Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
The study of the quality of lighting and visual comfort is conditioned to the health and well-being of those who use and enjoy the built spaces. Light is important to the conceptual design of an environment; therefore, many researchers have searched for ways to identify and evaluate visual comfort through different research instruments. One of the most recurrent, the questionnaire, is an instrument of data collection in order to evaluate the preferences and characteristics of a sample. In this context, the objective of this study was to identify, detail and provide greater understanding about the questionnaires that evaluate visual comfort, through a systematic literature review. It was selected a set of seventeen questionnaires and, thus, is intended to analyze the questionnaires under the following aspects: structure; the objective of the research; evaluated environment and main aspects and characteristics of lighting. It was possible to observe that during the systematic review of the literature, most of the researchers found, that deal with the measurement of visual comfort, making it for office environments. In addition, It was found that the aspects preferences and satisfaction; and glare and light distribution are the characteristics more recurring in the questionnaires analyzed. This work contributes to developing research studies that require a questionnaire as part of their evaluation method.
References
ABNT - ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS. NBR ISO/CIE 8995:1. Iluminação de ambientes de trabalho parte 1: Interior. Rio de Janeiro: ABNT, 2013.
ANASTASI, A.; URBINA, S. Psychological testing. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1997.
BEAN, A. R.; BELL, R. I. The CSP index: A practical measure of office lighting quality as perceived by the office worker. Lighting Research and Technology, n. 24, p. 215-225, 1992.
BIAN, Y.; MA, Y. Subjective survey & simulation analysis of time-based visual comfort in daylit spaces. Building and Environment. 131, p. 63-73, 2018. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.01.007.
BORTOLAN, G. M. Z.; FERREIRA, M. G. G.; SANTOS, F. A. N. V. Metodologias para análise do desconforto visual em ambientes de trabalho: uma revisão bibliográfica. In: CONGRESSO INTERNACIONAL DE ERGONOMIA E USABILIDADE DE INTERFACES HUMANO TECNOLÓGICA, 16., 2017, Florianópolis. Anais [...]. São Paulo: Blucher, 2017. p. 1301-1311. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5151/16ergodesign-0129.
BORTOLAN, G. M. Z.; FERREIRA, M. G. G.; TEZZA, R. Conforto e Desconforto: revisão de conceitos e elaboração de um modelo de conforto visual. Human Factors in Design, v. 8, n. 15, p. 67-84, 2019. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5965/2316796308152019067
BOYCE, P. R. Human Factors in Lighting. New York: Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2014.
BURATTI, C.; BELLONI, E.; MERLI, F.; RICCIARDI, P. A new index combining thermal, acoustic, and visual comfort of moderate environments in temperate climates. Building and Environment. 139, p. 27-37, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.04.038.
COLUCI, Marina Zambon Orpinelli; ALEXANDRE, Neusa Maria Costa; MILANI, Daniela. Construção de instrumentos de medida na área da saúde. Ciênc. saúde coletiva [online]. 2015, vol.20, n.3, pp.925-936. ISSN 1413-8123. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232015203.04332013.
EKLUND, N. H.; BOYCE, P. The development of a reliable, valid, and simple office lighting survey. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society, n. 25, p. 25-40, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00994480.1996.10748145.
ERTHAL, T. C. Manual de Psicometria. 8ª. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar, 2009.
FAGARASANU, M.; KUMAR, S. Measurement instruments and data collection: a consideration of constructs and biases in ergonomics research. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, v.30, n. 6, p. 355-369, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(02)00101-4.
FERENHOF, Helio Aisenberg; FERNANDES, Roberto Fabiano. Desmistificando a revisão de literatura como base para redação científica: Método SSF. Revista ACB, v. 21, n. 3, 2016. Disponível em: https://revista.acbsc.org.br/racb/article/view/1194. Acesso em: 25 out. 2017.
FARIA, João Roberto Gomes de; INSKAVA, Aline Yurika; PLANITZER, Sven Thomas. Lighting preferences in individual offices. Ambiente construído., Porto Alegre, v. 17, n. 1, p. 39-53, mar. 2017. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1678-86212017000100122.
FERRARI, D. A et al. Conceitos de conforto, estudos e relação com o design e a ergonomia: análise qualitativa da iluminação em uma indústria de fertilizantes. In: MENEZES, Marizilda dos Santos; MOURA, Mônica. (Org.). Rumos da pesquisa no design contemporâneo: relação tecnologia x humanidade. São Paulo: Estação das Letras e Cores, v. 1, p. 129-146, 2013.
FRESTEIRO, R. H. La iluminácion de los espacios como parâmetro de acessibilidade para personas com baja visión. Tese de doutorado em Arquitetura. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 2002.
GENE-HARN, L.; KEUMALA, N.; GHAFAR, N. A. Energy saving potential and visual comfort of task light usage for offices in Malaysia. Energy and Buildings. 147, p. 166-175, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.05.004.
GIL, A. C. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 5. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2010.
HWANG, T.; KIM, J. T. Effects of indoor lighting on occupants’ visual comfort and eye health in a green building. Indoor and Built Environment, p. 75-90, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X10392017.
HYGGE, S.; LÖFBERG, H. A. User evaluation of visual comfort in some buildings of the daylight Europe project. Right Light, v.2, n.4, p. 69-76, 1997. Disponível em: http://www.buildingreen.net/assets/cms/File/RL42lofb.pdf. Acesso em: 29 nov.2017.
IACOMUSSI, P; RADIS, M.; ROSSI, G.; ROSSI, L. Visual Comfort with LED Lighting. Elsevier Energy Procedia, v. 78, p. 729 – 734, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.082.
KESZEI, A., NOVAK, M.; STREINER, D. L. Introduction to health measurement scales. J Psychosom Res, v.68, nº 4, p. 319-323, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.01.006.
KRALIKOVA, R.; WESSELY, E. Lighting Quality, Productivity and Human Health. In: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING AND AUTOMATION, 27., 2016, Vienna. Proceedings […]. Vienna: DAAAM, 2016. p. 59-65. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2507/27th.daaam.proceedings.009
KONG, Z.; UTZINGER, M. D.; FREIHOEFER, K.; STEEGE, T. The impact of interior design on visual discomfort reduction: A field study integrating lighting environments with POE survey. Building and Environment. 138, p. 135-148, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.04.025.
LINHART, F.; SCARTEZZINI, J. L. Evenings office lighting: visual comfort vs. energy efficiency vs. performance? Building and Environment. v. 1, n. 46, p. 981-989, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.10.002.
MARCONI, Mariana de Andrade; LAKATO, Eva Maria. Fundamento de metodologia científica. 8. ed. São Paulo: Editora Atlas, 2017.
MARTAU, Betina Tschiedel. A luz além da visão: iluminação e sua relação com a saúde e bem-estar de funcionárias de lojas de rua e de shopping centers em Porto Alegre. 2009. 504 p. Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Engenharia Civil, Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Campinas, 2009. Disponível em: http://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/258754. Acesso em: 13 ago. 2018.
MOCHIZUKI, E.; KOIKE, K. A field survey on actual conditions of light environment in mid-scale of buildings in Japan. J. Light & Vis. Env. 34, nº 3, 2010.
MOTAMED, A.; DESCHAMPS, L.; SCARTEZZINI, J. P. On-site monitoring and subjective comfort assessment of a sun shadings and electric lighting controller based on novel High Dynamic Range vision sensors. Energy and Buildings. 149, p. 58-72, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.05.017.
OSRAM. Manual Luminotécnico Prático. São Paulo: OSRAM, 2011. Disponível em: http://www.iar.unicamp.br/lab/luz/ld/Livros/ManualOsram.pdf. Acesso em: 8 ago. 2016.
PASQUALI, L. Princípios de elaboração de escalas psicológicas. Revista de Psiquiatria Clínica, São Paulo, v. 25, n. 5, p. 206-213, 1998. Edição Especial. Disponível em: http://mpet.ifam.edu.br/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Principios-de-elaboracao-de-escalas-psicologicas.pdf. Acesso em: 01 set. 2017.
PASQUALI, L. Psicometria. Esc Enferm USP, n. 43, p. 992-9, 2009. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/reeusp/v43nspe/a02v43ns.pdf. Acesso em: 01 set. 2017.
PELLEGRINO, A. Assessment of artificial lighting parameters in a visual comfort perspective. Lighting Research and Technology. v. 3, n. 31. p. 107-115, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.05.017.
PRIMI, R.; MUNIZ, M.; NUNES, C. H. S. Definições contemporâneas de validade de testes psicológicos. Em C.S. Hutz (org). Avanções e polêmicas em avaliações psicológicas. p. 243-265. São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo, 2009.
RATTRAY, J.; JONES, M.C. J. Essential elements of questionarie design and development. J Clin Nurs, v.16, n.2, p. 234-243, 2007. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01573.x. Acesso em: 01 dez. 2017.
RICCIARDI, P.; BURATTI, C. Environmental quality of university classrooms: Subjective and objective evaluation of the thermal, acoustic, and lighting comfort conditions. Building and Environment. 127, p. 23-36, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.10.030.
RODRÍGUEZ, J. M et al. A fuzzy controller for visual comfort inside a meeting room. In: MEDITERRANEAN CONFERENCE ON CONTROL AND AUTOMATION, 23., 2015, Torremolinos. Proceedings […]. [S.l]: IEEE, 2015. p. 16-19,. ISBN: 978-1-4799-9936-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MED.2015.7158888.
SANTOS, A. J. et al. Aspectos subjectivos do conforto visual: Percepções e Expectativas. Lisboa: ES/LNEC: I&D Edificação Sustentável, 2010. 108 p. (Projecto FCT n.º PTDC/ECM/71914/2006). Disponível em: http://repositorio.lnec.pt:8080/bitstream/123456789/1000381/2/Rel%20219_2010.pdf. Acesso em: 1 dez. 2017.
SHAMSUL, B. M. T. et al. Effects of light’s colour temperatures on visual comfort level, task performances, and alertness among students. American Journal of Public Health Research, v.1, n. 7, p. 159-165, 2013.
http://pubs.sciepub.com/ajphr/1/7/3/. Acesso em: 10 out. 2017.
SIVAJI, A. et al. Lighting does matter: Preliminary assessment on office workers. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, p.638-647, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.283
SUN, C; LIAN, Z. Sensitive physiological indicators for human visual comfort evaluation. Lighting Research & Technology, v. 48, n. 6, p. 726-741, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153515624266.
SWATOWISKI, Fernando Wolff. Validação da Escala dos Atributos Pessoais no Contexto Social. 2011. 112 p. Dissertação (Mestrado)-Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências do Movimento Humano, Florianópolis, 2011.
VEITCH, J.A.; NEWSHAM, G. R. Determinants of Lighting Quality I: State of the Science. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society, v. 27, n. 1, p. 92-106, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00994480.1998.10748215
VEITCH, J. A., LOE, D.; BERRUTTO, V.; NAKAMURA, Y; CUTTLE, C. Integrated photometric descriptors for lighting quality research and recommendations. In: COMMISSION INTERNATIONALE DE L'ECLAIRAGE, 24., 1999, Warsaw. Proceedings[…]. Vienna: CIE Central Bureau, 1999. p. 56-63.
VEITCH, J. A. Psychological processes influencing lighting quality. Journal of the Illuminating, v. 30, n. 1, p. 124- 140, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00994480.2001.10748341.
WYMELENBERG, K. V. D.; INANICI, M. The effect of luminance distribution patterns on occupant preference in a daylit office environment. Leukos, v. 7, n. 2, p. 103-122, 2010. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1582/LEUKOS.2010.07.02003.
WYMELENBERG, K. V. D.; INANICI, M. A critical investigation of common lighting design metrics for predicting human visual comfort in offices with daylight. Leukos, n. 10, p. 145-164, 2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15502724.2014.881720
XUE, P.; MAK, C. M.; CHEUNG, H. D. The effects of daylighting and human behavior on luminous comfort in residential buildings: A questionnaire survey. Building and Environment, v. 1, n. 81, p. 51-59, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.06.011.
ZUMTOBEL RESEARCH. Zumtobel Staff GmbH: Lighting quality perceived in offices. Dornbirn, 2014. Disponível em: https://www.zumtobel.com/com-en/lighting_solutions.asp. Acesso em: 08 ago. 2016.
I accept that PARC Research in Architecture and Building Construction journal perform, on the original file approved for publication, revisions and modifications in orthoghaphic, grammar and standard issues.
I give to PARC Research in Architecture and Building Construction journal the rights of first publication of the revised version of my paper, licensed under the 'Creative Commons Attribution' license (which allows sharing the work with the recognition of first authorship and publication in this journal).
Downloads
