Banner Portal
Trinta anos da Teoria Conceptual da Metáfora: uma retrospectiva crítica
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Metáfora Conceptual. Contexto. Comunicação. Cultura.

How to Cite

SCHRÖDER, Ulrike Agathe. Trinta anos da Teoria Conceptual da Metáfora: uma retrospectiva crítica. Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos, Campinas, SP, v. 53, n. 1, p. 59–72, 2011. DOI: 10.20396/cel.v53i1.8636544. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/cel/article/view/8636544. Acesso em: 17 jul. 2024.

Abstract

O artigo aborda as críticas mais importantes articuladas durante os últimos trinta anos da Teoria Conceptual da Metáfora fundada por Lakoff & Johnson. Nosssa intenção é sintetizar e discutir os pontos mais fracos da abordagem e dirigir nossa atenção para pesquisas atuais que buscam superar as falhas da teoria sem abandonar seus pressupostos básicos.

https://doi.org/10.20396/cel.v53i1.8636544
PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

ALVERSON, H. (1991). “Metaphor and Experience: Looking Over the Notion of Image Schema”. In: FERNANDEZ, J. W. Beyond metaphor: The theory of tropes in anthropology. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 94-117.

BLACK, M. (1962). Models and Metaphors. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.

BRANDT, L. & BRANDT, Per Aage. (2005). “Making sense of a blend. A cognitive-semiotic approach to metaphor”. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 3, pp. 216-249.

BÜHLER, K. (1934/1982). Sprachtheorie: die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Stuttgart: Fischer.

BURKHARDT, A. (1987). “Wie die ‚wahre Welt endlich zur Metapher wurde. Zur Konstitution, Leistung und Typologie der Metaphe”. In: Conceptus XXI, 52, pp. 39-67.

BUTTERS, R. R. (1981). Do ‚Conceptual Metaphors Really Exist?“ In: Southeastern Conference on Linguistics Bulletin 5, 3, pp. 108-117.

CAMERON, L. “Metaphor and talk”. (2008) In: GIBBS, R. W. Jr. The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 197-211.

CAMERON, L. (2007). “Confrontation or complementarity? Metaphor in language use and cognitive metaphor theory”. In: Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 5, pp. 107-135.

CAMERON, L. & DEIGNAN, A. (2003). “Combining Large and Small Corpora to Investigate Tuning Devices Around Metaphor in Spoken Discourse”. In: Metaphor And Symbol 18 (3), pp. 149-160.

CHARTERIS-BLACK, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

DEBATIN, B. (1995). Die Rationalität der Metapher. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.

DEIGNAN, A. (2005). Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

FAUCONNIER, G. & TURNER, M. (2002). The Way We Think. New York: Basic Books.

FEILKE, H. (1994). Common sense-Kompetenz. Überlegungen zu einer Theorie “sympathischen” und “natürlichen“ Meines und Verstehens. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

FERNANDEZ. J. W. (1991). “Introduction: Confluents of Inquiry”. In:

FERNANDEZ, J. W. Beyond metaphor: The theory of tropes in anthropology. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 1-13.

GIBBS, R. W. Jr. (1999). “Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it into the cultural world”. In: GIBBS, R. W. Jr. & STEEN, G. J. Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

HASER, V. (2005). Metaphor, Metonymy, and Experientialist Philosophy: Challenging Cognitive Semantics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

HOLLAND, D. (1982). “All is Metaphor: conventional Metaphors in Human Thought and Language”. In: Reviews in Anthropology, 9, pp. 287-297.

HOLT, E. & DREW, P. (2005). “Figurative Pivots: The Use of Figurative Expressions in Pivotal Topic Transitions”. In: Research on Language and Sozial Interaction, 38, 1, pp. 35-61.

HüLZER-VOGT, H. (1991). Kippfigur Metapher – metaphernbedingte Kommunikationskonflikte in Gesprächen. Ein Beitrag zur empirischen Kommunikationsforschung. Band 1: Gesprächsanalyse. Münster: Nodus Publikationen.

HüLZER-VOGT, H.(1987). Die Metapher. Kommunikationssemantische Überlegungen zu einer rhetorischen Kategorie. Münster: Nodus Publikationen.

JACKENDOFF, R. (2002). Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

JäKEL, O. (2003). Wie Metaphern Wissen schaffen: die kognitive Metapherntheorie und ihre Anwendung in Modell-Analysen der Diskursbereiche Geistestätigkeit, Wirtschaft, Wissenschaft und Religion. Hamburg: Kovač.

JOHNSON, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

KIMMEL, M. (2005). “Culture regained: situated and compound image schemas”. In: HAMPE, B. & GRADY, J. E. From Perception to Meaning. Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 285-311.

KÖVECSES, Z. (2005). Metaphor in Culture. Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

LAKOFF, G. (1993).“The contemporary theory of metaphor”. In: ORTONY, A. Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 202-251.

LAKOFF, G. (1989). “Some empirical results about the nature of concepts”. Mind and Language 4, pp. 119-154.

LAKOFF, G. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

LAKOFF, G. (1982). Categories and Cognitive Models. Berkeley cognitive Science Report, 2.

LAKOFF, G. & JOHNSON, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh. The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.

LAKOFF, G. (1980/2003). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

LAKOFF, G. & TURNER, M. (1989). More than Cool Reason. A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.

LAKOFF, G. & WEHLING, E. (2009). Auf leisen Sohlen ins Gehirn. Politische Sprache und ihre heimliche Macht. Heidelberg: Carl-Auer-Systeme.

LAWLER, J. M. (1983 ). “Review: Metaphors We Live By”. In: Language, 59/1, pp. 201-207.

SCHRÖEDER - Trinta anos da teoria conceptual da metáfora...

LEEZENBERG, M. (2001). Contexts of Metaphor. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

LINZ, E. (2004 ). „Sprachlose Metaphern. Zur Rhetorizität der Kognition und ihrer Modellierung in der kognitiven Linguistik“. In: FOHRMANN, J. Rhetorik. Figuration und Performanz. Stuttgart, Weimar: Metzler. pp. 246-266.

LINZ, E. (2002). Indiskrete Semantik. Kognitive Linguistik und neurowissenschaftliche Theoriebildung. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.

MELO MOURA, H. M. (2005). “Metáforas e Regularidades Lingüísticas”. In:

MIRANDA, N. S. & NAME, C. (Ed.). Lingüística e Cognição. Juíz de Fora: Editora UFJF, pp. 109-119.

MURPHY, G. L. (1996 ). “On metaphoric representation.” In: Cognition 60, S. pp. 173-204.

NERLICH, B. & CLARKE, D. D. (2001). “Mind, meaning and metaphor: the philosophy and psychology of metaphor in 19th-century Germany”. In: History of the Human Sciences, 14(2), pp. 39-62.

NUESSEL, F. (1990). “More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor”. In: Metaphor and Symbol 5 (4), pp. 251-254.

PONTEROTTO, D. (2003). “The cohesive role of metaphor in discourse and conversation”. In: BARCELONA, A. Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 283-298.

QUINN, N. (1991). “The cultural basis of metaphor”. In: FERNANDEZ, J. W. Beyond metaphor: The theory of tropes in anthropology. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 56-93.

RICHARDS, I. A. (1936/1965). The Philosophy of Rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press.

ROLF, E. (2005). Metapherntheorien. Typologie, Darstellung, Bibliographie. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.

ROSCH, E. (1978). “Principles of Categorization”. In: ROSCH, E. & LLOYD, B. B. Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 27-48.

SARDINHA, T. B. (2007). Metáfora. São Paulo: Parábola Editorial.

SCHMITZ, H. W. (1985 ). „Die durchgängige Tropisierung der Sprache. über einen Aspekt von‚ Zeichen im Wandel’“. In: DUTZ, K. D. & SCHMITTER, P. Historiographia Semioticae. Studien zur Rekonstruktion der Theorie und Geschichte der Semiotik. Münster: MAkS Publikationen, pp. 241-270.

SCHRÖDER, U. (2009a). “Preferential Metaphorical Conceptualizations in Everyday Discourse About Love in the Brazilian and German Speech Communities”. In: Metaphor and Symbol, 24/2, pp. 105-120.

SCHRÖDER, U. (2009b). “A mesclagem metafórica de Fauconnier & Turner nas teorias de Karl Bühler e Wilhelm Stählin: antecipações e complementos”. In: ABRALIN 40 Anos - VI Congresso Internacional da ABRALIN, 2009b, João Pessoa, Anais. João Pessoa: Idéia, 1, pp. 2913-2922.

SCHRÖDER, U. (2008a). “Antecipações da metáfora cotidiana nas concepções de Hans Blumenberg e Harald Weinrich”. In: Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, 16, 2, pp. 39-54.

SCHRÖDER, U. (2008b). „Aufbrüche in der kognitiven Metaphernforschung aus kommunikationswissenschaftlicher Sicht“. In: ESCHBACH, A.; HALAWA, M. A. & LOENHOFF, J. Audiator et altera pars. Kommunikationswissenschaft zwischen Historiographie, Theorie und empirischer Forschung. Aachen: Shaker Verlag, pp. 147-166.

SCHRÖDER, U. (2008c). “Da teoria cognitiva a uma teoria mais dinâmica, cultural e sociocognitiva da metáfora”. In: Alfa (ILCSE/UNESP), v. 52, pp. 39-56.

SCHRÖDER, U. (2007). “Tendenzen gegenläufiger Reterritorialisierungen in brasilianischen und deutschen Rap-Texten”. In: Lusorama, 71-72, pp. 93-119.

SCHRÖDER, U. (2004). “Os precursores filosóficos da teoria cognitiva das metáforas”. In: Cadernos de Estudos Lingüísticos 46/2, pp. 243-252.

SEMINO, E. (2008). Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

SILVA SINHA, V.; SINHA, C.; ZINKEN, J. & SAMPAIO, W. (2009). “When Time is not Space: The social and linguistic construction of time intervals in an Amazonian culture.” Journal of Pragmatics, in press.

SINHA, C. & JENSEN DE LóPEZ, K. (2000). “Language, culture and the embodiment of spatial cognition”. In: Cognitive Linguistics, 11, pp. 17-41.

STÄHLIN, W. (1913). “Zur Psychologie und Statistik der Metaphern. Eine methodologische Untersuchung”. Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie XXXI, Frankfurt, pp. 297-425.

STEEN, G. J. (2007). Finding Metaphor in Grammar and Usage. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

STEFANOWITSCH , A. & GRIES, S. T. (2007). Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

VERVAEKE, J. & KENNEDY, J. M. (1996). “Metaphors in language and thought: Falsification and multiple meanings”. In: Metaphor and Symbol, 11, pp. 273-284.

ZANOTTO, M. S. & PALMA, D. V. (2008). “Opening Pandora’s box: Multiple readings of ‘a metaphor”. In: ZANOTTO, M. S.; CAMERON, L. & CAVALCANTI, M. C. Confronting Metaphor in Use. An applied linguistic approach. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 11-43.

ZINKEN, J. (2004). “Metphors, stereotypes, and the linguistic picture of the world: Impulses from the Ethnolinguistic School of Lublin.” metaphorik.de, 7, pp. 115-136, http://www.metaphorik.de/07/zinken. pdf

ZINKEN, J. & MUSOLFF, A. (2009). “Metaphorical Meadning & Understanding”. In: MUSOLFF, A. & ZINKEN, J. Metaphor and Discourse. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1-8.

The journal CADERNOS DE ESTUDOS LINGUÍSTICOS is granted all the copyright related to the published works. The originals will not be returned. By virtue of being part of this public access journal, the articles are free to use, with their own attributions, in educational and non-commercial applications

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.