Resumo
In this article I review some fundamental aspects of the singularist view of definite descriptions taking as paradigm the Frege-Strawson version of it. I consider more closely the role of the definite article and its relation with presuppositions. Finally, I raise some doubts about the coherence of such approach as an explanation for the phenomenon of reference.
Referências
ATLAS, J. “Frege’s polymorphous concept of presupposition and its role on a theory of meaning”. Semantikos I, pp. 29-44, 1975.
BARWISE, J., and COOPER, R. “Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Languages”. Linguistics and Philosophy 4, pp. 159-219, 1981.
BEANEY, M. The Frege Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 1997.
CAPPELEN, H., and LEPORE, E. Insensitive Semantics. New york: Oxford University Press, 2005.
DONNELLAN, K. “Reference and definite Descriptions”. The Philosophical Review 75 (1966), pp. 281-304. Reprinted in Almog, J. and Leonardi, P (eds.), Essays on Reference, Language and Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. 1966, pp. 3-32.
DONNELLAN, K. “Proper Names and Identifying Descriptions”. Synthese 21, pp. 335-58. Reprinted in Almog, J. and Leonardi, P (eds.), Essays on Reference, Language and Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. 1970, pp. 49-79.
DUMMETT, M. Frege. Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1973.
EVANS, G. The Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.
VON FINTEL, K. “Would You Believe It? The King of France is Back! (Presupposition and Truth-Value Intuitions). In Reimer, M., and Bezuidenhout, A. (eds.). Descriptions and Beyond. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004. 2004, pp. 315-41.
FREGE, G. “Über Sinn und Bedeutung”. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100, pp. 25-50. Translated by Black, M., and reprinted in Beaney (1997). 1892, pp. 151-71.
FREGE, G. Die Grundgesetze der Arithmetik (Vol. I). Jena: Pohle, 1893.
FREGE, G. Nachgelassene Schriften. (NS). Ed. by H. Hermes, F. Kambartel and F. Kaulbach. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag. (1979) Posthumous Writings. (PW). Transl. by Peter Long and Roger White. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976.
HILBERT, D., and BERNAYS, P. Grundlagen der Mathematik I. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 1934.
HAWTHORNE, J., and MANLEY, D. The Reference Book. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
KARTTUNEN, L. “Presuppositions of Compound Sentences”. Linguistic Inquiry IV, N. 2, 1973, pp. 169-93.
KEENAN, E. “Two Kinds of Presupposition in Natural Language”. In Fillmore, C. and Langendoen, D. (eds.) (1971). Studies in Linguistic Semantics, New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. 1971, pp. 413-61.
KRIPKE, S. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1980.
LEVINGSON, S. Pragmatics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
NEALE, S. Descriptions. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press/Bradford Books, 1990.
RUFFINO, M. “Context and Quantifier Domain”. Manuscrito 32, n. 1, 2009, pp. 283-308.
RUFFINO, M. “Dominios Quantificacionales e Intención del Hablante”. Orlando. E. (ed.), Significados en Contexto y Verdad Relativa. Ensayos Sobre Semántica y Pragmática. Buenos Aires: Título. 2015, pp. 77-98.
RUSSELL, B. “On Denoting”. Mind 14, N. 56, 1905, pp. 479-93.
RUSSELL, B. The Problems of Philosophy. London: Home University Library, 1912.
RUSSELL, B. “Mr. Strawson on Referring”. In My Philosopjical Development. London: Allen and Unwin. 1959, 238-45.
SELLARS, W. “Presupposing”. The Philosophical Review 63, No. 2, 1954 , pp. 197-215.
SHANON, B. “On the Two Kinds of Presuppositions in Natural Language ”. Foundations of Language 14, No. 2, 1976, pp. 247-9.
STANLEY, J., and SZABÓ, Z. “On Quantifier Domain restriction”. Mind and Language 15, 2000 , pp. 219-61.
SOAMES, S. A Critical Examination of Frege’s Theory of Presupposition and Contemporary Alternatives. Ph.D. Dissertation, M.I.T, 1976.
STALNAKER, R. “Pragmatics”. Synthese 22, I/2, 1970 , pp. 272-89.
STRAWSON, P. “On Referring”. Mind, New Series, 59, No. 235, 1950 , pp. 320-44.
STRAWSON, P. “A Reply to Mr. Sellars”. The Philosophical Review 63, No. 2, 1954, pp. 216-31.
O periódico Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos utiliza a licença do Creative Commons (CC), preservando assim, a integridade dos artigos em ambiente de acesso aberto.