O campo de pesquisas do empreendedorismo

transformações, padrões e tendências na literatura científica (1990-2019)

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20396/rbi.v21i00.8663831

Palavras-chave:

Empreendedorismo, Bibliometria, Análise de cluster, Temas

Resumo

A partir da década de 1990 os estudos sobre empreendedorismo aumentaram de forma significativa. Atualmente, o campo conta com muitas publicações científicas, periódicos, eventos especializados e está presente em cursos de graduação e pós-graduação. Ao longo do tempo surgiram diferentes abordagens, definições, conceitos, teorias e ramificações. Portanto, torna-se oportuno realizar uma revisão para analisar e compreender a evolução do campo em diferentes períodos. Diante disso, este trabalho teve como objetivo analisar a evolução do empreendedorismo enquanto campo de pesquisa por meio de temas que marcaram diferentes períodos. Foi realizada uma revisão bibliométrica de literatura com foco na análise de cluster. Foi possível observar que nas últimas décadas o campo ganhou amplitude, com a inserção de novos conceitos e temas de pesquisa. Além disso, a manutenção de alguns temas indica que estes continuam importantes e buscam densidade teórica/metodológica

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

André Spuri Garcia, Universidade Federal de Lavras

Doutorado em andamento em Administração pela Universidade Federal de Lavras.

Daniela Meirelles Andrade, Universidade Federal de Lavras

Doutorado em Administração pela Univerdodade Federal de Lavras. Professor na Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA), Lavras (MG), Brasil.

Referências

AUDRETSCH, D. B.; THURIK, A. R. Capitalism and democracy in the 21st century: from the managed to the entrepreneurial economy.Journal of Evolutionary Economics, New York, v. 10, n. 1-2, p. 17-34, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001910050003

BARON, R. A. Psychological perspectives on entrepreneurship: cognitive and social factors in entrepreneurs’ success. Current Directions in Psychological Science, New York, v. 9, n. 1, p. 15-18, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00050

BARRINGER, B. R.; BLUEDORN, A. C. The relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, Hoboken, v. 20, n. 5, p. 421-444, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199905)20:5<421::AID-SMJ30>3.0.CO;2-O

BAUCUS, D. A.; BAUCUS, M. S.; HUMAN, S. E. Consensus in franchise organizations: a cooperative arrangement among entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, New York, v. 11, n. 5, p. 359-378, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(96)00055-9

BYRNE, J.; FATTOUM, S.; DIAZ GARCIA, M. C. Role models and women entrepreneurs: entrepreneurial superwoman has her say. Journal of Small Business Management, Morgantown, v. 57, n. 1, p. 154-184, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12426

CAVALLO, A.; GHEZZI, A.; BALOCCO, R. Entrepreneurial ecosystem research: present debates and future directions. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, New York, v. 15, n. 4, p. 1291-1321, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-018-0526-3

CENTOBELLI, P. et al. Exploration and exploitation in the development of more entrepreneurial universities: a twisting learning path model of ambidexterity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, New York, v. 141, p. 172-194, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.014

CHANDRA, Y. Mapping the evolution of entrepreneurship as a field of research (1990-2013): a scientometric analysis. PloS One, San Francisco, v. 13, n. 1, e0190228, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190228

CHEN, C.; IBEKWE‐SANJUAN, F.; HOU, J. The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: a multiple‐perspective cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, New York, v. 61, n. 7, p. 1386-1409, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21309

CORNELIUS, B.; LANDSTRÖM, H.; PERSSON, O. Entrepreneurial studies: the dynamic research front of a developing social science. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Hoboken, v. 30, n. 3, p. 375-398, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00125.x

COVIN, J. G.; LUMPKIN, G. T. Entrepreneurial orientation theory and research: reflections on a needed construct. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Hoboken, v. 35, n. 5, p. 855-872, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00482.x

CRAMMOND, R. J. Entrepreneurship: origins and nature. In:

CRAMMOND, R. J. (Org.). Advancing entrepreneurship education in universities. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020. p. 23-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35191-5_2

DACIN, M. T.; DACIN, P. A.; TRACEY, P. Social entrepreneurship: a critique and future directions. Organization Science, Maryland, v. 22, n. 5, p. 1203-1213, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0620

DACIN, P. A.; DACIN, M. T.; MATEAR, M. Social entrepreneurship: why we don’t need a new theory and how we move forward from here. The Academy of Management Perspectives, New York, v. 24, n. 3, p. 37-57, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2010.52842950

DAVIDSSON, P. Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: a re-conceptualization. Journal of Business Venturing, New York, v. 30, n. 5, p. 674-695, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.01.002

EISENHARDT, K. M.; SCHOONHOVEN, C. B. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, Maryland, v. 7, n. 2, p. 136-150, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.2.136

ELLEGAARD, O.; WALLIN, J. A. The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: how great is the impact? Scientometrics, Amsterdam, v. 105, n. 3, p. 1809-1831, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z

EVANS, D. S.; JOVANOVIC, B. An estimated model of entrepreneurial choice under liquidity constraints. Journal of Political Economy, Chicago, v. 97, n. 4, p. 808-827, 1989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261629

EVANS, D. S.; LEIGHTON, L. S. Some empirical aspects of entrepreneurship. In: ACS, Z. J.; AUDRETSCH, D. B. (Org.). The economics of small firms. Dordrecht: Springer, 1990. p. 79-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7854-7_6

FRITSCH, M.; OBSCHONKA, M.; WYRWICH, M. Historical roots of entrepreneurship-facilitating culture and innovation activity: an analysis for German regions. Regional Studies, Oxfordshire, v. 53, n. 9, p. 1296-1307, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1580357

GAMANIS, A. et al. Tracing the concept of entrepreneurship and the role of an entrepreneur: a critical review. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovative Competitiveness, Cyprus, v. 1, n. 1, p. 1-14, 2019.

GARTNER, W. B. A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of Management Review, Ohio, v. 10, n. 4, p. 696-706, 1985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1985.4279094

GARTNER, W. B.; VESPER, K. H. Experiments in entrepreneurship education: successes and failures. Journal of Business Venturing, New York, v. 9, n. 3, p. 179-187, 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)90028-0

GRIMALDI, R. et al. 30 years after Bayh–Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, Amsterdam, v. 40, n. 8, p. 1045-1057, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.04.005

IRELAND, R. D. et al. Integrating entrepreneurship and strategic management actions to create firm wealth. Academy of Management Perspectives, New York, v. 15, n. 1, p. 49-63, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2001.4251393

JONES, M. V.; COVIELLO, N.; TANG, Y. K. International entrepreneurship research (1989-2009): a domain ontology and thematic analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, New York, v. 26, n. 6, p. 632-659, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.04.001

KLEIN, P. G. et al. Toward a theory of public entrepreneurship. European Management Review, Houndmills, v. 7, n. 1, p. 1-15, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/emr.2010.1

LANDSTRÖM, H. The evolution of entrepreneurship as a scholarly field. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, Boston, v. 16, n. 2, p. 65-243, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1561/0300000083

LANDSTRÖM, H.; HARIRCHI, G.; ÅSTRÖM, F. Entrepreneurship: exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, Amsterdam, v. 41, n. 7, p. 1154-1181, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.009

LEWIS, P. The quest for invisibility: female entrepreneurs and the masculine norm of entrepreneurship. Gender, Work & Organization, Oxford, v. 13, n. 5, p. 453-469, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2006.00317.x

LIÑÁN, F.; FAYOLLE, A. A systematic literature review on entrepreneurial intentions: citation, thematic analyses, and research agenda. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, New York, v. 11, n. 4, p. 907-933, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-015-0356-5

LIU, S. et al. Knowledge domain and emerging trends in Alzheimer’s disease: a scientometric review based on CiteSpace analysis. Neural Regeneration Research, Mumbai, v. 14, n. 9, p. 1643, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.255995

LOW, M. B.; MACMILLAN, I. C. Entrepreneurship: past research and future challenges. Journal of Management, v. 14, n. 2, p. 139-161, 1988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638801400202

MCCLELLAND, D. C. et al. Achieving society. London: Simon & Schuster, 1961. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/14359-000

MITCHELL, R. K. et al. The distinctive and inclusive domain of entrepreneurial cognition research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Hoboken, v. 28, n. 6, p. 505-518, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00061.x

MURRAY, F. The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: sharing the laboratory life. Research Policy, Amsterdam, v. 33, n. 4, p. 643-659, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.013

PRADO, J. W. et al. Realismo crítico e estudos organizacionais: uma análise bibliométrica. Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo em Administração, Niterói, v. 13, n. 2, p. 125-147, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12712/rpca.v13i2.27540

QUADRINI, V. Entrepreneurship, saving, and social mobility. Review of Economic Dynamics, Orlando, v. 3, n. 1, p. 1-40, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/redy.1999.0077

RAZIN, E.; LIGHT, I. Ethnic entrepreneurs in America’s largest metropolitan areas. Urban Affairs Review, Thousand Oaks, v. 33, n. 3, p. 332-360, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107808749803300305

SANTOS, F. M. A positive theory of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, Dordrecht, v. 111, n. 3, p. 335-351, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1413-4

SCHLÄGEL, C.; KÖNIG, M. Determinants of entrepreneurial intent: a meta‐analytic test and integration of competing models. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Hoboken, v. 38, n. 2, p. 291-332, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12087

SHANE, S.; VENKATARAMAN, S. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, Mississippi, v. 25, n. 1, p. 217-226, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791611

SHEPHERD, D. A. Party on! A call for entrepreneurship research that is more interactive, activity based, cognitively hot, compassionate, and prosocial. Journal of Business Venturing, New York, v. 30, n. 4, p. 489-507, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.02.001

SOLOMON, G. T.; WEAVER, K. M.; FERNALD JUNIOR, L. W. A historical examination of small business management and entrepreneurship pedagogy. Simulation & Gaming, Newbury Park, v. 25, n. 3, p. 338-352, 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878194253003

STAM, E. Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: a sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, Abingdon, v. 23, n. 9, p. 1759-1769, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484

THORNTON, P. H.; RIBEIRO-SORIANO, D.; URBANO, D. Socio-cultural factors and entrepreneurial activity: an overview. International. Small Business Journal, London, v. 29, n. 2, p. 105-118, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242610391930

VAN LOOY, B. et al. Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? Research Policy, Amsterdam, v. 33, n. 3, p. 425-441, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2003.09.004

VERHEUL, I.; VAN STEL, A.; THURIK, R. Explaining female and male entrepreneurship at the country level. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, London, v. 18, n. 2, p. 151-183, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620500532053

VOLERY, T.; MAZZAROL, T. The evolution of the small business and entrepreneurship field: a bibliometric investigation of articles published in the International Small Business Journal. International Small Business Journal, London, v. 33, n. 4, p. 374-396, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242613516139

WESTHEAD, P.; UCBASARAN, D.; WRIGHT, M. Experience and cognition: do novice, serial and portfolio entrepreneurs differ? International Small Business Journal, London, v. 23, n. 1, p. 72-98, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242605049104

WIKLUND, J.; SHEPHERD, D. Knowledge‐based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium‐sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal, Hoboken, v. 24, n. 13, p. 1307-1314, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.360

YOUSAFZAI, S. Y.; SAEED, S.; MUFFATTO, M. Institutional theory and contextual embeddedness of women’s entrepreneurial leadership: evidence from 92 countries. Journal of Small Business Management, Morgantown, v. 53, n. 3, p. 587-604, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12179

ZAHRA, S. A.; GEORGE, G. International entrepreneurship: the current status of the field and future research agenda. In: HITT, M. et al. (Org.). Strategic entrepreneurship: creating a new mindset. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002. p. 255-288.

Publicado

2022-06-10

Como Citar

GARCIA, A. S. .; ANDRADE, D. M. . O campo de pesquisas do empreendedorismo: transformações, padrões e tendências na literatura científica (1990-2019). Revista Brasileira de Inovação, Campinas, SP, v. 21, n. 00, p. e022002, 2022. DOI: 10.20396/rbi.v21i00.8663831. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8663831. Acesso em: 1 dez. 2022.

Edição

Seção

Seção Especial - ANPAD