Palabras clave
Tamaño
Capital extranjero
Cómo citar
Resumen
La presente investigación analiza las diferencias entre empresas con presencia de capital extranjero de acuerdo con su tamaño, en términos de las actividades de innovación, vinculación externa y los modos de innovación. A partir de un abordaje econométrico sobre datos de la Encuesta Nacional de Empleo e Innovación, demostramos que las empresas con presencia de capital extranjero presentan un comportamiento diferenciado una vez que se estratifican por tamaño. Las empresas extranjeras vis-à-vis las nacionales tienden a realizar mayores esfuerzos de innovación y se caracterizan por implementar modos de innovación más complejos, que combinan los modos DUI y STI. Sin embargo, del análisis por estrato de tamaño surge que las empresas extranjeras de mayor tamaño relativo realizan relativamente menos esfuerzos de innovación promedio e implementan modalidades menos complejas. Estos resultados revalorizan los análisis que consideran la heterogeneidad de empresas extranjeras y demuestran que las de mayor tamaño relativo no son las de mejor performance innovadora, al contrario de lo que ocurre con las empresas de capital nacional.
Citas
ALMEIDA, P.; PHENE, A. Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: the influence of the MNC and host country on innovation. Strategic Management Journal, Hoboken, v. 25, p. 847-864, 2004.
AMSDEN, A. H. Nationality of firm ownership in developing countries: who should ‘crowd out’ whom in imperfect markets? In: CIMOLI, M.; DOSI, G.; STIGLITZ, J. E. (Org.). Industrial policy and development: the political economy of capabilities accumulation. USA: Oxford University Press, 2009. p. 409-423.
AMSDEN, A. H.; TSCHANG, T.; GOTO, A. Do foreign companies conduct R&D in developing countries? Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute, 2001. (Working Paper Series).
ANDERSEN, E. S. Approaching national systems of innovation from the production and linkage structure. In: LUNDVALL, B. Å. (Ed.). National systems of innovation: toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter, 1992. p. 71-96.
ANLLÓ, G.; RAMOS, A. Innovación, estrategias empresariales y oportunidades productivas de las firmas extranjeras en Brasil y Argentina. Santiago, Chile: CEPAL, 2008.
APANASOVICH, N. Modes of innovation: a grounded meta-analysis. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, New York, v. 7, n. 3, p. 720-737, 2016.
ARAÚJO, R. D. Esforços Tecnológicos das Firmas Transnacionais e Domésticas. In: DE NEGRI, J. A.; SALERNO, M. S. (Orgs). Inovações, Padrões Tecnológicos e Desempenho das Firmas Industriais Brasileiras. Rio de Janeiro: IPEA, 2005, p. 119-170.
ARZA, V.; LÓPEZ, A. Innovation and productivity in the Argentine manufacturing sector. Washington: Inter-American Development Bank, 2010. (IDB Working Paper Series, 62). Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1817297. Acces in: 20 March 2020.
BEUGELSDIJK, S.; JINDRA, B. Product innovation and decision making autonomy in subsidiaries of multinational companies. Journal of World Business, New York, v. 53, n. 4, p. 529-539, 2018.
BIRKINSHAW, J.; MORRISON, A. L. Configurations of strategy and structure in subsidiaries of multinational structure. Journal of International Business Studies, Houndmills, v. 26, n. 4, p. 729-753, 1995.
CANTWELL, J.; MUDAMBI, R. MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates. Strategic Management Journal, Hoboken, v. 26, p. 1109-1128, 2005.
CANTWELL, J.; SANTANGELO, G. D. The frontier of international technology networks: sourcing abroad the most highly tacit capabilities. Information Economics and Policy, Amsterdam, v. 11, n. 1, p. 101-123, 1999.
CHEN, J.; CHEN, Y.; VANHAVERBEKE, W. The influence of scope, depth, and orientation of external technology sources on the innovative performance of Chinese firms. Technovation, Amsterdam, v. 31, n. 8, p. 362-373, 2011.
CHIAO, Y. et al. Subsidiary size, internationalization, product diversification, and performance in an emerging market. International Marketing Review, Bradford, v. 25, n. 6, p. 612-633, 2008.
CHUDNOSKY, D.; LOPEZ, A. Inversión extranjera directa y desarrollo: la experiencia del Mercosur. Revista de la CEPAL, Santiago, n. 92, p. 7-23, 2007.
CRESPI, G.; ZUNIGA, P. Innovation and productivity: evidence from six latin american countries. World Development, New York, v. 40, n. 2, p. 273-290, 2012.
DE NEGRI, F. Estratégias tecnológicas na Argentina, Brasil e México. Economia & Tecnologia, Curitiba, v. 6, n. 20, p. 127-138, 2010.
DEAN, T. J.; BROWN, R. L.; BAMFORD, C. E. Differences in large and small firm responses to enviromental context: strategic implications from a comparative analysis of business formations. Strategic Management Journal, New York, v. 19, n. 8, p. 709-728, 1998.
DELFINI, M.; ERBES, A. La gestión de la fuerza de trabajo en las filiales argentinas de empresas multinacionales. In: NOVICK, M.; PALOMINO, H.; GURRERA, M. S. (Orgs.), Multinacionales en la Argentina: estrategias de empleo, relaciones laborales y cadenas globales de valor. Buenos Aires: United Nations Development Program/Ministry of Labor, Employment and Social Security, 2011. p. 211-252.
DIMITRATOS, P. et al. Micro-multinational or not? International entrepreneurship, networking and learning effects. Journal of Business Research, New York, v. 67, n. 5, p. 908-915, 2014.
DIMITRATOS, P. et al. Micro-multinationals: new types of firms for the global competitive landscape. European Management Journal, Oxford, v. 21, n. 2, p. 164-174, 2003.
DINENZON, M.; ROBERT, V.; YOGUEL, G. Estrategias de las filiales de multinacionales en la Argentina: cadena de valor y autonomía.
In: NOVICK, M.; PALOMINO, H.; GURRERA, M. S. (Org.), Multinacionales en la Argentina: estrategias de empleo, relaciones laborales y cadenas globales de valor. Buenos Aires: United Nations Development Program/Ministry of Labor, Employment and Social Security, 2011. p. 103-128.
DUNNING, J. H.; NARULA, R. The R&D activities of foreign firms in the United States. International Studies of Management & Organization, Abingdon, v. 25, n. 1-2, p. 39-74, 1995.
ERBES, A. et al. Capacidades de absorción y Conectividad, relaciones laborales y dinámica del empleo en las Filiales argentinas. In: NOVICK, M.; PALOMINO, H.; GURRERA, M. S. (Org.), Multinacionales en la Argentina: estrategias de empleo, relaciones laborales y cadenas globales de valor. Buenos Aires: United Nations Development Program/Ministry of Labor, Employment and Social Security, 2011. p. 103-128.
FIGUEIREDO, P. N. The role of dual embeddedness in the innovative performance of MNE subsidiaries: evidence from Brazil. Journal of Management Studies, Oxford, v. 48, n. 2, p. 417-440, 2011.
FITJAR, R. D.; RODRIGUEZ-POSE, A. Firm collaboration and modes of innovation in Norway. Research Policy, Amsterdam, v. 42, n. 1, p. 128-138, 2013.
GROVER, V.; DAVENPORT, T. H. General perspectives on knowledge management: fostering a research agenda. Journal of Management Information Systems, London, v. 18, n. 1, p. 5-21, 2001.
GUO, A.; CHEN, J.; JIN, J. An analysis of the complementary innovation mechanism between STI and DUI modes. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, United Kingdom, v. 7, n. 3/4, p. 265-273, 2010.
HECKMAN, J. J. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, New York, v. 47, p. 153-161, 1979.
ISAKSEN. A.; KARLSEN, J. Combined and complex mode of innovation in region cluster development: analysis of the light-weight material cluster in Raufoss, Norway. In: ASHEIM, B. T.; PARRILLI, M. D. (Org.), Interactive learning for innovation: a key drive within clusters and innovation systems. Basingstroke: Palgrave-Macmilan, 2012. p. 115-136.
ITO, B.; WAKASUGI, R. What factors determine the mode of overseas R&D by multinationals? Empirical evidence. Research Policy, Amsterdam, v. 36, n. 8, p. 1275-1287, 2007.
JENSEN, M. B. et al. Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy, Amsterdam, v. 36, n. 5, p. 680-693, 2007.
JOHNSTON, S. Headquarters and subsidiaries in multinational corporations: strategies, tasks and coordination. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
JOHNSTON, S.; MENGUC, B. Subsidiary size and the level of subsidiary autonomy in multinational corporations: a quadratic model investigation of Australian subsidiaries. Journal of International Business Studies, Basingstoke, v. 38, p. 787-801, 2007.
KUEMMERLE, W. The drivers of foreign direct investment into research and development: an empirical investigation. Journal of International Business Studies, Basingstoke, v. 30, n. 1, p. 1-24, 1999.
LAVARELLO, P. Estrategias empresariales y tecnológicas de las firmas multinacionales de las industrias agroalimentarias argentinas durante los años noventa. Desarrollo Economico, Buenos Aires, v. 44, n. 174, p. 1-30, 2004.
LE BAS, C.; SIERRA, C. Location versus home country advantages in R&D activities: some further results on multinationals’ locational strategies. Research Policy, Amsterdam, v. 31, p. 589-609, 2002.
LIU, M. C.; CHEN, S. H. MNCs’ offshore R&D networks in host country’s regional innovation system: the case of Taiwan-based firms in China. Research Policy, Amsterdam, v. 41, n. 6, p. 1107-1120, 2012.
LUNDVALL. B. Introducción. In: LUNDVALL, B. (Org.). Sistemas nacionales de innovación: hacia una teoría de la innovación y el aprendizaje por interacción. San Martín, Argentina: UNSAM Edita, 2009. p. 11-30.
MALERBA, F.; ORSENIGO, L. Technological regimes and sectoral patterns of innovative activities. Industrial and Corporate Change, New York, v. 6, n. 1, p. 83-117, 1997.
MARIN, A.; BELL, M. The local/global integration of MNC subsidiaries and their technological behaviour: Argentina in the late 1990s. Research Policy, Amsterdam, v. 39, n. 7, p. 919-931, 2010.
MORERO, H. A. Internacionalización, tramas productivas y sistema nacional de innovación. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, Santiago, v. 5, n. 3, p. 142-161, 2010.
NARULA, R.; MARIN, A. FDI spillovers, absorptive capacities and human capital development: evidence from Argentina. Holland: Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology, 2003. (Working Paper, 2003-016).
NARULA, R.; ZANFEI, A. Globalization of innovation: the role of multinational enterprises. In: FAGERBERG, J; MOWERY, D. C.; NELSON, R. R. (Org.), The oxford handbook of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005. p. 318-345.
NELSON, R. R.; ROSENBERG, N. Technical innovation and national systems. In: NELSON, R. R. (Org.). National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993. p. 3-21.
NUNES, S.; LOPES, R. Firm performance, innovation modes and territorial embeddedness. European Planning Studies, Abingdon, v. 23, n. 9, p. 1796-1826, 2015.
PASALI, S. S.; CHAUDHARY, A. Assessing the impact of foreign ownership on firm performance by size: evidence from firms in developed and developing countries. Transnational Corporations Journal, New York, v. 27, n. 2, p. 183-204, 2020.
PATEL, P.; PAVITT, K. National systems of innovation under strain: the internationalisation of corporate R&D. In: BARREL, R.; MASON, G.; MAHONY, M. (Org.). Productivity, innovation and economic performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000. p. 217-235.
PAVITT, K. Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, Amsterdam, v. 13, n. 6, p. 343-373, 1984.
PENROSE, E. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1995 (2nd. ed.).
PORTA, F.; RAMOS, A. Inversión extranjera directa y reformas estructurales en la Argentina: tendencias y estrategias en la década de los ´90. Revista Aportes para la Integración Latinoamericana, Argentina, v. 8, n. 7, 2002.
ROITTER, S. et al. Competencias endógenas y vinculaciones en agentes pertenecientes a las tramas productivas automotriz y siderúrgica. Economía: Teoría y Práctica, Mexico, n. 26, p. 69-118, 2009.
SOOREEA, R. et al. How attractive is India to foreign R&D-based biotech businesses? U.S. micro-multinational enterprises. SCMS Journal of Indian Management, India, v. 15, n. 4, p. 12-21, 2018.
UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT – UNCTAD. World investment report: transnational corporations and the internationalization of R&D. New York, Geneva: United Nations, 2005.
VERMUNT, J. K. Latent class modeling with covariates: two improved three-step approaches. Political Analysis, Cambridge, v. 18, p. 450-469, 2010.
ZUCOLOTO, G. F.; CASSIOLATO, J. E. Desenvolvimento tecnológico por origem de capital: aexperiência brasileira recente. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, Rio de Janeiro, v. 12, n. 1, p. 133-170, 2013.
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2022 Revista Brasileira de Inovação
Descargas
