Abstract
The objective of this paper is to analyse the recent expansion of teaching and research activities in the field of intellectual property in Brazil. The dynamism of Brazilian academic research, with growing international presence through volume of articles indexed on the basis of the ISI Standard and network structuring, has as consequence an increasing demand for professionals well versed in the multidisciplinary and complex intellectual property activities in both governmental (ministries, universities, research institutes, regulatory agencies, judiciary, legislative, etc) and non-governmental sectors (private enterprises, NGOs, law firms, etc). The challenge consists of training professionals and enabling the development of intellectual property analysis and enforcement models more compatible with economies growing based on technology development. Evidences show the growing use of the interdisciplinary perspective in order to analyse intellectual property issues which is a very challenging academic approach.References
Carvalho, S.M.P., “Propriedade intelectual na agricultura”, Tese de doutorado, DPCT, Instituto de Geociências, Unicamp, Campinas, SP, 2003.
Carvalho, S.M.P.; Chamas, C.; Buainain, A.M., “Políticas Comparadas de Propriedade Intelectual no Brasil: análise comparativa entre saúde e agricultura”, XI Seminário de Gestión Tecnológica ALTEC 2005, Salvador, BA, 2005.
Carvalho, S.M.P.; Salles-Filho, S; Ferreira, C., “Acesso das Micro, Pequenas e Médias Empresasao Sistema de Propriedade Intelectual no Brasil a partir do cruzamento de dados do IBGE e do INPI”, XI Seminário de Gestión Tecnológica ALTEC 2005, Salvador, BA, 2005.
Hennessey, W.O., “Intellectual Property Program of the Franklin Pierce Law Center – Past Developments, Current Situation, and Future Tasks, with particular emphasis on its Educational Methodology to Develop Human Resources Meeting Social Needs”, ICS Seminar, 22 fev. 2004.
IIPTI, International Intellectual Property Training Institute, Curriculum 2006. www.iipti.kipo.go.kr, 2005.
Inovação Unicamp. Edição de 31 mar. 2005, publicada em www.inovacao.unicamp.br.
INPI – Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial, Relatório de Gestão da Diretoria de Articulação Institucional e Informação Tecnológica 2005, Rio de Janeiro, RJ: INPI/DART, 2006.
Jaguaribe, A., “Defining and Managing Global Public Goods, Turim, 4-5 nov. 2005, Globus et Locus International Seminar, www.globusetlocus.org.
Love, J.; Hubbard, T., “Paying for Public Goods” (pdf), originalmente publicado como capítulo de livro em Code: Collaborative Ownership and the Digital Economy, ed. Rishab Aiyer Ghosh, MIT Press: Cambridge, 2005.
Pacheco, C.A., A Cooperação Universidade-Empresa No Brasil: Dificuldades e Avanços de um Sistema de Inovação Incompleto. in Reunión Regional OmpiCepal de Expertos sobre el Sistema Nacional de Innovación: Propiedad Intelectual, Universidad y Empresa. Organización Mundial de la Propiedad Intelectual (Ompi)/Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), Santiago, Chile, 1 a 3 out. 2003.
Polanyi, K., A Grande Transformação, Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Campus, 2000.
Stiglitz, J., Apresentação realizada no workshop, Initiative for Policy Dialogue, Intelectual Property Rights Task Force, Columbia, 2005.
TIPA – Atividades da Academia, tipa.law.ntu.edu.tw/index.htm, 2005.
USPTO – Atividades da Academia, www.uspto.gov, 2005.
The content of the articles and reviews published in RBI are of absolute and exclusive responsibility of their authors.
Downloads
