Palavras-chave
Como Citar
Resumo
O currículo que planejamos, o que ensinamos e o que diferentes aprendizes recebem são significativamente distintos. Este artigo apresenta uma reflexão a respeito de dois aspectos da formação de professores. O primeiro e principal deles é a formação recebida pelo professor quando aluno e o impacto desta na sua prática. Em segundo lugar está o aspecto da formação planejada e deliberada pelo autor como formador de professor. Com base nos estudos de uma gama de autores, particularmente na idéia de rizoma de Deleuze e Guattari, o estudo mostra o poder educativo da reflexão para os sujeitos envolvidos. Uma gama de dados foi coletada ao longo de quatro anos, à medida que alunos-professores aprendiam a se tornar professores de ciências em educação básica (para crianças de 5 a 11 anos de idade). O trabalho de Lucy e de outras alunas é apresentado aqui para mostrar como o ato de ouvir com atenção desenvolve o conhecimento de maneira que é impossível prever como ocorre a compreensão para a criança, para o aluno-professor e a também para o autor, formador de professor
Abstract:
The curriculum we plan, the curriculum we teach and the curriculum that different learners receive are significantly different. This report presents a reflection on two aspects of teacher education. The primary aspect is the education received by the student teacher and its impact on their practice. The secondary aspect is the education planned and delivered by the author as a teacher educator. Drawing on the works of range of authors, particularly the idea of rhizome of Deleuze and Guattari, the study shows the educative power of reflection for the parties involved. A range of data was collected across four years as student teachers learn to become teachers of primary science. The work of Lucy and others is presented to show how careful listening develops understanding in ways that are impossible to predict, understanding for the children, understanding for the student teacher, and understanding for the teacher educator author.
Key words: Teacher education. Rhizome. Reflection
Referências
BERLINER, D.C. A personal response to those who bash teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education 51 (5), 2000, p.358-371.
BOGUE, R. Deleuze and Guattari. London: Routledge, 1989.
CALDERHEAD, J.; SHORROCK, S.B. Understanding Teacher Education: Case studies in the professional development of beginning teachers. London: Falmer, 1997.
CARLSEN, W.S. Subject matter knowledge and science teaching: a pragmatic perspective. In: BROPHY, J. (ed.). Advances in Research on Teaching, 2, Greenwich: Connecticut JAI Press, 1991, p.115-144.
DELEUZE, F.; PARNET, C. Dialogues. (Trad. Tomlinson H.; Habberjam, B.). New York: Columbia University Press, 1987 (original work published 1977).
DfEE (Department for education and Employment). Circular 4/98 High Status, High Standards: Requirements for Courses of Initial Teacher Training, London DFEE, 1998.
DELEUZE, G.; GUATTARI, F. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia, London: Athlone Press, 1987.
DREVER; COPE. Students’ use of theory in an initial teacher education programme, Journal of Education for Teaching 25 (2), 1999, p.97-109.
DRIVER, R. Theory into practice II: A constructivist approach to curriculum development, In: FENSHAM, P. (ed.). Development and Dilemmas in Science Education, London: Falmer Press, 1988.
EISNER, E. The Art of Educational Evaluation: a personal view. London: Falmer, 1985.
FREEMAN, D. Towards a descriptive theory of teacher learning and change, ISATT Conference, Dublin, Ireland, July 1999.
FURLONG, J.; BARTON, L.; MILES, S.; WHITING, C.; WHITTY, G. Teacher Education in Transition: Re-forming professionalism? Buckingham, Open University Press, 2000.
GOLBY, M.; MARTIN, A.; PORTER, M. Some researchers’ understanding of primary teaching. Research Papers in Education, 10 (3), 1995, p.297-302.
GROSSMAN, P.; WILSON, S.; SHULMAN, L. Teachers of substance: subject matter knowledge for teaching. In: REYNOLDS, M. (ed.). Knowledge Base for Beginning Teachers. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1988.
GUSTAFSON, B.J.; ROWELL, P.M. Elementary preservice teachers: constructing conceptions about learning science, teaching science and the nature of science 1, International Journal of Science Education, 17 (5), 1995, p.589-605.
KAGAN, D.M. Professional growth wrong preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research 62 (2), 1992, p.129-169.
KREJSLER, J. Becoming individual in education and cyberspace, Teachers and Teaching, 10 (5), 2004, p.489-503.
LORTIE, D.C. School Teacher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975.
NIAS, J. Primary teachers talking: a reflexive account of longitudinal research. In: WALFORD, G. Doing Educational Research. London: Routledge, 1991, p.147-165.
NICHOLS-THOMPSON, S.E.; TIPPINS, D. Generating elementary teachers’ personal understandings about the phenomena of science teaching and learning. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, 1997.
OFSTED. Using Subject Specialists to Promote High Standards at Key Stage 2. London: OFSTED, 1997.
ORPWOOD, Graham. The logic of advice and deliberation: making sense of science curriculum talk. In: ROBERTS, D. A.; OESTMAN, Leif (eds.). Problems of Meaning in Science Curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press, 1998, p.133-149.
OSBORNE, J.; SIMON, S. Primary Science: past and future directions. Studies in Science Education, 26, 1996, p.99-147.
OSBORNE, R.; FREYBERG, P. Learning in Science: The implications of children’s science. London: Heinemann, 1985.
OVENS, P. Reflective Teacher Development in Primary Science. London: Falmer Press, 1999.
PARKER, J.; SPINK, E. Becoming science teachers: an evaluation of the initial stages of primary teacher training. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 22 (1), p.17-31, 1997.
PARKER-REES, R. Time to relax a little: making time for the interplay of minds in education. Education, 3-13, (March), 2000, p.29-35.
PHILLIPS, D.K. Female preservice teachers’ talk: illustrations of subjectivity, visions of ‘nomadic’ space. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 8 (1), 2002, p.9-27.
PORLAN, R. Las concepciones epistemológicas de los profesores: el caso de los estudiantes de magisterio. Investigación en la Escuela (22), 1994, p.67-84.
RITCHIE, S.M.; RIGANO, D.L. Researcher-participant positioning in classroom research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 14(6), 2001, p.741-756.
ROCKWELL, E. Ethnography and the commitment to public schooling. In: UANDERSON, G.L.; MONTERO-SMITH, M. Educational Qualitative Research in Latin America: The struggle for a new paradigm. New York: Taylor and Francis, 1998, p.3-34.
RYAN, C. Becoming a teacher of primary science: integrating theory and practice. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 9 (4), 2003, p.333-350. St PIERRE, E.A. An introduction to figurations – a poststructural practice of inquiry. Qualitative Studies in Education, 10 (3), 1997, p.279-284.
STIVALE, Charles J. Comment peut-on être deleuzian? Pursuing a Two-Fold Thought. In: BUCHANAN, Ian. (ed.) A Deleuzian Century? Durham and London: Duke University Press, 1999. p. 135-143.
SUMMERS, M.; KRUGER, C.; MANT, J. Teaching Electricity Effectively: a research based guide for primary science, Hatfield, Association for Science Education, 1997.
ZEICHNER, K.M.; GORE, J.M. Teacher socialization. In: HOUSTON, W.R. (ed.); HABERMAN, M.; SIKULA, J. (associated eds.). Handbook of Research on Teacher Education. London: Macmillan, 1990, p.329-348.
A Proposições utiliza a licença do Creative Commons (CC), preservando assim, a integridade dos artigos em ambiente de acesso aberto.