Banner Portal
AS LÍNGUAS SEMANTICAMENTE ERGATIVAS NA PERSPECTIVA DA TIPOLOGIA SINTÁTICA GERAL
PDF

Como Citar

KIBRIK, A. E. AS LÍNGUAS SEMANTICAMENTE ERGATIVAS NA PERSPECTIVA DA TIPOLOGIA SINTÁTICA GERAL. Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos, Campinas, SP, v. 18, p. 15–36, 2012. DOI: 10.20396/cel.v18i0.8636836. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/cel/article/view/8636836. Acesso em: 20 abr. 2024.

Resumo

-
https://doi.org/10.20396/cel.v18i0.8636836
PDF

Referências

CHAFE, W. 1976. Givennes, constrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. ln: Ch. Li (ed.),1976.

COMRIE, B. 1978, Ergativity. In: W.P. Lehmann (ed.) Syntactic Typology. Austin: University of Texas Press.

DIXON, R. M. W. 1972. The Dyirbal Language of North Queesland. Cambridge University Press.

DIXON, R. M. W. 1979, Ergativity. Language, 55,1.

FILLMORE, CH. 1968. The case for case. In: E. Bach and R. T. Harms (eds.). Universais in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

GIVÓN, T. 1979.Understanding language. New York: Academic Press.

GIVÓN, T. 1984. Syntax. A functional-typological introduction. Volume 1. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

HOPPER, P. and S. Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language, 56.

KIBRIK, A. E. S. V. Kodzasov, D. S. Samedov e I. P. Olovjannikova. 1977. Opyt strukturnogo opisanija arčinskogo jazyka. Vol. I: 28-29. Moscou.

KIBRIK, A. E. 1979a. Podležaščee i problema universanoj modeli jazyka. Izvestia AN SSSR Seria literatury i jazyka. N4.

KIBRIK, A. E. 1979b. Canonical ergativity and Daghestan languages. In: F. Plank (ed.). 1979.

KIBRIK, A. E. 1979-1981. Materialy k tipologii ergativnosti. Institut russkogo jazyka AN SSSR. Predvaritelnye publikacii. Vypuski, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 140, 141. Moskwa.

KIBRIK, A. E. 1985. Toward a typology of ergativity. In: T. Nichols and A. C. Woodbury (eds.) Grammar inside and outside the clause. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

KIBRIK, A. E. 1987. Constructions with clause actants in Daghestanian languages. Lingua, 71.

KLIMOV, G. A. 1972. Očerk obšej teorii ergativnosti. Moskva: Nauka.

LI, Ch. (ed.) 1976. Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press.

LI, Ch. and S. Thompson. 1976. Subject and topic: a new typology of language. In: Ch. li (ed.) 1976.

PLANK, F. 1979. Ergativity, syntactic typology, and universal grammar. In: F. Plank (ed.) 1979.

PLANK, F. (ed.).1979. Ergativity: Toward a theory of Grammatical relations. London: Academic Press.

SCHACHTER, P. 19n. Reference-related and role-related properties of subjects. In: P. Cole and T. Sadock (eds.). Syntax and Semantics, 8: Grammatical relations. New York: Academic Press.

SEKI, L. 1990. Kamaiurá (Tupi-Guaraní) as an Active-Stative Language. In: D.L. Payne (ed.). Amazonian Linguistics: Studies in Lowland South American Languages. Austin: University of Texas Press.

TCHEKHOFF, C. 1978. Aux fondements de la Syntaxe: l'ergatif. Paris: Pressas Universitaires de France.

VAN VALIN, R.1977.Ergativity and universality of subjects. In: Papers from the 13th regional meeting. Chicago, linguistic society. Chicago.

WIERZBICKA, A. 1980. Lingua mentalis. New York: Academic Press.

O periódico Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos utiliza a licença do Creative Commons (CC), preservando assim, a integridade dos artigos em ambiente de acesso aberto.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.