Keywords
Regional development
São Paulo system of innovation environments
São Paulo
How to Cite
Abstract
Aiming to accelerate the complexity of the economy of the State of São Paulo, the São Paulo System of Innovation Environments (SPAI) was conceived in order to orchestrate the implementation of technology parks in some of its municipalities. After almost a decade of existence, this regional policy begins to be questioned with regard to the performance of its parks, which should generate positive impacts in the regions where they are located. The origin of these questions lies in the divorce between the framework and institutional design of SPAI and the logic of the technology parks policy model. The main objective of this article is to analyse the way in which SPAI has orchestrated the incentives for São Paulo technology parks to promote regional development. To do so, the methodology used in this article combined qualitative research and the construction of a logical model of technology parks.
References
ALBAHARI, A. Heterogeneity as a Key for Understanding Science and Technology Park Effects. In: AMOROSO, S.; LINK, A.; WRIGHT, M. (Eds.), Science and Technology Parks and Regional Economic Development. Palgrave Advances in the Economics of Innovation and Technology. London: Palgrave Macmillan, p. 143-157, 2019.
ALLEN, J. Third Generation Science Parks. Manchester, UK: Manchester Science Parks, 2007.
ARRETCHE, M. Tendências no estudo sobre avaliação. In RICO, E. (Org.), Avaliação de políticas sociais: Uma questão em debate. São Paulo: Cortez/Instituto de Estudos Especiais, p. 29-49, 1999.
ARRETCHE, M. Uma contribuição para fazermos avaliações menos ingênuas. In BARREIRA, M. C.; CARVALHO, M. C. (Orgs.), Tendências e perspectivas na avaliação de políticas e programas sociais. São Paulo: IEE/PUC-SP, p. 43-56, 2001.
ASLANI, A.; EFTEKHARI, H.; DIDARI, M. Comparative analysis of the science and
technology parks of the US universities and a selected developing country. RISUS - Journal on Innovation and Sustainability, v. 6, n. 2, p. 25–33, 2015.
AULICINO, A. L.; PETRONI, L. M. Inovação: O processo de implantação do parque tecnológico para o desenvolvimento sustentável da região sudoeste do estado de São Paulo: O caso do município de Ribeirão Branco. XXII Seminário Nacional de Parques Tecnológicos e Incubadoras de Empresas e XX Workshop ANPROTEC, Foz do Iguaçu, Paraná, p. 1-16, 2012.
AULICINO, A.; PETRONI, M. Parque tecnológico Sudoeste Paulista: Fator motriz do processo prospectivo para o desenvolvimento territorial, Gestão & Regionalidade, v.34, n. 100, p. 161-182, 2018.
BAKOUROS, Y.; MARDAS, D.; VARSAKELIS, N. Science park, a high tech fantasy?: An analysis of the science parks of Greece. Technovation, v. 22, n. 2, p. 123–128, 2002.
BALLAND, P.-A.; BOSCHMA, R.; FRENKEN, K. Proximity and innovation: From statics to dynamics, Regional Studies, v. 49, n. 6, p. 907-920, 2015.
BALLAND, P.-A. et al. Complex economic activities concentrate in large cities. Nature Human Behaviour, v. 4, n. 3, p. 248-254, 2020.
BENNETT, A.; CHECKEL, J. Process tracing: From metaphor to analytic tool. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
BRASIL (Casa Civil da Presidência da República); IPEA (Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada). Avaliação de políticas públicas: Guia prático de análise ex ante, Brasília: Ipea, 2018.
CASSIOLATO, M.; GUERESI, S. Como elaborar modelo lógico: Roteiro para formular programas e organizar avaliação, Nota Técnica, n. 6, Brasília: Ipea, 2010.
CHEBA, K. Polish technology parks and regional development: Are they effective? Quantitative Methods in Economics, v. XIV, n.1, p. 65–73, 2013.
CHEN, C.-J.; WU, H.-L.; LIN, B.-W. Evaluating the development of high-tech industries: Taiwan's science park. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 73, n. 4, p. 452-465, 2006.
CHEN, C.-P., CHIEN, C.-F., & LAI, C.-T. Cluster policies and industry development in the Hsinchu Science Park: A retrospective review after 30 years. Innovation, v. 15, n. 4, p. 416–436, 2013.
CHEN, H. A Comprehensive Typology for Program Evaluation. Evaluation Practice, v. 17, n. 2, p. 121–130, 1996.
CIRILLO, C. Birth of an idea: The creation of Research Triangle Park and its sustained economic impact on the Research Triangle area. Durham papers. Disponível em http://sites.duke.edu/urbaneconomics/?p=899, 2013.
CÓSER, I.; GONÇALVES, E. Instrumentos de apoio financeiro para parques
tecnológicos: A experiência de Minas Gerais. Revista de Economia, v. 37, n. 7, p. 53-77, 2011.
DAVIDS, M.; FRENKEN, K. Proximity, knowledge base and the innovation process: Towards an integrated framework, Regional Studies, v. 52, n.1, p. 23-34, 2018.
DAVIES, B.; MARÉ, D. Relatedness, complexity and local growth. Regional Studies, v. 55, n. 3, p. 479-494, 2021.
ETZKOWITZ, H. The triple helix: University-industry-government innovation in action. New York: Routledge, 2008.
ETZKOWITZ, H. Is Silicon Valley a global model or unique anomaly? Industry and Higher Education, v. 33, n. 2, p. 83-95, 2019.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Setting up, managing and evaluating EU science and technology parks. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2014.
FERGUSON, R.; OLOFSSON, C. Science parks and the development of NTBFs - location, survival and growth. Journal of Technology Transfer, v. 29, n. 1, p. 5–17, 2004.
FERREIRA, H.; CASSIOLATO, M.; GONZALEZ, R. Como elaborar modelo lógico de programa: Um roteiro básico. Nota Técnica, n. 2, Brasília: Ipea, 2007.
FERREIRA, H.; CASSIOLATO, M.; GONZALEZ, R. Uma experiência de desenvolvimento metodológico para avaliação de programas: O modelo lógico do programa Segundo Tempo, Texto para Discussão, n. 1369, Brasília: Ipea, 2009.
FUKUGAWA, N. Science parks in Japan and their value-added contributions to new technology-based firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, v. 24, n. 2, p. 381– 400, 2007.
FUNNEL, S.; ROGERS, P. Purposeful program theory: Effective use of theories of change and logic models. San Francisco, California: John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
GALA, P. Complexidade econômica: Uma nova perspectiva para entender a antiga questão da riqueza das nações. Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto, 2017.
GUADIX, J. et al. Success variables in science and technology parks. Journal of Business
Research, v. 69, n. 11. p. 4870-4875, 2016.
GUERREIRO, E.; MONTEIRO, E.; NANNI, H. Desenvolvimento sustentável e
governança participativa: Arranjo produtivo local e Parque Tecnológico de Santos. Second International Workshop Advances in Cleaner Production, São Paulo, 2009.
HAUSER, G. et al. Capacidade de inovação de parques tecnológicos em países emergentes: Uma proposta metodológica. XVI Congresso Latino-Iberoamericano de Gestão e Tecnologia. Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 2015.
HAYES, H.; PARCHMAN, M.; HOWARD, R. A logic model framework for evaluation and planning in a primary care practice-based research network (PBRN). Journal of American Board of Family Medicine, v. 24, n. 5, p. 576-582, 2011.
HENRIQUES, I.; SOBREIRO, V.; KIMURA, H. Science and technology park: Future challenges. Technology in Society, v. 53, p. 144-150, 2018.
HU, A. Technology parks and regional economic growth in China. Research Policy, v. 36,
n. 1, p. 76-87, 2007.
HU, T-S. Interaction among high-tech talent and its impact on innovation performance: A comparison of Taiwanese science parks at different stages of development. European Planning Studies, v. 16, n. 2, p. 163–187, 2008.
HU, T.-S.; LIN, C.-Y.; CHANG, S.-L. Technology-based regional development strategies and the emergence of technological communities: A case study of HSIP, Taiwan. Technovation, v. 25, n. 4, p. 367–380, 2005.
JACOSKI, C. Competitividade e desenvolvimento regional no Território da Fronteira Sul – A estruturação de um parque tecnológico regional. II Congresso Brasileiro de Engenharia de Produção, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, p. 1-10, 2012.
JANNUZZI, P. (2016), Monitoramento e avaliação de programas sociais: Uma introdução aos conceitos e técnicas, Campinas, São Paulo: Alínea.
KANG, B.-J. A study on the establishing development model for research parks. The Journal of Technology Transfer, v. 29, n. 2, p. 203-210, 2004.
KRAUSE, C. Modelo lógico para análise de políticas públicas em perspectiva histórica, Texto para Discussão, n. 2572, Brasília: Ipea, 2020.
LEE, W.-H.; YANG, W.-T. The cradle of Taiwan high technology industry
development-Hsinchu Science Park (HSP). Technovation, v. 20, n. 1, p. 55-59, 2000.
LEVY, Y.; ELLIS, J. A systems approach to conduct an effective literature review
in support of information systems research. Informing Science, v. 9, p. 181–212, 2006.
LINK, A.; SCOTT, J. On the growth of US science parks. The Journal of Technology Transfer, v. 28, n. 1, p. 81–85, 2003.
LINK, A.; SCOTT, J. The economics of university research parks. Oxford Revue of
Economic Policy, v. 23, n. 4, p. 661–674, 2007.
LÖFSTEN, H., & LINDELÖF, P. Science parks in Sweden: Industrial renewal and
development? R&D Management, v. 31, n. 3, p. 309-322, 2001.
MALEKAN, M. Designing marketing strategies for development of e-business using quality function deployment model (Case study: Companies of the Pardis Science and Technology Park). Applied Mathematics in Engineering, Management and Technology, v. 3, n. 2, p. 21-29, 2015.
MCCARTHY, I. A typology of university research park strategies: What parks do and why
it matters. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, v. 47, p. 110-122, 2018.
MCLAUGHLIN, J.; JORDAN, G. Using logic models. In: WHOLEY, J.; HATRY, H.; NEWCOMER, K. (Eds.). Handbook of practical program evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, p. 70-90, 2015.
MELLO, J.; ROCHA, F. Networking for regional innovation and economic
growth: The Brazilian Petrópolis technopole. International Journal of Technology Management, v. 27, n. 5, p.488–497, 2004.
MILES, M.; HUBERMAN, A.; SALDAÑA, J. Fundamentals of qualitative data analysis. In MILES, M.; HUBERMAN, A.; SALDAÑA, J. Qualitative data analysis, a methods sourcebook, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, p. 36-52, 2014.
OH, D.; KANG, B. Creative Model of Science Park Development: Case Study on Daedeok Innopolis, Korea. In BUTLER, J.; GIBSON, D. (Eds.), Global Perspectives on Technology Transfer and Commercialization: Building Innovative Eco-systems, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, p. 162-188, 2011.
PARK, S. Science parks in Sweden as regional development strategies: A case study on Ideon Science Park. AI & Society, v. 16, n. 3, p. 288–298, 2002.
PEREIRA, M.; OLIVEIRA, E.; OLIVEIRA, A. Origens dos Parques Tecnológicos e as
Contribuições para o Desenvolvimento Regional Brasileiro. Latin American Journal of
Business Management, v. 7, n. 1, p. 117-138, 2016.
QUERE, M. Sophia-Antipolis as a “reverse” science park: From exogenous to endogenous development. In FRANKEN, K. (Ed.), Applied evolutionary economics and economic geography, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, p. 48–66, 2007.
SÃO PAULO. Decreto N˚ 50.504, de 06 de fevereiro de 2006. Institui o Sistema Paulista de Parques Tecnológicos. São Paulo, SP: Governo do Estado, 2006. Disponível em:
https://www.al.sp.gov.br/repositorio/legislacao/decreto/2006/decreto-50504-06.02.2006.html. Acesso em: 8 jun. 2022.
SÃO PAULO. Decreto N˚ 50.196, de 02 de abril de 2009. Regulamenta o Sistema Paulista de Parques Tecnológicos, de que trata o artigo 24 da Lei Complementar nº 1.049, de 19 de junho de 2008, e dá providências correlatas. São Paulo, SP: Governo do Estado, 2009.
Disponível em: https://www.al.sp.gov.br/repositorio/legislacao/decreto/2009/decreto-54196-02.04.2009.html. Acesso em: 8 jun. 2022.
SÃO PAULO. Decreto N˚ 60.286 de 25 de março de 2014. Institui e regulamenta o Sistema Paulista de Ambientes de Inovação – SPAI e dá providências correlatas. São Paulo, SP: Governo do Estado, 2014.
Disponível em: https://www.al.sp.gov.br/repositorio/legislacao/decreto/2014/decreto-60286-25.03.2014.html. Acesso em: 8 jun. 2022.
SECCHI, L. Políticas públicas: Conceitos, esquemas de análise, casos práticos. São
Paulo: Cengage, 2010.
SECCHI, L. Análise de políticas públicas: Diagnóstico de problemas, recomendações de soluções, São Paulo: Cengage, 2016.
SOENARSO, W.; NUGRAHA, D.; CENTER, E. Development of science and
technology park (STP) in Indonesia to support innovation-based regional economy:
Concept and early stage development. World Technopolis Association, v. 2, n.18, p. 32-42, 2013.
SONOBE, T.; ZHANG, H. An Inquiry into the Development of Science and Technology Parks in China. Economics Discussion Papers, n. 2010-26, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, 2010. Disponível em:
http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2010-26.
STEINER, J.; CASSIM, M.; ROBAZZI, A. Parques Tecnológicos: Ambientes de Inovação. Revista IEA – USP, 2008.
TOLA, A.; CONTINI, M. From the diffusion of innovation to tech parks, business incubators as a model of economic development: The case of “Sardegna ricerche”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Science, v. 176, n. 1, p. 494-503, 2015.
UKHANOVA, I.; VORONOVA, E. Creation science and technology parks as a component of innovation in economic development. Socio-Economic Research Bulletin, v.1, n. 41, p. 107–114, 2011.
VEDOVELLO, C., JUDICE, V.; MACULAN, A. M. Revisão crítica às abordagens a parques tecnológicos: Alternativas interpretativas às experiências brasileiras recentes. Revista de Administração e Inovação, v. 3, n. 2, p. 103–118, 2006.
VELLENICHE, A. et al. A influência dos parques tecnológicos nos cursos da área de TI e no desenvolvimento econômico. Revista Científica On-line - Tecnologia, Gestão e Humanismo, v. 2, n. 1, p. 24-32, 2013.
VENNESON, P. Case studies and process tracing: Theories and practices. In: PORTA, D. D.; KEATING, M. (eds.), Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: A pluralist perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 223–239, 2008.
VILISOVA, A.; QIANG, F. Analysis of Russia and Other Countries Economic Parameters and Their Connection with the Development of Science Parks. International Journal of Economics and Finance, v. 6, n. 6, p. 49-56, 2014.
W. K. KELLOGG FOUNDATION. Using logic models to bring together planning, evaluation and action: Logic model development guide. Battle Creek, Michigan: W.K. Kellogg Foundation, 2004.
WALLSTEN, S. The role of government in regional technology development: The effects of public venture capital and science parks. In BRESNAHAN, T.; GAMBARDELLA, A. (Eds.), Building high-tech clusters: Silicon Valley and beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 229-279, 2004.
WOJEWNIK-FILIPKOWSKA, A. Investing in industrial-technology parks in city
development: A cost-benefit analysis. Real Estate Management and Valuation, v. 23, n. 1,
p. 24–41, 2015.
YANG, C.; LIAO, H. Backward linkages of cross-border production networks of Taiwanese PC investment in the Pearl River Delta, China. Tijdschrift Voor Economische
en Sociale Geografie, v. 101, n. 2, p. 199-217, 2010.
YANG, C.-H.; LEE, W.-C. Establishing science parks everywhere? Misallocation in R&D and its determinants of science parks in China, China Economic Review, v. 67, 101605, 2021.
ZEN, A.; HAUSER, G. A articulação e o desenvolvimento dos parques tecnológicos: O caso do Programa Porto Alegre Tecnópole - Brasil. XI Seminário de Gestão Tecnológica, Salvador, Bahia, 2005.
ZHANG, H.; SONOBE, T. Development of Science and Technology Parks in China, 1988–2008. Economics: The Open Access Open-Assessment E-Journal, v. 5, p. 1–25, 2011.
ZHENG, S. et al. The birth of edge cities in China: Measuring the effects of industrial
parks policy. Journal of Urban Economics, v.100, p. 80-103, 2017.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Brasileira de Inovação
Downloads
