Banner Portal
Reasons, benefits and difficulties of the university-industry interaction
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

University-Industry Interaction
Innovation
Computer Science
Rio Grande do Sul

How to Cite

SCHAEFFER, Paola Rücker; RUFFONI, Janaina; PUFFAL, Daniel. Reasons, benefits and difficulties of the university-industry interaction. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, Campinas, SP, v. 14, n. 1, p. 105–134, 2015. DOI: 10.20396/rbi.v14i1.8649091. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8649091. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2024.

Abstract

The article analyzes the reasons, benefits and difficulties of university-industry (U-I) interactions. It was conducted a survey research that investigated interactions of computer science knowledge area of Rio Grande do Sul in 2013. The results show that the main reasons and benefits for universities are classified as intellectuals, whereas for the firms are proactive reasons and innovation benefits. Regarding the difficulties, the two groups of respondents highlighted the interest and institutional factors. To go beyond “points of interaction”, as suggested by the literature as a characteristic of the U-I interactions in Brazil, it is necessary not only quantitatively expand the number of interactions, but also increase the quality of relationships, referring to the understanding that these influence directly in the activity of generating knowledge and innovations. The issues raised in the survey demystify the idea of universities as “ivory towers” and firms as passive actors.

https://doi.org/10.20396/rbi.v14i1.8649091
PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

ALBUQUERQUE, E. M. Immature systems of innovation: introductory notes about a comparison between South Africa, India, Mexico and Brazil based on science and technology statistics. Belo Horizonte: UFMG/Cedeplar, 2003 (Texto para discussão, 221).

ARVANITIS, S.; KUBLI, U.; WOERTER, M. University-industry knowledge and technology transfer in Switzerland: What university scientists think about co-operation with private enterprises. Research Policy, v. 37, n. 10, p. 1865-1883, 2008.

ARVANITIS, S. University-industry knowledge and technology transfer in Switzerland: the university view. Zurich: KOF Swiss Economic Institute, 2005 (KOF working paper, n. 119).

ARZA, V. Channels, benefits and risks of public-private interactions for knowledge transfer: a conceptual framework inspired by Latin America. Science and Public Policy, v. 37, n. 7, p. 473-484, 2010.

BONACCORSI, A.; PICCALUGA, A. A theoretical framework for the evaluation of university-industry relationships. R&D Management, v. 24, n. 3, p. 229-247, 1994.

COHEN, W. M.; NELSON, R. R.; WALSH, J. P. Links and Impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, v. 48, n. 1, p. 1-23, 2002.

COSTA, A. B.; RUFFONI, J.; PUFFAL, D. Proximidade geográfica e interação universidade-empresa no Rio Grande do Sul. Revista de Economia, v. 37, n. especial, p. 213-238, 2011.

D’ESTE, P.; PERKMANN, M. Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. Journal of Technology Tranfer, v. 36, n. 3, p. 316-339, 2011.

DUTRÉNIT, G.; ARZA, V. Channels and benefits of interactions between public research organizations and industry: comparing four Latin American countries. Science and Public Policy, v. 37, n. 7, p. 541-553, 2010.

EDQUIST, C. Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions and organizations. London: Pinter, 1997.

FELLER, I.; AILES, C. P.; ROESSNER, J. D. Impacts of research universities on technological innovation in industry: evidence from engineering research centers. Research Policy, v. 31, p. 457-474, 2002.

FERNANDES, A. C.; SOUZA, B. C.; SILVA, A. S.; SUZIGAN, W.; CHAVES, C. V.; ALBUQUERQUE, E. Academy-industry links in Brazil: evidence about channels and benefits for firms and researchers. Science and Public Policy, v. 37, n. 7, p. 485-498, 2010.

FREEMAN, C. Technology policy and economic performance: lesson from Japan. London/ New York: Pinter Publishers, 1987.

FREEMAN, C. “The National System of Innovation” in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 19, n. 1, 1995.

FREITAS, I. M. B.; MARQUES, R. A.; SILVA, E. M. P. University-industry collaboration and innovation in emergent and mature industries in new industrialized countries. Research Policy, v. 42, n. 2, p. 443-453, 2013.

HAIR, J. F.; BABIN, B.; MONEY, A. H.; SOMOUEL, P. Fundamentos de métodos de pesquisa em administração. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2005.

IBGE – Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa de Inovação Tecnológica 2008. Rio de Janeiro: Ministério do Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão, 2010.

KLEVORICK, A.; LEVIN, R.; NELSON, R.; WINTER, S. On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy, v. 24, n. 2, p. 185-205, 1995.

MAZZOLENI, R.; NELSON, R. The roles of research at universities and public labs in economic catch-up. Research Policy, v. 36, n. 10, p. 1512-1528, 2007.

MEYER-KRAHMER, F.; SCHMOCH, U. Science-based technologies: industry-university interactions in four fields. Research Policy, v. 27, n. 8, p. 835-851, 1998.

MOWERY, D.; SAMPAT, B. Universities in national systems. In: FAGERBERG, J.; MOWERY, D.; NELSON, R. The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, p. 209-239.

NELSON, R. R.; ROSENBERG, N. Technical innovation and national systems. In: NELSON, R. R. National Innovation Systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.

PORTO, G. S.; KANNEBLEY JÚNIOR, S.; SELAN, B.; BARONI, J. P. M. T. Redes de interação universidade-empresa no Brasil: uma análise de redes sociais. Revista de Economia, v. 37, n. especial, p. 9-24, 2011.

PÓVOA, L. M. C. A crescente importância das universidades e institutos públicos de pesquisa no processo de catching-up tecnológico. In: Seminário sobre a Economia Mineira Cedepelar, 12, 2008, Belo Horizonte. Anais... Belo Horizonte: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, 2008.

PRAGER, O. J.; OMENN, G. S. Research, innovation and university-industry linkages. Science, v. 207, n. 25, p. 379-384, 1980.

RAPINI, M. S. Interação universidade-empresa no Brasil: evidências do Diretório dos Grupos de Pesquisa no Brasil. Estudos Econômicos, v. 37, n. 2, p. 212-233, 2007.

RAPINI, M. S.; SUZIGAN, W.; FERNANDES, A. C.; DOMINGUES, E.; CARVALHO, S. S. M.; CHAVES, C. V. A contribuição das universidades e institutos de pesquisa para o Sistema de Inovação Brasileiro. In: Encontro Nacional de Economia, 37, 2009, Foz do Iguaçu. Anais... Foz do Iguaçu: Anpec, 2009.

REIS, D. R. The professor as innovation agent in the interaction process with company. In: International Conferences on Technology Policy and Innovation, 2, 1998, Lisboa. Anais... Lisboa: IST, 1998.

ROSENBERG, N. Schumpeter and the endogeneity of technology: some American perspectives. London: Routledge, 2000.

ROSENBERG, N.; NELSON, R. R. American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy, v. 23, n. 3, p. 323-348, 1994.

SEGATTO, A. P. Análise do processo de cooperação tecnológica universidade-empresa: um estudo exploratório. 1996. Dissertação (Mestrado em Administração) – Departamento de Administração da Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 1996.

SEGATTO-MENDES, A. P.; SBRAGIA, R. O processo de cooperação universidade-empresa em universidades brasileiras. Revista de Administração, v. 37, n. 4, p. 58-71, 2002.

SHIMA, W. T.; SCATOLIN, F. D. Uma comparação das universidades/institutos de pesquisa e das empresas sobre o processo de interação. Revista de Economia, v. 37, n. especial, p. 213-238, 2011.

SUZIGAN, W.; ALBUQUERQUE, E. M. A interação entre universidades e empresas em perspectiva histórica no Brasil. In: SUZIGAN, W.; ALBUQUERQUE, E. M.; CARIO, S. A. F. Em busca da inovação: interação universidade-empresa no Brasil. São Paulo: Autêntica, 2011.

TARTARI, V.; BRESCHI, S. Set them free: scientists’ evaluations of the benefits and costs of university-industry research collaboration. Industrial and Corporate Change, v. 21, n. 5, p. 1117-1147, 2012.

The content of the articles and reviews published in RBI are of absolute and exclusive responsibility of their authors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.