Resumo
Durante as décadas de 2000 e 2010, o crescimento da produção de açúcar e etanol estimulou a expansão da cana-de-açúcar em novas regiões do Brasil, reduzindo a concentração de São Paulo. Este artigo tem como objetivo analisar em que medida o crescimento da produção canavieira em regiões periféricas levou ao aumento das capacidades de conhecimento. Como forma de considerar as assimetrias regionais, utiliza-se da abordagem das diferenciações da base de conhecimento em associação com os sistemas regionais de inovação (SRI) e as relações centro-periferia. Para isso, utilizamos dados sobre o emprego formal e artigos científicos no Centro-Sul do país entre 2003 e 2017. Os resultados demonstram que existem limitantes na difusão do conhecimento canavieiro dado que importante parcela da produção de conhecimento continua concentrada nas tradicionais regiões de crescimento no interior paulista.
Referências
ANDERSEN, A.D.; WICKEN, O. Making sense of how the natural environment shapes innovation, industry dynamics, and sustainability challenges. Innovation and Development, p. 1-27, 2020.
ASHEIM, B. The Changing Role of Learning Regions in the Globalizing Knowledge Economy: A Theoretical Re-examination. Regional Studies, v. 46, n. 8, p. 993-1004, 2012.
ASHEIM, B.; COENEN, L. Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters. Research Policy, v. 34, n. 8, p. 1173-1190, Oct. 2005.
ASHEIM, B.; GERTLER, M. The geography of innovation: regional innovation systems. In: FAGERBERG, J.; MOWREY, D. (org.). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: OUP Oxford, 2005. p. 291-317.
ASHEIM, B.; BOSCHMA, R.; COOKE, P. Constructing Regional Advantage: Platform Policies Based on Related Variety and Differentiated Knowledge Bases. Regional Studies, v. 45, n. 7, p. 893-904, 2011.
ASHEIM, B.; GRILLITSCH, M.; TRIPPL, M. Regional innovation systems: Past–present–future. In: SHEARMUR, R.; CARRINCAZEAUX, C.; DOLOREUX, D. (org.). Handbook on the geographies of innovation. Chelthenam: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016. p. 45-62.
ASHEIM, B.; GRILLITSCH, M.; TRIPPL, M. Introduction: Combinatorial Knowledge Bases, Regional Innovation, and Development Dynamics. Economic Geography, v. 93, n. 5, p. 429-435, 2017.
BACCARIN, J.G.; OLIVEIRA, J.A.; MARDEGAN, G.E. The environmental, social and economic effects of recent technological changes in sugarcane on the State of São Paulo, Brazil. Journal of Agrarian Change, 2020.
BALLAND, P.-A.; RIGBY, D. The Geography of Complex Knowledge. Economic Geography, v. 93, n. 1, p. 1-23, 2017.
BOSCHMA, R. A concise history of the knowledge base literature: Challenging questions for future research. In: ISAKSEN, A.; MARTIN, R.; TRIPPL, M. (org.) New avenues for regional innovation systems-theoretical advances, empirical cases and policy lessons. Springer, 2018. p. 23-40.
CALDAS, M.M.; GRANCO, G.; BISHOP, C.; KASTENS, J.; BROWN, J.C. Effects of Sugarcane Ethanol Expansion in the Brazilian Cerrado: Land Use Response in the New Frontier. In: QIN, Z.; MISHRA, U.; HASTING, A. Bioenergy and Land Use Change. American Geophysical Union, 2017. p. 39-51.
CFTA. Conselho Federal dos Técnicos Agrícolas. Decreto Federal no 90.922, de 6 de fevereiro de 1985 (com alterações do Decreto 4.560). Disponível em: https://bit.ly/335Kr0B. Acesso em: 15 abr. 2021.
COCHRANE, W.W. The development of American agriculture: a historical analysis.
Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993.COENEN, L.; ASHEIM, B.; BUGGE, M.M.; HERSTAD, S.J. Advancing regional innovation systems: What does evolutionary economic geography bring to the policy table? Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, v. 35, n. 4, p. 600-620, 2017.
CONFEA. Conselho Federal de Engenharia e Agronomia. Decreto no 23.196, de 12 de outubro de 1933. Disponível em: https://normativos2.confea.org.br/ementas/visualiza.asp?idEmenta=2&idTiposEmentas=2&Numero=23196&AnoIni=&AnoFim=&PalavraChave=&buscarem=conteudo. Acesso em: 15 abr. 2021.
COOKE, P.; LEYDESDORFF, L. Regional development in the knowledge-based economy: The construction of advantage. The journal of technology Transfer, v. 31, n. 1, p. 5-15, 2006.
COOKE, P.; URANGA, M. G.; ETXEBARRIA, G. Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy, v. 26, n. 4-5, p. 475-491, 1997.
DAVID, A.; DORN, D. The growth of low-skill service jobs and the polarization of the US labor market. American Economic Review, v. 103, n. 5, p. 1553-1597, 2013.
FAOSTAT. Data. Disponível em: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home. Acesso em: 20 nov. 2020.
FURTADO, A.T.; SCANDIFFIO, M.I.G.; CORTEZ, L.A.B. The Brazilian sugarcane innovation system. Energy Policy, v. 39, n. 1, p. 156-166, 2011.
FURTADO, C. Intra-country discontinuities: Towards a theory of spatial structures. Social Science Information, v. 6, n. 6, p. 7-16, 1967.
GALVAO, L.S.; FORMAGGIO, A.R.; TISOT, D.A. Discrimination of sugarcane varieties in Southeastern Brazil with EO-1 Hyperion data. Remote sensing of Environment, v. 94, n. 4, p. 523-534, 2005.
GIULIANI, E.; MORRISON, A.; RABELLOTTI, R. Innovation and technological catch-up: The changing geography of wine production. Chelthenam: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011.
GRIGG, D. An introduction to agricultural geography. New York: Routledge, 1995.
HOWELLS, J. The geography of knowledge: never so close but never so far apart. Journal of Economic Geography, v. 12, n. 5, p. 1003-1020, Sept. 2012.
IEA. International Energy Agency. Data & Statistics. Disponível em: https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics. Acesso em: 30 nov. 2020.
ISAKSEN, A.; MARTIN, R.; TRIPPL, M. New avenues for regional innovation systems and policy. In: ISAKSEN, A.; MARTIN, R.; TRIPPL, M. (org.). New Avenues for regional innovation systems-theoretical advances, empirical cases and policy lessons. Springer, 2018. p. 1-19.
JOHNSON, C. Pro Bash Programming: Scripting the GNU/Linux Shell. Apress, 2009.
LANDELL, M.G. de A. et al. Oxisol subsurface chemical attributes related to sugarcane productivity. Scientia Agrícola, v. 60, n. 4, p. 741-745, 2003.
LUNDVALL, B.-Å . National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Anthem Press, 1992.
LUNDVALL, B.-Å.; JOHNSON, B. The learning economy. In: LUNDVALL, B.-Å. (org.). The learning economy and the economics of hope. London and New York: Anthem Press, 2016. p. 107-130.
MALERBA, F. Sectoral systems of innovation: basic concepts. In: MALERBA, F. (org.). Sectoral systems of innovation: Concepts, issues and analyses of six major sectors in Europe. Cambridge University Press, 2004. p. 9-41.
MARTIN, R.; MOODYSSON, J. Comparing knowledge bases: On the geography and organization of knowledge sourcing in the regional innovation system of Scania, Sweden. European Urban and Regional Studies, v. 20, n. 2, p. 170-187, 2013.
MASSEY, D.B. Spatial Divisions of Labor: Social Structures and the Geography of Production. Psychology Press, 1995.
MENDONÇA, M.L.; PITTA, F.T.; XAVIER, C.V. The Sugarcane Industry and the global economic crisis. Transnational Institute (TNI), Network for Social Justice and Human Rights, 2013.
MITCHELL, R. Web scraping with Python: Collecting more data from the modern web. O’Reilly Media, Inc., 2018.
MORAES, M.A.F.D.; ZILBERMAN, D. Production of ethanol from sugarcane in Brazil: from State intervention to a Free Market. New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer, 2014.
MYRDAL, G. Rich Land and Poor. New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers, 1957.
PAGE, B. Across the Great Divide: Agricultural and Industrial Geography. Economic Geography, v. 72, n. 4, p. 376-397, 1996.
PAGE, B.; WALKER, R. From Settlement to fordism: The Agro-industrial revolution in the American Midwest. Economic Geography, v, 67, n. 4, p. 281-315, 1991.
PALLUDETO, A.W.A.; TELLES, T.S.; SOUZA, R.F.; DE MOURA, F.R. Sugarcane expansion and farmland prices in São Paulo State, Brazil. Agriculture & Food Security, v. 7, n. 1, p. 1, 2018.
PALMER, I. Science and agricultural production. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, 1972.
PERLIN, M.S.; SANTOS, A.A.; IMASATO, T.; BORENSTEIN, D.; SILVA, S. da. The Brazilian scientific output published in journals: A study based on a large CV database. Journal of Informetrics, v. 11, n. 1, p. 18-31, 2017.
PLUM, O.; HASSINK, R. Analysing the knowledge base configuration that drives southwest Saxony’s automotive firms. European Urban and Regional Studies, v. 20, n. 2, p. 206-226, 2013.
POSSAS, M.L.; SALLES-FILHO, S.; SILVEIRA, J.M. da. An evolutionary approach to technological innovation in agriculture: some preliminary remarks. Research policy, v. 25, n. 6, p. 933-945, 1996.
R CORE TEAM. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020.
RODRÍGUEZ, O. El estructuralismo latinoamericano. México: Siglo XXI, 2006. ISBN 9682326699.
SMITH, N. Uneven development: Nature, capital, and the production of space. New York: Blackwell, 1984.
SOUZA, R.F. Captchas Negated by Python reQuests – CNPQ. GitHub repositor, 2018.
SOUZA, R.F.; SABINO, W. getLattes: Read and process data from Lattes currriculum platform. Zenodo, 2020.
STORPER, M. Keys to the City: How Economics, Institutions, Social Interaction, and Politics Shape Development. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2013.
TÖDTLING, F.; TRIPPL, M. One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, v. 34, n. 8, p. 1203-1219, 2005.
UNICADATA. Produção. Disponível em: https://observatoriodacana.com.br/. Acesso em: 15 nov. 2020.
USDA. Foreign Agricultural Service. Sugar: World Markets and Trade. Nov. 2020.
WACLAWOVSKY, A.J.; SATO, P.M.; LEMBKE, C.G.; MOORE, P.H.; SOUZA, G.M. Sugarcane for bioenergy production: an assessment of yield and regulation of sucrose content. Plant Biotechnology Journal, v. 8, n. 3, p. 263-276, 2010.
WALKER, R. The conquest of bread: 150 years of agribusiness in California. New York, London: New Press, 2004.
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Brasileira de Inovação
Downloads
