Introdução à divisão 3-tricotômica de signos

Autores

  • João Queiroz Universidade Estadual de Campinas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20396/cel.v46i2.8637173

Palavras-chave:

Linguística.

Resumo

C.S.Peirce desenvolveu, por mais de 40 anos, entre 1865 e 1911, baseado em uma teoria lógica-fenomenológica de categorias, diversas “classificações de signos”. Estas classificações tem atraído e desafiado, por décadas, gerações de pesquisadores e muitas comunidades de linguistas e semioticistas. O propósito deste artigo é apresentar, introdutoriamente, uma de suas mais elaboradas classificações – as dez classes de signos.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

João Queiroz, Universidade Estadual de Campinas

Universidade Estadual de Campinas

Referências

BALAT, M. (1989-1991). “Sémiotique et psychanalyse”. (manuscrito fornecido pelo autor).

BERGMAN, M. (2000). “Reflections on the Role of the Communicative Sign in Semeiotic”, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy, Spring, XXXVI (2): 225-254.

BRUNNING, J. (1997). “Genuine triads and teridentity”, em Studies in the logic of Charles Sanders Peirce: 252-270. Houser, N., Roberts, D., Evra, J. (Eds.). Indiana: Indiana University Press.

COLAPIETRO, V. (1989). Peirce’s Approach to the Self: A Semiotic Perspective on Human Subjectivity. New York: State University of New York Press.

DE WAAL, C. (2001). On Peirce. Wadsworth.

DE TIENNE, A. (2003). “Learning qua Semiosis”. S.E.E.D. Journal — Semiotics, Evolution, Energy, and Development (3): 37-53.

FARIAS, P. & QUEIROZ, J. (2000). “Notes for a dynamic diagram of Charles Peirce’s classifications of signs”. Semiotica: Journal of the International Association for Semiotic Studies 131-1/2: 19-44.

FARIAS, P. (2003). “On diagrams for Peirce’s 10, 28, and 66 classes of signs”. Semiotica — Journal of the International Association for Semiotic Studies 147 (1/4): 165-184.

FARIAS, P. (2004). “10cubes and 3N3: using interactive diagrams to investigate Charles Peirce’s classifications of signs”. Semiotica — Journal of the International Association for Semiotic Studies 151-1/4: 41-63.

FREADMAN, A. 1996. “Peirce’s second classification of signs”, em: Peirce’s doctrine of signs: Theory, Applications, and Connections “. Colapietro, V. M. e Olshewsky, T. M. (Eds.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

FARIAS, P. (2001a). “The Classifications of Signs (I): 1867 – 1885”, em: Digital Encyclopedia of C.S.Peirce. Queiroz, J. & Gudwin, R. (Eds.)

FARIAS, P. (2001b). “The Classifications of Signs (II): 1903”, em Digital Encyclopedia of C.S.Peirce. Queiroz, J. & Gudwin, R. (Eds.)

FARIAS, P. (2004). The Machinery of Talk – Charles Peirce and the Sign Hypothesis. Stanford: Stanford Univerity Press.

HAUSMAN, C. (1993). Charles Sanders Peirce’s Evolutionary Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

HOOKWAY, C. (1985). Peirce. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

HOUSER, N. (1991). “A Peircean classification of models”, em: On Semiotic Modeling. Anderson, M. & Merrell, F. (Eds.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

FARIAS, P. (1997). “Introduction: Peirce as logician”, em: Studies in the Logic of Charles S. Peirce. Houser, N., Roberts, D., Evra, J. (Eds.). Indiana: Indiana University Press.

JAPPY, A. (1984). “Peirce’s third trichotomy and two cases of sign path analysis”. Semiotica 49, 1/2: 15-26.

KENT, B. (1987). Charles S. Peirce: logic and the classification of the sciences. McGill-Queens University Press

LEO, R.F. (1992). Il Concetto di Relazione in Peirce. Edizioni Universitairie Jaca.

LISZKA, J. (1996). A General Introduction to the Semeiotic of Charles Sanders Peirce. Indiana: Indiana University Press.

MERRELL, F. (1996). Signs Grow: Semiosis and life processes. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

MURPHEY, M. (1993). The Development of Peirce’s Philosophy. MA.: Harvard University Press.

NOTH, W. (1995). Handbook of Semiotics. Indiana: Indiana University Press.

PARKER, K. (1998). The Continuity of Peirce’s Thought. Vanderbilt University Press.

PEIRCE, C.S. 1883 (1983). (Ed.). Studies in Logic by members of the John Hopkins University. John Benjamins Publishing Co.

PEIRCE, C.S. 1931-1935. The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Electronic edition. Vols. I-VI. Hartshorne, C. & Weiss, P. (Eds.). Charlottesville: Intelex Corporation. MA.: Harvard University.

PEIRCE, C.S. (1958). The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vols. VII-VIII. Burks, A.W. (Ed.). Edição Eletrônica. Charlottesville: Intelex Corporation (1994 [1866-1913]).

PEIRCE, C.S. (1967). Annotated Catalogue of the papers of Charles S. Peirce. Amherst: University of Massachusetts. ROBIN, R. (Ed.) [Referências aos manuscritos e cartas de C.S.Peirce: MS e L, de acordo com o catálogo)

PEIRCE, C.S. (1976). New Elements of Mathematics by Charles S. Peirce. Eisele, C. (Ed.). The Hague: Mouton.

PEIRCE, C.S. (1977). Semiotics and significs: the correspondence between Charles S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Welby. Hardwick, C. S. (Ed.). Indiana University Press.

PEIRCE, C.S. (1984). Writings of Charles S. Peirce. Peirce Edition Project. (Ed.). Indiana University Press.

PEIRCE, C.S. 1998 (1893-1913). The essential Peirce: selected philosophical writings. Peirce Edition Project. (Ed.) Indiana University, Vol. II.

POTTER, V. 1967 (1997). Charles S. Peirce: On Norms & Ideals. University of Massachusetts Press.

QUEIROZ, J. (2004). Semiose segundo C.S.Peirce. São Paulo: Educ/Fapesp.

QUEIROZ, J. & EL-HANI, C.N. (2004). Towards a multi-level approach to the emergence of semiosis in semiotic systems. Technical Report DCA-FEEC-UNICAMP. DCA 04-07. pp.1-21.

RANSDELL, J. (1977). “Some leading ideas of Peirce’s semiotic”. Semiotica 19 (3/4): 157-178.

RANSDELL, J. (1983). “Peircean semiotic”. (manuscrito fornecido pelo autor).

SANTAELLA, L. 1995. A Teoria Geral dos Signos: semiose e autogeração. Editora Ática.

SAVAN, D. 1987-88. An Introduction to C.S.Peirce’s Full System of Semiotic. Monograph Series of the Toronto Semiotic Circle, vol.1: Victoria College.

SERSON, B. (1997). “On Peirce’s pure grammar as a general theory of cognition: from the thought-sign of 1868 to the semeiotic theory of assertion”. Semiotica 113-1/2:107-157.

TURSMAN, R. (1987). Peirce’s theory of scientific discovery: a system of logic conceived as semiotics. Indiana University Press.

WEISS, P. & BURKS, A. (1945). “Peirce’s sixty-six signs”. Journal of Philosophy XLII: 383-388.

Downloads

Publicado

2011-08-02

Como Citar

QUEIROZ, J. Introdução à divisão 3-tricotômica de signos. Cadernos de Estudos Lingüísticos, Campinas, SP, v. 46, n. 2, p. 271-282, 2011. DOI: 10.20396/cel.v46i2.8637173. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/cel/article/view/8637173. Acesso em: 26 nov. 2020.

Edição

Seção

Resenhas