrepreneurial cognition research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Hoboken, v. 28, n. 6, p. 505-518, 2004.
MURRAY, F. The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: sharing the laboratory life. Research Policy, Amsterdam, v. 33, n. 4, p. 643-659, 2004.
PRADO, J. W. et al. Realismo crítico e estudos organizacionais: uma análise bibliométrica. Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo em Administração, Niterói, v. 13, n. 2, p. 125-147, 2019.
QUADRINI, V. Entrepreneurship, saving, and social mobility. Review of Economic Dynamics, Orlando, v. 3, n. 1, p. 1-40, 2000.
RAZIN, E.; LIGHT, I. Ethnic entrepreneurs in America’s largest metropolitan areas. Urban Affairs Review, Thousand Oaks, v. 33, n. 3, p. 332-360, 1998.
SANTOS, F. M. A positive theory of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, Dordrecht, v. 111, n. 3, p. 335-351, 2012.
SCHLÄGEL, C.; KÖNIG, M. Determinants of entrepreneurial intent: a meta‐analytic test and integration of competing models. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Hoboken, v. 38, n. 2, p. 291-332, 2014.
SHANE, S.; VENKATARAMAN, S. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, Mississippi, v. 25, n. 1, p. 217-226, 2000.
SHEPHERD, D. A. Party on! A call for entrepreneurship research that is more interactive, activity based, cognitively hot, compassionate, and prosocial. Journal of Business Venturing, New York, v. 30, n. 4, p. 489-507, 2015.
SOLOMON, G. T.; WEAVER, K. M.; FERNALD JUNIOR, L. W. A historical examination of small business management and entrepreneurship pedagogy. Simulation & Gaming, Newbury Park, v. 25, n. 3, p. 338-352, 1994.
STAM, E. Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: a sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, Abingdon, v. 23, n. 9, p. 1759-1769, 2015.
THORNTON, P. H.; RIBEIRO-SORIANO, D.; URBANO, D. Socio-cultural factors and entrepreneurial activity: an overview. International. Small Business Journal, London, v. 29, n. 2, p. 105-118, 2011.
VAN LOOY, B. et al. Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? Research Policy, Amsterdam, v. 33, n. 3, p. 425-441, 2004.
VERHEUL, I.; VAN STEL, A.; THURIK, R. Explaining female and male entrepreneurship at the country level. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, London, v. 18, n. 2, p. 151-183, 2006.
VOLERY, T.; MAZZAROL, T. The evolution of the small business and entrepreneurship field: a bibliometric investigation of articles published in the International Small Business Journal. International Small Business Journal, London, v. 33, n. 4, p. 374-396, 2015.
WESTHEAD, P.; UCBASARAN, D.; WRIGHT, M. Experience and cognition: do novice, serial and portfolio entrepreneurs differ? International Small Business Journal, London, v. 23, n. 1, p. 72-98, 2005.
WIKLUND, J.; SHEPHERD, D. Knowledge‐based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium‐sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal, Hoboken, v. 24, n. 13, p. 1307-1314, 2003.
YOUSAFZAI, S. Y.; SAEED, S.; MUFFATTO, M. Institutional theory and contextual embeddedness of women’s entrepreneurial leadership: evidence from 92 countries. Journal of Small Business Management, Morgantown, v. 53, n. 3, p. 587-604, 2015.
ZAHRA, S. A.; GEORGE, G. International entrepreneurship: the current status of the field and future research agenda. In: HITT, M. et al. (Org.). Strategic entrepreneurship: creating a new mindset. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002. p. 255-288.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Brasileira de Inovação
Downloads
