Abstract
In recent decades, we have observed a growing concern about academic misconduct and the increased occurrence of fraud in research activities. Currently, this theme represents a permanent challenge for the editorial team of any academic journal. The subject also gained relevance in several institutions related to academic research, such as universities, journal indexing, databases, and funding agencies. These institutions have been reinforcing the importance of Good Scientific Practice dissemination and adopting mechanisms that aim to discourage practices of academic misconducting. In this editorial we discuss this subject, in view of the debates that have emerged in Brazil and within the scope of the Brazilian Journal of Innovation itself.
References
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION. Code of Ethics, 2011. Acesso em: 02 fev. 2021. Disponível em: https://cdn.ymaws.com/wera.site-ym.com/resource/resmgr/a_general/aera.pdf.
BERGGREN, C.; KARABAG, S.F. Scientific misconduct at an elite medical institute: The role of competing institutional logics and fragmented control. Research Policy, v. 48, n. 2, p. 428-443, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.020.
BIAGIOLI, M. Before and After Photoshop: Recursive Fraud in the Age of Digital Reproducibility. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, v. 58, n. 46, 2019.
BIAGIOLI, M.; LIPPMAN, A. Gaming the metrics: misconduct and manipulation in academic research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2020.
BIAGIOLI, M.; KENNEY, M.; MARTIN, B.; WALSH, J. Academic misconduct, misrepresentation and gaming: a reassessment.
Research Policy, v. 48, n. 2, p. 401-413, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.025.
COUNCIL OF SCIENCE EDITORS. Acesso em: 02 fev. 2021. Disponível em: https://www.councilscienceeditors.org/.
COMITEE ON PUBLICATION ETHICS. Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Disponível em: https://publicationethics.org/files/Research_institutions_guidelines_final_0_0.pdf. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2020.
DOAJ. Disponível em: https://doaj.org. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2020.
FUNDAÇÃO DE AMPARO À PESQUISA DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO.Código de Boas Práticas Científicas. Disponível em: https://fapesp.br/boaspraticas/FAPESPCodigo_de_Boas_Praticas_Cientificas_2014.pdf. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2020.
HORBACH, S.S.; HALFFMAN, W.W. The extent and causes of academic text recycling or ‘self-plagiarism’. Research Policy, v. 48, n. 2, p. 492-502, 2019.
INSTITUTO DE GEOCIÊNCIAS DA UNICAMP. Periódicos do IG. Disponível em: https://portal.ige.unicamp.br/institucional/periodicos-do-ig. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2020.
LATINDEX. Directório. Disponível em: https://www.latindex.org/latindex/ficha?folio=12904. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2020.
LINTON, J. Academic dishonesty primer: How to avoid it—Advice for authors. Technovation, v. 34, n. 1, p. 1-2, 2014. ISSN 0166-4972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.11.002.
MERTON, R.K. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.
PORTAL DE PERIÓDICOS CAPES. Disponível em: https://www-periodicos-capes-gov-br. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2020.
PORTAL DE PERIÓDICOS ELETRÔNICOS CIENTÍFICOS - UNICAMP. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/index/search/?query=revista+brasileira+de+inova%C3%A7%C3%A3o. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2020.
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE INOVAÇÃO. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/about. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2020.
SCIENTIFIC ELECTRONIC LIBRARY ONLINE. Guia de boas práticas para o fortalecimento da ética na publicação científica. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/3xwwmqY. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2020.
SCIENTIFIC ELECTRONIC LIBRARY ONLINE. Seleção de Periódicos. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/avaliacao/20200403_pt.htm. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2020.
SHINKAI, R.S.A. Originality and plagiarism: a question of authorship in the Academy. Rev. esc. enferm. USP, São Paulo, v. 48, n. 3, p. 388-393, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-623420140000300001.
VASCONCELOS, S.; LETA, J.; COSTA, L.; PINTO, A.; SORENSON, M.M. Discussing plagiarism in Latin American science. Brazilian researchers begin to address an ethical issue. EMBO Reports, v. 10, n. 7, p. 677-682, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2009.134.
WALSH, J.P.; LEE, Y.N.; TANG, L. Pathogenic organization in science: Division of labor and retractions. Research Policy, v. 48, n. 2, p. 444-461, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.09.004.
WEB OF SCIENCE. Master Journal List - Search Journals. Disponível em: https://mjl.clarivate.com/search-results. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2020.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Brasileira de Inovação
Downloads
