Keywords
Argumentative semantics
Structure
How to Cite
Abstract
This article has as object of study the theoretical treatment of the phenomenon of presupposition. Your goal is to investigate it over the past 50 years. Our methodology is to reflect this object in two moments: in the theory of argumentation in language (years 60 to 80), and in the theory of semantic blocks (years 90 to 2018), in partially translated texts. Our hypothesis is the resignification of the presupposition. One of the results is that such a review makes the confrontation between a modus operandi (which was believed) very much engaged in a structure, for a reading (more suited to the originals) of an analytical modus capable of scrutinying the implicit weekly structure, only tangible by it.
References
BALLY, C.; SECHEHAYE, A. Cours de Linguistique Générale. Payot: Paris, 1985.
CAREL, M. L’entrelacement argumentatif: lexique, discours et blocs sémantiques. Paris : Honoré Champion, 2011.
CAREL, M. Introduction. In : CAREL, Marion. Argumentation et Polyphonie : de Saint-Augustin à Robet-Grillet. Paris : Harmattan, 2012.
CAREL, M. Tu seras un homme. Un prologement de la doxa : le paradoxe. Inédito, 2013.
CAREL, M. Argumentation et temporalité: l’exemple de quand. Inédito. Paris : Inalco, 2014.
CAREL, M. Présupposition et organisation du sens. Inédito. Paris, 2016.
CAREL, Marion ; DUCROT, Oswald. Le problème du paradoxe dans une sémantique argumentative. In : Langue Française. V. 123. Paris : Persée, 1999, p. 6-26.
CAREL, Marion ; DUCROT, Oswald. La semántica argumentativa: una introducción a la teoría de los bloques semánticos. Buenos Aires: Colihue, 2005.
CAREL, Marion ; DUCROT, Oswald. Temporalité, Argumentation et Récit: la théorie des blocs sémantiques. Inédito. Paris : École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, 2014a.
CAREL, Marion ; DUCROT, Oswald. Pour une analyse argumentative globale du sens. In : Arena Romanistica. Bergen: University of Bergen. V. 1, 2014b, p. 72 – 89.
DUCROT, Oswald. Qu’est-ce que le structuralisme? Le Structuralisme en linguistique. Paris : Éditions du Seuil, 1968.
DUCROT, Oswald. Dire et ne pas dire. Principes de sémantique linguistique. Paris: Hermann, 1972.
DUCROT, Oswald. La preuve et le dire: langage et logique. Paris : Maison Mame, 1973.
DUCROT, Oswald. Les mots du discours. Paris: Les Éditions de minuit, 1980a.
DUCROT, Oswald. Les échelles argumentatives. Paris: Les Éditions de minuit, 1980b.
DUCROT, Oswald. Le dire et le dit. Paris: Les Éditions de minuit, 1984a.
DUCROT, Oswald. Enunciação. In: ROMANO, Ruggiero. Enciclopédia Einaudi. Lisboa: IN-CM, 1984b, p. 368 – 476.
DUCROT, Oswald. O dizer e o dito. Revisão técnica da tradução: Eduardo Guimarães. Campinas: Pontes, 1987.
DUCROT, Oswald. Logique, Structure, énonciation. Paris : Les Éditions de minuit, 1989.
DUCROT, Oswald. Os internalizadores. In: Letras de Hoje. v. 37, No 3: PUCRS, 2002, p. 7 – 26.
DUCROT, Oswald. Argumentação retórica e argumentação linguística. In: Letras de Hoje. v. 44, Porto Alegre: PUCRS, 2009, p. 20 – 25.
DUCROT, Oswald. Les risques du discours: Rencontres avec Oswald Ducrot. Paris : Éditions Lambert-Lucas, 2013.
MACHADO, J. C. O paradoxo a partir da Teoria dos Blocos semânticos: língua, dicionário e história. 373f. Tese (Doutorado em Linguística) - Centro de Educação e Ciências Humanas, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística/Universidade Federal de São Carlos – PPGL/UFSCar, São Carlos-SP, 2015.
MACHADO, J. C. A Teoria dos Blocos Semânticos em revisão. In: UFMG, Revista de Estudos da Linguagem - RELIN, Belo Horizonte, v. 25, n. 4, p. 1935-1964, 2017.
SILVA, Adilson Ventura da. A poesia em Ducrot. Dissertação de Mestrado. Campinas: Unicamp, 2006.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2019 Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos
Downloads
