Keywords
Post-occupancy evaluation
Architecture and Urbanism
Semantic technologies
Person-environment studies
How to Cite
Abstract
This paper intends to combine domain ontology and knowledge graphs as methods for exploring and representing information about users' experience in shared workspaces, using a semantic model for the analysis of comments taken from digital platforms. Furthermore, use the case study to explore the structuring of the reality of relationships between people and environments from organizational and spatial performances. The adopted strategy uses performance measure indicators as a conceptual basis for establishing the semantic relations between entities (objects) and properties (characteristics) regarding the qualitative aspects provided by users. The methodological procedures applied to a dataset composed of 261 comments resulted in a basis for analysis with 567 individual indicators. From this amount, 76 classes of objects were extracted and associated through 14 relations representatives of the user's preferences and interactions with the environment. The results demonstrate a robust set of information highlighting the potential for exploring digital data in spaces through the semantic web. Semantic technology presents itself as a solution for mapping information about spaces undergoing evaluation, in addition to representing user satisfaction with their corresponding occupied spaces, potentially assisting knowledge feedback for organizational management and architectural retrofit.
References
BARRETT, C.; MCCARTHY, M. Why co-working doesn’t work for all. Magazine Work Design, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.workdesign.com/2018/06/why-co-working-doesnt-work-for-all/. Acesso em: 16 jan. 2021.
BERGMAN, B. J.; MCMULLEN, J. S. Entrepreneurs in the making: Six decisions for fostering entrepreneurship through maker spaces. Business Horizons, v. 63, n. 6, p. 811-824, Nov./Dec. 2020. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2020.07.004.
BOBILLO, F.; DELGADO M.; GÓMEZ-ROMERO, J; LÓPEZ, E. A semantic fuzzy expert system for a fuzzy balanced scorecard. Expert Systems with Applications, v. 36, n. 1, p. 423-433, 1 Jan. 2009. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.09.020.
BOUNCKEN, R. B.; ASLAM, M. M.; QIU, Y. Coworking spaces: Understanding, using, and managing sociomateriality. Business Horizons, v. 64, n. 1, p. 119-130, 1 Jan./Feb. 2021. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2020.09.010.
BOUNCKEN, R. B.; REUSCHL, A. J. Coworking-spaces: how a phenomenon of the sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and for entrepreneurship. Review of Managerial Science, v. 12, n. 1, p. 317-334, Jan. 2018. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0215-y.
CECI, F.; GONCALVES, A. L.; WEBER, R. A model for sentiment analysis based on ontology and cases. IEEE Latin America Transactions, v. 14, n. 11, p. 4560-4566, Nov. 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2016.7795829.
DAVIS, D. Evaluating buildings with computation and machine learning. In: VELIKOV, A. (Ed.); MANNINGER, S. (Ed.); CAMPO, M. (Ed.); AHLQUIST, S. (Ed.), THÜN, G. (Ed.). ACADIA/ / 2016: Posthuman Frontiers: Data, Designers, and Cognitive Machines. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 2016. Disponível em: http://papers.cumincad.org/data/works/att/acadia16_116.pdf. Acesso em: 14 jan. 2021
DUL, J. The Physical Environment and Creativity: A Theoretical Framework. In: KAUFMAN, J. C. (Ed.); STERNBERG, R. J. (Ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. 2nd. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. p. 481-510.
FINCH, E. (Ed.). Facilities change management. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012. 202 p.
FRANÇA, A. J. G. L.; ONO, R.; ORNSTEIN, S. W. APO, desempenho e suas relações com normas e certificações. In: ONO, R. (Org.); ORNSTEIN, S. W. (Org.); VILLA, S. B. (Org.); FRANÇA, A. J. G. L. (Org.). Avaliação Pós-Ocupação na arquitetura, no urbanismo e no design: da teoria à prática. São Paulo: Oficina de Textos, 2018. p. 149–178.
FREITAS JUNIOR, V. Ontologia para representação semântica de indicadores de desempenho considerando aspectos de vaguidade, temporalidade e relacionamento entre indicadores. 2016. 219 f. Tese (Doutorado em Engenharia do Conhecimento) - Programa de Engenharia e Gestão do Conhecimento, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2016. Disponível em: http://btd.egc.ufsc.br/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Vanderlei-Freitas-Junior.pdf. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2021.
FREITAS JÚNIOR, V.; UREN, V.; BREWSTER, C.; GONÇALVES, A. L. Ontology for Performance Measurement Indicators’ Comparison. International Journal of Digital Information and Wireless Communications, Hong Kong, v. 6, n. 2, p. 87–96, Apr. 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17781/P001977.
FUZI, A. Co-working spaces for promoting entrepreneurship in sparse regions: the case of South Wales. Regional Studies, Regional Science, London, v. 2, n. 1, p. 462-469, Jan. 2015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2015.1072053.
GOBIN, B. Reusing OWL-S to model knowledge intensive tasks performed by Knowledge Based Systems. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ICT AND KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING, 9. Bangkok, 2012. Proceedings [...]. Piscataway: IEEE, 2012. p. 34-42. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICTKE.2012.6152410.
KHAZANCHI, S.; SPRINKLE, T. A.; MASTERSON, S. S.; TONG, N. A spatial model of work relationships: The relationship-building and relationship-straining effects of workspace design. Academy of Management Review, Biarcliff Manor, v. 43, n. 4, p. 590-609, Oct. 2018. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0240.
LEFRANÇOIS, M. Planned ETSI SAREF Extensions based on the W3C&OGC SOSA/SSN-compatible SEAS Ontology Patterns. In: WORKSHOP ON SEMANTIC INTEROPERABILITY AND STANDARDIZATION IN THE IOT. Amsterdam, 2017. Proceedings [...] Nova York: Association for Computing Machinery, July 2017. Disponível em: https://hal-emse.ccsd.cnrs.fr/emse-01638275/document. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2021.
LUO, Y.; CHAN, R. C. K. Production of coworking spaces: Evidence from Shenzhen, China. Geoforum, v. 110, p. 97-105, Mar. 2020. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.01.008.
NOY, N. F.; MCGUINNESS, D. L. Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology. Stanford: Knowledge Systems Laboratory, 2001.
ORNSTEIN, S. W. Avaliação Pós-Ocupação (APO) no Brasil, 30 anos: O que há de novo? Revista PROJETAR - Projeto e Percepção do Ambiente, Natal, v. 2, n. 2, p. 7-12, 30 ago. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21680/2448-296X.2017v2n2ID16580.
ORNSTEIN, S. W.; ONO, R.; VILLA, S. B.; FRANÇA, A. J. G. L. Avaliação pós-ocupação (APO) aplicada à realimentação do processo de projeto. In: ONO, R. (org.); ORNSTEIN, S. W. (org.); VILLA, S. B. (org.); FRANÇA, A. J. G. L. (Org.). Avaliação Pós-Ocupação na arquitetura, no urbanismo e no design: da teoria à prática. São Paulo: Oficina de Textos, 2018. p. 19–47.
PARRINO, L. Coworking: assessing the role of proximity in knowledge exchange. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, v. 13, n. 3, p. 261-271, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2013.47.
PAULHEIM, H. Knowledge graph refinement: A survey of approaches and evaluation methods. Semantic Web, Manhattan, v. 8, p. 489-508, 6 Dec. 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-160218.
RASMUSSEN, M. H.; LEFRANÇOIS, M.; BONDUEL, M.; HVIID, C. A.; KARLSHOJ, J. OPM: An ontology for describing properties that evolve over time. In: LINKED DATA IN ARCHITECTURE AND CONSTRUCTION WORKSHOP, 6., 2018, London. Proceedings […]. London: CEUR-WS, 2018. p. 24-33. Disponível em: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2159/03paper.pdf. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2021.
RASMUSSEN, M. H.; LEFRANÇOIS, M.; PAUWELS, P.; HVIID, C. A.; KARLSØJ, J. Managing interrelated project information in AEC Knowledge Graphs. Automation in Construction, v. 108, p. 102956, Dec. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102956.
RAUTENBERG, S.; TODESCO, J. L.; GAUTHIER, F. A. O. Processo de desenvolvimento de ontologia: uma proposta e uma ferramenta. Revista Tecnologia, Fortaleza, v. 30, n. 1, p. 133-144, jun. 2009. Disponível em: https://periodicos.unifor.br/tec/article/view/5284/4134. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2021.
RHEINGANTZ, P. A.; AZEVEDO, G. A.; BRASILEIRO, A.; ALCANTARA, D.; QUEIROZ, M. Observando a Qualidade do Lugar: procedimentos para a avaliação pós-ocupação. Rio de Janeiro: PROARQ/FAU/UFRJ, 2009. 117 p.
VILLA, S. B.; ONO, R.; FRANÇA, A. J. G. L.; ORNSTEIN, S. W. Procedimentos metodológicos. In: ONO, R. (Ed.); ORNSTEIN, S. W. (Ed.); VILLA, S. B. (Ed.); FRANÇA, A. J. G. L. (Ed.) Avaliação Pós-Ocupação na arquitetura, no urbanismo e no design: da teoria à prática. São Paulo: Oficina de Textos, 2018. p. 81-92.
VILLA, S. B.; SARAMAGO, R. C. P.; GARCIA, L. C. Desenvolvimento de Metodologia de Avaliação Pós-Ocupação do Programa Minha Casa Minha Vida: aspectos funcionais, comportamentais e ambientais. Brasília: Rio de Janeiro: Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada - IPEA, 2016. 64 p. (Texto para discussão, 2234). Disponível em: https://www.ipea.gov.br/portal/images/stories/PDFs/TDs/07102016td_2234.pdf. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2021.
WEIJS-PERRÉE, M.; KOEVERING, J.; APPEL-MEULENBERG, R.; ARENTZE, T. Analysing user preferences for co-working space characteristics. Building Research & Information, v. 47, n. 5, p. 534-548, 4 jul. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2018.1463750.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 PARC Pesquisa em Arquitetura e Construção
Downloads
