Banner Portal
Two nominalizing suffixes in brazilian portuguese: locality constraints on morphophonological realization
PDF

Palavras-chave

Vogal temática. Alomorfia condionada pela raiz. Domínios Cíclicos.

Como Citar

FREITAS, Maria Luisa. Two nominalizing suffixes in brazilian portuguese: locality constraints on morphophonological realization. Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos, Campinas, SP, v. 56, n. 1, p. 87–113, 2014. DOI: 10.20396/cel.v56i1.8636526. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/cel/article/view/8636526. Acesso em: 26 abr. 2024.

Resumo

Este artigo discute os aspectos morfofonológicos de dois sufixos nominalizadores no Português Brasileiro: -ção e –mento. Tendo em vista um modelo sintático de formação de palavras como o proposto pela Morfologia Distribuída e assumindo que a derivação sintática procede em termos de fases, argumentamos que os aspectos morfofonológicos dessas nominalizações são o resultado de duas propriedades sintáticas: primeiro, o tipo de estrutura argumental do verbo; e segundo, o ponto na derivação no qual a estrutura sintática é enviada ao componente fononlógico.

https://doi.org/10.20396/cel.v56i1.8636526
PDF

Referências

ALEXIADOU, A.; RATHERT, M (eds). (2010). The syntax of nominalizations across languages and frameworks. De Gruyter Mouton.

FREITAS – Two nominalizing suffixes in Brazilian Portuguese: locality constraints on... ALEXIADOU, A.; MARTIN, F. (2012).Competing affixes as aspectual morphemes. The case of deadjectival nominalizations. Online Proceedings of the 8th Mediterranean Morphology Meeting.

ARAD, M. (2003). Locality constraints on the interpretation of the roots: the case of Hebrew denominal verbs. natural language & linguistic Theory 21: 737–778.

BASÍLIO, Margarida. formação e classes de palavras no Português do Brasil. São Paulo: Contexto, 2004.

BECHARA, E. (2000). moderna gramática do Português. rio de Janeiro: Lucerna.

BERMÚDEZ-OTERO, R. (to appear).The Spanish lexicon stores stems with theme vowels, not roots with inflectional class features. Forthcoming in Probus 25(1).

BOOIJ G.; RUBACH, J. (1987). Postcyclic versus Postlexical Rules in Lexical Phonology. linguistic inquiry, Vol. 18, No. 1 (Winter, 1987), pp. 1-44.

DUARTE, I. (2003). A família das construções inacusativas. In: MATEUS, M.H.M. et al. gramática da língua portuguesa. Lisboa: Caminho. p.507-548.

EMBICK, D. (1998).”Voice systems and the syntax/morphology interface”. In H. Harley (ed.) The Proceedings of the Penn/MIT Workshop on Aspect, Argument Structure, and Events, miTwPl.

EMBICK, D. (2000). Features, syntax and categories in the latin perfect. In: linguistic inquiry. Cambridge, Massachusets: MIT Press, v.31, n.2, p.185-230.

EMBICK, D. (2010). localism versus globalism in morphology and Phonology. Cambridge, Ma: Mit press.

EMBICK, D.; MARANTZ, A. (2008) “Architecture and Blocking,” linguistic inquiry 39:1,1–53.

GAMARSKI, Léa. A derivação regressiva: umestudo da produtividade lexical em português. PhD. Dissertation. Rio de Janeiro, UFRJ, 1984.

GRIMSHAW, J. (1992). argument structure. linguistic inquiry monograph eighteen. Cambridge, Ma: Mit press.

HALE, K.; KEYSER, S. J. (1993).On argument structure and the lexical expression of grammatical relations. The view from Building 20. essays in honor of sylvain Bromberger, ed. by Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser,53-110. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

HALE, K.; KEYSER, S. J.. (1998).The basic elements of argument structure. Papers from the UPenn/ Mit roundtable on argument structure and aspect, miT working Papers in linguistics 32, ed. by Heidi Harley, 73-118. Cambridge MA: MIT, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MitWpL.

HALE, K.; KEYSER, S. J.. (2002). Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge, Ma: Mit press.

HALLE, M. (1997). “Distributed Morphology: Impoverishment and Fission.” miT working Papers in linguistics 30, p. 425-439.

HALLE, M.; MARANTZ, A. (1993). “Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection,” in Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, eds., The View from Building 20: essays in linguistics in honor of sylvain Bromberger, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 111–176.

HALLE, M.; MARANTZ, A. (1994). Some key features of distributed morphology. miT working Papers in linguistics 21: Papers on phonology and morphology. p. 275–288. Cambridge, MA: Mit press.

HARLEY, H. (to appear) “On the identity of roots”. Theoretical linguistics.

HARLEY, H. (2005).”Bare Phrase Structure, Acategorial roots, one-replacement and unaccusativity,” harvard working Papers on linguistics Vol. 9, ed. by Slava Gorbachov and Andrew Nevins.

KENSTOWICZ, M. (1996). “Base-identity and uniform exponence: Alternatives to cyclicity,” in J. Durand and B. Laks, eds., current trends in phonology: models and methods, university of Salford Publications, 363–93.

KIPARSKY, P. (1968) “Linguistic universal and linguistic change.” In Emmon Bach and Robert T. Harms, eds., universals in linguistic Theory , New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston,170-202.

KIPARSKY, P.(1973).” “Elsewhere in Phonology”, in S.R.Anderson and P. Kiparsky, eds., A Festshrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 93-106.

KIPARSKY, P. (1982).Lexical Phonology and Morphology. In-Seok Yang (ed.), linguistics in the morning calm. seoul.

KIPARSKY, P. (1982).Word-formation and the Lexicon. In F. Ingemann (ed.) Proceedings of the MidAmerica Linguistics Conference, Lawrence, Kansas.

LEVIN, B.; RAPPAPOT HOVAV, M. (1995). Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics interface, Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 26, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

MARANTZ, A. (1997). “No Escape from Syntax: Don‟t Try Morphological Analysis in the Privacy of Your Own Lexicon,” in Alexis Dimitriadis, Laura Siegel, Clarissa Surek-Clark, and Alexander Williams, eds., Proceedings of the 21st Penn Linguistics Colloquium, UPenn Working Papers in Linguistics, Philadelphia, 201–225.

MARANTZ, A. (2007). “Phases and words,” in S. H. Choe et al, ed., Phases in the theory of grammar, Dong In Publisher, Seoul.

MARVIN, T. (2002) Topics in the stress and syntax of words. Doctoral dissertation, Mit.

MATOSO CÂMARA JR. (1970). estrutura da língua portuguesa. Petrópolis: Vozes.

NOYER, R. (1992) Features, Affixes, and Positions in Autonomous Morphological Structure. Doctoral dissertation, Mit.

OLIVEIRA, S. M. (2007). Os sufixos nominalizadores –ção e –mento. Estudos Linguísticos XXXVI(1).

OLTRA-MASSUET, I. (1999). on the notion of theme vowel: a new approach to catalan Verbal morphology. Master thesis. Mit, Cambridge, Ma.

ROCHA, Luiz Carlos de Assis. (1999). A nominalização no português do Brasil. revista de estudos da linguagem 8: 1, p. 5-52.

SANTOS, C.M.B. (2006). Os sufixos –ção e –mento na construção de nomes de ação e processo: contribuições à prática lexicográfica. Master thesis. Porto Alegre: UFRGS.

O periódico Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos utiliza a licença do Creative Commons (CC), preservando assim, a integridade dos artigos em ambiente de acesso aberto.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.