Keywords
Literary polemics
Anachronism
How to Cite
Abstract
Ricardo Piglia decided to publish his personal diaries, but not before retouching and modifying them, as well as adding new texts. Hence, the daily writing was reformulated as a retroactive writing and decisively changed the characteristics of some of the tracts through a clearly controversial gesture. Especially when, in the dramatic circumstance of being diagnosed with a terminal illness in the process of reviewing the texts, Piglia knew that the publication of these diaries could only be posthumous.
References
BENJAMIN, Walter. El narrador. Consideraciones sobre la obra de Nicolai Leskov. In: Sobre el programa de la filosofía futura. Planeta-Agostini: Barcelona, 1986, pp. 189-211.
PIGLIA, Ricardo. Los diarios de Emilio Renzi. Años de formación. Tomo I. Buenos Aires: Anagrama, 2015.
PIGLIA, Ricardo. Los diarios de Emilio Renzi. Los años felices. Tomo II. Buenos Aires: Anagrama, 2016a.
PIGLIA, Ricardo. Las tres vanguardias. Saer, Puig, Walsh. Buenos Aires: Eterna Cadencia, 2016b.
PIGLIA, Ricardo. Los diarios de Emilio Renzi. Un día de la vida. Tomo III. Buenos Aires: Anagrama, 2017.
O periódico Remate de Males utiliza a licença do Creative Commons (CC), preservando assim, a integridade dos artigos em ambiente de acesso aberto.
Downloads
