Resumen
-Citas
ABELSON, R. P. (1973) The structure of belief systems. In: Computer Models of Thought, eds. Schank, R. C. and Colby, K. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
ALBERT, H. (1975) [1968] Traktat Über kritische Vernunft. Tübingen: Mohr.
APOSTEL, L. (1978a) Communication et action. Gent: Communication and Cognition Press.
APOSTEL, L. (1978b) Persuasive communication as metaphorical discourse under the guidance of conversational maxims. Logique et Analyse 87: 265-320.
APOSTEL, L., ed. (1974) Negation. Gent: Communication and Cognition Press.
BARTH, E. M. (1974) The Logic of the Articles in Traditional Philosophy. A Contribution to the Study of Conceptual Structures. Dordrecht and Boston: Reidel: Translation of De logica van de lidwoorden in the traditionele filosofie, Leiden 1971: Leiden University Press.
BARTH, E. M. (1977) Phenomenology, grammar, or theory of argumentation? A plea for meta-philosophical change, applied to the problems of naninalization and of negation. Cultural Hermeneutics 4: 163-182.
BARTH, E. M. (1979) Perspectives on Analytic Philosophy. Amsterdam: North-Holand (Mededelingen der Kninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Afdeling Letterkunde, nieuwe reeks 42 (2).)
BARTH, E. M. (1981) Reconstruction of Hegelian and other idealistic logic in Germany around 1810. In: Konzepte der Dialektik, eds. W. Becker and W. K. Essler, pp. 47-65. Frakfurt-on-Main: Klostermann.
BARTH, E. M. and Krabbe, E. C. W., (1982) From Axiom to Dialogue. A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter. (Foundations of Communication Series, ed. Roland Posner.)
BARTH, E. M. and Martens, J. L. (1977) Argumentum an hominem: From chaos to formal dialects. The method of dialogue-tableaux as a tool in the theory of fallacy. Logique et Analyse n. s. 20 (77/78): 76-96.
BARTH, E. M. and Martens, J. L. (1982) Argumentation: Approaches to Theory Formation: Containing the Contributions to the Groningen Conference on the Theory of Argumentation, October 1978. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (Studies in Language Companion Series 8, eds. John W. M. Verhaar and Werner Abraham.)
BETH, E. W. (1955) Semantic Entailment and Formal Derivability. Amsterdam:North-Holland. (Mededelingen der Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen. Afdeling Letterkunde, nieuwe reeks 18(13). Reprinted.
Reprinted in: The Philosophy of Mathematics, ed. K.J.J. Hintikka, pp. 9-41. London etc.: Oxford University Press.
CRAWSHAY-WILLIAMS, R. (1957) Methods and Criteria of Reasoning. An Inquiry into the Structure of Controversy. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
DE GROOT, A. D. (1969) Methodology. Foundations of Inference and Research in the Behavioral Sciences. The Hague: Mouton. Translation of Methodologie Grondslagen van onderzoek en denken in de gedragswetenschappen. The Hague 1961: Mouton.
GILES, R. (1976) A logic for subjective belief. In: Foundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference, and Statistical Theories of Science. Proceedings of an International Research Colloquium held at the University of Western Ontario. London. Canada. 10-13 May 1973, I: Foundations and Philosophy of Epistemic Application of Probability Theory, eds. W. L. Harper and C.A. Hooker, pp. 41-72. Dordrecht and Boston: Reidel.
GRICE, H. P. Logic and Conversation (William James Lectures, ms.)
GUNTHER, A. (1977a) Der Begriff der Dialogbasis. In: Konstituenten dialogischer Kommunikation, ed. C. H. Heidrich. Hamburg: Buske.
GUNTHER, A. (1977b) Dialogkonstruktionen auf der Basis logischer Ableitungen. Hamburg: Buske. (IKP-Forschungsberichte, Reihe I, Band 68.)
HABERMAS, J. (1973) Wahrheitstheorien. In: Wirklichkeit und Reflexion. Walter Schulz zum 60. Geburtstag, ed. H. Fahrenbach, pp. 211-265. Pfullingen.
HAMBLIN, C. L. (1970) Fallacies. London: Methuen.
HAMBLIN, C. L. (1971) Mathematical models of dialogue. Theoria 37: 130-155.
HEIDRICH, C. H. (1977) Intensionale Analysen von Sprechhandlungen. Hamburg: Buske. (IKP Forschungsberichte, Reihe I, Band 63.)
HEIDRICH, C. H. ed. (1977) Konstituenten dialogischer Kommunikation. Hamburg: Buskes. (IKP-Forschungsberichte, Reihe I, Band 63.)
HINTIKKA, K. J. J. (1968) Language-games for quantifiers. In: Studies in Logical Theory. ed. N. Rescher. Oxford; Plackwell. (American Philosophical Quarterly Monograph Series 2, ed. N. Rescher.)
HINTIKKA, K. J. J. (1973) Logic, Language-Games and Information, Kantian Themes in the Philosophy of Logic. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
HOFSTEE, W. K. B. (1980) De empirische discussie. Meppel: Boom.
KRABBE, E. C. W. (1978) The adequacy of material dialogue-games. (Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 19: 321-330.
KRABBE, E. C. W. (1982) Studies in Dialogical Logic. Dissertation, Groningen State University.
LORENZ, K. (1961) Arithmetik und Logik als Spiele. Inaugural dissertation, Kiel University. Selection reprinted in: Lorenzen. P. and Lorenz, K., Dialogische Logik, pp. 17-95.
LORENZ, K. (1973) Rules versus theorems: A new approach for mediation between institutionistic and two-valued logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2: 352-367.
LORENZEN, P. (1961) Ein dialogisches Konstruktivitätskriterium. In: Infinitistic Methods. Proceedings of the Symposium on the Foundations of Mathematics, Warsaw, 2-9 September 1959, ed.
pp. 193-200. Oxford etc.: Pergamon Press, and Warsaw: Pánstowe wydawnictwo naukowe. Reprinted in: Lorenzen, P. and Lorenz, K., Dialogische Logik, pp. 9-16.
LORENZEN, P. (1969) Normative Logic and Ethics. Mannheim etc.: Bibliographisches Institut. (The John Locke Lectures 1967-68, Oxford.)
LORENZEN, P. and Lorenz, K. (1978) Dialogische Logik. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
MITTELSTAEDT, P. (1978) Quantun Logic. Dordrecht and Boston: Reidel.
NAESS, A. (1953) Interpretation and Preciseness. A Contribution to the Theory of Communication. Oslo. (Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi i Oslo. Skrifter II, Historisk, Filosofisk Klasse, Nº. 1.)
NAESS, A. (1956) Wie fökdert man heute die empirische Bewegung? Eine Auseinandersetzung mit dem Empirismus von Otto Neurath und Rudolph Carnap. Oslo: mimeographed. (Filosofiske Problemer 19, Institutt for Filosofi, Universitetet i Oslo.)
NAESS, A. (1966) Communication and Argument. Elenents of Applied Semantics. London: Allen and Unwin, and Oslo: Universitetsforlaget. Translation of En del eleaentaere logiske eaner, Oslo 1947: Universitetsforlaget.
NAESS, A. (1975) Kommunikation und Argunentation. Eine Einführung in die angewandte Semantik. Kronberg: Scriptor Verlag. Translation of En del elementaere logiske emner, 11th edition (1975).
NAESS, A., Christophersen, J. A.; and Kvalö, K. (1956) Democracy, Ideology, and Objectivity. Studies in the Semantics and Cognitive Analysis of Ideological Controversy. Oslo.
OLBRECHTS-Tyteca, L. (1974) Le comique du discours. Brussels: Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles.
ONG, W. J. (1974) [1958] Ranus, Method, and the D cay of Dialogue. From the Art to Discourse to the Art of Reason. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
PARRET, H. (1980) Contexts of Understanding. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (Pragmatics and Beyond. An Interdisciplinary Series of language Studies. eds. Parret , H. and Berschueren, J, No. 6.)
PERELMAN, Ch. (1963) The Idea of Justice and the Problem of Argument. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
PERELMAN, Ch. (1977) L'Empire rhétorique. Rhétorique et argumentation. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.
PARELMAN, Ch., and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1958) Traité de l'argumentation. La nouvelle rhetorique. Presses Universitaires de France.
PERELMAN, Ch. (1969) The New Rhetoric. A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame. Ind. and London: University of Notre Dame Press. Translation of Traité de l'argumentation. La nouvelle hetorique.
POPPER, K. (1973) (1934) Logik der Forschung. Tübingen: Mohr.
POPPER, K. (1972) [1959] The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.
RESCHER, N.(1977) Dia1ectics. A Controversy-Oriented Approach to the Theory of Knowledge. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.
ROSCHE, E. (1975) Universals and cultural specifics in human categories. In: Cross- Cultural Perspectives on learning, eds. Brislin, R.: Bochner, S.; and lonner, W., NY: Halsted.
SAARINEN, E., ed. (1979) Game-Theoretical Semantics. Dordrecht and Boston: Reidel.
SEARLE, J. R. (1969) Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
TOULMIN, S. E. (1958) The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. TOULMIN, S. E. (1975) Der Gebrauch von Argumenten. Kronberg: Scriptor Verlag. Translation of The Uses of Argument.
VAN DUN, F. (1972) On the modes of opposition in the formal dialogues of P. Lorenzen. In: Negation, ed. L. Apostel, pp. 103-136 (=Logique et Analyse 15 (57/58)).
VAN EEMEREN, F. H., and Grootendorst, R. (1983) Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. A Theoretical Model For the Analysis of Discussion Towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Dordrecht: Foris Publications (in press).
VAN EEMEREN, F. H.; Grootendorst, R.; and Kruiger, T. (1982) The Study of Argumentation. New York: Irvington. Translation of Argumentatietheorie, Ultrecht and Antwerp 1978: Het Spectrum.
WALTON, O. (1983) The Ad Hominem Fallacy. A Study in the Logical Pragmatics of Criticism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins (in press). (Pragmatics and Beyond Series 4 (4), ed. Herman Parret.)
WOODS, J. (1977) Towards a theory of Argument. Metaphilosophy 8: 298-315.
WOODS, J., and Walton. D. (1972) On fallacies. Journal of Critical Analysis 4: 103-112.
WOODS, J., and Walton. D. (1976) Fallaciousness without invalidity. Philosophy and Rhetoric 9: 52-54.
Se otorgan a la Revista CADERNOS DE ESTUDOS LINGÜÍSTICOS todos los derechos de autor relativos a los trabajos publicados. No se devolverán los originales. En virtud de su aparición en esta revista de acceso abierto, los artículos son de uso gratuito, con la debida atribución, en aplicaciones educativas y no comerciales.