Banner Portal
Estrutura de governança em alianças estratégicas de P&D geradoras de inovações da Embrapa
PDF Acesso via SciELO
PDF

Palavras-chave

Alianças Estratégicas
P&D
EMBRAPA
Inovações Agropecuárias

Como Citar

PREUSLER, Taísa Scariot; COSTA, Priscila Rezende da; CRESPI, Tatiane Baseggio. Estrutura de governança em alianças estratégicas de P&D geradoras de inovações da Embrapa. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, Campinas, SP, v. 20, n. 00, p. e0200021, 2021. DOI: 10.20396/rbi.v20i00.8654230. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8654230. Acesso em: 14 jun. 2024.

Resumo

Com o crescimento populacional e o aumento da expectativa de vida, as inovações são o principal meio de otimizar a produção agropecuária. Doravante, a formação de alianças pode ser uma alternativa para potencializar a base de recursos pró-inovação das organizações envolvidas nesses desafios. Sendo assim, neste estudo, objetivou-se compreender como as alianças estratégicas de P&D são estruturadas para promover inovações agropecuárias. Três alianças, envolvendo a Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) e parceiros, constituíram a unidade de análise da pesquisa. Sobre a estruturação e a formalização das alianças analisadas, foi possível concluir que elas são dimensionadas, inicialmente, conforme a natureza dos atores envolvidos, embora tenha se constatado que seus níveis são alterados também pelo escopo, prazo e natureza das atividades praticadas.

https://doi.org/10.20396/rbi.v20i00.8654230
PDF Acesso via SciELO
PDF

Referências

ALMEIDA, J.M; COSTA, P.R. Development of Relational Capability in Technology-based Companies in the Information and Communication Technology Sector. International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research, v. 5, p. 119-126, 2017.

APPIO, F.P. et al. Search mechanisms and innovation: An analysis across multiple perspectives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 120, p. 103-116, 2017.

ARGYRES, N.; MAYER, K.J. Contract design as a firm capability: An integration of learning and transaction cost perspectives. Academy of Management Review, v. 32, n. 4, p.1060-1077, 2007.

BRASIL. Ministério da Agricultura e Reforma Agrária. Portaria n. 193, de 7 de agosto de 1992. Institui o Sistema Nacional de Pesquisa Agropecuária. Diário Oficial da União: seção 1, Brasília, DF, p. 51, 10 ago. 1992.

CARAYOL, N. Objectives, agreements and matching in science-industry collaborations: Reassembling the pieces of the puzzle. Research policy, v. 32, n. 6, p. 887-908, 2003.

CHESBROUGH, H. Open innovation: a new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. In: CHESBROUGH, H.; VANHAVERBEKE, W.; WEST, J. (ed.). Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. p. 1-12. COSTA, P.R.; PORTO, G.S. Elementos Tecnológicos Determinantes das Capacidades Dinâmicas de Inovação e Cooperação: Um Estudo com as Multinacionais Brasileiras. Revista Ibero-americana de Estratégia, v. 13, n. 3, p. 77-93, 2014.

CRESWELL, J. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London: SAGE Publications, 2017.

CUMMINGS, J.N.; KIESLER, S. Coordination costs and project outcomes in multiuniversity collaborations. Research Policy, v. 36, n. 10, p. 1620-1634, 2007.

DING, R.; DEKKER, H.C.; GROOT, T. Risk, partner selection and contractual control in interfirm relationships. Management Accounting Research, v. 24, n. 2, p. 140-155, 2013.

DOSSA, A.A.; SEGATTO, A.P. Pesquisas cooperativas entre universidades e institutos públicos no setor agropecuário brasileiro: um estudo na Embrapa. Revista de Administração Pública, v. 44, n. 6, p. 1327-1352, 2010.

DUTRÉNIT, G.; VERA-CRUZ, A.O. Fostering innovation in the agriculture sector: The case of intermediary organisations in Mexico. MedCrave, v. 2, n. 2, p. 95-107, 2018.

DU, J.; LETEN, B.; VANHAVERBEKE, W. Managing open innovation projects with science-based and market-based partners. Research Policy, v. 43, n. 5, p. 828-840, 2014.

DYER, J.H.; SINGH, H. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, v. 23, n. 4, p. 660-679, 1998.

EMBRAPA. Embrapa em números. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.embrapa.br/embrapa-em-numeros. Acesso em: 18 ago. 2020.

ETZKOWITZ, H. Innovation Lodestar: The entrepreneurial university in a stellar knowledge firmament. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 123, p. 122-129, 2017.

FABRIZIO, K.R. Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation. Research policy, v. 38, n. 2, p. 255-267, 2009.

FAEMS, D.; VAN LOOY, B.; DEBACKERE, K. Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: Toward a portfolio approach. Journal of product innovation management, v. 22, n. 3, p. 238-250, 2005.

FIGUEIREDO, P. New challenges for public research organisations in agricultural innovation in developing economies: Evidence from Embrapa in Brazil’s soybean industry. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, v. 62, p. 21-32, 2016.

GODOY, A.S. Introdução à pesquisa qualitativa e suas possibilidades. Revista de administração de empresas, v. 35, n. 2, p. 57-63, 1995.

GULATI, R.; SINGH, H. The architecture of cooperation: Managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Administrative science quarterly, v. 43. n. 4, p. 781-814, 1998.

HEIMERIKS, K.H.; DUYSTERS, G. Alliance capability as a mediator between experience and alliance performance: An empirical investigation into the alliance capability development process. Journal of Management Studies, v. 44, n. 1, p. 25-49, 2007.

HELFAT, C.E. et al. Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2009.

HOANG, H.; ROTHAERMEL, F.T. The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance. Academy of Management Journal, v. 48, n. 2, p. 332-345, 2005.

JAP, S.D.; ANDERSON, E. Safeguarding interorganizational performance and continuity under ex post opportunism. Management science, v. 49, n. 12, p. 1684-1701, 2003.

KALE, P.; SINGH, H. Managing strategic alliances: what do we know now, and where do we go from here? The Academy of Management Perspectives, v. 23, n. 3, p. 45-62, 2009.

KALE, P.; DYER, J.H.; SINGH, H. Alliance capability, stock market response, and long‐term alliance success: the role of the alliance function. Strategic management journal, v. 23, n. 8, p. 747-767, 2002.

KAUPPILA, O-P. Alliance management capability and firm performance: Using resourcebased theory to look inside the process black box. Long Range Planning, v. 48, n. 3, p.151-167, 2015.

KOHTAMÄKI, M.; RABETINO, R.; MÖLLER, K. Alliance capabilities: A systematic review and future research directions. Industrial Marketing Management, v. 68, p. 188-201, 2018.

LETEN, B. et al. IP models to orchestrate innovation ecosystems: IMEC, a public research institute in nano-electronics. California management review, v. 55, n. 4, p. 51-64, 2013.

LHUILLERY, S.; PFISTER, E. R&D cooperation and failures in innovation projects: Empirical evidence from French CIS data. Research Policy, v. 38, n. 1, p. 45-57, 2009.

LUO, Y.; TAN, J. Structuring international joint ventures: how should contractual design be aligned with environmental conditions? Management International Review, v. 43, n. 2, p. 185-211, 2003.

MARCONI, M. de A. et al. Técnicas de pesquisa. 6. ed. São Paulo: Atlas. 2006. v. 4.

MASCARENHAS, B.; KOZA, M.P. Develop and nurture an international alliance capability. Thunderbird International Business Review, v. 50, n. 2, p. 121-128, 2008. MILAGRES, R.; REZENDE, O.; SILVA, S.A.G. da. Papel e posição do departamento de alianças: caso Embrapa. Revista de Administração Pública, v. 51, n. 3, p. 431-450, 2017.

MORA-VALENTIN, E.M.; MONTORO-SANCHEZ, A.; GUERRAS-MARTIN, L.A. Determining factors in the success of R&D cooperative agreements between firms and research organizations. Research Policy, v. 33, n. 1, p. 17-40, 2004.

NIESTEN, E.; JOLINK, A. The impact of alliance management capabilities on alliance attributes and performance: A literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, v. 17, n. 1, p. 69-100, 2015.

PATTERSON, W.; AMBROSINI, V. Configuring absorptive capacity as a key process for research intensive firms. Technovation, v. 36, p. 77-89, 2015.

POPPO, L.; ZENGER, T. Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal, v. 23, n. 8, p. 707-725, 2002.

POWELL, W.W.; KOPUT, K.W.; SMITH-DOERR, L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative science quarterly, v. 41, n. 1, p. 116-145, 1996.

ROPER, S.; LOVE, J.H.; BONNER, K. Firms’ knowledge search and local knowledge externalities in innovation performance. Research Policy, v. 46, n. 1, p. 43-56, 2017.

SHAKERI, R.; RADFAR, R. Antecedents of strategic alliances performance in biopharmaceutical industry: A comprehensive model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 122, p. 289-302, 2017.

SCHILKE, O.; COOK, K.S. Sources of alliance partner trustworthiness: Integrating calculative and relational perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, v. 36, n. 2, p. 276-297, 2015.

SCHILKE, O.; GOERZEN, A. Alliance management capability: An investigation of the construct and its measurement. Journal of Management, v. 36, n. 5, p. 1192-1219, 2010.

SLUYTS, K.; MARTENS, R.; MATTHYSSENS, P. How to build alliance capability: A life cycle approach. In: SANCHEZ, R.; HEENE, A. (ed.). Enhancing Competences for Competitive Advantage (Advances in Applied Business Strategy) Binley, England: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2010. v. 12. p. 173-200.

SLUYTS, K. et al. Building capabilities to manage strategic alliances. Industrial Marketing Management, v. 40, n. 6, p. 875-886, 2011.

SORRENTINO, F.; GARRAFFO, F. Explaining performing R&D through alliances: Implications for the business model of Italian dedicated biotech firms. Journal of Management & Governance, v. 16, n. 3, p. 449-475, 2012.

VIEIRA FILHO, J.E.R.; VIEIRA, A.C.P. A Inovação da Agricultura Brasileira: uma reflexão a partir da análise dos certificados de proteção de cultivares Brasília, DF: Repositório do Conhecimento do Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA), 2013. (Texto para Discussão, n. 1866).

WALSH, J.P.; LEE, Y.N.; NAGAOKA, S. Openness and innovation in the US: Collaboration form, idea generation and implementation. Research Policy, v. 45, n. 8, p. 1660-1671, 2016.

WANG, G. et al. The effects of firm capabilities on external collaboration and performance: The moderating role of market turbulence. Journal of Business Research, v. 68, n. 9, p. 1928-1936, 2015.

ZAMBERLAN, L. et al. Pesquisa em ciências sociais aplicadas. Ijuí: Unijuí, 2014.

ZHANG, S.; LI, N.; LI, J. Redefining relational rent. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 117, n. 4, p. 315-326, 2017.

ZOLLO, M.; REUER, J.J.; SINGH, H. Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances. Organization science, v. 13, n. 6, p. 701-713, 2002.

Creative Commons License
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Brasileira de Inovação

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.