Banner Portal
Climate-active building enclosures
Neste volume apresentamos na capa a Residência para professores em Gando, Burkina Faso. Projetada por Francis Kéré. Imagem do Wikimedia Commons
PDF

Keywords

Climate-active
Bibliometric analysis
State-of-the-art
Building performance

How to Cite

LUCARELLI, Caio de Carvalho; OLIVEIRA, Matheus Menezes; CARLO, Joyce Correna. Climate-active building enclosures: an integrative literature review. PARC Pesquisa em Arquitetura e Construção, Campinas, SP, v. 14, n. 00, p. e023023, 2023. DOI: 10.20396/parc.v14i00.8671581. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/parc/article/view/8671581. Acesso em: 11 may. 2024.

Abstract

The building energy demand and anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions have risen since the preindustrial period, reaching the highest levels. Brazil is the eighth largest consumer of primary energy globally, with buildings accounting for 51.2% of the total electric energy consumption. In this sense, the building enclosure has substantial potential and the lowest cost for reducing energy expenditure. The dynamicity of environmental factors allows for many design approaches, and since the user comfort analysis evolved, time-varying building skin configurations emerged. When coupled with computational design, the building's skins no longer must compromise to one stationary condition that is never optimal to any particular condition. These climate-active envelopes need a seemingly conveyed characterization or a straightforward design process as a relatively new technique. We aimed to differentiate climate-active building typologies and gather the latest compositions and performance assessment metrics, rendering an integrative literature review, state-of-the-art, and bibliometric analysis. As the main results, we assembled tabular data on 100 research pieces considering various study methodologies, climate-active typologies, movement categories, actuation styles, simulation engines, and performance criteria, demonstrating that most studies evaluated facade typologies, concerned temperate climates and adopted simple, binary movement characterizations. Furthermore, the design process for active building enclosures needs to be clearer and well-structured, and the available computational tools still need improvement.

https://doi.org/10.20396/parc.v14i00.8671581
PDF

References

ABDEL-RAHMAN, W. Thermal performance optimization of parametric building envelope based on bio-mimetic inspiration. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, v. 12, n. 1, p. 1133–1142, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.asej.2020.07.007.

ABDELMOHSEN, S.; MASSOUD, P.; ELSHAFEI, A. Using Tensegrity and Folding to Generate Soft Responsive. In: eCAADe International Conference, 34, Oulu. Proceedings [...] Oulu: Finland, 2016. p. 529–536.

ABDULLAH, H.; ALIBABA, H. Retrofits for energy efficient office buildings: Integration of optimized photovoltaics in the form of responsive shading devices. Sustainability (Switzerland), v. 9, n. 11, 2017. DOI: 10.3390/su9112096.

AL-MASRANI, S.; AL-OBAIDI, K.; ZALIN, N.; ISMA, M. Design optimization of solar shading systems for tropical office buildings: Challenges and future trends. Solar Energy, v. 170, p. 849–872, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2018.04.047.

AL-MASRANI, S.; AL-OBAIDI, K. Dynamic shading systems: A review of design parameters, platforms and evaluation strategies. Automation in Construction, v. 102, p. 195–216, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.01.014.

AL DAKHEEL, J.; AOUL, K. Building applications, opportunities and challenges of active shading systems: A state-of-the-art review. Energies, v. 10, n. 10, 2017. DOI: 10.3390/en10101672.

ALANI, M. Responsive Facade © MIT. 2018. Available in: https://create.arduino.cc/projecthub/Mostafa7/responsive-facade-ec7264. Access: 3 mar. 2022.

ALKHATIB, H.; LEMARCHAND, P.; NORTON, B.; O'SULLIVAN, D. Deployment and control of adaptive building facades for energy generation, thermal insulation, ventilation and daylighting: A review. Applied Thermal Engineering, v. 185, p. 116331, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116331.

ALSHARIF, R.; ARASHPOUR, M.; CHANG, V.; ZHOU, J. A review of building parameters’ roles in conserving energy versus maintaining comfort. Journal of Building Engineering, v. 35, p. 102087, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.102087.

ATTIA, S.; BILIR, S.; SAFY, T.; STRUCK, C.; LOONEN, R.; GOIA, F. Current trends and future challenges in the performance assessment of adaptive façade systems. Energy and Buildings, v. 179, p. 165–182, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.09.017.

AUGUSTIN, N. Motion with Moisture Creating Passive Dynamic Envelope Systems Using the Hygroscopic Properties of Wood Veneer. 2018. 130 f. Dissertation (MPhil) - University of Waterloo, 2018.

AVIV, D. Adaptive Roof Aperture for Multiple Cooling Conditions. In: SimAUD International Conference, Delft. Proceedings [...] Delft: Netherlands, 2018. p. 97-100.

AYOUB, M. 100 Years of daylighting: A chronological review of daylight prediction and calculation methods. Solar Energy, v. 194, p. 360–390, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2019.10.072.

AYOUB, M. Integrating illuminance and energy evaluations of cellular automata controlled dynamic shading system using new hourly-based metrics. Solar Energy, v. 170, p. 336–351, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2018.05.041.

BACHA, C.; BOURBIA, F. Effect of kinetic facades on energy efficiency in office buildings - hot and dry climates. In: Advanced Building Skins International Conference, Bern. Proceedings [...] Bern: Switzerland, 2016. p. 97-100.

BADARNAH, L. Form follows environment: Biomimetic approaches to building envelope design for environmental adaptation. Buildings, v. 7, n. 2, 2017. DOI: 10.3390/buildings7020040.

BAKR, A. Kinetic Facades the new Paradigm Shift in Architecture toward an Environmental Design Performance. Journal of Arts, Literature, Humanities and Social Sciences, v. 43, n. September 2019, p. 577–590, 2019. DOI: 10.33193/JALHSS.43.29755.

BENEVOLO, L. História da arquitetura Moderna. [s.l.]. 3. ed.: Perspectiva, 2001. ISBN: 978-8527301497.

BÖKE, J. Thinking- Skins. Architecture and the Built Environment, n.8, p., 2020. DOI: 10.7480/abe.2020.08.5035.

BÖKE, J.; KNAACK, U.; HEMMERLING, M. Prototype of a cyber-physical façade system. Journal of Building Engineering, v. 31, n. March, p. 101397, 2020. ISBN: 21995818.

BORG, S. P.; FARRUGIA, E.; BUHAGIAR, V. A Comparative Study of the Energetic Performance of Climate Adaptive Façades Compared to Static Façade Design in a Mediterranean Climate. In: Advanced Building Skins International Conference, 11, Bern. Proceedings [...] Bern: Switzerland, 2016.

BUI, D.; NGUYEN, T.; GHAZLAN, A.; NGO, N.; NGO, T. Enhancing building energy efficiency by adaptive façade: A computational optimization approach. Applied Energy, v. 265, 2020. DOI: 1 0.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114797.

CANNAVALE, A.; MARTELLOTTA, F.; COSSARI, P.; GIGLI, G.; AYR, U. Energy savings due to building integration of innovative solid-state electrochromic devices. Applied Energy, v. 225, n. April, p. 975–985, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.034.

CARLUCCI, F. Thermal Comfort Assessment of Buildings. Milano, [s.n.]: Springer, 2021. ISBN: 23639075

CHAYAAMOR-HEIL, N.; LARACUENTE, N. Bio-inspired Passive Kinetic Solar Shading Device for a Responsive Architectural Envelope. In: Advanced Building Skins International Conference, Bern. Proceedings [...] Bern: Switzerland, 2018.

CHEN, J.; HUANG, S. Adaptive building facade Optimisation. In: CAADRIA International Conference, Hong Kong. Proceedings [...] Hong Kong: Japan, 2016. p. 259-268.

CHENG, J.; ZHANG, Z.; PENG, C. Parametric modelling and simulation of an indoor temperature responsive rotational shading system design. In: CAADRIA International Conference, 25, Hong Kong. Proceedings [...] Hong Kong: Japan, 2020. p. 579-588.

CHOI, S.; LEE, D.; JO, J. Lighting and cooling energy assessment of multi-purpose control strategies for external movable shading devices by using shaded fraction. Energy and Buildings, v. 150, p. 328–338, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.06.030.

CLARKE, L.; EOM, J.; MARTEN, E.; HOROWITZ, R.; KYLE, P.; LINK, R.; MIGNONE, B.; MUNDRA, A.; ZHOU, Y. Effects of long-term climate change on global building energy expenditures. Energy Economics, v. 72, p. 667–677, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.01.003.

DE DEAR, R.; BRAGER, G. Developing an Adaptive Model of Thermal Comfort and Preference Richard. ASHRAE Transactions, v. 104, p. 18, 1998.

DELGARM, N.; SAJADI, B.; KOWSARY, F.; DELGARM, S. Multi-objective optimization of the building energy performance : A simulation-based approach by means of particle swarm optimization. Applied Energy, v. 170, p. 293–303, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.141.

EL-DABAA, R. The Use of Kinetic Facades in Enhancing Daylight Performance for Office Buildings. 2016. 118 f. Dissertation (MPhil) - Department of Architectural Engineering and Environmental Design, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, 2016.

EL-RAHMAN, S.; ESMAIL, S.; KHALIL, H.; EL-RAZAZ, Z. Biomimicry inspired Adaptive Building Envelope in hot climate. Journal of Engineering Research, v. 166, p. A1–A17, 2020. DOI: 10.21608/erj.2020.135274

ELGHAZI, Y.; MAHMOUD, A. Origami Explorations a Generative Parametric Technique For kinetic cellular façade to optimize Daylight Performance. In: eCAADe International Conference, 34, Oulu. Proceedings [...] Oulu: Finland, 2016. p. 399–408.

ELKHATIEB, M. A performance-driven design model of territorial adaptive building skins (TABS) for daylighting performance optimization in office buildings in Egypt. 2016. 338 f. Thesis (Ph.D.) - School of Architecture, University of Liverpool, 2016.

ELKHATIEB, M.; SHARPLES, S. Climate Adaptive Building Shells for Office Buildings in Egypt: A Parametric and Algorithmic Daylight Tool. In: SBE16 International Conference, Dubai. Proceedings [...] Dubai: United Arab Emirates, 2016.

ELTAWEEL, A.; SU, Y.; HAFEZ, M.; ELTAWEEL, W. An automated louver with innovative parametrically-angled reflective slats: Prototyping and validation via using parametric control in Grasshopper along with Arduino board. Energy and Buildings, v. 231, p. 110614, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110614.

ELTAWEEL, A.; SU, Y. Parametric design and daylighting: A literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 73, n. December 2016, p. 1086–1103, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.011.

ELZEYADI, I. The impacts of dynamic façade shading typologies on building energy performance and occupant’s multi-comfort. Architectural Science Review, v. 60, n. 4, p. 316–324, 2017. DOI: 00038628.2017.1337558.

FABBRI, S.; SILVA, C.; HERNANDES, E.; OCTAVIANO, F.; DI THOMMAZO, A.; BELGAMO, A. Improvements in the StArt tool to better support the systematic review process. In: ACM International Conference, Limerick. Proceedings [...] Limerick: Ireland, 2016.

FAZELI, N.; MAHDAVINEJAD, M.; BEMANIAN, M. Dynamic Envelope and Control Shading Pattern for Office Buildings Visual Comfort in Tehran. Space Ontology International Journal, v. 8, n. 3, p. 31–40, 2019.

FECHEYR-LIPPENS, D.; BHIWAPURKAR, P; Applying biomimicry to design building envelopes that lower energy consumption in a hot-humid climate. Architectural Science Review, v. 60, n. 5, p. 360–370, 2017. DOI: 10.1080/00038628.2017.1359145.

FERSCHIN, P.; DI ANGELO, M.; BRUNNER, G. Rapid Prototyping for Kinetic Architecture. In: IEEE, Angkor Wat. Proceedings [...] Angkor Wat: Cambodia, 2015. p. 118-123.

FIORITO, F.; SAUCHELLI, M.; ARROYO, D.; PESENTI, M.; IMPERADORI, M.; MASERA, G.; RANZI, G. Shape morphing solar shadings: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 55, p. 863–884, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.086.

FULLER, R. Synergetics: Explorations in the Geometry of Thinking. Sebastopol [s.n]: Macmillan Publishing Co. Inc., 1977. ISBN: 9780020653202.

GHOSH, A.; NORTON, B. Advances in switchable and highly insulating autonomous (self-powered) glazing systems for adaptive low energy buildings. Renewable Energy, v. 126, p. 1003–1031, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.04.038.

GROBMAN, Y.; CAPELUTO, I.; AUSTERN, G. External shading in buildings: comparative analysis of daylighting performance in static and kinetic operation scenarios. Architectural Science Review, v. 60, n. 2, p. 126–136, 2017. DOI: 00038628.2016.1266991.

HACHEM, C.; ELSAYED, M. Patterns of façade system design for enhanced energy performance of multistory buildings. Energy and Buildings, v. 130, p. 366–377, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.08.051.

HEINZELMANN, F. Design method for adaptive daylight systems for buildings covered by large (span) roofs. 2018. 301 f. Thesis (Ph.D.) - Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, Eindhoven University of Technology, Germany, 2018.

HOFER, J.; GROENEWOLT, A.; JAYATHISSA, P.; NAGY, Z.; SCHLUETER, A. Parametric analysis and systems design of dynamic photovoltaic shading modules. Energy Science and Engineering, v. 4, n. 2, p. 134–152, 2016. DOI: 10.1002/ese3.115.

HOPKINS, O. Architectural Styles: A visual Guide. [s.l.; s.n.]: Laurence King Publishing Ltd, 2014. ISBN: 9781780671635.

HOSSEINI, S.; MOHAMMADI, M.; ROSEMANN, A.; SCHRÖDER, T.; LICHTENBERG, J. A morphological approach for kinetic façade design process to improve visual and thermal comfort: Review. Building and Environment, v. 153, p. 186–204, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.02.040.

HOSSEINI, S.; MOHAMMADI, M.; SCHRÖDER, T.; GUERRA-SANTIN, O. Integrating interactive kinetic façade design with colored glass to improve daylight performance based on occupants’ position. Journal of Building Engineering, v. 31, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101404.

HOSSEINI, S.; FADLI, F.; MOHAMMADI, M. Biomimetic kinetic shading facade inspired by tree morphology for improving occupant’s daylight performance. Journal of Daylighting, v. 8, n. 1, p. 65–82, 2021. DOI: 10.15627/jd.2021.5.

HOSSEINI, S.; MOHAMMADI, M.; GUERRA-SANTIN, O. Interactive kinetic façade: Improving visual comfort based on dynamic daylight and occupant’s positions by 2D and 3D shape changes. Building and Environment, v. 165, n. August, p. 106396, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106396.

JAHANARA, A.; FIORAVANTI, A. Kinetic Shading System as a means for Optimizing Energy Load: A Parametric Approach to Optimize Daylight Performance for an Office Building in Rome. In: eCAADe International Conference, 35, Rome. Proceedings […] Rome: Italy, 2017. p. 231-240.

JAMBO, A. S. The effectiveness of enviro-materially actuated kinetic facades: Evaluating the thermal performance of thermo-bimetal shading component geometries. 2017. 151 f. Dissertation (MPhil) - School of Architecture, University of Southern California, California, 2017.

JANG, D.; KIM, S. A biomimetic approach for the multi-objective optimization of kinetic facade design. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Architectural and Environmental Engineering, v. 11, n. 10, p. 1481–1487, 2017.

JAYATHISSA, P.; LUZZATTO, M.; SCHMIDLI, J.; HOFER, J.; NAGY, Z.; SCHLUETER, A. Optimizing building net energy demand with dynamic BIPV shading. Applied Energy, v. 202, p. 726–735, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.083.

JERMYN, E. Deployable Structures. 2012. Available in: https://evajermyn.com/2012/05/28/deployable-structures/. Access: 3 sep. 2022.

KIM, H. A model for performance evaluation of climate-adaptive building envelopes using parametric models and multi-criteria optimization. 2017. 159 f. Thesis (Ph.D.) - Office of Graduate and Professional Studies, Texas A&M University, 2017.

KIM, H.; CLAYTON, M. A multi-objective optimization approach for climate-adaptive building envelope design using parametric behavior maps. Building and Environment, v. 185, n. 2020, p. 107292, 2020a. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107292.

KIM, H.; CLAYTON, M. Parametric behavior maps: A method for evaluating the energy performance of climate-adaptive building envelopes. Energy and Buildings, v. 219, p. 110020, 2020b. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110020.

KIM, J. Folding Fan Facade: Designing an actuated adaptive facade system for a fire-grain daylight control. 2018. 60 f. Dissertation (MPhil) - Department of Architecture, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2018.

KIRIMTAT, A.; KOYUNBABA, B. K.; CHATZIKONSTANTINOU, I.; SARIYILDIZ, S. Review of simulation modeling for shading devices in buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 53, p. 23–49, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.020.

KNAACK, U.; KLEIN, T.; BILOW, M.; AUER, T. Façades: principles of Construction. Basel, 2. ed.: Birkhäuser, 2014. ISBN: 9783764386696.

KOLAREVIC, B. Towards architecture of change. In: KOLAREVIC, B.; PARLAC, V. (org.). Exploring architecture of change. New York [s.n]: Routledge, 2015. p. 01-16. ISBN: 9781138791015.

KURU, A.; OLDFIELD, P.; BONSER, S.; FIORITO, F. Biomimetic adaptive building skins: Energy and environmental regulation in buildings. Energy and Buildings, v. 205, p. 109544, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109544.

LANZA VOLPE, A. Building Optimization: The Adaptive Façade. Advanced Materials Research, v. 1149, p. 64–75, 2018. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.1149.64.

LE-THANH, L.; LE-DUC, T.; NGO-MINH, H.; NGUYEN, Q.; NGUYEN-XUAN, H. Optimal design of an Origami-inspired kinetic façade by balancing composite motion optimization for improving daylight performance and energy efficiency. Energy, v. 219, p. 119557, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.119557.

LEE, B. Heating, cooling, and lighting energy demand simulation analysis of kinetic shading devices with automatic dimming control for Asian Countries. Sustainability (Switzerland), v. 11, n. 5, 2019. DOI: 10.3390/su11051253.

LEE, D.; CHO, Y. H.; JO, J. H. Assessment of control strategy of adaptive façades for heating, cooling, lighting energy conservation and glare prevention. Energy and Buildings, v. 235, p. 110739, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110739.

LO VERSO, V.; JAVADI, M.; PAGLIOLICO, S.; CARBONARO, C.; SASSI, G. Photobioreactors as a dynamic shading system conceived for an outdoor workspace of the state library of Queensland in Brisbane: Study of daylighting performances. Journal of Daylighting, v. 6, n. 2, p. 148–168, 2019. DOI: 10.15627/jd.2019.14.

LOONEN, R. Approaches for Computational Performance Optimization of Innovative Adaptive Façade Concepts. 2018. 190 f. Thesis (Ph.D.) - Department of the Built Environment, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands, 2018.

LÓPEZ, M.; RUBIO, R.; MARTÍN, S.; BEN C. How plants inspire façades. From plants to architecture: Biomimetic principles for the development of adaptive architectural envelopes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 67, p. 692–703, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.018.

MAHMOUD, A.; ELGHAZI, Y. Parametric-based designs for kinetic facades to optimize daylight performance: Comparing rotation and translation kinetic motion for hexagonal facade patterns. Solar Energy, v. 126, p. 111–127, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2015.12.039.

MALLASI, Z. Using parametric BIM integration for prototyping future responsive façades. Journal of Facade Design and Engineering, v. 6, n. 1, p. 89–100, 2018. DOI: 10.7480/jfde.2018.1.1865.

MATHEOU, M.; COUVELAS, A.; PHOCAS, M. C. Transformable building envelope design in architectural education. Procedia Manufacturing, v. 44, n. 2019, p. 116–123, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.212.

MEGAHED, N. Understanding kinetic architecture: typology, classification, and design strategy. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, v. 13, n. 2, p. 130–146, 2017. DOI: 10.1080/17452007.2016.1203676.

MICHAEL, A.; GREGORIOU, S.; KALOGIROU, S. A. Environmental assessment of an integrated adaptive system for the improvement of indoor visual comfort of existing buildings. Renewable Energy, v. 115, p. 620–633, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.07.079.

MOHER, D.; LIBERATI, A.; TETZLAFF, J.; ALTMAN, D. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Academia and Clinic, 2009. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.

MOLONEY, J. Designing Kinetics for Architectural Facades: State Change. [s.l.; s.n.]: Routledge, 2011. ISBN: 9780415610346.

MOULTON, N.; ROCCO, J.; KIDER JUNIOR., J.; FIORE, S. An affective kinetic building façade system: mood swing. In: Advanced Building Skins International Conference, Bern. Proceedings [...] Bern: Switzerland, 2018. p. 407-416.

NAGY, Z.; SVETOZAREVIC, B.; JAYATHISSA, P.; BEGLE, M.; HOFER, J.; LYDON, G.; WILLMANN, A.; SCHLUETER, A. The Adaptive Solar Facade: From concept to prototypes. Frontiers of Architectural Research, v. 5, n. 2, p. 143–156, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.foar.2016.03.002.

NAIK, N.; YANG, J.; ELZEYADI, I. Optimizing the performance of variable geometry shading screens for occupant’s comfort. In: PLEA International Conference, Edinburg. Proceedings […] Edinburg: Scotland, 2017. p. 3309–3316.

NARANGEREL, A.; LEE, J.; STOUFFS, R. Daylighting Based Parametric Design Exploration of 3D Facade Patterns. In: eCAADe International Conference, 34, Oulu. Proceedings [...] Oulu: Finland, 2016. p. 379–388.

NEGROPONTE, N. The Architecture Machine. Cambridge [s.n]: MIT Press, 1972. ISBN: 0 262 14008 X.

NGUYEN, T.; CERANIC, B.; CALLAGHAN, C. A shape grammar approach to climatically adaptable façade systems with real time performance evaluation. In: SYNGELLAKIS, S. (org.). Eco-Architecture VII. [s.l: s.n.]: WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 2019. p. 127–138. ISBN: 1743-3509.

NGUYEN, T. Shape gramma based adaptive building envelopes: Towards a novel climate responsive facade system for sustainable architectural design in Vietnam. 2019. 319 f. Thesis (Ph.D.) - University of Derby, England, 2019.

OLGYAY, V. Design with climate: Bioclimatic approach to architectural regionalism. Princeton [s.n.]: Princeton University Press, 2015. ISBN: 978-0-691-16973-6.

OXMAN, R. Theory and design in the first digital age. Design Studies, [S. l.], v. 27, n. 3, p. 229–265, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2005.11.002.

OXMAN, R. Thinking difference: Theories and models of parametric design thinking. Design Studies, v. 52, p. 4–39, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2017.06.001.

PANYA, D.; SEO, J.; PARK, H.; CHOO, S. A study of kinetic façade modelling performance using virtual reality. In: ISARC International Symposium, Alberta. Proceedings […] Alberta: Canada, 2019. p. 356–359.

PANYA, D. S.; KIM, T.; CHOO, S. A methodology of interactive motion facades design through parametric strategies. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), v. 10, n. 4, 2020. DOI: 10.3390/app10041218.

PAWLIN, M. Biomimicry in Architecture. Newcastle upon Tyne, 2. ed.: RIBA Publishing, 2019. ISBN: 9781859467381.

PESENTI, M.; MASERA, G.; FIORITO, F. Exploration of Adaptive Origami Shading Concepts through Integrated Dynamic Simulations. Journal of Architectural Engineering, v. 24, n. 4, p. 04018022, 2018. DOI: 10.1061/(asce)ae.1943-5568.0000323.

POWELL, D.; HISCHIER, I.; JAYATHISSA, P.; SVETOZAREVIC, B.; SCHLÜTER, A. A reflective adaptive solar façade for multi-building energy and comfort management. Energy and Buildings, v. 177, p. 303–315, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.07.040.

REICHERT, S.; MENGES, A.; CORREA, D. Meteorosensitive architecture: Biomimetic building skins based on materially embedded and hygroscopically enabled responsiveness. CAD Computer Aided Design, v. 60, p. 50–69, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2014.02.010.

REKI, M. Exploring new forms through parametric patterns in responsive facades. 2018. 105 f. Dissertation (MPhil) - Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Gazi University, Turkey, 2018.

RICCI, A.; PONZIO, C.; FABBRI, K.; GASPARI, J.; NABONI, N. Development of a self-sufficient dynamic façade within the context of climate change. Architectural Science Review, v. 64, n. 1–2, p. 87–97, 2021. DOI: 10.1080/00038628.2020.1713042.

RIZI, R.; ELTAWEEL, A. A user detective adaptive facade towards improving visual and thermal comfort. Journal of Building Engineering, v. 33, n. June 2020, p. 101554, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101554.

ROMANO, R.; AELENEI, L.; AELENEI, D.; MAZZUCCHELLI, E. What is an adaptive façade? Analysis of recent terms and definitions from an international perspective. Journal of Facade Design and Engineering, v. 6, n. 3, p. 065–076, 2018. DOI: 10.7480/jfde.2018.3.2478.

ROSSI-SCHWARZENBECK, M.; FIGLIOLA, A. Adaptive building and skin: an innovative comutational workflow to design energy efficient buildings in different climate zones. Journal of Green Building, v. 14, n. 4, p. 473–473, 2019. DOI: 10.4324/9781315081595-1.

SAMADI, S.; NOORZAI, E.; BELTRÁN, L.; ABBASI, S. A computational approach for achieving optimum daylight inside buildings through automated kinetic shading systems. Frontiers of Architectural Research, v. 9, n. 2, p. 335–349, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.foar.2019.10.004.

SCHIELKE, T. Dynamic design with light: Media facades. In: SCHUMACHER, M.; VOGT, M.; KRUMME, L. (org.). New MOVE: Architecture in Motion - New Dynamic Components and Elements. [s.l.; s.n.]: Birkhauser, 2019. p. 90-93. ISBN: ‎978-3035613605.

SCHIMIDT III, R.; AUSTIN, S. Adaptable architecture: theory and practice. [s.l.], 1. ed.: Routledge, 2016. ISBN: 9780415522571.

SCHUMACHER, M.; VOGT, M.; KRUMME, L. A. C. New MOVE: Architecture in Motion - New Dynamic Components and Elements. [s.l.; s.n.]: Birkhauser, 2020. ISBN: ‎978-3035613605.

SCHUMACHER, P., 2016. Parametricism 2.0: Rethinking Architecture’s Agenda for the 21st Century, Architectural Design.

SHEIKH, W.; ASGHAR, Q. Adaptive biomimetic facades: Enhancing energy efficiency of highly glazed buildings. Frontiers of Architectural Research, v. 8, n. 3, p. 319–331, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.foar.2019.06.001.

SHEN, Y.; LU, P. The development of kinetic façade units with BIM-based active control system for the adaptive building energy performance service. In: CAADRIA International Conference, 21, Hong Kong. Proceedings […] Hong Kong: China, 2016. p. 517–526.

SHI, X.; TABLADA, A.; WANG, L. Influence of two motion types on solar transmittance and daylight performance of dynamic façades. Solar Energy, v. 201, p. 561–580, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2020.03.017.

SMITH, S.; LASCH, C. Machine learning integration for adaptive building envelopes. In: ACADIA International Conference, Ann Arbor. Proceedings […] Ann Arbor: Michigan, 2016. p. 98–105.

SONG, J.; LIN, H.; SHIM, J. LEAF (LOW ENERGY ADAPTIVE FAÇADE) Self-adapting micro shading façade design using responsive polymer sheets. In: World Congress: Facade Tectonics Institute, Los Angeles. Proceedings […] Los Angeles: California, 2016. p. 145–155.

SVETOZAREVIC, B.; BEGLE, M.; JAYATHISSA, P.; CARANOVIC, S.; SHEPHERD, R. F.; NAGY, Z.; HISCHIER, I.; HOFER, J.; SCHLUETER, A. Dynamic photovoltaic building envelopes for adaptive energy and comfort management. Nature Energy, v. 4, n. 8, p. 671–682, 2019. DOI: 10.1038/s41560-019-0424-0.

SVETOZAREVIC, B. Soft-Robotic-Driven Adaptive Photovoltaic Building Envelopes. 2018. 137 f. Thesis (Ph.D.) - University of Belgrade, 2018.

TABADKANI, A.; BANIHASHEMI, S.; HOSSEINI, M. Daylighting and visual comfort of oriental sun responsive skins: A parametric analysis. Building Simulation, v. 11, n. 4, p. 663–676, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s12273-018-0433-0

TABADKANI, A.; ROETZEL, A.; XIAN LI, H.; TSANGRASSOULIS, A. A review of automatic control strategies based on simulations for adaptive facades. Building and Environment, v. 175, n. January, p. 106801, 2020a. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106801.

TABADKANI, A.; ROETZEL, A.; XIAN LI, H.; TSANGRASSOULIS, A.; ATTIA, S. Analysis of the impact of automatic shading control scenarios on occupant’s comfort and energy load. Applied Energy, v. 294, n. January, p. 116904, 2021b. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116904.

TABADKANI, A.; ROETZEL, A.; XIAN LI, H.; TSANGRASSOULIS, A. Design approaches and typologies of adaptive facades: A review. Automation in Construction, v. 121, n. April 2020, p. 103450, 2021a. DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103450.

TABADKANI, A.; ROETZEL, A.; XIAN LI, H.; TSANGRASSOULIS, A. Innovative control approaches to assess energy implications of adaptive facades based on simulation using EnergyPlus. Solar Energy, v. 206, n. January, p. 256–268, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2020.05.087.

TABADKANI, A.; VALINEJAD SHOUBI, M.; SOFLAEI, F.; BANIHASHEMI, S. Integrated parametric design of adaptive facades for user’s visual comfort. Automation in Construction, v. 106, n. May, p. 102857, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102857.

TAFRIHI, E.; ABDEL-RAHMAN, A. Heat-actuated Auxetic Facades. In: World Congress: Facade Tectonics Institute, Los Angeles. Proceedings […] Los Angeles: California, 2018. p. p. 1–11.

TALAEI, M.; MAHDAVINEJAD, M.; ZARKESH, A.; MOTEVALI HAGHIGHI, H. A Review on Interaction of Innovative Building Envelope Technologies and Solar Energy Gain. Energy Procedia, v. 141, p. 24–28, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.11.006.

TEKSOY, M.; DURSUN, O. A novel framework to evaluate the performance of responsive kinetic shading devices. Light & Engineering, v. 27, p. 51–60, 2018.

VALITABAR, M.; MOGHIMI, M.; MAHDAVINEJAD, M.; PILECHIHA, P. Design optimum responsive façade based on visual comfort and energy performance. In: CAADRIA International Conference, Hong Kong. Proceedings [...] Hong Kong: China, 2018. p. 93–102.

VAZ, C.; SOUSA, J.; PINTO, H.; CARDOSO, A; QUEIROZ, N. O desenvolvimento de elementos de proteção de fachada responsivos – exploração e controle de um processo. Gestão & Tecnologia de Projetos, v. 11, n. 2, p. 73–87, 2016. DOI: 10.11606/gtp.v11i2.118346.

VAZQUEZ, E.; RANDALL, C.; DUARTE, J. Shape-changing Architectural Skins: A Review on Materials, Design and Fabrication Strategies and Performance Analysis. Journal of Facade Design and Engineering, v. 7, n. 2, p. 93–114, 2019. DOI: 10.7480/jfde.2019.2.3877.

VELIKOV, K.; THÜN, G. Responsive Building Envelopes: Characteristics and Evolving Paradigms. In: TRUBIANO, F. (org.). Design and Construction of High-Performance Homes: Building Envelopes, Renewable Energies and Integrated Practice. [s.l.; s.n.]: Taylor & Francis Group, 2017. p. 75–92.

VLACHOKOSTAS, A.; MADAMOPOULOS, N. Daylight and thermal harvesting performance evaluation of a liquid filled prismatic façade using the Radiance five-phase method and EnergyPlus. Building and Environment, v. 126, p. 396–409, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.10.017.

WAGDY, A.; FATHY, F.; ALTOMONTE, S. Evaluating the daylighting performance of dynamic façades by using new annual climate-based metrics. In: PLEA International Conference, Los Angeles. Proceedings […] Los Angeles: California, 2016. p. 941–947.

WANG, C.; MORATA, A. Adaptive Facade, the active connection between indoor and outdoor: Visual and Thermal evaluation of an adaptive facade in the urban context of Copenhagen. 2019. 84 f. Dissertation (MPhil) - Faculty of Engineering, Lund University, Sweden, 2019.

YANG, C. The Intelligent Control Strategy of Kinetic Façades for Daylight and Energy Performance. 2020. 213 f. Thesis (Ph.D.) - Faculty of the USC School for Architecture, University of Southern California, California, 2020.

YI, H.; KIM, D.; KIM, Y.; KIM, D.; KOH, J.; KIM, M. 3D-printed attachable kinetic shading device with alternate actuation: Use of shape-memory alloy (SMA) for climate-adaptive responsive architecture. Automation in Construction, v. 114, p. 103151, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103151.

YI, H.; KIM, M.; KIM, Y.; KIM, S.; LEE, K. Rapid simulation of optimally responsive façade during schematic design phases: Use of a new hybrid metaheuristic algorithm. Sustainability (Switzerland), v. 11, n. 9, 2019. DOI: 10.3390/su11092681.

YI, H.; KIM, Y. Self-shaping building skin: Comparative environmental performance investigation of shape-memory-alloy (SMA) response and artificial-intelligence (AI) kinetic control. Journal of Building Engineering, v. 35, p. 102113, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.102113.

YI, Y.; SHARSTON, R.; BARAKAT, D. Auxetic structures and advanced daylight control systems. Journal of Facade Design and Engineering, v. 7, n. 1, p. 63–74, 2019. DOI: 10.7480/jfde.2019.1.2620.

YI, Y.; YIN, J.; TANG, Y. Developing an advanced daylight model for building energy tool to simulate dynamic shading device. Solar Energy, v. 163, n. January, p. 140–149, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2018.01.082.

YOON, J. Climate-adaptive facade design with smart materials: Evaluation and strategies of thermo-responsive smart material applications for building skins in Seoul. In: PLEA International Conference, Hong Kong. Proceedings […] Hong Kong: China, 2018. p. 620–626.

YOON, J. Design-to-fabrication with thermo-responsive shape memory polymer applications for building skins. Architectural Science Review, v. 64, n. 1–2, p. 72–86, 2021. DOI: 00038628.2020.1742644.

YOON, J. SMP Prototype Design and Fabrication for Thermo-responsive Façade Elements. Journal of Facade Design and Engineering, v. 7, n. 1, p. 41–61, 2019. DOI: 10.7480/jfde.2019.1.2662.

YOON, J.; BAE, S. Performance evaluation and design of thermo-responsive SMP shading prototypes. Sustainability (Switzerland), v. 12, n. 11, 2020. DOI: 10.3390/su12114391.

ZHOU, J.; NAZI, W.; WANG, Y.; ROSKILLY, A. Investigating the impact of building’s facade on the building’s energy performance - a case study. Energy Procedia, v. 158, p. 3144–3151, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.1016.

ZUK, W.; CLARK, R. H. Kinetic Architecture. [s.l.], 1. ed.: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1970.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 PARC Pesquisa em Arquitetura e Construção

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.