Resumo
A literatura sobre redes globais de inovação (GINs) vem contribuindo para a identificação de mudanças na atuação de corporações multinacionais. Contudo, tal literatura ainda não explorou o papel das interações universidade-empresa nesse contexto. Objetiva-se aqui suprir essa lacuna em duas frentes. Primeiro, é apresentada uma análise exploratória de um banco de dados original contendo informações de firmas de nove países desenvolvidos e em desenvolvimento. Em segundo lugar, avalia-se a ligação entre a interação com universidades e a maturidade do sistema nacional de inovação. O método de análise de correspondência múltipla e um modelo Probit foram utilizados para avaliar os fatores-chave para as GINs. Os resultados identificam perfis diferenciados pelas características das firmas, mas que refletem padrões nacionais de associação. O modelo Probit confirma que a internacionalização produtiva e as interações locais aumentam a probabilidade de existência de interações com instituições internacionais.Referências
ALBUQUERQUE, E. National Systems of Innovation and Non-OECD Countries: notes about a rudimentary and tentative typology. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, v. 19, n. 4, p. 35-54, 1999.
AZEVEDO, J. G. Petrobrás – From Lobato to Tupi: 70 years of results and challenges for people and technology. In: 11th International Congress of the Brazilian Geophysical Society. Salvador, 2009.
BRITTO, G.; CAMARGO, O. S.; KRUSS, G.; ALBUQUERQUE, E. M. Global interactions between firms and universities. Innovation and Development, v. 3, p. 71-87, 2013.
CANTWELL, J. The globalisation of technology: what remains of the product cycle model? Cambridge Journal of Economics, n. 19, p. 155-155, 1995.
CANTWELL, J. Innovation and information technology in the MNE. In: RUGMAN, A. M. (Ed.). The Oxford handbook of international business. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009, p. 417-446.
CAVES, R. E. Multinational enterprise and economic analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
CHAMINADE, C. On the concept of global innovation networks.. Sweden: Lund University, 2009 (CIRCLE Eletronic Working Papers, 2009/05).
COHEN, W. M.; NELSON, R. R.; WALSH, J. P. Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, v. 48, n. 2, p. 1-23, 2002.
DANTAS, E.; BELL, M. Latecomer firms and the emergence and development of knowledge networks: The case of Petrobrás in Brazil. Research Policy, v. 38, n. 5, p. 829-844, 2009.
DANTAS, E. The co-evolution of firm-centered knowledge networks and capabilities in late industrializing countries: the case of Petrobras in the offshore oil innovation system in Brazil. World Development, v. 39, n. 9, p. 1570-1591, 2011.
DE CAMPOS, A. L. University-industry in late-industrialising countries: a study of Unilever Brazil. Saarbruck: LAP, 2006.
DUNNING, J. H. Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Workingham: Addison-Wesley, 1995.
DUNNING, J. H.; LUNDAN, S. M. Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2008.
DUTRÉNIT, G. Introduction to special issue – Interactions between public research organisations and industry in Latin America: a study on channels and benefits from the perspective of firms and researchers. Science and Public Policy, v. 37, n. 7, p. 471-472, 2010.
ERNST, D. Global production networks and the changing geography of innovation systems. Implications for developing countries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, v. 11, n. 6, p. 497-523, 2002.
ERNST, D. Innovation offshoring: Asia’s emerging role in global innovation networks. Honolulu: East-West Center, 2006.
ERNST, D. A new geography of knowledge in the eletronics industry? Asia’s role in global innovation networks. Policy Studies, n. 54, 2009.
ERNST, D.; HART, D. M. Governing the Global Knowledge Economy: Mind the Gap!. Honolulu: East-West Center, 2008 (Working paper – Economics Serie, n. 93).
ERNST, D.; NAUGHTON, B. China’s emerging industrial economy: insights from the IT industry. In: MCNALLY, C. A. (Ed.). China’s emergent political economy: capitalism in the dragons’ liar. London/New York: Routledge, 2008, p. 39-59.
EUN, J. H.; LEE, K.; WU, G. Explaining the. Research Policy, v. 35, n. 9, p. 1329-1346, 2006.
EVENSON, R. E.; GOLLIN, D. Assessing the impact of the Green Revolution, 1960 to 2000. Science, v. 300, n. 5620, p. 758, 2003.
EZZRARI, A.; VERME, P. A multiple correspondence analysis approach to the measurement of multidimensional poverty in Morocco, 2001-2007. Washington DC: The World Bank, 2012 (Working Paper Series, 6087).
FIGUEIREDO, P. N. The role of dual embeddedness in the innovative performance of MNE subsidiaries: evidence from Brazil. Journal of Management Studies, n. 48, p. 417-440, 2011.
FREEMAN, C. Technology policy and economic performance. London: Pinter Publishers, 1988.
GOMPERS, P. A.; LERNER, J. The money of invention: how venture capital creates new wealth. Boston: Harvard Business Press, 2001.
GREENACRE, M. Correspondence analysis. Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science. London: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2005.
GREENE, W. Econometric analysis. Upper Sadlle River: Prentice Hall, 2003.
HENDERSON, J.; DICKEN, P.; HESS, M.; COE, N. YEUNG, H. W. Global production networks and the analysis of economic development. Review of International Political Economy, v. 9, n. 3, p. 436-464, 2002.
HAGEDOORN, J. Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Research Policy, v. 31, n. 4, p. 477-492, 2002.
INGINEUS. Patterns of knowledge accumulation, institutional frameworks and insertion in GINS in successful sub-national regions. 2011a. Available at: http://www.feemdeveloper.net/UserFiles/INGINEUS_D4.1.pdf. Access: 03 Jan. 2013.
INGINEUS. Methodology report: complete standardised data set containing all the information collected in all countries. 2011b. Available at: http://www.feemdeveloper.net/UserFiles/INGINEUS_D2.2_MethodologyReport(1).pdf. Access: 01 Mar. 2013
INGINEUS. Complete standardised data set. 2011c. Available at: http://www.ingineus.eu/UserFiles/INGINEUS_D2.2_Fulldatasetandcodes_VER2.zip. Access: 20 Dec. 2011.
KLEVORICK, A. K.; LEVIN, R. C.; NELSON, R. R.; WINTER, S. G. On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy, v. 24, n. 2, p. 185-205, 1995.
KRUSS, G.; ADEOTI, J.; NABUDERE, D. Universities and knowledge-based development in sub-Saharan Africa: comparing university-firm interaction in Nigeria, Uganda and South Africa. The Journal of Development Studies, v. 48, n. 4, p. 516-530, 2012.
KUEMMERLE, W. Building effective R&D capabilities abroad. Harvard Business Review, n. 75, p. 61-72, 1997.
LE ROUX, B.; ROUANET, H. Multiple correspondence analysis. Los Angeles: Sage, 2010.
LEE, K.; JOSEPH, K.; ABRAHAM, V.; EUN, J. H.; WU, G.; WANG, Y. Promoting effective modes of university-industry interactions and their evolution for economic catch up in Asia. A Research Report for IDRC. Seoul: East Asia Institute. 2009.
LEVY, R.; ROUX, P.; WOLFF, S. An analysis of science-industry collaborative patterns in a large European University. The Journal of Technology Transfer, v. 34, n. 1, p. 1-23, 2009. Available at: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:34:y:2009:i:1:p:1-23.
LORENZ, E. Organisational innovation, governance structure and innovative capacity in British and French industry. DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies, 1999 (DRUID Working Papers, n. 99-1). Available at: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aal:abbswp:99-1.
LUNDVALL, B-Å. Innovation as an interactive process – from user-producer interaction to national systems of innovation. In: DOSI, G.; FREEMAN, C.; NELSON, R.; SILVERBERG, G.; SOETE, L. (Eds.). Technical change and economic theory. London: Pinter, 1988, p. 349-367.
MANSFIELD, E.; LEE, J.-Y. The modern university: contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support. Research Policy, v. 25, n. 7, p. 1047-1058, 1996.
NARIN, F.; HAMILTON, K. S.; OLIVASTRO, D. The increasing linkage between US technology and public science. Research Policy, v. 26, n. 3, p. 317-330, 1997.
NARULA, R.; GUIMÓN, J. The R&D activity of multinational enterprises in peripheral economies: evidence from the EU new member states. Maastricht: UNU-MERIT, 2010.
NELSON, R. R. National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
NELSON, R. R.; WRIGHT, G. The rise and fall of American technological leadership: the postwar era in historical perspective. Journal of Economic Literature, v. 30, n. 4, p. 1931-1964, 1992.
OECD. Open innovation in global networks. Paris: OECD, 2008.
OSTRY, S.; NELSON, R. R. Techno-nationalism and techno-globalism: conflict and cooperation. Washington: The Brookings Institution, 1995.
PATEL, P. Localised production of technology for global markets. Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 19, n. 1, p. 141-153, 1995.
PAVITT, K. What makes basic research economically useful? Research Policy, v. 20, n. 2, p. 109-119, 1991.
PRAGER, D. J.; OMENN, G. S. Research, innovation, and university-industry linkages. Science, v. 207, n. 4429, p. 379, 1980.
SUZIGAN, W.; RAPINI, M.; ALBUQUERQUE, E. A changing role for universities in the periphery. Belo Horizonte: Cedeplar-UFMG, 2011 (Textos para discussão, 420).
TETHER, B.; TAJAR, A. The organisational-cooperation mode of innovation and its prominence amongst European service firms. Research Policy, v. 37, n. 4, p. 720-739, 2008.
THE ECONOMIST INTELLIGENCE UNIT. Sharing the idea: the emergence of Global Innovation Networks. London: The Economist, 2007.
THURSBY, J.; THURSBY, M. Here or there? A survey of factors in multinational R&D location. 2006Available at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11675. Access: 01 Mar. 2013.
UNCTAD. World investment report 2005 – Transnational corporations and the internationalization of R&D. Geneva: United Nation Conference on Trade and Development, 2005.
O conteúdo dos artigos e resenhas publicados na RBI são de absoluta e exclusiva responsabilidade de seus autores.
Downloads
