Palavras-chave
Como Citar
Resumo
The possibility of a minimalist derivation being equated with on-line computation is caused into question. Formal solutions are explored, in the context of an Integrated Model of Linguistic Competence, for solving the problems that such an equation presents regarding the directionality of the derivation vis-à-vis incremental processing and costless movement operations. A mixed top-down/ bottom-up model is proposed, which relies on parallel derivational spaces. Sequential and simultaneous copies in the course of the derivation distinguish movement with and without computational cost.Referências
AUGUSTO, M.R.A. (2007) Distinções entre movimentos A e A-barra na computação on-line: QU e passiva. Caderno de Resumos do V Congresso Internacional da Abralin, UFMG, Belo Horizonte, 2007, pp. 605-606.
BADDELEY, A. (1986). Working Memory, Oxford: Claredon Press.
BAKER, M. C. (1988). Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago,: University of Chicago Press.
Cadernos de Estudos Lingüísticos 49(2) − Jul./Dez. 2007 BOCK, J. K. & LEVELT, W. J. M. (1994).Language production: grammatical encoding. In: M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.). Handbook of Psycholinguistics. San Diego: Academic Press.
BOGDAN, R. (1993). L’histoire de la Science Cognitive. In: L, Sfez (Ed.), Dictionnaire Critique de la Communication, PUF, Paris, 1993, p.870-878.
CANÇADO, M. (2005) Posições argumentais e propriedades semânticas. D.E.L.T.A. 21:1, 23-56.
CHESI, C. (2004) Phases and Cartography in Linguistic Computation: toward a Cognitively Motivated Computational Model of Linguistic Competence. Ph.D. Thesis.
CHOMSKY, N. (1970) Remarks on nominalization. In: Jacobs, R. & Rosenbaum, P.(Eds.). Readings in English transformational grammar. Waltham, Mass: Ginn.
CHOMSKY, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Foris, Dordrecht.
CHOMSKY, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
CHOMSKY, N. (1998). Minimalist inquiries: the framework. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 15, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
CHOMSKY, N. (1999). Derivation by Phase. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics,18, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
CHOMSKY, N. (2001). Beyond Explanatory Adequacy. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistic, 20.
CHOMSKY, N. (2005). On phases. Mass: MIT Press.
CORRÊA, L. M. S. (2002). Explorando a relação entre língua e cognição na interface: o conceito de interpretabilidade e suas implicações para teorias do processamento e da aquisição da linguagem. Veredas: Revista de Estudos Lingüísticos, 6, 1, p.113-129.
CORRÊA, L. M. S. (2005a). Possíveis diálogos entre Teoria Lingüística e Psicolingüística: questões de processamento, aquisição e do Déficit Específico da linguagem. In: N. Miranda & M. C. L. Name (Eds.). Lingüística e Cognição, Juiz de Fora: Editora da UFJF.
CORRÊA, L. M. S. (2005b). Uma hipótese para a relação entre processador lingüístico e gramática numa perspectiva minimalista In: Anais do IV Congresso Internacional da ABRALIN, p. 353-364, disponível online: http://www.abralin.org/publicacao/abralin2005.pdf
CORRÊA, L. M. S. (2007) Incrementalidade na computação on-line e interferência de informação semântica/ contextual no processamento da concordância sujeito-predicativo. Caderno de Resumos do V Congresso Internacional da Abralin, UFMG, Belo Horizonte, 2007, pp. 604-605.
CORRÊA, L. M. S. (a sair). Relação processador lingüístico–gramática em perspectiva: problemas de unificação em contexto minimalista.
CORRÊA, L. M. S. & AUGUSTO, M. R. A. (2005). Possible loci of SLI from a both linguistic and psycholinguistic perspective. In: Abstracts EUCLDIS 2005, IX EUCLDIS Conference, ParisRoyaumont, p.34.
CORRÊA, L. M. S. (submetido). Possible loci of SLI from a both linguistic and psycholinguistic perspective.
CORRÊA, L. M. S. (em prep.). (título provisório) The unification problem revisited.
CORRÊA, L. M. S. & RODRIGUES, E. S. (2005). Erros de atração no processamento da concordância sujeito-verbo e a questão da autonomia do formulador sintático In: M. Maia, & I. Finger (Eds.). Processamento da Linguagem, Editora da EDUCAT: Pelotas, p.303-335.
FERREIRA, F. (2000) Syntax in Language Production: an Approach Using Tree-Adjoining Grammars. In: L. Wheeldon (Ed.). Aspects of Language Production. East Sussex: Psychology Press.
FIEBACH, C., SCHLESEWSKY, M., & FRIEDERICI, A. (2002). Separating syntactic memory costs and syntactic integration costs during parsing: The processing of German WH-questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 250-272.
CORRÊA & AUGUSTO − Computação lingüística no processamento on line... FODOR, J. A.; BEVER, T G. & GARRETT, M. (1974). The Psychology of Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics and Generative Grammar. New York: McGraw-Hill.
FONG, S. (2005). Computation with Probes and Goals: A Parsing Perspective. In: A. M. Di Sciullo & R. Delmonte (Eds.) UG and External Systems. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
FRAZIER, L. (1987). Sentence Processing: A tutorial review. In: M. Coltheart (Ed.). Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading.
FRAZIER, L. & J.D. FODOR. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two stage parsing model. Cognition, 6, 291-325.
FRAZIER, L. & CLIFTON (1996). Construal. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
FRIEDMANN, N. & GRODZINSKY, Y. (1997). Tense and Agreement in agrammatic production: Pruning the syntactic tree. Brain & Language, 56, pp. 397-425.
FRIEDERICI, A. D. (2002). Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends Cogn Sci, 6, p. 78-84.
FRIEDERICI, A. D. & JACOBSEN, T. (1999). Processing grammatical gender during language comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 5, p. 467-484.
GARRETT, M. F. (1975). The analysis of sentence production. In: G. Bower (Ed.). Psychology of learning and motivation, 9, New York: Academic Press.
GARRETT, M. F. (1980). Levels of processing in sentence production. In. B. Butterworth (Ed.). Language Production, 1, Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
GIBSON, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality and syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68, 1-47.
GORELL, P. (1995). Syntax and parsing. New York; Cambridge University Press.
GRODZINSKY, Y. (1990). Theoretical perspectives on language deficts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
GRODZINSKY, Y. (1995). Trace deletion, theta-roles, and cognitive strategies. Brain & Language, 51, pp. 467497.
GRODZINSKY, Y. & FRIEDERICI, A. (2006). Neuroimaging of syntax and syntactic processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 16, 240-246.
GUIMARÃES, M. (2004). Derivation and representation of syntactic amalgams. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Maryland at College Park.
JAKUBOWICZ, C. & ROULET, L. (2007) Narrow syntax or interface deficit? Gender agreement in French SLI. In: J.M. Liceras, H. Zobi & H. Goodluck (eds) The role of formalfeatures in second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
HALE, K. & KEYSER, J. (Eds.) (1993). On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. The View from Building 20. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
HAEUSLER, O. C. F. (2005) A estrutura Argumental de Verbos na Produção Eliciada de Crianças com Queixas de Linguagem e Manifestações do Déficit Especificamente Lingüístico (DEL) no Português do Brasil. Dissertação de Mestrado. Puc-Rio.
HAUSER, M., CHOMSKY, N. & FITCH, W. T. (2002). The Faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, p. 1569-1579.
KAYNE, R. S. (1994) The Antisynmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
KIMBALL, J. (1973). Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language. Cognition, 2, p. 15-47.
LARSON. R.K. (1988) Implicit arguments in situation semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy, 11, 2, p. 131-168.
LEVELT, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
LEVELT, W. J. M; ROELOFS, A. & MEYER, A. S. (2001) A theory of lexical access in speech production, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, p.1-75, http://www.bbsonline.org/documents/a/00/00/05/26/.
LIMA, R.J.; CORRÊA, L.M.S. & AUGUSTO, M.R.A. (submetido) Padrões de seletividade na produção agramática e distinção entre movimentos sintáticos na computação on-line.
MARR, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. New York: W. H. Freeman.
MILLER G. A. & CHOMSKY, N. (1963). Finitary models of language users. In: D. Luce, R. Bush & E. Galanter (Orgs). Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, 2, New York: J. Wiley.
PHILLIPS, C. (1996). Order and Structure. PhD. dissertation, MIT.
PHILLIPS, C. (2003). Linguistics and linking problems. In: M. Rice; W. Warren (Eds.), Developmental Language Disorders: From Phenotypes to Etiologies. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
RODRIGUES, E. S. (2006). O Processamento da concordância de número entre sujeito e verbo na produção de sentenças. Tese de Doutorado em Letras, PUC-Rio.
SILVEIRA, M. (2002). O Défict Especificamente Lingüístico (DEL) e uma avaliaçãopreliminar de sua manifestação em crianças falantes de português. Dissertação de Mestrado.PUC-Rio.
TOWNSEND, D. J. & BEVER, T. G. (2002). Sentence Comprehension: The Integration of Habits and Rules. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
WANNER, E. & MARATSOS, M. (1978). An ATN approach to comprehension. In: M. Halle; J. Bresnan; G. A. Miller. (Orgs.). Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality. Cambridge: MIT Press.
WEXLER, K.(1998) Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: A new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Língua, 106, p.23-79.
ZURIF, E.; SWINNEY, D.; PRATHER, P.; SOLOMON, J.; & BUSHELL, C. (1993). An on-line analysis of syntactic ssing in Broca’s and Wernicke’s aphasia. Brain and Language, 45, 448-464.
O periódico Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos utiliza a licença do Creative Commons (CC), preservando assim, a integridade dos artigos em ambiente de acesso aberto.
Downloads
