Resumo
Este trabalho tem como objetivo definir uma metodologia para identificar as principais estratégias de cooperação tecnológica transacional e aplicá-la aos casos de Estados Unidos e Japão. Este exercício permitirá comprovar as hipóteses relativas ao novo modelo de rede que caracteriza a internacionalização da atividade inovadora na busca pelas competências tecnológicas que se estendem pelo mundo, mas que se concentram na tríade Estados Unidos-Europa-Japão. A partir de patentes depositadas em conjunto na European Patent Office, entre 1985 e 2008, o trabalho confirma a existência de estratégias pela busca de competências dentro da tríade, com o objetivo de explorar complementaridades e vantagens domésticas.Referências
ALVES, J. D. O.; DEL-VECCHIO, R.; INHUDES, A. Transparência econômica do Banco Central do Brasil: uma análise matemática das surpresas. In: XL SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE PESQUISA OPERACIONAL. Anais... João Pessoa, 2008.
ANDRADE, E.; SAMPAIO, R.; SILVA, G. Notas em Matemática Aplicada. SBMAC, 2007.
ARCHIBUGI, D.; IAMMARINO, S. The policy implications of the globalisation of innovation. Research Policy, n. 28, p. 317-336, 1999.
ARCHIBUGI, D.; MICHIE, J. The globalisation of technology: a new taxonomy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, n. 19, p. 121-140, 1995.
ARORA, A.; GAMBARDELLA, A. The changing technology of technological change. General and abstract knowledge and the division of innovative labour. Research Policy, n. 23, p. 523-32, 1994.
BLANC, H.; SIERRA, C. The internalisation of R&D by multinationals: a trade-off between external and internal proximity. Cambridge Journal of Economics, n. 23, p. 187-206, 1999.
BEERS, C.; BERGHALL, E;.POOT, A. P. R&D Internationalization, R&D Collaboration and Public Knowledge Institutions in Small Economies: evidence from Finland and the Netherlands”. Research Policy, v. 37, n. 2, p. 294-308, 2008.
BONACICH, P. Eigenvector-like measures of centrality for asymmetric relations, Social Networks, n. 23, p. 191-201, 2001.
CANTWELL, J. The internationalization of technological activity and its implications for competitiveness. In: GRANSTRAND, O.; HAKANSON, L.; SJOLANDER, S. (Eds.). Technology management in international business. New York:Wiley, 1992, p. 75-95.
CANTWELL, J. The gobalisation of technology: what remains of the product cycle model. Cambridge Journal of Economics, n. 19, p. 155-74, 1995.
CANTWELL, J.; IAMMARINO, S. MNCs, technological innovation and regional systems in the EU: some evidence in the Italian case. International Journal of the Economics of Business, v. 5, n. 3, p. 383-408, 1998.
CANTWELL, J.; JANNE, O. The role of multinational corporations and national states in the globalization of innovatory capacity: the european perspective. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, v. 12, n. 2, 2000.
CASSIOLATO, J. E.; LASTRES, H.; SZAPIRO, M.; VARGAS, M. A. Local systems of innovation in Brazil, development and transnational corporation: a preliminary assessment based on empirical results of a research project. 2001 (DRUID conference paper).
COHEN,W. M.; LEVINTHAL, D. A. Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal, n. 99, p. 569-596, 1989.
DEL-VECCHIO, R.; GALVÃO, D.; LOURES, R.; LIMA, L. Medidas de centralidade da Teoria dos Grafos aplicada a fundos de ações no Brasil. In: XLI SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE PESQUISA OPERACIONAL. Anais... Porto Seguro. 2009.
DUNNING, J. H. Explaining changing patterns of international production: in defense of eclectic theory. Oxford Bulleting of Economics and Statistics, n. 41, p. 269-295, 1979.
DUNNING, J. H. Multinational enterprises and the globalization of innovatory capacity. Research Policy, n. 23, p. 67-89, 1994.
ERBER, F. S.; CASSIOLATO, J. E. Resumo de política industrial: teoria e prática no Brasil e na OECD. Revista de Economia Política, v. 17, n.2 (66), p. 32-60, 1997.
FEOFILOFF, P. Exercício de Teoria dos Grafos. 2006. Disponível em: http://www.ime.usp.br/~pf/. Acesso em: 15 dez. 2009.
FILIPPAIOS, F.; PAPANASTASSIOU, M.; PEARCE, R.; RAMA, R., New forms of organisation and R&D internationalisation among the world’s 100 largest food and beverages multinationals. Research Policy n. 38, p. 1032-1043, 2009.
FLORIDA, R., The globalisation of R&D: results of a survey of foreign-affiliated R&D laboratories in the USA. Research Policy, v. 26, n. 1, p. 85-103, 1997.
GERYBADZE A.; REGER, G. Globalisation of R&D: recent changes in the measurement of innovation in transnational corporations. Research Policy, n. 28, p. 251-274, 1999.
GHOSHAL, S.; BARTLETT, C. A. The multinational corporation as an inter-organisational network. Academy of Management Review, v. 15, n. 4, p. 603-25, 1990.
GHOSHAL, S. Building the entrepreneurial corporation: new organizational processes, new managerial tasks. European Management Journal, v. 13, n. 2, p. 139-55, 1995.
GRANSTRAND, O. The economics and management of intellectual property. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, 1990.
GRANSTRAND, O.; HAKANSON, I.; SJOLANDER, S. Internationalization of R&D – a survey of some recent research. Research Policy, v. 22, p. 413-30, 1993.
HAGEDOORN, J. Global strategies in innovation: networks in research and production. IJTM, Special Publication on the Role of Technology in Corporate Policy. 1991.
HAGEDOORN, J.; SOETE, L. The internationalisation of science and technology policy: how do ‘national’ systems cope? Science and technology policy research. Tokyo: Mita Press, National Institute for Science and Technology Policy,1991.
HIRATUKA, C. Internacionalização de atividades de pesquisa e desenvolvimento das empresas transnacionais: análise da inserção das filiais brasileiras. São Paulo em Perspectiva, v. 19, n. 1, p. 105-114, 2005.
ITO, B.; WAKASUGI, R. What factors determine the mode of overseas R&D by multinationals? Empirical evidence. Research Policy, n. 36, p. 1275-1287, 2007.
IWASA,T.; ODAGIRI, H. Overseas R&D, knowledge sourcing and patenting: an empirical study of Japanese R&D investment in the US. Research Policy, n. 33, p. 807-828, 2004.
KUEMMERLE, W. Foreign direct investment in industrial research in the pharmaceutical and electronics industries − results from a survey of multinational firms. Research Policy, n. 28, p. 179-193, 1999.
KUMAR, N. Determinants of location of overseas R&D activity of multinational enterprises: the case of US and Japanese corporations. Research Policy, n. 30, p. 159-174, 2001.
LALL, S. Export performance technological upgrading and foreign direct investment strategies in the Asian newly industrializing economies with special reference to Singapore. Desarollo Productivo, n. 88, 2000.
LALL, S. Investment and Technology policies for competitiveness: review of successful country experiences. New York and Geneva: , United Nations, 2003.
LE BAS, C.; SIERRA, C. Location versus home country advantages ‘in R&D activities: some further results on multinationals’ locational strategies. Research Policy, n. 31, p. 589-609, 2002.
LEVIN, R. C.; KLEVORICK, A. K.; NELSON, R. R.; WINTER S. G. Appropiating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, n. 3, p. 783-820, 1987.
LÖÖF, H. Multinational enterprises and innovation: firm level evidence on spillover via R&D collaboration. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, n. 19, p. 41-71, 2009.
MA, Z.; LEE, Y. Patent application and technological collaboration in inventive activities: 1980–2005. Technovation, n. 28, p. 379-390, 2008.
MEYER-KRAMER, F.; REGUER, G. New perspectives on the innovation strategies of multinational enterprises: lessons for technology policy in Europe. Research Policy, n. 28, p. 751-776, 1999.
ODAGIRI, H.; YASUDA, H. The determinants of overseas R&D by Japanese firms: an empirical study at the industry and company levels. Research Policy, v. 25, n. 7, p. 1059-1079, 1996.
OST − Observatoire des Sciences et des Techniques. Science and technologie: indicateurs. Paris: Economica, 1998.
PAPANASTASSIOU, M.; PEARCE, R. Decentralisation of technology and organisational restructuring in the multinational enterprise group. In: EUROPEAN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS ACADEMY, 21st ANNUAL CONFERENCE. Urbino, December 1995.
PATEL, P.; VEGA, M. Patterns of internationalisation of corporate technology: location vs. home country advantages. Research Policy, n. 28. P. 145-155, 1999.
PATEL, P.; PAVITT, K. The technological competences in the world ́s largest firms: com-
plex and path dependent, but not much variety. Research Policy, n. 26, p. 141-156, 1997.
PEARCE, R. World product mandates and multinational enterprise specialization. Scandi-
navian International Business Review, n. 2, p. 38-58, 1992.
ROCHA, C. Competências tecnológicas e cooperação interfirma. Resultados da análise de patentes depositadas em conjunto. Tese (Doutorado). Rio de Janeiro: IE/UFRJ, 1995.
RUGMAN, A. Inside the multinationals: the economics of internal markets. Londres: Ed. Croom Helm, 1981.
SERAPIO, M.; DALTON, D. Foreign R&D facilities in the United States. Research Technology Management, v. 36, n. 6, p. 33-39, 1993.
SCHMOCH et al. Linking technology areas to industrial sectors. Final Report to the European Commission, DG Research. Paris, Brighton: Karlsruhe, 2003.
SHIMIZUTANI, S.; TODO, Y. What determines overseas R&D activities? The case of Japanese multinational firms. Research Policy, n. 37, p. 530-544, 2008.
UNCTAD. World investment report: TNCs and export competitiviness. Nova York: Nações Unidas, 2002.
VERNON, R. International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, n. 80, p. 190-207, 1966.
VON ZEDTWITZ, M.; GASSMANNB, O. Market versus technology drive in R&D internationalization: four different patterns of managing research and development. Research Policy, n. 31, p. 569-588, 2002.
ZANFEI, A. Transnational firms and the changing organisation of innovative activities. Cambridge Journal of Economics, n. 24, p. 515-542, 2000.
O conteúdo dos artigos e resenhas publicados na RBI são de absoluta e exclusiva responsabilidade de seus autores.
Downloads
